tools do not provide enough feedback to the user. Ifthere are fundamental errors related to sketching linkages or to providing specifications, those arenot shared with the user. The users can extract the final results, kinematics or forces, but there isno information about the equations used in the backend. The availability of equations, for instance,will greatly help their usage in course work. If more information is available, students can improvetheir understanding of the step-by-step process taught in lectures or illustrated in technical books.During homework and laboratory activities, a student must spend a lot of time trying to manuallyverify the correctness of their work. The teaching team also experiences delay during the gradingprocess
engineering, the learner will be able to- • Define the field of biogeotechnical engineering, describe its fundamental principle, and name various disciplines involved in biogeotechnics. • Differentiate between bio-inspired and bio-mediated processes. • Describe opportunities available in the field and acquire positive attitude toward biogeotechnical research and career.Content sequencing The order in which information is presented, plays a crucial role in helping the learnerunderstand the content in efficient and effective manner.4 Taking cues from Merrill’s firstprinciples of instruction5 and cognitive learning theories12, 13 that recommend activating existingknowledge and
may reflect the ability to take atest, rather than critical thinking ability. This could relate to either the fundamental nature of thetest (multiple choice), and/or the use of a limited time for completion of the instrument. TheCCTST, and similar objective instruments, are all intended to be administered within a limittime. By doing so, timedness becomes part of the operationalization of critical thinking, eventhough time is not a part of any of the definitions. This study suggests that the use of timedinstruments for the measurement of critical thinking needs to be carefully considered, especiallywhen comparing two groups that differ qualitatively in their thinking abilities, as in this study.The effect of time may be less pronounced when
introductory biology course into an active learningexperience that resonates with a wide range of undergraduate students. Backward course designled to an innovative curriculum that (1) is based on biology’s big ideas, (2) has measurablelearning outcomes, and (3) encourages development of higher order thinking skills. Our studioclassroom design maximizes interactions; cantilevered workstations distributed throughout theroom encourage student-instructor and student-student interactions. Group discussions occur atwhiteboards as students solve problems, create concept maps, plan experiments and interpretexperimental data. Workstation computers and dual monitors support whole-class instruction aswell as student-led group explorations. The classroom design
Paper ID #21258Assessment of the Impact of Summer STEAM Programs on High School Par-ticipants’ Content Knowledge and Attitude Towards STEAM CareersMr. Marcelo Caplan, Columbia College Marcelo Caplan - Associate Professor, Department of Science and Mathematics, Columbia College Chicago. In addition to my teaching responsibilities, I am involved in the community engagement programs and activities of the department. I am the coordinator of three outreach programs 1) the NSF-ISE project ”Scientists for Tomorrow” which goal is to promote Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) learning in community centers in the
. 8% 11 % 48 % 33 % 2.7 Understanding what everyday research work is like. 8% 4% 22 % 67 % 3.1 Writing scientific reports or papers. 11 % 26 % 26 % 37 % 3.2 Making oral presentations. 4% 8% 11 % 33 % 44 % 3.13 Managing my time. 4% 15 % 22 % 56 % 4%During your research experience HOW MUCH did you: None A little Some Fair amount Great
Paper ID #8476EET Capstone Student Project: Chemical Mixing Plant Integrated with Pro-grammable Logical Controller and Human Machine InterfaceProf. Aleksandr Sergeyev, Michigan Technological University Aleksandr Sergeyev is currently an Associate Professor in the Electrical Engineering Technology program in the School of Technology at Michigan Technological University. Dr. Aleksandr Sergeyev earned his bachelor degree in Electrical Engineering at Moscow University of Electronics and Automation in 1995. He obtained the Master degree in Physics from Michigan Technological University in 2004 and the PhD degree in Electrical
technological advances such as the Internet, telecommunications and geospatialtechnologies. These technologies are helping to create geographically dispersed butinterconnected communities around the world. Again, the catalysts to these technologies areinformation management and innovation, both of which are dependent on knowledge. Carnoy2contends that globalization increases the demand for education and since knowledge is theproduct of education, knowledge is therefore fundamental to globalization. This assertionsupports the fact that institutions of higher education have a responsibility to export knowledgeoutside the geographic boundaries for the benefit of the global community. In recent years, institutions of higher education, especially in
how you plan to improve. Please respond to the following questions on a separate page. Please type your response and submit it with this page attached. This reflection should be placed in your portfolio after it is returned to you. 1. Look at the graded quiz and list important facts or concepts that you have learned from the course but that you did not know before starting the course. I learned how to accurately draw PvT diagrams and label all the points on them. I am now able to distinguish among fluids, gases, liquids, solids, and vapors using data. I know what isothermal compressibility and volume expansivity are, and I can write their definitions
fundamental knowledge abouthow NSF-ATE grants work, PI responsibilities, and NSF expectations among new PIs at two-year colleges. Since the PI 101 program is managed by experienced PIs, and only highlyexperienced and successful ATE PIs serve as mentors, those working with new-to-ATE PIs mustbe sensitive to what it was like when they received their first award. No level of knowledge orunderstanding about project or program logistics should be assumed. For example, a questionasked by many teams was when they could expect the check from NSF. They did not know thatthere is no grant award check coming from NSF. Awarded grant funds are accessed through asystem of electronic funds-transfer via a draw-down process. Others wanted to know whatshould be
Shirvaikar is the Chair and Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Texas at Tyler, where he develops curriculum and laboratories in computer engineering. Prior to this he worked at Texas Instruments specializing in real time imaging systems. Dr. Shirvaikar graduated with his doc- torate from the University of Tennessee. He also has a M.S. degree from the University of Maine, and a B.Tech. from Banaras Hindu University, India. His current research interests include real time imaging and engineering education. Page 22.1455.1 c American Society for Engineering Education
Dr. Niaz Latif is the Dean of the School of Technology at Purdue University Calumet (PUC). He is also the Interim Associate Vice Chancellor of Research and Graduate Studies at PUC. Dr. Latif served as an Assistant Dean for Statewide Technology Administration in the College of Technology at Purdue University, West Lafayette, before joining Purdue University Calumet on July 1, 2007. He is the Principal Investigator of the 2010 NSF-ATE grant, ”Meeting workforce needs of Mechatronics Technicians.”Mohammad A. Zahraee, Purdue University, Calumet Mohammad A. Zahraee is the Assistant Dean for Graduate Studies and professor of Mechanical Engi- neering Technology at Purdue University Calumet. He is currently a Co-Pi on two NSF
, John T., Freuler, Richard J., and Fentiman, Audeen W., “Building a Successful Fundamentals ofEngineering for Honors Program”, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference and Exposition, June 2004BiographyMICHAEL HOFFMANNMichael Hoffmann is an Instructional Laboratory Supervisor at The Ohio State University. After more than 20years in research and industry Mr. Hoffmann is now one of two individuals responsible for laboratory facilitieswithin the First-Year Engineering Program in the College of Engineering, where in part he develops laboratoryexperiments and laboratory instructional materials for over 1000 students in the Program. His credentials includeearned B.S. and M.S. degrees in Aeronautical and
Scholarship (CES) or Community Engaged Research (CER). Ultimately, high qualityCE can span all of the traditional faculty activities of teaching, research, and service. While thisis a win-win in terms of beneficial impacts, it can also pose challenges in the faculty promotionand tenure process where academia traditionally compartmentalizes these activities and research-intensive institutions place outsized weight on the importance of research. In STEM fields,fundamental research (including laboratory experiments and numerical modeling) is oftenviewed as more scholarly than applied research. CES/CER is at risk of being devalued undertraditional academic standards [5-6] given its dual purpose of real-world benefits forcommunities.CES is increasingly
agenda or stimulating debate; educating researchers and others to take up new positions with broader understanding of renewable/energy issues; and stimulating dialogue amongst decision-makers. • Affecting the Energy Policy Regime: The modification of existing energy policy in Puerto Rico; and fundamental redesign of its major components This typology was tested within ITEAS in the training of faculty, including engineering professors. This also constitutes the overall framework of the endeavors described in the remainder of the paper. The main focus of the work in ITEAS has been Puerto Rico’s electric power system.III. A Multi-Sector Approach The future of electric energy systems is usually discussed from a technological
experiment show students’ satisfaction of the overall learningfrom the joint project.2 IntroductionDesigning a quality curriculum has been a controversial topic in recent years [1, 2]. Researchersbelieve that with teaching fundamental skills to students, they can learn any new concept or tech-nology when entering the industry [3]. Software design and architecture [4] as well as databasedesign [5] courses are two key concepts which students learn during traditional software engi-neering programs that have important applications in the real world. Database courses typicallyprovide students with information about proper modelling, design practices, database implemen-tation and management in teams [6]. This knowledge is useful in future applications to
members to orchestrate the details which made this transition possible. With theproper attitudes, there is no fundamental reason why a similar arrangement cannot find aplace at other undergraduate institutions.Summary We have described the process by which the US Air Force Academy has createdstudent engineer-student manager teams for its undergraduate capstone designexperience. While originally meant to support the vision of the senior leadership of ourservice as well as that of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, thisexperience is proving highly beneficial both to our Systems Engineering and SystemEngineering Management majors, and to our traditional engineering majors as well.Survey data show that at least the
college teaching most class time is spent with a professor lecturing and studentswatching, listening, and writing. Students work individually and cooperation is generally dis-couraged. In contrast, in student-centered pedagogical methods the focus of activity is shiftedfrom the teacher to the learners. Student-centered learning methods have been shown to have advantages relative to the clas-sical teacher-centered approach in terms of a range of outcome metrics: short-term mastery,long-term retention, depth of understanding, critical thinking, creative problem-solving skills,positive attitudes toward the subject, and level of confidence in knowledge or skills.1 Student-centered learning methods include active, cooperative, collaborative, and
verification and testing. To address the misunderstanding aboutprototypes and to teach the students how to get the most out of a prototype, we added a newlecture, given in Engineering Design II, that covers the general purpose of and detailed aspects ofprototyping. Students are provided sample prompts of various design problems, and are asked toselect the best sub-systems to prototype to solve the design problem.Student Performance EvaluationsStudent performance evaluations include peer- and self-evaluations of team participation andproject management. Each student is asked to write the top three contributions for each teammember, including himself or herself, and to rate each team member’s contributions using a 5-point Likert scale. The ratings are
classes. The first is an introductory math course that covers eitherpre-calculus or introductory calculus basics. The second course presents technicalcommunications and provides an introduction to engineering design and team work. The thirdcourse, “Crossing the Boundary,” reintroduces students to basic math and science concepts bypresenting the materials in an integrated way. “Crossing the Boundary” has the following fourgoals:Goal 1 to prepare students for the math exams they will encounter during their first college term,Goal 2 to show students the connections between math, science, and engineering in order to provide a deeper understanding of the fundamental concepts,Goal 3 to enhance students’ ability to work effectively in teams
engineering courses, communication skills are not taught explicitly;however, students are expected and held accountable for being able to speak and write well.Consequently, there is a need to change university engineering programs in order to provideopportunities for students to develop communication skills (Pet-Armacost, & Armacost, 2003).The importance and need for oral and written communication skills in engineering has beenclearly recognized. Engineering students who have good communication skills are more likelyto succeed and advance in the professional world than those who don’t.Team-Working Skills in EngineeringIn today’s work environment, project tasks generally involve the establishment of teams formedby people from different functional
requirement to write a memorandumThus, it is critical for engineering educators to improve the summarizing the results of each Design Review wasstagnant method of traditional teaching and learning. Small eliminated. This cooperative learning technique was usedmistakes in the engineering profession can lead to death or on six of seven homework assignments during the term andmillions of dollars in repair. on seven of nine homework assignments in their pre- For the fall 2018 semester, in the Design of Steel and requisite course. Student feedback was collected from bothWood Structures at the United States Military Academy at Likert Scale questions and open-ended questions. ThisWest Point, Civil
a pejorative quality, used to describe a person who is highly intelligent but quirky,odd, and perhaps socially inept. Wikipedia even asserts that lack of interest in personal hygienecan be an attribute of geeks.8 Computers and the Internet are close companions for many geeks,who eagerly await latest releases of software and compare advantages and disadvantages ofdifferent generations of programs, or write their own codes if disdain for the original gets thebest of them.Geeks have been marginalized from American culture at large,8 although jokes about geekswould suggest that they do not mind—or perhaps even notice—their role at the edge of socialnorms. Strikingly, the infiltration of computers, the Internet, cell-phones, iPods and other
specify what behaviors the students willhave to demonstrate. (See [8] for information on writing course-level learning outcomes.)Based upon literature on learning objectives, the objectives have appropriate characteristics forprogram-level use. The objective definitions all begin with action verbs describing the types ofbehaviors that should be involved in achieving the objective. In regard to Bloom’s taxonomy ofeducational objectives, the objectives adequately represent all six of the categories of thecognitive domain. This is especially noteworthy since, “Undergraduate instruction inengineering generally restricts itself to Levels 1-3…” 6 The appropriate distribution of theobjectives across the taxonomy further validates the list of engineering
Data Analytics: Final Project: Final MATLAB5: to define a Study the data Research & Project & How to use function to allow types in Development: Reflections MATLAB as a input to it when it MATLAB; how Final Project: on the sophisticated initiates its to produce Presentation & Camp: calculator, create execution and heterogeneous Report Writing: Individual plots. output from it collections of Teams will presentations when it is done. data via structs prepare a Power and reports. Matrices and and cells. Point Operators
engineering and design technologies understandable and accessible to all, by providingeducators and students with low cost-fundamental tools and curriculum.Through the Xilinx University Program (XUP), professors and students all over the world haveaccess to the latest technologies and tools for academic teaching and research.This paper presents the results of a decade of Digital Design Contests, reviewing topics such asthe successes and challenges developing and organizing a novel worldwide contest, trying toenhance students hardware and software skills, preparing the engineering workforce for the nextdecade, and measuring the results. The rest of the paper is organized as follows: Section IIIpresents the student design
fundamental to the quality of any curriculum. Current empirically-based education theory is essential to effective instruction and thus to the improvement of curricular quality. 4. A rational sequence. Educational activities should be carefully ordered in a developmental sequence to form a coherent curriculum based on the stated, intended outcomes of both the curriculum and its constituent courses.With these principles in mind, we describe the process by which a curricular framework for theMcBride Public Affairs minor for engineering students has been developed. As shown in Table1, this framework is the outcome of more than a year of activities involving all relevantconstituencies within the McBride community, including current
with students writing the test in a secure browser. The test takes 90 minutes tocomplete, with 60 minutes allotted to the performance task and 30 minutes allotted to the selectedresponse questions.The core of the CLA+, the performance task, is used to measure critical thinking, problem solvingand written communication and remains the key focus of the CLA+. The performance taskspresents a real-world situation in which students assume an appropriate role to address theproblem, identify a solution, or provide conclusions and recommendations resulting from careful Page 26.1176.4analysis of the provided evidence. The student responses in the
Paper ID #16484Fostering an Entrepreneurial Mindset through a Sophomore-Level, Multi-Disciplinary, Engineering Design Studio ExperienceDr. Cristi L Bell-Huff, Lawrence Technological University Cristi L. Bell-Huff, PhD is the Director of the Studio for Entrepreneurial Engineering Design (SEED) at Lawrence Technological University where she teaches courses on fundamentals of engineering design projects and entrepreneurial engineering design. In addition to her PhD in Chemical Engineering, she also has an MA in Educational Studies and is a certified teacher in Michigan. She has industrial experience in pharmaceutical product
collegewas established in 1871. Smith College is the first and only women's college in the U.S. to grant Page 11.241.2a degree in engineering. The Picker Engineering Program offers a single Bachelor of Science inengineering science, combining the fundamentals of multiple engineering disciplines. In early2000, Smith College undertook a major effort to develop an engineering program for the 21stcentury. Most of this effort was directed at capitalizing on the fact that, at Smith College,engineering is taught in a liberal arts environment at an institution with a strong internationalcomponent in the curriculum. As a college committed to liberal arts