,dyslexia, and ADHD possess unique abilities that may be assets in STEM fields. Despite thepotential of neurodivergent students to leverage these abilities to contribute to innovation in theirfield, they face a multitude of barriers and difficulties as they navigate rigid educationalenvironments. While there has been research on the strengths and challenges of neurodivergentSTEM students at the undergraduate level, there is a lack of studies at the graduate level. Thispaper details findings from a qualitative study on the experiences of neurodivergent graduatestudents within their STEM programs. Findings from a series of 10 focus groups suggest thatneurodivergent students face pressure to mask their neurodiversity-related traits and hide
, motivating the player to keep playing. In addition, games provideachievable, short-term successes, enticing the player with constant rewards. Although there aremany game-like elements implemented in in-person classes, there is a lack of reports on theefficacy of the technique in online asynchronous graduate classes. ClassTools is a gamificationplatform where many educational tools such as ‘Fling the Teacher’ are freely available. Theonline interactive game - ‘Fling the Teacher’ is used in this study. ‘Fling the Teacher’ is modeledafter Angry Birds, a popular casual puzzle video game, and provides 15 multiple choice questionsfor the user to answer in an engaging environment. If the players answer all 15 questionscorrectly, they get to fling an avatar
Paper ID #20115Engineering Education Research Approaches: An Analysis of the CurrentResearch Trends Around the WorldMr. Luis Felipe Zapata Rivera, Florida Atlantic University Felipe Zapata Is a Phd student of Computer Engineering at Florida Atlantic University, in the past worked as a researcher assistant in the group of educational computer in the Eafit University in Medellin, Colom- bia. His work areas include: Remote Laboratories for Education, Development of online assessment systems and Machine Learning. He conducted their studies in systems engineering and masters degree at Eafit University. During his masters he
in engineering graduate education with the intention of increasing diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice in STEM graduate education. He is completed a postdoctoral appointment in engineering education with the Engineering Cognitive Research Laboratory with Dr. Catherin Berdanier at Pennsylvania State University. He is currently a Research Scientist at Purdue University with the STRIDE research group directed by Dr. Allison Godwin at Cornell University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Persistence Pathways: Changing Research Labs to Persist in Engineering Graduate EducationThis full empirical research study investigates the factors contributing to
their research is valuable to enterprises, based on my experience, companies are quite motivated and very willing to collaborate with us.” (P1)Guided by this belief, the college has reformed its training process and evaluationmechanisms to ensure graduates meet the expectations and needs of enterprises. The ICengineering doctoral program implements a dual-supervisor system, assigning each studentboth a faculty supervisor and a corporate supervisor. All key aspects of the program,including individual study schedules, practice reports, thesis proposals, and dissertations, arejointly guided and approved by both supervisors. This approach not only ensures that studentsreceive formal scientific research training but also aligns their research
ARO Basic Research Research Funding by State >$10M >$5M$2M$15M Accelerate Transition of Basic Research >$8M$2M250 institutions $76M 3 year grants; no automatic renewal Graduate students supported: ~1400 ~ 1120 university grants, $120K/yr grant
society.Mathematical models are applied for the study of institutions, policies, groups and so on.Theories are verified by experiments or other investigation system, or by creating new methodsor even by analytical methods and designing techniques in public and private sectors.The main idea is to work around a real project, in teams, looking for solutions by the point ofview of the different courses involved in the module. The content of the courses is up to thespecialists.4. ObjectivesThe main objectives of this social engineering graduation program are: to prepare engineering researchers and professionals in administrative positions who work in areas related to policy to design and implement in national territory socio- economic systems and
fourth case studydescribed project-based assessment of conceptual knowledge in an advanced graduatecourse. In this case, the traditional, comprehensive final exam was replaced with anindividual or team project related to the course material. Recognizing that they elected totake the course, presumably to aid their graduate research, students were encouraged topursue topics directly related to their research. The complete projects were deeplyinsightful, indicating a level of conceptual knowledge gain which could not have beenmeasured using a final exam. Project-based assessment was very effective in this advancedgraduate elective, where students were compelled by a personal desire to learn.Like most faculty study groups, the faculty participating
undergraduate researchparticipants are significantly more likely to pursue graduate education3,5,6.In light of the more recent emphasis on the involvement of undergraduates in research, thepurpose of this paper is to highlight the effectiveness of the undergraduate research program inthe laboratory of Nicholas A. Peppas and to study the impact that has been made not only on theeducation and careers of the undergraduate participants but also on their graduate studentmentors. To this end, a selection of former undergraduate and graduate students have beensurveyed on the direct impact of their research experience in our laboratory, with a particularemphasis on the importance of the program in influencing a student’s decision to seek a higherdegree. In
2015.1,2 Research and development in nanotechnology is likely to changecompletely the design, analysis, and manufacturing for a wide range of engineering products.Nanotechnology, however, is still mostly a topic for graduate schools whereas undergraduateprograms that focus on nanotechnology remain sporadic.3 Our NSF-NUE award will builda multidisciplinary, cross-campus educational program that integrates nanotechnology to theundergraduate curricula in science and engineering. Our educational program in nanotechnologywill also reach out to high school (K9-K12) and graduate students.In the development of an educational program for introducing nanotechnology to undergraduate(UG) students majoring in STEM at the New Jersey Institute of Technology
value through strategic collaboration. As Executive Director of the Center for Innovation Strategies, he supports innovation-based learning and entrepreneurship. Paul previously served as Director of Operations and Collaboration Strategy in the Office of Research, Industry Liaison Office. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Implementing Backward Design Approach in Integrated Business and Engineering (IBE)Capstone Project: A NASA Tech Transfer Case StudyThe 21st century presents engineering students with complex, interdisciplinary challenges thatrequire a combination of technical and business skills. This case study examines theimplementation of a backward design approach within a joint
Paper ID #47951Using Generative AI to Assist a Smooth Transition from Industry Expert toCollege Professor - A Case StudyDr. Wei Lu, Texas A&M University Dr. Wei Lu is a Postdoctoral Researcher at the Department of Engineering Technology & Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. Her research focuses on Higher Education in Agriculture & Engineering, K-12 (STEM) Education, Communications, MarketingDr. Behbood ”Ben” Ben Zoghi P.E., Southern Methodist University Ben Zoghi is the Associate Dean, Advanced Studies and Industrial Partnerships, Executive Director, Hart Center for Engineering Leadership Bobby B
AC 2008-221: A SURVEY-BASED STUDY TO IDENTIFY METHODS FORACHIEVING POSITIVE OUTCOMES FOR UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCHERSTamara Floyd-Smith, Tuskegee University Page 13.121.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 A Survey-Based Study to Identify Methods for Achieving Positive Outcomes for Undergraduate Researchers Abstract This work describes the results of a survey administered to individuals involved inadministrating and supervising undergraduate research. The purpose of the survey is tounderstand what factors lead to positive outcomes for undergraduate researchers. Positiveoutcomes include undergraduates pursuing graduate degrees, pursuing
. Page 13.118.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008A Study to Establish a Masters Degree Program in Electronics and Computer Technology at Bowling Green State UniversityAbstractThis paper presents the results of a study conducted to assess the feasibility of establishing amaster’s degree in Electronics and Computer Technology (ECT) program at Bowling GreenState University (BGSU), Ohio. Following an informal market analysis for the need of such adegree program, a review of ten technology masters programs in ECT related areas at differentuniversities was conducted to find the curriculum of the existing programs. Surveyquestionnaires were then administered to three groups of subjects: graduating seniors, alumni,and
longitudinalstudy is purposed to investigate the impact of the integration of career development supports inan undergraduate biosystems engineering program on students’ vocational identity developmentin order to improve career education and engineering education. The study will take place overfour-years, with one cohort of students followed through the three-year biosystems program atthe University of Manitoba, in Canada, and into their first year as alumni. This Work-in-Progresspaper focuses on Phase 1 of this project: the career supports integrated into a first year requireddesign course. Little research has been conducted on the topic of career interventions inengineering programs. This study proposes to fill this gap through qualitative analysis
ARO Basic Research Research Funding by State >$10M >$5M$2M$15M Accelerate Transition of Basic Research >$8M$2M250 institutions Program $70M 3 year grants; no automatic renewal Graduate students supported: ~1400 ~ 900 university grants
Paper ID #11987Industrial Consortium to Foster Applied Research to Enhance Regional Eco-nomic Growth: a Successful Case Study.Dr. Osvaldo M. Micheloud, Tecnologico de Monterrey (ITESM) Dr. Osvaldo Miguel Micheloud Vernackt was born in Argentina in 1949; he graduated in Electrical En- gineering from University of Rosario in 1973. In 1975 he ob-tained a scholarship to continue graduate studies at the University of Washington, in Seattle, and there he obtained the degrees of Master of Science (MSc), in 1978, and PhD in 1979, both in the area of Electronics and Automatic Control. Dr. Micheloud is currently the Director of
AC 2008-2298: ENGINEERING RESEARCH RESOURCESNajwa Hanel, University of Southern California Page 13.520.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Engineering Research and Resources The American University of BeirutAs a member of the University of Southern California Science & Engineering Libraryfaculty, I was granted a Sabbatical Leave in 2006 to study the engineering researchers’resources at the American University in Beirut, Lebanon (AUB). My sabbatical report waswell received by my colleagues at USC and elsewhere motivating me to enhance it andshare it with you. The purpose of this paper is to reflect upon the history of an
Associates, typically by thesame associates that hosted their industrial internship; nine went into academia or continued in a Ph.D.program. Over the past three years, a group of six Microbiology, Chemical, and Civil Engineering students atvarious undergraduate and graduate levels of seniority have worked as a team to find answers to a veryexpensive and complicated problem for the oil industry - souring of petroleum reservoirs. The oil companiesbelieved the CBE had just the right mix of engineering and microbiology to investigate the role that sulfatereducing bacteria might play in hydrogen sulfide production in oil recovery operations. Most importantly, theIndustrial Associates wanted the Center researchers to study ways to inhibit this
stage discovery Translational research Mission-focused impact35+ young investigator awards from NSF Engineering Research Centers: $18 million from USAID to establish theNSF CAREER, AFOSR YIP, DARPA Leading QESST & CBBG plus partnering U.S.-Pakistan Centers for AdvancedYFA, ONR YIP, NASA and NIH over past on NEWT & FREEDM Studies in Energy (USPCASE) to improvethree years. power production in Pakistan NSF I/UCRCs (Industry/University Cooperative Research Programs): Lead
Paper ID #29012Graduate Program Review and Lessons LearnedDr. Mohammad Moin Uddin P.E., East Tennessee State University Dr. Mohammad Moin Uddin is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering, Engineering Technology, and Surveying at East Tennessee State University. He holds a joint appointment as an As- sociate Professor of Engineering and Engineering Technology and as a Graduate Faculty member of the Graduate Studies. Dr. Uddin is active in research and scholarship. He has been awarded grants from National Science Foundation, Tennessee Department of Transportation, DENSO and ASEE (ETD mini- grants) and
Texas A&M University, a state-of-the-art facility for education and research in the areas of automation, control, and automated system integration. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Outcomes and Case Studies of Undergraduate Student Participation in ResearchThe National Science Foundation has noted that research experiences are one of the mosteffective avenues for attracting and retaining students in science and engineering [1]. Otherstudies also suggest that undergraduate research may hold some of the answers to increasingstudent learning, retention, graduation rates and entrance into graduate programs [2-8].Recent studies by Deloitte and The
learning relating to both the general education framework established byIUPUI and the courses taken by a specific group of undergraduate students about to enter theworkforce.The scope of this type of research could cover a vast spectrum of students, related institutions,and organizational stakeholders; however, it is difficult to apply organization research to allacademic areas or to research the needs of all target employers. As a result of these challenges,narrowing the scope of the study and defining the problem and research questions will help limitthe information needed to establish a specific set of KSAs common to all employers hiringengineering technology graduates for entry-level supervisory, technical, and professionalpositions and the
the undergraduateand postgraduate levels and also serve to assist the development of graduate attributes by theinclusions of industry case studies in the teaching programs. The paper provides some detailsof how the School sources its partners and uses the research-teaching nexus to enrich teachingIntroductionAs in most professional degree programs, engineering must address the professionaldevelopment of its undergraduates, instilling within the students an understanding andappreciation of the profession into which they will graduate. Engineering accreditation bodiessuch as Engineers Australia (EA) and the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology, Inc. (ABET) typically indicate to teaching institutions the desirable attributesthat
, Stealth, Antenna, and Microwave EngineeringSequence. In addition, specialized sequences can be created from existing courses to meet a specific student’sneeds. This requirement to study two full sequences provides breadth, depth, and flexibility. It alsocomfortably accommodates multidisciplinary study requirements because some sequences cross departmentallines and students are allowed to take sequences from different departments as well. In this section we describehow one designs a sequence from the bottom up and then we provide the details of our militarycommunications sequence. Most of AFIT’s research in the communications engineering area is sponsored by aerospaceorganizations. Many of these organizations also employ our graduates after
Paper ID #7273Laboratory Experiment in Engineering Materials for Upper-Level Under-graduate and Graduate StudentsDr. David R Veazie P.E., Southern Polytechnic State University Dr. Veazie received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Southern University in 1986, and his M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Tech in 1987 and 1993, respectively. He worked for AT&T Bell Laboratories in New Jersey as a Member of the Technical Staff and was a National Research Council (NRC) Postdoctoral Fellow at the NASA Langley Research Center. In 1994, he joined Clark Atlanta University’s Department of Engineering, and
and Graduate Students Gisele Ragusa, Ph.D. University of Southern California Abstract Over the past two decades, various research studies across education and business fieldshave attempted to measure individuals’ creativity and innovative behavior. The research oncreativity has most often been accomplished in K-12 education while research in innovation hasfocused on workplace measurement. Business research has attempted to link metrics ofinnovation to entrepreneurship. Educational research has not broached this connection.Research is somewhat split as to whether creativity and innovation are domain or disciplinarycharacteristics or
implications not only forimproving the verisimilitude of career research, but also for broadening participation inengineering to individuals with career goals other than the engineering profession.Literature ReviewPrevious studies on career choice in engineering have found that many engineering graduates donot remain in engineering positions or do not enter the engineering profession entirely [3]–[6].For instance, the Science and Engineering Indicators 2018 Report found that, for individualswhose highest degree was in engineering, 42% were employed in a non-engineering role [7].Interestingly, the report also found that 90% of these individuals saw their jobs involving somesort of engineering [7]. Given the high proportion of engineering alumni in non
graduates do not experience this uniformity; therefore, theapplication of identity research directly to this population does not accurately reflect theiridentity. This lack of differentiation limits our knowledge of the engineering technologygraduates’ self-identification. Titles that the engineering technology graduate assumes upongraduation divide this population, and confuses our knowledge of career trajectories.This study is an initial probe into the engineering technology graduate’s identity. This early workwill provide insight for future work in this area. In order to obtain information from engineeringtechnology graduates, the study was distributed through the alumni office. It is thought thatgraduates that belong to the alumni association
% Distribution A. Cleared for public release. 3 What is Basic Research?• Systematic study directed toward greater understanding of fundamental aspects of phenomena, without specific applications towards processes or products in mind• Implications • AFOSR investments impact far-term capabilities • Basic research can be published without restrictions • AFOSR is free to invest internationally with very few restrictions Distribution A. Cleared for public release. 4 Why the AF Invests in Basic Research• To probe today’s technology limits and ultimately lead to future Dr. Chad Mirkin’s research