self-reflective essays.In this section, we present an analysis of the collected data from tutors and tutees separately, aswell as an overview of faculty roles and involvement in the program.1. Impact on TutorsIn studying the effects, the service has on the tutors; we focus on the following aspects: • The academic and social impact • The advantages and disadvantages of participating as a tutorAs mentioned earlier, 10 tutors were involved in this study, all seniors, and juniors, with goodacademic standing. A focus group was held at the beginning of the semester to identify thestudents' vision of a successful tutoring service. Based on their prior experience as tutors,students were asked to provide suggestions to incorporate into the new
process of engineeringdesign. These successful competitions have taken place since the fall semester of 2007 on thecampuses of two engineering universities (alternating as hosts): one Western and one MiddleEastern. The Petroleum Institute (PI) of Abu Dhabi, UAE, and The Colorado School ofMines (CSM), USA, have held these competitions as part of a collaborative researchinitiative titled “Preparing Global Engineers: Developing Engineering Design EducationAcross Cultures.” The competitions were expanded in 2009 to include international forumsfor students and faculty to share optimal views of engineering design methodologies.While the theory, objectives, and practices of the respective cornerstone engineering designprograms are similar, the
]. Injuries to employees have grave consequences at personal level, fromthe person being temporarily unavailable, to, in many industries, becoming a less valuable person on theemployment market. This is especially a problem for a smaller company that does not have replacements atevery level of the process. While preventing all injuries is ideal, it is also unrealistic. Reducing the risk ofinjury is the goal of the Personal Blind Spot Information System.Initially, with the haptic design, the design team was very concerned that they may have issues with activepatents. Listed below in Table 1 are all the patents related to the conceptual design. The students modifiedthe design concepts to avoid infringing on any of their claims. Table 1
. Onementor mentioned that solving license issues for the required software could have made theirremote learning experience more enjoyable.Key Findings from 2021:One concerning outcome of the 2021 REU program was women’s participation and theirsatisfaction with the program. There were some recommendations from the community toincrease women’s participation, such as bringing women into the leadership team, bringing morewomen into mentorship roles, facilitating the connection between women in the program,bringing in women role models, and encouraging membership in professional organizations.However, the 2021 cohort had eight female mentors, the highest number across all three years,and the program also brought women role models to encourage women
academia, industry,government and private organizations for the benefit of the society and the nations.The goals and objectives of LACCEI include the following:Cooperation and partnerships among member institutions in the areas of engineering education,research, and technology advancement with emphasis on: ‚ Faculty and student exchange ‚ New and/or higher level academic programs ‚ Dual/joint degree and certificate programs ‚ Distance, continuing and e-education ‚ Laboratory development and sharing of resources ‚ Curriculum development, course equivalency and accreditation support ‚ Faculty development, including higher degrees ‚ Industry internship, cooperative programs and career development ‚ Joint training and
2.0 CE-453 Theory of Structures-II 4.0 Total Credits Required 140.5a) MS Geotechnical Engineering: The course focuses on strengthening students’ knowledgein geotechnical engineering and exposing them to issues related to engineering geology,geotechnic, foundation engineering, geological and rock engineering, hydrology, soil structureand pavement design/analysis/rehabilitation (Table 2).b) MS Structural Engineering: The course focuses on solution of problems in structuralengineering by enlarging and deepening students’ knowledge; thus emphasizing that they have agood grasp of new design concepts and technologies. The course contents encompass advancetechniques for structural analysis
teamworkinstruction, with the hope that curricular and content changes would result in more favorableutility and evaluations.Following this, the new instructional format, utilizing the expertise from faculty in three differentdisciplines, was born and collaboration began in Spring 2007. Specifically, the engineeringfaculty member provided the context-specific engineering case(s) that were to be the basis for therole play, role reversal, and alter-egoing instructional techniques. The communication facultymember provided the teamwork information and selected key communicative skills andprinciples to be emphasized in each case. Finally, the theatre faculty member led the students inthe interactive activities and coached them as they acted out specific
Journal, and the ACM SIGCSE and ITiCSE and Koli Calling International Computer Science Education confer- ences. Pears is currently Steering Committee Chairman of the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, and has served as Programme Chair for several other international conferences.Dr. Judy Sheard, Monash University Judy Sheard is an Associate Professor in the faculty of information technology, Monash University. She has had leadership roles both nationally and internationally in the computing education research com- munity. Sheard’s main research interests are in student learning behavior and in exploring the web as a new educational medium. She has extensive experience in computing education related projects includ
Paper ID #27708Effect of Evolving Design Requirements on Students’ MotivationDr. Karinna M Vernaza, Gannon University Dr. Karinna Vernaza joined Gannon University in 2003, and she is the Interim Dean of the College of En- gineering and Business and a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department. She earned her Ph.D. and M.S. in mechanical engineering from the University of Notre Dame. Her B.S. is in Marine Systems Engineering from the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy. She was awarded the 2012 ASEE NCS Out- standing Teacher Award, 2013 Gannon University Distinguished Faculty Award and 2013-2014 Gannon University
not using their PDAs. When asked to bring their PDAs to class after a few weeksinto the fall semester, many students said that they could not find them. Some students hadbroken or damaged their PDA. The two most common causes of damage was dropping it on thefloor or crushing the display by putting the PDA inside of a book bag. Most students said thatthey experimented with the device when they first got it, but that they stopped using it when thesemester began. The students said that they did not have time to learn how to use it. The fact that the students had abandoned their PDAs is not the issue. Not everyonebenefits from using a PDA, and deciding to use a PDA is a personal choice. Our concern,however, is that the students did not
strategic decision-making, creating a well-rounded educational experience.Despite being the first iteration, the 2022 exercise was successful, marked by minimalconnectivity issues and strong participant engagement. Feedback highlighted the value of thehands-on learning experience, with students and faculty praising the realism and complexity ofthe exercise. However, the event also revealed areas for improvement, particularly incommunication and scheduling. These insights provided a foundation for refining futureexercises, ensuring smoother operations and enhanced participant experiences in subsequentyears.2022 Scenario: Securing a Financial Trading PlatformThe 2022 International Cybersecurity Exercise centered on a fictional company
knowledgerequired to develop a business plan for a new venture, and 2) provide a foundation for betterunderstanding the value and relevance of entrepreneurial knowledge and skills increasinglybeing delivered to engineering students.IntroductionIn order to equip engineering students with the skills they need to succeed in today’s turbulenteconomy, engineering programs are increasingly offering some form of entrepreneurship trainingto their students (Shartrand, Weilerstein, Besterfield-Sacre, & Golding, 2010). Onecharacteristic of entrepreneurship education is that it often comprises experiential learningactivities which are designed to increase students’ proficiency in entrepreneurship (Solomon,Duffy, & Tarabishy, 2002). In some cases, these
. Students presented their final designs in writing and orally before a panel whichincluded faculty members and Accuride engineers. They were evaluated on final weight, style,presentation, and analysis, with the latter making up the bulk of the score.The project provided several opportunities for students to connect directly with real world designissues in a way that wouldn’t have been possible without the industry partnership. For one, studentsfelt the pressure of competition to achieve the lightest wheel, just as Accuride must keep pace withindustry competitors to maintain or grow their market share. In addition, they were held account-able for weaknesses in their analysis process. For example, the industry panel quickly identifiedsharp corners
, 10 – Sustainability, 11 – Contemporary Issues & History, 12 – Risk & Uncertainty, 17 – Public Policy, 18 – Business & Public Administration, 19 – Globalization, and 20 – Leadership). In addition, the committee identified Outcome 5 – Material Science and Outcome 24 – Professional & Ethics as ones that may be challenging for programs to fully implement. The discussion that follows explores these issues in the context of NC State. Institutional Profile North Carolina State University is a major, comprehensive, studentcentered research university. It was founded in 1887 and today enrolls over 33,000 students. The College of Engineering, with approximately 250 tenure/tenuretrack faculty in
-oriented aspect.Lessons learned from the multi-year multi-team aspect: 1. Having the same faculty advisor for the entire multi-year project duration is a pre- requisite. This ensures a smooth transition from one group to the next, from one year to the next. It also reduces the time for ‘relearning’ the project if a new faculty were to take over in the middle of the project. 2. It is important to adhere to the scheduled weekly meeting between project advisor and team members to ensure proper progress is made in the project. 3. It is beneficial to have the same client throughout the four years. The client can provide feedback concerning the progress of the design as well as evaluate the work of the
and providingfeedback:‚ Post-milestone project discussion meetings. Shortly after each milestone, the instructors meet with each team for 30 minutes to clarify any issues, discuss their impressions on the state of the project and make concrete suggestions, as well as to gauge student spirits and inquire about problems or concerns. This interactive meeting replaces the more traditional practice of instructors evaluating the merits of student projects while having limited visibility of the context, followed by writing a “verdict” email to the team about the instructors’ opinion on the state of the project. The informal atmosphere of these project meetings is critical for putting students at ease and for achieving
students as they identify important needs that lead to engineeringdesign projects. The faculty team then collaborated to define the scope of the material, includinginterviewing, ethnography, formulation of needs statements, and decomposition. The team laidout the learning outcomes for the six modules (Table 1) and storyboards for the instructor videos.Next, the faculty team worked with on-campus resources to produce the instructional videos.The situational videos (e.g., baking a cake, changing a tire) were done by the faculty teamthemselves, often with family, because of concerns during the pandemic. Student assistantshelped to edit the videos so that relevant text and examples were clear. The faculty team alsodeveloped in-class exercises, which
generations typically exhibitgreater comfort and frequent use of new technologies. In contrast, older generations oftenencounter barriers such as lower digital literacy and heightened anxiety towards adopting newdevices [13]. This disparity results in variations in how they access and utilize technology in theirdaily lives. However, this gap is gradually narrowing as older adults become more tech-savvy.Despite this progress, differences still exist, particularly concerning the extent and complexity oftechnology usage.Part-time Jobs (Working Hours)Having a part-time job has become a significant factor in students’ lives since the changes to thehigher education student funding system. Students were negatively affected by working part-timein addition to
2007 DARPA Urban Challenge – Highland RacingE. Hou*, T. N. Chang*, A. Dhawan, J. Ji+, E. Luxford, D. Rodriguez*, W. Stoddart*, S. Siddiqui *Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering + Department of Mechanical Engineering New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark, NJ 071021. Introduction The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001, Public Law 106-398, Congressmandated in Section 220 that “It shall be a goal of the Armed Forces to achieve the fielding of unmanned,remotely controlled technology such that… by 2015, one-third of the operational
alternative constructions of stakeholders.Literature Review Much of the curricula engineering educators have developed has focused on micro-ethical issues such as designing safe products, not accepting bribes, and abiding as an individualto professional codes of ethics (Herkert, 2005). Herkert has described the need for curriculumthat engages with macro-ethical concerns such as engineers’ sociopolitical responsibility andconsideration of how their practices affect multiple stakeholders. He has argued that consideringthese concerns is essential so that engineers can be given tools that will enable them to deal withcomplicated ethical issues that arise in their roles (Herkert, 2005). Some scholars have begun examining the ways stakeholder
also be identified within philosophy and the evolutionof knowledge within a discipline. They can be seen as part of the normal delineation anddefinition that occurs when new disciplines form and existing disciplines evolve. These ideasare also an invitation to thoughtful engagement with issues of engineering knowledge andpractice, an invitation to thoughtful dialogue between father and daughter around the engineeringfamily table.Bibliography1. Wankat, P.C., Felder, R.M., Smith, K.A., & Oreovicz, F.S. (2002). The scholarship of teaching and learning in engineering. In M.T. Huber & S.P. Morreale (Eds.), Disciplinary styles in the scholarship of teaching and learning. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.2
were fully vetted beforehand led to some challenges and opportunities for refinement.For example, two of the topics for which the first cohort of students taking the course did notreport significant improvements were Design for Manufacture and Healthcare Economics.Recognizing room for improvement through the student surveys and observations by the coursecoordinator, alterations were made for coverage of these topics for the second offering of thecourse. Specifically, a new presentation on quality has been added to complement the focus onmanufacturing processes, and the course coordinator developed a new presentation for healthcareeconomics that better aligns with the issues most salient to the medical device industry. Facultywill continue to
systems - Clinical laser applications5. Regulatory issues Safety - FDA regulationsCovering all these topics while providing sufficient depth and examples relevant to biology andmedicine would probably require at least 4 semester-long classes, which is more than what canbe integrated in a regular undergraduate biomedical engineering curriculum. Therefore,biomedical optics curricula typically focus on a limited number of topics, that are usually relatedto the research interests of the faculty teaching the courses (1). In our curriculum, a number of Page 5.595.5additional topics that are not discussed during regular class hours are covered
not to pursue engineering in general, is inadequateto explain the disparity across different majors [5], [6]. Chemical engineering serves as anexample of the inadequacies of these explanations; despite its mathematical rigor, masculineperceptions and typical career paths, chemical engineering attracts a large number of women [4].Apart from the identified issues with gender and engineering are concerns about minorityretention in engineering. Computer science engineering is a field that does not have highretention rates for minority students. A resounding number of studies refer to female andminorities’ perceived lack of confidence in their own computing abilities as a key factor in theirdecision to leave the major. Varma [7] indicated that
related careersThis paper details the St. Elmo Brady STEM Academy (SEBA), a program that is currently in itsthird year, which was created to expose underrepresented 4th and 5th grade boys to innovativeSTEM learning opportunities. Students participating in the after-school SEBA program completehands-on activities and inquiry-based learning modules that serve to reinforce core concepts andgenerate new ideas. Participants also learn about STEM pioneers and inventors, with anemphasis on professionals who are also from underrepresented groups and may appear morerelatable to the students. Perhaps most importantly, participants interact with underrepresentedgraduate and undergraduate students, faculty and staff to complete experiments. Finally
; Rapid Prototyping Lab, and Massachusetts Digital Games Institute. He joined WPI in 2015 as a Professor of Practice through the support of the Kern Family Foundation to create a vibrant entrepreneurial mindset culture on campus with both faculty & students. Prior to WPI, Curtis has 20+ years of experience in leadership positions at large corporations, including American Express, MasterCard, United Retail, and Bethlehem Steel. He’s held full ”Profit and Loss” responsibility for several multi-million-dollar businesses, generating double-digit annual growth for each. He also held positions in new business development, marketing, strategic alliances, and R&D implementing new technology into manufacturing
Paper ID #21650Teaching in a Foreign Land: Experiences of International Teaching Assis-tants in U.S. Engineering ClassroomsMr. Ashish Agrawal, Virginia Tech Ashish Agrawal is a PhD candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. He did his B-Tech from Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee and his MS from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, both in Electric Engineering. His research inter- ests include experiences of international faculty and students in US classrooms, sociology of education, and critical and inclusive pedagogies.Dr. Lisa D
(46) project begins 1st issue Studies in Education First of a series of Journals in the field created and edited 1968 and craft by Professor S.J. Eggleston. The titles of subsequent (47) Journal of the College of Craft developments in the field eg. Education Studies in Design Education, Craft and Technology. Journal of Design and Technology Education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education This issue sets a new direction includes research
Session 1626 Pattern-based Programming Instruction* J. Philip East, S. Rebecca Thomas, Eugene Wallingford, Walter Beck, Janet Drake University of Northern Iowa/Marist College Several years ago a group of our computer science faculty began seriously examining initialprogramming instruction. We discovered a shared perception that too many students don't write reason-able programs even after completing a semester course in programming. Others have noted the same mayeven be true after the second course (e.g., [1]). There is cause for concern as computer applicationspervade our society, often in life-critical situations. Our students are producing some of
in CATE compared to other learning resources • Possible issues or concerns with our implementation4.1 Assessment SurveyPrior to taking the survey, students had the option to watch a five-minute introductoryvideo and also invited them to explore the CATE environment directly.10,11 Based onstudents’ general comments in the survey, many respondents had already tried CATE inour EE 201 basic circuits course. Note this is a service course for non-majors. Resultsbelow are from 59 respondents.For the following survey questions on CATE features, students rated items with thisLikert scale: • (5) Strongly agree • (4) Agree • (3) Neutral • (2) Disagree • (1) Strongly disagreeStudents were asked to rank CATE’s features. Questions are sorted