same fundamental knowledge in biology and mathematics, butwithout the fully integrated or contextualized nature of systems bioengineering.Both survey instruments consisted of the following 14 questions: 1. Suppose that your first job is for a small biotech/pharmaceutical company. Just a few weeks into your job, your supervisor asks you to use an existing computational model to identify the best potential drug targets within a metabolic network. Rate your current confidence level at accomplishing this task on a scale of 1-5 (5 being “extremely high confidence”). 2. You are asked to write Matlab code that solves a system of 20 ordinary differential equations (ODEs) that are hypothesized to describe the behavior of a
-Existing Personal Values, which is only scored for statements reflecting on events previousto participation in DREAM, was indicated. Head Mentors indicated enhancement of their engineering studies through: a real-worldapplication (External Applications); improved communication skills, writing skills and contentknowledge (Skills Development); inspiration, satisfaction and a creative outlet (Emotional Gain);engagement in the community (Awareness Gain); and interactions with other Head Mentors andmentees (Interpersonal Interactions). It should be noted that there were 6 negative responsesappearing in External Applications and 1 negative response in Skills Development. The benefitsof community engagement to engineering education are certainly real
on personal, interpersonal, and product and system buildingskills, and includes disciplinary fundamentals appropriate for aerospace and relatedengineering systems. The Syllabus was validated with program stakeholders in 1999 and 42000.3. Integrated CurriculumA curriculum that weaves personal, interpersonal, and product and system skills intodisciplinary courses was designed in 2002 for pilot implementation in Fall 2002 and fullimplementation in Fall 2003. Every course has a plan outlining the CDIO skills that 3should be integrated, as well as the degree of implementation.4. Introduction to EngineeringUnified Engineering I and II is a yearlong course of 48 units (approx. 12 sem. cr.) thatincludes fluid mechanics
that was not achieved with the first cohort. Lastly, 85% of participantswere from underrepresented minority (URM) backgrounds and 70% were female. Thus, theenrollment of our participants in graduate programs continues to enhance diversity inengineering and the field of BMMB. Going forward we will continue to track the progress ofparticipants and the careers they choose after completion of their graduate degrees. We will alsocontinue to use student feedback to improve the experience for participants. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference ProceedingsIntroductionA fundamental value of a REU is the research experience students acquire. By
Paper ID #25394Multi-Learning Techniques for Enhancing Student Engagement in Cyberse-curity EducationDr. Te-Shun Chou, East Carolina University Dr. Te-Shun Chou is an Associate Professor in the Department of Technology Systems at ECU. He received his Bachelor degree in Electronics Engineering at Feng Chia University and both Master’s de- gree and Doctoral degree in Electrical Engineering at Florida International University. He serves as the program coordinator of the Master program in Network Technology for the Department of Technology Systems and the lead faculty of Digital Communication Systems concentration for the
develop my own LOC device in the lab. • I believe this course has been very beneficial in developing my knowledge in one specific area in my career field. I feel as though I could approach a BME related problem with the LOC fundamentals I have learned in this class. • The design project was a great tie into how what we have been learning is actually used. • Learned about specific applications especially through writing the research paper and presentations. The end of the course really brought everything together. • I have learned a lot about microfluidics. I think microfluidics have the ability to make a large impact on medicine. Because of this class I am considering a future in microfluidics. • I
Session 2553 A Freshman Module to Teach Instrumentation Methods Jagdish Gajjar Union CollegeAbstractEvolution of modern electronic devices has reached a level where a black-box approachto designing and building systems is within the capabilities of beginning laboratoryexperiments. This facilitates the introduction of modern instrumentation methods tofreshmen in an engineering curriculum. The paper describes a freshmen moduledesigned to provide an exposure to transducers, signal conditioning, computerinterfacing and signal processing. The module consists of a coordinated set of
, beliefs, gender difference, mentors.INTRODUCTIONThe Engineering the Grid research experience for undergraduates (REU) is a ten week programsponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF) with an annual cohort of 10 students for3 years. It was awarded to broaden the undergraduate multidisciplinary research teams at NCState beyond the NSF-sponsored Engineering Research Center (ERC) Future RenewableElectric Energy Delivery and Management (FREEDM) Systems where both investigatorsstarted both education programs: pre-college and college [1]. The goal of the FREEDMSystems is strongly centered on integrating scalable renewable generating energy sources intoan efficient power electric grid. Today’s grid, based on traditional electromechanical devices
State University Olga Stavridis is the Assistant Director of OSU Women in Engineering (WiE) Program. She spent six years as a Senior Lecturer for the College of Engineering’s Engineering Education Department at The Ohio State University. She has been teaching Fundamentals for Engineering I and II for the Freshmen Engineering Scholars Program; Engineering Graphics and Spatial Visualization Courses for the last five years. She was previously the Director of the Engineering Co-op and Internship Program at Ohio State. Olga received her Bachelor’s Degree in Industrial and Systems Engineering from Ohio State and Mas- ter’s Degree in Industrial Engineering from Arizona State University. She has twelve years of industry
discussion with clear goals which makes it easy to start each session and develop a relationship. The only add might be the student bringing the mentor some piece of work for the mentor's input.” “Perhaps the use of Zoom with a recording for the initial session then a meetup to discuss the write-up. That way the student can focus on the interview and not have to worry about taking notes.” “I think the structure is good. May consider engaging students earlier in their college career (i.e., junior year?), to provide mentorship as they move thru their job searching and interviewing process.” “This is a tremendous work. Keep the strength of its “mission”. It can become a pattern soon. Keep and develop the “sense of purpose”. Provide for advocacy. Open
Paper ID #9492The Use Of Peer Evaluations In A Non-Traditional First Year System DesignClassMr. Joseph Pow, Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science, RIT Joe Pow is the Associate Director of the Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science at the Rochester Institute of Technology. He was the designer and first instructor of a new non-traditional project-based course for incoming Imaging Science freshmen which has had a transformational impact on the Cen- ter. Prior to his arrival at RIT, he was a project manager for the Department of Defense, where he was responsible for the development and production of a wide
program this spring called Think Big29. The Think Big Program focuses ondriving innovation in engineering encouraging students and faculty members to solve some ofthe world’s biggest problems. The Entrepreneurship Center will partner with the college ofengineering to provide training to the inventors on how to write business plans and developinvestor pitches.Panelist #3 (Adrienne Minerick): I’m an Associate Professor and was specifically recruited into Page 23.955.7a program targeting women for technology entrepreneurship. The parent program is calledACTiVATE 30 and it was licensed by INFORUM Michigan 31. There are four of us fromMichigan
lectures and one recitation per week, students learn tomaster the topics listed in Table 1. The required text for the course is Precalculus: Mathematics Page 23.1285.8for Calculus, 6th edition, by James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, and Saleem Watson; ISBN10:0840068077. Table 1. Pre-calculus for engineers course: units, topics and timeframe. Unit Topics Real numbers, exponents and radicals, algebraic expressions Algebra Fundamentals Rational expressions, equations, modeling with equations (12 hours) Inequalities, coordinate
Paper ID #11183Preliminary Evaluation of a Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU)Program: A Methodology for Examining Student OutcomesD. Jake Follmer, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park D. Jake Follmer is a doctoral candidate in educational psychology at The Pennsylvania State University. His interests are in issues related to learning, assessment, and program evaluation.Dr. Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkDr. Esther W Gomez, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Esther Gomez is an assistant professor in the Departments of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering at the
effective engineering curricula for cultivatingcritical thinking remain elusive, and brief duration (one semester or less) is the most commonshortcoming to most critical thinking interventions. [30].Teaching Critical Thinking in Undergraduate Engineering EducationSeveral literature reviews on critical thinking interventions in undergraduate engineeringeducation have been conducted in recent years and reveal that, while various pedagogicalapproaches to teaching critical thinking exist (e.g. reflective writing and supplementaldiscussions), project-based learning appears to be the most studied [29], [30], [41], [42]. Project-based learning presents students with the challenge of solving a real-world problem and isthought to promote critical thinking
; Innovation and creativity, Complex problem-solving and Analytical thinking. Thecurrent panorama is especially detrimental for educational institutions in Latin America. Inthis particular circumstance, the need to explore new models for developing internationalcooperation, negotiation and leadership became evident. The preliminary results and findingsof this study indicate that international virtually collaboration could be an effective strategyto train students with international skills and to develop certain personal attitudes such asenthusiasm, motivation and intellectual engagement.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of Writing Lab, TecLabs,Tecnologico de Monterrey, in the production of this work. The
having 10-12 weeks per term (tri-mester) and one program had 7 weeks per term suggesting that they are on a quarter system. Thetotal number of credit hours for civil engineering capstone courses ranged between one and six.The wording of the question, What is the total number of equivalent semester credit hours foryour Capstone course?, could have been interpreted by some as only the portion of the totalcapstone course that one specific instructor teaches (e.g. communications, report writing, etc.).That said, 5% of the respondents reported one credit hour, 2% reported two credit hours, 32%reported three credit hours, 29% four credit hours, 11% reported five credit hours, and 21%reported six credit hours. 6
Paper ID #22126Revising the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (BOK): The Applicationof the Cognitive Domain of Bloom’s TaxonomyDr. Decker B. Hains, Western Michigan University Dr. Decker B. Hains is a Master Faculty Specialist in the Department of Civil and Construction Engi- neering at Western Michigan University. He is a retired US Army Officer serving 22 years on active duty with the US Army Corps of Engineers and taught at the United States Military Academy at West Point (USMA). He earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering from USMA in 1994, Master of Science degrees from the University of Alaska
correct, portion of the problem. This saved both thestudent and the instructor time in the resubmission process, and eliminated what many studentssaw as meaningless copying of previous work. Second, when a large portion of the class made a Page 26.64.6particular mistake, the instructor would address the issue in the next class, rather than writing thesame comments out on many assignments. This served to save time for the instructor andallowed for more dialogue on particularly difficult concepts. Both of these changes wereimplemented early in the semester in both classes, and it is not believed that either of theseadaptations fundamentally
Applications Inventory (MAI); and the other to gaugestudents' self-efficacy perceptions related to studying engineering and to learning and applyingmathematics, the Engineering and Mathematics Perceptions Survey (EMPS). In this second yearof the project we will use the instruments to detect effects of the workshop innovation. Theproject is funded by the National Science Foundation, Directorate of Education and HumanResources, Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Program, Grant # DUE-0837757.This paper reports the results of the full administration of both instruments in Fall 2010 to allfirst-year engineering students at our institution (approximately 820). Slightly less than halfenroll in the first calculus course in the engineering
maintained the basic flavor and goals of mostexperiments from the earlier years. The experiments were developed specifically to interfacewith the robot, but again included both digital and analog exercises. One of the new experimentsapplied the skills learned earlier in the new series to drive the robot around obstacles.Evaluation of the Kits and the Lab ProgramStudent reporting of their lab work and results has not changed over the years. The studentassessment is essentially the same as was previously reported. All students write basic reports onall experiments in a lab notebook. Lab instructors grade all the students’ reports on a scale fromone to ten, ten being the top score. The student reports were checked for completeness of theexperimental
Paper ID #41306Syllabi Indicators of Learning Community Supports in Civil EngineeringClassroomsJessica Momanyi, William Paterson University Jessica Momanyi is a recent graduate of William Paterson University, where she was a Psychology major with a minor in Music - Classical Voice. She was involved in Engineering Education Research during the summer of 2023 as a scholar through an NSF-funded Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln, in the Engineering Education lab under the supervision of Dr. Grace Panther and Dr. Heidi Diefes-Dux. As an Honors College student at William
Paper ID #37534Long-Term Impact of COVID-19 on the First-YearEngineering Experience at a Mid-Sized Teaching FocusedUniversityBrian Dick Brian Dick chairs the Physics, Engineering, and Astronomy department at Vancouver Island University, and coordinates its Engineering Transfer program. He believes strongly in enabling equitable access to engineering education, and led work to develop the Common First-Year Engineering Curriculum in British Columbia. He is also passionate about enriching program curriculum with intercultural experiences and student engagement as global citizens. Brian has led intercultural projects
Paper ID #15529Developing a Systems Engineering Activity for Middle School Students UsingLEGO RoboticsDr. Aaron W. Johnson, Tufts University Center for Engineering Education and Outreach Aaron W. Johnson is a postdoctoral research associate at the Tufts University Center for Engineering Education and Outreach. He received his Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Astronautics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2014, where his research focused on human-automation interaction in complex aerospace vehicles. Aaron also obtained a master’s degree from MIT in 2010 and a bachelor’s degree from the University of Michigan in 2008
Manufacturing Engineers Education Foundation, was tointroduce the campers to fundamental scientific and engineering principles, to basicmanufacturing processes, and to the application of these principles through engineering analysisto predict the behavior of a physical system. The central theme for the camp was building amodel rocket from manufactured components to “shoot a field goal” as the final activity.Campers engaged in the manufacture of the components and the study of basic principles(Newton’s Laws of Motion, aerodynamic drag, thrust, weight, etc.) necessary for prediction ofthe flight path of the rocket. In preparing for the launch, each camper built and ground-tested arocket. The campers used a Bradley University developed, PC based, rocket
, developing CT facets (i.e.,decomposition, abstraction, etc.) is often more relevant than writing correct syntax [35]–[37].This study focuses on examining student produced flowcharts as the aim of the study was toanalyzing students’ development of CT rather than students’ learning of coding.Laboratory experiences in undergraduate physics courses are full of opportunities to engagestudents in CT. The integration of CT and engineering design (ED) can foster students' learningduring these experiences (e.g., [38]–[41]). However, there is a need for further research about thebest ways to integrate CT and ED in undergraduate STEM courses and to examine how studentsdevelop these skills within multidisciplinary STEM contexts [20], [21]. Following calls to
disadvantages [6].C. Sense of belonging In addition to beliefs, students’ feelings of belonging and acceptance in their collegecommunity are important in predicting their academic success. The need to belong and affiliatewith others is a fundamental motivation, and this motivation influences various interpersonalbehaviors [17]. Research conducted with elementary students has suggested that sense ofschool belonging is the most impactful contextual variable on classroom achievement, andbelonging is positively correlated with academic self-efficacy [18]. In another study looking atwomen’s persistence in engineering, rates of retention were associated with feelings ofbelonging to the major and the department [19]. A sense of belongingness often
manual was submitted for grade with eachexperimental apparatus. The design report explained the theoretical underpinnings of theexperiment as well as details on the construction of the apparatus. The lab manual included adetailed experimental protocol for student experiments with questions for a follow-on lab reportto be written by students next semester.Design constraints (the extent to which the design is open ended)• Each group was provided with a 15 gallon fish tank and either a trickling filter (Eheim, Ecco 2232) or RBC (Marineland, Emperor Biowheel 280). These filters are designed for use with fish tanks.• The system was required to be plumbed so that flow rate through the filter may be varied during the experiment by
AC 2009-492: ANALYSIS OF MIDDLE- AND HIGH-SCHOOL STUDENTS’LEARNING OF SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS, AND ENGINEERING CONCEPTSTHROUGH A LEGO UNDERWATER ROBOTICS DESIGN CHALLENGEElisabeth McGrath, Stevens Institute of TechnologySusan Lowes, Teachers College, Columbia UniversityPeiyi Lin, Teachers College, Columbia UniversityJason Sayres, Stevens Institute of Technology Page 14.215.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Analysis of Middle and High School Student Learning of Science, Mathematics and Engineering Concepts Through a LEGO Underwater Robotics Design ChallengeAbstractThe Build IT project is a university-school collaboration to
exploration as a theme, and the other used micro controllers as thefoundation for activities. The goals of this research are as follows: 1. Develop effectivecurricula for improving student self-efficacy in CT, 2. Develop a reliable and effective wayof measuring student self-efficacy in CT, and 3. Enforce the notion that CT is not problemsolving (PS), but a component of cognition.Background and Related Work“Computational thinking involves solving problems, designing systems, and understandinghuman behavior, by drawing on the concepts fundamental to computer science”26. However,computational thinking (CT) is not intended to be equated to computer science; rather theessence of CT comes from thinking like a computer scientist when faced with problems