, Page 15.1345.2Multiple logical/mathematical, visual/spatial, bodily-kinetic, musical,Intelligences interpersonal, and intrapersonal. 1Conventional geotechnical engineering teaching methods are based in technical andmathematical learning modes (as compared to personal and artistic learning modes). Enhancingthe learning environment using hands-on activities and teamwork exercises (which are commonin laboratory environments) is effective based on educational research. However, studentlearning occurs using a broad variety of learning styles, including feeling, personal, and artisticmodes. For improving learning using learning different styles, novel use of technology has
, which is a methods-based paper published inthe International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, employed critical theory as a guidingframework. In this work, Mobley et. al. [73] employed Veteran Critical Theory [62] as an “organizingframework” to describe qualitative methods (key event timeline and the identity circle) used in researchwith military undergraduates in engineering to elicit rich narratives and counter narratives of experience.At the time of writing this manuscript, only one other publication, a doctoral dissertation in the field ofengineering education written by Sheppard [41], that employed critical theory could be found. In thispaper, Sheppard [41] employed the socio-educational justice framework FoK to a support a
how the LEWAS lab uses a weir equation and the DopplerEffect to calculate water flow rate. This was extremely valuable to students in the class as theywere now motivated to understand the concepts by observing that the concepts are actually beingused in a real world setting to solve real problems. Thirdly, working in the LEWAS lab providesundergraduates with background knowledge for some of the future courses they plan to take. Forinstance, as the fourth author was dealing with the Linux infrastructure of the lab, he firstencountered the fundamentals of process management, which was later reinforced in hiscomputer systems course. Similarly, the sixth author got the opportunity to learn about datastructure and to know how it is used in the
AC 2009-1432: EDUCATING FEDERAL ENGINEERS TO BEENTREPRENEURIAL THINKERS AND LEADERS – WHO WOULD OFTHOUGHT?Sharon deMonsabert, George Mason University Dr. deMonsabert is an Associate Professor of Civil, Environmental and Infrastructure Engineering. She is the program director for the Certificate in Technical Entrepreneurship for the Federal Government. She teaches courses related to Sustainable Development, Environmental Systems and Engineering, and Technical Entrepreneurship. Dr. deMonsabert was recently appointed to the position of Fellow for Academic Curricula at George Mason University.John Lanzarone, U.S. Army Corps of EngineersMico Miller, George Mason UniversityBarry Liner, George Mason
provideexperiential engineering experiences and the fundamental mathematics and science backgroundto prepare students for subsequent courses in their chosen engineering major. Currently, studentscomplete 3 general engineering courses (one is a 1 credit Introduction to Engineering course), 1or 2 calculus courses depending on their Advanced Placement credit, an engineering chemistrycourse, and 1 physics course. The first 4-credit general engineering course GE 1110, the“design” course, is a course that focuses on learning the principles of the engineering designprocess which is the widely accepted process for engineers that is analogous to the scientificmethod for scientists. This is accomplished through active learning in areas such as needsassessment and
encounter essential content. As such, students in theseclassrooms may have a less rigorous understanding of underlying fundamentals.10One drawback of project-based learning is that hands-on activities are not automatically “minds-on.”17 Oftentimes, the focus of activities becomes object manipulation rather than knowledgeattainment and skill development. This separation between activities and content can beperpetuated by teachers who routinely emphasize the task to be completed rather than thematerial to be learned, a common mistake.23An intertwining of content and projects must therefore occur if the aim of product design is toemploy disciplinary practices. Ideally, successful products will demonstrate achievement,providing indicators of learning
in these standards also gave the students an insight into how test procedures and test reports should be written in order to achieve good and repeatable test results. Students were encouraged to use the information from these standards to improve on their laboratory report writing skills.• Lessons Learned and Future Integration Plan To supplement the experiments, EET students were also introduced to computer simulation so virtual RF instrumentation could be used to perform analysis. This is expected to continue. Initially, among all the courses targeted for EMC integration in 2005, the most challenging course was the Electronic Communication Systems (ECS). Two of the most significant reasons were: 1
Paper ID #23135Critical Incidents in Engineering Students’ Development of More Compre-hensive Ways of Experiencing InnovationDr. Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University Nicholas D. Fila is a postdoctoral research associate in Electrical and Computer Engineering and Industrial Design at Iowa State University. He earned a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and a M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. His current research interests include innovation, empathy, design thinking, and instructional design
incorporate more non-technical courses (e.g., ethics; social sciences; writing). These requirements may not be fullyimplemented, but they do influence the shape of curricula, and reduce the freedom of a programor institution's faculty. Although many faculty believe that formalizing a five year bachelor'sprogram would best serve their students, few institutions will take the risk of losing enrollmentby acknowledging that successful completion of the bachelors requirements often takes fiveyears. With a serious decrease in high school students’ interest in engineering, consideration ofcurricular innovation is made in a context of competition for students with other institutions andother fields of study. This concern with marketing has also led to an
theUniversity of Nottingham.70 CourseMarker improved grades after the parameters for assignmentswere tweaked in response to early results. From 1998–2001 and 1999–2002 respectively, theoverall percentage of students passing first- and second-level programming rose. The authors donot provide specific numbers, but they clearly correlate student improvement to CourseMarkerwhen they write, “The ratio of student passes to failures is very high, and has improved with theevolution of CourseMarker and the support provided by the system.”In 2005, Kumar showed learning improvement with an automated tutor aimed at testing staticand dynamic scoping concepts in a programming languages course.71 The author’s experimentconsisted of a pre-test and post-test given
reports via rubric. Rubric evaluation of student reports revealed that students’performance in senior design projects is primarily driven by their instructor’s expectations; ifsustainability is not a major deliverable, then students are less likely to integrate sustainabilityconcepts that they learned from prior classes in their reports. To make sustainability a priority,senior design project requirements should be updated to explicitly require holistic sustainabil-ity applications. Instructors could approach raising sustainability expectations by engaging asustainability expert as an advisor to the senior design course and/or utilizing a sustainabilityexpert as project mentor, as demonstrated in the success of one senior design project at
Paper ID #8710Use of the National Academy of Engineering’s Grand Challenges for Engi-neering as a semester-long project for an Introduction to Engineering courseDr. Lindsay Corneal, Grand Valley State University Lindsay Corneal is an Assistant Professor in the Padnos College of Engineering and Computing at Grand Valley State University. She received her B.A.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Windsor, a M.B.A. from Lawrence Technological University, and a Ph.D. from Michigan State University in Materials Science and Engineering
Paper ID #37458Criteria Conundrum: Engineering Students’ Beliefs about the Role ofCompeting Criteria in Process Safety JudgementsCayla Ritz, Rowan University Cayla, originally from Freeland, Maryland, has attended Rowan University for all undergraduate and graduate-level degrees. She graduated in Spring 2020 with her BS in Mechanical Engineering with a con- centration in Honors Studies. She also has her MSc in Mechanical Engineering with a COGS in Holocaust and Genocide Studies, and is pursuing a PhD in Engineering with a concentration in Engineering Educa- tion. Specifically, her research interests are focused on
organizationsas “creating value” in the same way that technological innovation is [9], [10]. These types oflower-recognition tasks also can include “office housework”—planning social events, gettingcoffee for colleagues, coordinating meetings. Some of these tasks carry more organizationalsignificance than do others, as they can sustain networks, communication, and projectmomentum, but few are rewarded in the way that strategic stretch work can be; Babcock et al.[8] write that these are tasks people generally do not want to do as part of their jobs and wishwould be completed by others.And yet some groups do them, and do them more than other groups do, even among those in thesame profession and role. Sociological and economic research shows that gender
variables include their academic profiles, such as theirperformance on mathematics placement examinations and ability to pass fundamental sciencecourses. Institutional variables include the community college’s capacity to support theiracademic goals and to provide resources that will support their transfer aspirations. 3) Initial Transfer to the Four-Year University. Once again, students’ ability totransition and excel within the four-year engineering college context is largely dependent ontheir individual level of academic and social preparation (for example, the level of preparationthat the community college provided for upper-level technical courses, and students’ familiaritywith how to form study groups) as well as institutional
working for grades and notknowledge. “Everyone is secretly trying to get a grade from the course, even though he disputesthe fact.” Kirsten believed that the grading system was an unfortunate part of “mass production”in education.24 In 1943 Kirsten was interviewed for an article in which he said “Specialized educationhas put American youth into a groove, beyond which they are unable to see. We have been soanxious to teach our students everything from A to Z in their chosen field, the average pupil isgraduated without any personal philosophy, with little appreciation of the delicate balances andsymphonies of nature’s forces, an ignorance of the fundamental ethics of the good life and acomplete disregard for that which is not in his text
design thinking that you think are not currently instantiatedin the Design Course but could potentially be useful to fit in in some way? How would you findthe space for that?” An example of a discussion question about the Daly and Yilmaz article32 ondivergent and convergent thinking is, “As an instructor, what purposes do each of these kinds ofprompts (divergent/convergent/neutral) serve? When would you employ each of these prompts?”In a typical discussion focusing on the assigned readings, LAs worked in groups of 3-4. Eachgroup was given a whiteboard to write down their collective thoughts. Then, each group wouldinformally present their ideas using whiteboards to the whole class, and we would discusscommon themes or ideas in a whole-class
theconcepts and each new lab assignment. We also presented strategies for approaching the labassignment and writing the report. Unfortunately, this approach does not scale well with theincreasing class size. Hence, we wanted to find a strategy for student success that scales wellwith the growing number of students, without compromising on instruction and that helps free upthe lab time that may be used to provide one-on-one time with students.1.1 Discovery of the Issues in Fall ’18 and Spring ‘19The motivation for using the flipped class delivery method for the lab instructions is based on theobservation of student performance and outcomes in Fall 2018 and Spring 2019. We analyzedthe lab assignment submission rate and earned lab grades. Figure 1 shows
transfer their practices of loyalty and duty. They developed systems of training specific to their organizations and practices. They explicitly followed a “German path” rather than an “American path.” That is, they developed practices for maximizing the use of raw materials and formulating alternatives rather than seeking to minimize labor costs regardless of the implications for resources. The makers of engineers, the technical workers at the top, adapted their practices to keep them congruent. In anticipation of graduates gaining additional on the job, for example, they focused formal engineering education on its fundamental, most general forms
Paper ID #28966What will you do to help elementary students who struggle in theengineering design process? Analysis of teachers’ reflections.(Fundamental)Mr. Zachary Minken, Arcadia University Mr. Zachary Minken, High School Science Teacher, teaches Biology and Chemistry to 10th - 12th grade students. He is the Lead Coach of the School of the Future Robotics Team, which is a rookie team participating in the FIRST Tech Challenge. During the summer months, he is the Director of the iD Tech Camp based at the University of Pennsylvania, a summer program designed to teach students ages 7-17 about programming, physical
Educational Research Methods Division of ASEE.Julie Martin Julie P. Martin is a Fellow of ASEE and an associate professor of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. Julie’s professional mission is to create environments that elevate and expand the research community. She is the editor- in-chief of Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, where her vision is to create a culture of constructive peer review in academic publishing. Julie is a former NSF program director for engineering education and frequently works with faculty to help them write proposals and navigate the proposal preparation and grant management processes. She was a 2009 NSF CAREER awardee for her work operationalizing social
Tripoli University, Libya and her Master’s degree in Linguistics as a Fulbright scholar from Florida International University. She decided on pursuing her EdD after having worked in the field of education for 8 years. She is interested in social justice issues and inclusivity of education.Dr. Adam Maltese, Indiana University-Bloomington Professor of Science Education ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Developing Habits of Mind through Family Engineering at Home (Fundamental)Abstract: Engineering in early education provides the foundation for the future of innovation.Reinforcing learning and engineering habits of mind (HoM) at an early age is crucial
. In engineering programs,laboratory courses provide an intensive overview of experimental methods and relatedunderlying theories of manufacturing. Upon program completion, the ETECH graduate andengineering graduate entering industry will likely have similar positions in design, processengineering, manufacturing, research and development, or technical sales and services. TheETECH graduate is prepared to immediately begin technical assignments in their specialty areasince programs stress current industrial practices and design procedures. They “hit the groundrunning” in the words of many employers. The engineering graduate typically requires a periodof internship since engineering programs stress fundamental concepts over applications.PSU’s
. Emmett is a certified Project Management Professional and since 2018 has supported strategic global and online initiatives in engineering, including developing online modules to train global engineering competencies. He is the author of the books Cultivating Environmental Justice: A Literary History of US Garden Writing (University of Massachusetts Press, 2016) and with David E. Nye, Environmental Humanities: A Critical Introduction (MIT Press, 2017). With Gregg Mitman and Marco Armiero, he edited the collection of critical reflections and works of art, Future Remains: A Cabinet of Curiosities for the Anthropocene (University of Chicago, 2018). His humanities scholarship has appeared in the journals Environmental
less than two months after a nationwide racialreckoning regarding the inequitable treatment of BIPOC. CU Boulder is a public, R1,predominantly white institution in the western United States. The intended focus of both thiscase study—and the broader study, in general—was on the institutional policies that wouldsupport the hiring of faculty who recognize and support the university’s goal of inclusiveexcellence [3], not on the socially-constructed identities of the individual applicants. Animportant rationale for the choices made in the search is that based on faculty hiring results overthe past five academic years, the supposed best practices for equitable hiring interventionsenacted to date have not translated to a fundamental shift in the
thinking (CT) is a 21st century problem solving process that involves the useof fundamental computer science (CS) concepts to create solutions that incorporate theexecution of an information-processing agent [9]. The most often cited CS conceptsattributed to the CT process are 1) Decomposition; 2) Pattern recognition; 3) Abstraction;4) Algorithmic design. These four concepts have been defined in T able 1 below. Otherauthors have also identified debugging and iteration [6] as part of the CT process. It shouldbe noted that computational thinking is broader than CS and is not synonymous withprogramming [9] – [10]. Programming may be used for the implementation of thealgorithmic design identified during the computational process; however, problems
Paper ID #32721A Characterization of Engineering and Computer Science UndergraduateParticipation in High-impact Educational Practices at Two WesternLand-grant InstitutionsDr. Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University Angela Minichiello is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University (USU) and a registered professional mechanical engineer. Her research examines issues of access, diversity, and inclusivity in engineering education. In particular, she is interested in engineering professional formation, problem-solving, and the intersections of online learning and alternative
example visually, in physical form,and in writing—can facilitate learning, research shows.43 But integration can also impedelearning because it can place excessive demands on resource-limited cognitive processes, such asattention and working memory.44,45,46While fundamental to all learning experiences, social and cultural experiences such as thosewhich require students to work with each other and actively engage in discussion, joint decisionmaking, and collaborative problem solving may be particularly important in integrated learning.Some social processes can support learning through deliberate efforts to convey knowledge andstrategies to children. Techniques such as scaffolding47 and peer collaboration can help studentsbe successful with
poses a few obvious problems.They have not studied calculus, nor the concepts of equilibrium, resultant force, and moment, letalone moment of inertia, thermodynamics, and most of chemistry. Graphics is still in the future,so the term “3-view” makes no sense. Computing is in the future, and so is the training onexpressing and interpreting graphical data, and writing technical reports. These students lack thediscipline, the trait of rigorous reasoning, the technical and emotional maturity, the work ethicand the in-depth knowledge inculcated by the 10 quarters leading up to Capstone Design.Lessons from Prior Work 3-14Several approaches have been used to engage the
teaching method (i.e. problem-basedlearning, discovery-based learning), while the traditional college teaching method is deductive, i.e.starting with fundamentals and proceeding to applications. Most students, struggling with an Page 7.677.3 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationoverloaded and mostly traditional curriculum, also prefer this approach. This dimension wastherefore removed from the ILS, so as not to provide incentives for a continuing use of thetraditional deductive instruction29