AC 2011-1291: THE FIRST-TO-FOURTH FLATLINE: ASSESSING UN-DERGRADUATE STUDENTS’ CREATIVE CAPACITYHolli Burgon, University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignJ. Bruce Elliott-Litchfield, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign J. Bruce Elliott-Litchfield is assistant dean in Undergraduate Programs in Engineering. He advises stu- dents and directs the Academy for Excellence in Engineering Education, the iFoundry Illinois Engineering First-year Experience, the Learning in Community program, and the Creativity, Innovation, and Vision course suite. He is faculty advisor for Engineers Without Borders and conducts research on what students learn via international service projects and how students learn to enhance creativity. An
mutual constitution between individualsand groups [23, p.13]. In other words, identity formation was situated in the students’interactions with SIRI - the bonds they established with each other, their instructors, andmentors, and how they ultimately engaged with the intentional design of the program or imposedSIRI community. We draw on the theoretical framework of culturally responsive teaching [16] to explorethe potential of SIRI as a context for science identity formation and learning for historicallyunderrepresented and minoritized groups pursuing STEM degrees in higher education settings. Ifwe conceive of CRT as a series of the connections that students build with all aspects of thelearning environment – including curricula, people
direct supervision of WPI faculty, an experience that is unrivaled bytraditional international study abroad. The impact of successfully completing professional-levelprojects at remote locations is that students solve real-world problems while immersed in adifferent culture. In 1999-2000, more than 400 of WPI’s typical graduating class of 650 studentscompleted one or both qualifying projects in teams off campus on externally sponsored topics.In the 2000-01 academic year, WPI is sending over 450 students to one of WPI’s off-campusresidential Project Centers. WPI’s program is not a traditional study-abroad program. This paperwill provide an understanding of the management and logistical structure of Global PerspectiveProgram at WPI, with special
ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility(g) an ability to communicate effectively(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a globaland societal context(i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning(j) a knowledge of contemporary issues(k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary forengineering practice.Student employees are exposed to every one of these areas while working on CIRAS projects.The typical studentThe majority of the students that work for CIRAS are juniors or seniors. They typically find outabout job opportunities from other
Assistant Professor in Physics and Keystone Instructor in the A. J. Clark School of Engineering at the University of Maryland. Broadly speaking he is interested in modeling learning and reasoning processes. In particular, he is attracted to fine-grained analysis of video data both from a micro- genetic learning analysis methodology (drawing on knowledge in pieces) as well as interaction analysis methodology. He has been working on how learners’ emotions are coupled with their conceptual and epistemological reasoning. He is also interested in developing models of the dynamics of categorizations (ontological) underlying students’ reasoning in physics. Lately, he has been interested in engineering design thinking, how
lifecycle of a data set, from consulting on 20DMPs to archiving the data using an institutional repository. Purdue University has also developed an institutional repository that is dedicated solely to disseminating and curating 21research data and have engaged in direct partnerships with faculty to address their distinct data 22, 23needs. Several libraries are now offering data information literacy programming designed to 24, 25teach students how to manage and curate the data they produce more effectively. As Akers reminds us, not all faculty
desktop, arerelatively inexpensive to implement and maintain, are comparatively safe to operate, and generate littlein the way of waste materials or other environmental hazards. Such approaches to engineeringeducational laboratories follow trends in chemistry education employing microscale laboratories inplace of the traditional wet chemistry (e.g., flasks and beakers) experiments. Moreover, the student isfully engaged in all aspects of the experiments (design, fabrication, instrumentation, operation, dataacquisition and analysis)1-4. Page 24.403.2Thermal (infrared) imaging and machine vision are increasingly important and versatile
welfare1. Then consider thepublic health and social justice implications such as the estimated 4,000 unnecessary deaths dueto the excess NOx emitted into the atmosphere2. Most engineers will recognize the double-edgedpotential for their profession to either promote or debase communal welfare. It is irrefutably insociety’s long-term interest that engineers act ethically; infusing formal ethics education(admittedly in conjunction with numerous other factors) into the curriculum is important fordeveloping engineers. One simply needs to read headlines in the news to see the impact of unethical behavior byengineers – illicit emissions controls, negligent pipeline maintenance, and improper municipalwater treatment are some of the more conspicuous
breadth of material coverage while simultaneouslypresenting courses in a logical fashion so that they build upon and reinforce one another and notappear as individual, disjointed topics. Aligning courses and their content with the engineeringthought process is one approach that can achieve both objectives. This paper describes how thisconcept is applied to a three course engineering sequence offered as a part of a core curriculumto non-engineering students at the United States Military Academy. Engineering design stepssuch as problem definition, design and analysis are linked with fundamental environmentalengineering concepts like risk assessment, pollutant partitioning, and materials balance.Examples of how course objectives, laboratory
in 2017. This circumstance and the community engagementenvironment created by the Center, allowed staff and students to promptly join existing reliefefforts and to design and carry out high-impact operations assisting households with childrenmembers of the MSE clubs. EECOS, PEARLS and RISE-UP were conceived in the aftermath ofthe natural disaster and began on October 1st, 2018. The projects share the common goal ofincreasing resiliency among STEM students to succeed in their studies and careers. They havehelped participants to develop resilience because aspects that affect them not only as students,but also as complete human beings have been addressed. These are the types of projects thatmake participants feel that they belong to a community
could influence students to change their majorout of engineering were explored.The required courses that were primarily indicated by students to impact their understanding ofthe ‘impact of engineering on society’ (for ABET outcomes assessment) and ‘socialresponsibility’18 are highlighted in Table 7. All four majors at this institution require students totake a first-year projects course; across the many sections of the course, some of these projectsmay be service-learning (S-L), others are community contextualized, and some are purelytechnical exercises (like a Rube Goldberg machine).26 Additional introductory courses to themajor required in the first semester for architectural, civil, and environmental engineeringstudents contain an emphasis
. Page 10.221.2 3. an ability to design a system, component or process to meet desired needs. 4. an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams. 5. an ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems. 6. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. 7. an ability to communicate effectively. 8. the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context. 9. a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in, life-long learning. 10. a knowledge of contemporary issues. 11. an ability to understand the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. 12. an ability to apply knowledge in a
focusing onteamwork issues, teaching style, students’ belief in their own abilities and desire to continue theireducation, peer interactions, and laboratory projects. While student perceptions are only one partof a comprehensive assessment program, they are certainly important. By addressing studentperceptions of core outcomes and fundamental pedagogical issues, TUBA should be relevant to arange of BMEN programs which offer a wide variety of specialized “tracks,” different areas ofprogrammatic emphasis, etc. Given that there exists a need for a measure such as the TUBA, thefollowing sections will describe the development and subsequent validation and reliabilitytesting that has been thus far performed.Development of the TUBAIn keeping with the
of Louisiana at Lafayette in numerous capacities for over 20 years. She served as Director of the Alumni Association, Director of Special Projects for the President, Director of University College, and Director of High School Relations. Through her work experience at UL, she has been able to develop and sustain strong community and post-secondary partnerships and bring valuable resources and expertise to the Lafayette Parish System GEAR UP initiative.Adrienne Enriquez, Oregon GEAR UPMiss Kelsey Z. Musa, Saint Louis University, Parks College Kelsey Musa is a Civil Engineering student currently pursuing the BS-MS Program in Engineering at Saint Louis University with a focus on Structural Engineering. Her experience in
organizations (student chapters and evendepartments) to be a part of and experience speakers, conferences, and community servicesurrounding the group’s basic needs. Some students look to socialize and begin to connect withlike-minded peers within activities and focused study areas for our veterans and active dutymilitary.References[1] Humphrey, J., “Getting Student Veterans Off the Sidelines,” accessed 5 February 2017,http://www.military.com/education/getting-veteran-students-off-the-sidelines.html[2] Kuh, G., et. al., Student Success in College, Josey-Bass, 2010.[3] Welch, R., Martin, A., Bower, K., Rabb, R., “Promoting Engagement through Innovative and PragmaticPrograms,” Proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference on Engineering Education, New
of need-based support programs they experience increased belonging because theyhave opportunities to build community with students from similar backgrounds [27]. Studentsalso have opportunities to build relationships with program staff and learn important practices tohelp them succeed, such as the significance of connecting with faculty outside of the classroom,utilizing office hours, and pursuing research opportunities. However, LIS may not have access tohigh-impact engagement opportunities that could support their success based on time andfinances [7][30][33].Inequities in EngineeringAlthough an engineering degree can serve as an upward mobility opportunity for LIS, thisstudent population faces additional challenges due to the culture of
Pre-recorded video: Welcome by Dean1:15 PM Pre-recorded video: Welcome montage of staff, students, faculty and alumni1:25 PM Pre-recorded video: 3 current students share their stories of what helped them feel a sense of community and belonging1:35 PM Break into small groups to engage in self-reflection and facilitated discussions around the following themes: ● Their personal strengths and their mentors who have impacted their lives; ● Envisioning what an inclusive community would look like and how they can build on their assets to contribute meaningfully to create a
requireddocumentation for TC2K purposes. This account should be of use to the EngineeringTechnology community because our program was one of two electronics programs thatparticipated in the 2001 pilot studies conducted by TAC of ABET in its conversion to TC2K.II. Pittsburg State University’s EET ProgramPittsburg State University is a small institution in the state of Kansas’ Regents system. With anenrollment of about 6,000 students, the university has colleges of liberal arts, education, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Page 9.225.1 Copyright © 2004
wooden blockor a foam block in the same location; students observed how far each moved after the impact. In the next lesson, the first author and/or a classroom teacher then introduced each classof students to a Hexbug Nano® robot, which is about the size of a toothbrush head and movesaround randomly on smooth hard surfaces [4]. Students observed the robot as it moved aroundon the linoleum floor. The first author and/or classroom teachers then elicited from students theproblem – that the robot might wander away too far and get lost – and the goal for the designchallenge: that a fence could help keep the robot from wandering away. They shared that thestudents would be able to use up to 10 wooden and up to 10 foam blocks to create a fence
the liquefactionphenomena and the impact experienced on select recent earthquakes. Additionally, the design ofan experiment demonstration will be completed during the academic year. The device will be afeature laboratory demonstration to inspire students interested in earthquake engineering. Astudent was guided to research the literature on soil liquefaction and performed simple exerciseson how liquefaction occurs. Once the student developed a working knowledge of theliquefaction phenomena the design of a liquefaction demonstration device was initiated. Thestudent developed design drawings (AutoCAD and to scale) to be used in building the device inconjunction with the departmental machinist.IntroductionIn the past two years our society has
system, component or process to meet Yes desired needs. 4. an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams. Yes 5. an ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems. Yes 6. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. Yes 7. an ability to communicate effectively. 8. the broad education necessary to understand the impact of Yes engineering solutions in a global and societal context. 9. a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in, life-long Yes learning. Yes 10. a knowledge of
responsibility, sustainable engineering, and community engagement. Bielefeldt is also a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education.Sabina Schill Dr. Sabina Schill is a postdoctoral scholar at Florida International University working with Dr. Bruk Berhane on Engineering For US All (e4usa), a high school curriculum that aims to democratize engineering. Sabina received her BS in Physics from Westminster College in Salt Lake City, UT, and her PhD in Environmental Engineering from the University of Colorado Boulder. Sabina has research interests in the areas of K-12 engineering education, mentoring, and identity development.Haley Passov © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
4: ABET EAC General Criterion 3: Student Outcomes [1] 1. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics 2. an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors 3. an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences 4. an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts 5. an ability
explore key dimensions of social fit asidentified in the quantitative survey. The four open-ended questions were structured to align withthese dimensions: 1. Experiences of Inclusion or Exclusion, which is to provide context for students’ responses on social match, social acceptance, and faculty engagement. 2. Challenges in Adjusting to Campus Life which further examines cultural capital and difficulties in navigating the U.S. education system. 3. Impact of Social and Religious Group Involvement, which determines the role of community engagement in fostering a sense of belonging. 4. Similarities and Differences with Peers, which assesses how perceived social fit aligns with lived cultural and academic integration.By
rooms werealso used to encourage student engagement.Responding to the COVID Pandemic: Results and Reflections on Round-Table Discussions at ASEE 2020Page 4Another important area for student engagement was communication in the new environment. Using thefirst few minutes of class to perform microphone checks and check in on student well-being. Softwareapplications like GroupMe and Remind were used to maintain student contact. In some cases GroupMewas already being utilized by students and the faculty were able to join as new members to the groupchat. Another option was to use Google Voice to maintain contact without sharing a personal phonenumber. Piazza is an interactive learning environment for collaboration between faculty and students,but can
communities in which all students are integrated as competent members.The data also suggests that increasing numbers of students are choosing to leave college or theuniversity before completing their degree. Tinto states that of “nearly 2.4 million students who in1994 entered higher education for the first time, over 1.5 million will leave their first institutionwithout receiving a degree” 6. Therefore, the number of students leaving their higher educationinstitution exceeds the number of students who decide to remain on campus. This retention issue Page 22.603.2has a direct impact on the financial stability and the academic credibility
designer) systemically transfers his/her design knowledge to become the student’s (as anovice designer) independent design problem solving capability. The distinctions betweennovice and expert designers, with respect to their different thinking processes/patterns, have beenindicated by many previous studies9-10. In practice, unfortunately, a great majority of the student-instructor interactions occurs in an ad-hoc manner as opposed to a structured process. So far,relatively few efforts have been committed to investigating how to make the currently ad-hocstudent-instructor interactions more structured, and what are the impacts of a more structuredstudent-instructor interaction process on the student’s learning of “design thinking”.2. Conceptual
Methodist University-Dallas, TX. He is currently a Professor of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Cal Poly Pomona. His research interests include Digital Sig- nal Processing and Digital Image Processing applications, Communication Systems, and Robotics. He is an author of numerous research papers and presentations in these areas. He has worked on undergrad- uate education research projects sponsored by Northrop Grumman, Boeing, and Lockheed Martin. Dr. Aliyazicioglu is a member of the IEEE, Eta Kappa Nu, Tau Beta Pi, and ASEE. Aliyazicioglu is faculty advisor for the student chapter of the IEEE.Fang Tang, Dr. Fang (Daisy) Tang is the Chair and Professor in the Computer Science Department at
encountered in that first few months of freshman year. The Minority TechnologyAssociation (MTA) supports the Boiler Mentors Peer Mentoring program as well as hasprogramming throughout the school year. They work together to encourage each other in theirstudies and other factors impacting their lives. It is a club sponsored by the college, and themembership includes URM students from all backgrounds. A course TECH 100 – “TechnologyFreshman Seminar” is one credit hour course available to all freshman where they learn aboutthe support services available at Purdue University. They also learn skills to help them getthrough their courses and learn more about success at the university.An academic support program called BEST – Building Excellence for Students
assessments of students’performance through their written work and team research memos in the Learning, Engagement,Achievement and Progress program (LEAP). The LEAP 1501 course (“Social and EthicalImplications of Engineering”) is a part of the freshman learning cohort program at the University ofUtah. Engineering LEAP (E-LEAP) is one of twelve disciplines offered in this program in which pre-engineering students form a cohort, or a learning community, and stay with their colleagues andinstructor for two consecutive semesters. Courses with general education credits are offered in smallclasses (capped at 35 seats). This paper draws inferences and findings from Fall Semester 2011 andFall Semester 2012 courses, LEAP 1501, “Social and Ethical Implications