a coefficient of variation of 0.58. This is notsurprising since the size of the classes range from two to 26 students. Such small programs are bound tohave greater variability since a change of enrollment of just one women student can greatly affect theresulting percentage.PRIOR STUDIES RELATED TO WOMEN IN ENGINEERING Although few studies have been published that discuss issues of recruitment and retention ofwomen specifically in the area of civil engineering, a number of studies discuss the problems of lownumbers of women in the general field of engineering and several provide suggestions for increasing the 3numbers. Engineering has the smallest percentage of women in their
131 INTRODUCING SECURE CODING CONCEPTS IN ENGINEERING PROGRAMMING Kalyan Mondal mondal@fdu.edu Fairleigh Dickinson University 1000 River Road, T-MU1-01 Teaneck, NJ 07666Abstract: Over the last several years, the world has witnessed numerous major cyber attacks resulting in stolenpersonal credit card numbers, leak of classified information vital for national defense
engineering disciplines byinfusing systems thinking concepts. There is very little literature that attempts to characterize(and compare) existing systems engineering programs.Because of that lack of data about our community, two of us at MichTech have embarked on aproject to obtain preliminary data from a large cross section of all systems engineeringundergraduate programs. Our initial goal was to help better place our program in relation toothers, and also to identify programs that are similar to ours for purpose of cross fertilization -learning from each other. A description of our preliminary data collection process follows thenext section. The next section is a first-person narrative by a recent graduate of our systemsengineering program focused
Council onHigher Education and an ABET-knowledgeable member. Among the issues addressed were thefollowing: tuition collection and financial aid matters, commonality in course objectives andexpected student outcomes, equipment needs, computers and related infrastructure needs,recruitment and admission details, transfer opportunities, provision of student services, qualitycontrol issues, library acquisitions, and use of distance learning technologies.From an overall organization standpoint (see Figure 2), the UK Dean of the College of Engineeringhas ultimate responsibility for the Extended Campus Engineering Programs in Paducah. TheDirector of the Extended Campus Engineering Programs reports to the dean and interfacesregularly with the Associate
Session 2248NSF Supported Engineering Technology Programs and Institutional Changes George H. Sehi, Ph.D. Sinclair Community CollegeIn FY95, Sinclair Community College was awarded NSF grant to establish a National Center ofExcellence for Advanced Manufacturing Education. Now in its third year, the AME Center hasmade major progress in transforming engineering technology education as it prepares students forcareers in the Manufacturing Engineering TechnologyUnder the guiding influence of the AME Center, the learning environment is evolving throughthe pilot testing of curriculum modules
Assessment and Evaluation Process for Engineering Technology Program William Danley and Vladimir Genis danleywj@drexel.edu, genisv@drexel.edu One Drexel Plaza, Philadelphia, PA 19104, U.S.A. Abstract: The Applied Engineering Technology (AET) Program at Drexel University recognizes the need for periodic assessment and evaluation to make sure that the AET is achieving its mission. This paper describes how the assessment and evaluation of Program Educational Objectives and Program Outcomes leads to a “Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) of the Program Report
Institute of Technology (COE) Professor Margaret Bailey, Ph.D., P.E. is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering within the Kate Gleason College of Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology. Dr. Bailey teaches courses and conducts re- search related to Thermodynamics, engineering and public policy, engineering education, and gender in engineering and science. She is the co-author on an engineering textbook, Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics, which is used worldwide in over 250 institutions. Dr. Bailey is the Principal Investi- gator (PI) for the RIT NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation grant. The goal of this large-scale ($3.4M), multi-year university-level organizational transformation effort is to
Engineering Education, 2007 A General Engineering Technology Program in Motorsports TechnologyAbstractSouthside Virginia, in particular the cities of Danville, Martinsville and the surrounding area, isthe home of Virginia International Raceway and a rapidly growing motorsports industry. Thereis a strong need for educational opportunities to support manufacturing and related industries inthis region. In the early 2000’s Patrick Henry Community College in Martinsville established anassociate of applied science degree in Motorsports Technology to help meet the need fortechnical support personnel. As the industry has grown it has become evident that engineers andtechnologists are needed at the baccalaureate and
Session 1432 Quest for a perfect power engineering program Peter Idowu Pennsylvania State University - Harrisburg. 777 W. Harrisburg Pike, Middletown, PA 17057AbstractFollowing a prolonged decline in enrollment and interest in power engineering, educators haveformulated a variety of responses they believe will stem the tide of woes that seem to havebesieged the profession. The range of creative solutions proposed in many programs arecentered around what power engineering curriculum should contain, how course materials shouldbe delivered, and how to
three sponsoring programs. Each panel session ended withinput or questions from the audience. There may have been as many as 800 attendees andthe symposium was quite interesting because of the diverse nature of the grandchallenges. The breadth of topics placed the symposium at the opposite end of thespectrum of typical single topic engineering symposia or conferences. But what was theprocess that had led up to this symposium?In 2006 the National Academy of Engineering started a project titled Grand Challengesfor Engineering. The stated purpose of this National Academy of Engineering project1is In a fourteen-month project, the NAE will convene a select, international committee to evaluate ideas on the greatest challenges and
in thefuture. The goal of this track is to produce technologists with a focus and training incomputational sciences, and in their primary technology domain area. Students withundergraduate degrees in engineering, mathematics, physics and computer science may also beadmitted and must meet the course and curriculum requirements in technology.Educational Objectives of the ProgramThe educational objectives of the program are as follows:o Educate and graduate students with a mastery of high performance computer programming tools as well as processing, data acquisition, analysis techniques.o Acquire, educate and train in computational modeling, simulation and visualization.o Relate acquired computational science and engineering knowledge
already full, andwe are trying to add something engineer related into whatever time is available. During the summer of 2002, 16 students had the time available to participate in the CadetDistrict Engineer Program. The students went to 12 districts and 13 different locations. Sixstudents went outside the continental United States; two to Germany, two to Japan, one to SouthKorea, and one to Hawaii. The other students went to engineer districts located at Baltimore,Boston, Chicago, Eglin Air Force Base, Jacksonville, New Orleans, Patrick Air Force Base, andSeattle. The typical jobs the students performed were Quality Assurance Inspector and AssistantProject Manager. All the students had a positive experience and reported an increased interest
Session 2663 Rapid Prototyping for Manufacturing Engineering Technology Program Andrzej Markowski, Harry Petersen Automotive and Manufacturing Engineering Technology Minnesota State University, MankatoAbstractDevelopment, presentation and evaluation of a Rapid Prototyping class for ManufacturingEngineering Technology (MET) students at Minnesota State University, Mankato is presented.The two credit (400/500 level) class has been designed as an open-ended one-semester project inwhich students work in small groups following the typical stages of product development -designing, prototyping
writingcomponents are completed over the summer). There were four such programs (Brazil, China,Chile and Germany) offered in the summer of 2007 and the program is continuing in 2008. TheSchool of Engineering’s and the University’s Study Abroad Offices provide numerousalternatives and opportunities for international travel and some of these have an engineeringlearning component. We have also joined a consortium of schools in The InternationalAssociation for the Exchange of Students for Technical Experience (IAESTE) to provideadditional engineering related international opportunities for our students. Additional programsexist and are being developed. Until now however, an international experience has not been arequired part of a student’s degree completion
2006-130: CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT FOR AN INTERDISCIPLINARYMANUFACTURING ENGINEERING PROGRAMFrank Liou, University of Missouri-Rolla Dr. Frank Liou is a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of Missouri-Rolla (UMR). He currently serves as the Director of the Manufacturing Engineering Program at UMR. His teaching and research interests include CAD/CAM, nano-technology, rapid prototyping, and rapid manufacturing. He has published over 100 technical papers and has research grants and contracts over $7M. Page 11.384.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006
Paper ID #17802Green and Alternative Energy Program in Engineering TechnologyDr. Vladimir Gurau P.E., Kent State University, Tuscarawas Campus Dr. Gurau is an Associate Professor of Engineering Technology at Kent State University. Previously he worked for seven years as a Senior Research Associate in the Chemical Engineering Department at Case Western Reserve University where he served as Principal Investigator on several research programs funded by the State of Ohio’s Third Frontier Fuel Cells Program, by the U.S. Department of Energy or in collaboration with General Motors. In this quality he performed research on
successfulcompletion of the Electrical Engineering discipline, the student will receive a Bachelor ofScience in Electrical Engineering from College Park. In addition, other engineeringprograms may be pursued through the five-year UMCP plan for cooperative engineeringeducation which combines classroom theory with career-related work experience.Collaborative Distance Education ProgramThis unique program is founded on the premise of sharing resources among thecollaborating institutions and builds on the strengths of UMES, SU, and UMCP. Themodel combines the advantages of distance education and the conventional teachingenvironment and provides a unique means of offering quality engineering education toremote locations in the eastern shore of the state of Maryland
curriculum requires is the same as within their curriculum. This hascreated challenges in ensuring standard policies and procedures are followed for all studentswithin the curriculum.Establishing meaningful Senior Design ExperiencesAnother challenge that exists in creating a Construction Engineering program is to establishmeaningful Construction Engineering Senior Design Experiences. There were a multitude ofchallenges related to this aspect of the program. The first is working to overcome the mindsetand terminology used within the Civil faculty and alumni of Construction Management ratherthan Construction Engineering. The Civil Engineering – Construction exam on the ProfessionalEngineers licensing exam, defines design experiences related
AC 2009-1055: ROLE OF MANUFACTURING PROGRAMS IN ENGINEERINGWORKFORCE DEVELOPMENTVenkitaswamy Raju, State University of New York-Farmingdale The author is a Professor of Manufacturing Engineering Technology and the Director of Science and Technology Programs at the State University of New York – Farmingdale. His prior assignments include teaching and research at the Rochester Institute of Technology, Purdue School of Engineering Technology at the Indiana University – Purdue University, Indianapolis, and the Florida A&M University. He is a member of the Manufacturing Higher Education Task Force and the Accreditation Committee of the Society of Manufacturing Engineers. He is also on
important. The 1500-2000 students who startin engineering at Purdue from all over the world have great diversity in their pre-collegepreparations. In a wide variety of retention and grade assessment studies of admissionsinformation, pre-college course grades, test scores and other background factors, grades inbeginning level courses were identified as the critical elements related to student success[3,4,5,6,7]. A multifaceted placement program was developed to optimally place students inbeginning math, chemistry, physics, computer, and communications courses. A by-product ofthose background studies was the development of a Department of Freshman EngineeringStudent Information Form. The information provided another way to examine trends in
AC 2005-552: USING ELECTRONIC PORTFOLIOS IN A LARGE ENGINEERINGPROGRAMG.T. Adel,G.V. Loganathan,J. Muffo,Jr., O.Hayden Griffin,Kumar Mallikarjunan, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityM. L. Wolfe,Marie Paretti, Virginia TechT.M. Wildman,Tamara Knott, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityVinod Lohani, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Page 10.1407.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2005 Using Electronic Portfolios in a Large Engineering Program T. W. Knott, V. K. Lohani, G.V. Loganathan G. T. Adel, M.L. Wolfe, M. C. Paretti, K. Mallikarjunan
of chilly climate, hostile culture was predominantly expressed by women.However, extreme work pressure, mysterious career pathways, and isolation were reported byboth men and women; diving catch situations (where risk averse individuals are penalized in thepromotion and advancement structure) emerged only once, and seven new classifications ofnegative workplace conditions emerged related to type of work (boring, inconsistent,underutilized); nature of the work environment (job insecurity, oppressive physical environment,poor management); and work/life conflicts.IntroductionWhile many professional fields compete for talent, the battle for brain power is often particularlysevere in high-tech, among science, engineering, and technology
engineering may receive push-backfrom engineering programs; they argue engineering is applied by its nature so adding the word“applied” is not a good way to distinguish engineering and engineering technology.After reviewing all the information related to the name of the program, the faculty involvedsought the opinions of potential students, their parents, industrial partners, and the universityadministrators and finalized the name of the program as Electronics Engineering Technology(EET).Job market analysisThe objective of the new EET program is to create the workforce resources needed by industry.To justify the establishment of the new program, it is necessary to analyze the need of industry.The team first looked at the outlook for Electronics
95In June 2016, the director of DiSC and the Engineering Librarian met with the DAEN ProgramDirector to discuss the program and student needs, especially related to finding and accessingdata. This meeting helped us gain a better understanding of the program beyond what waspublished on its website, and we were made aware of their plans. Around this time, just asDAEN enrollment was increasing, DiSC witnessed an uptick in consultations with and lab visitsfrom students. Not surprisingly, this trend was in line with DAEN enrollment growth.We observed that DAEN students often had a different approach to data needs and data questionsthan students and researchers in other areas of study. Up to this point, DiSC data consultationswere predominantly with
GLOBALIZATION AND PRODUCT DESIGN CURRICULUM IN ENGINEERING PROGRAMS Devdas Shetty1 and Seong J. Choi2 1 Professor and Vernon D Roosa Chair holder University of Hartford, Connecticut 06117 (USA) 860- 768-4615; Shetty@hartford.edu 2. Professor of Mechanical Engineering, Korean University of Technology and Education, South KoreaAbstractToday products are manufactured and marketed globally and supply chains have dominated themanufacturing landscape. Most companies have much wider product ranges. These
issues addressed were tuition collection andfinancial aid matters, commonality in course objectives and expected student outcomes, equipmentneeds, computers and related infrastructure needs, recruitment and admission details, transferopportunities, provision of student services, quality control issues, library acquisitions, and use ofdistance learning technologies.Organizationally, the UK dean of the College of Engineering has ultimate responsibility for theextended campus engineering programs in Paducah. The director of the extended campus engineeringprograms reports to the dean and interfaces regularly with the associate dean for extended campusprograms, who serves as a liaison with the Lexington campus faculty and administration. The
KEEN Learning Outcomes 1. Effectively collaborate in a team setting 2. Apply critical & creative thinking to ambiguous problems 3. Construct & effectively communicate a customer "appropriate value proposition” 4. Persist through and learn from failure 5. Effectively manage projects through appropriate commercialization or final delivery process 6. Demonstrate voluntary social responsibility 7. Relate personal liberties and free enterprise to entrepreneurshipWith this benchmark of seven learning outcomes established KEEN worked with TTI to developspecific methods and frameworks to measure: 1- student demonstration of the seven KEENlearning outcomes, 2 - retention of students in undergraduate engineering programs, and
AC 2010-756: COMPETENCY-BASED ASSESSMENT OF ENGINEERINGTECHNOLOGY PROGRAM OUTCOMESCarmine Balascio, University of Delaware Carmine C. Balascio, Ph.D., P.E. is an Associate Professor in the Department of Bioresources Engineering at the University of Delaware. He earned bachelor’s degrees in Agricultural Engineering Technology and Mathematics from U.D. He earned an M.S. in Agricultural Engineering and a Ph.D. double major in Agricultural Engineering and Engineering Mechanics from Iowa State University. He teaches courses in surveying, soil mechanics, and storm-water management and has research interests in urban hydrology, water resources engineering, and assessment of student learning. He is
to measure outcomes and objectives,so necessary improvements can be implemented. The primary assessment of program outcomesare based on student work, such as assignments, exams and student portfolios related tocoursework. However, the use of alumni surveys and employer surveys as means of programobjectives assessment is qualitative evidence based on opinion. These data should be used assupportive evidence, and their use as primary or only means of assessment is discouraged. Thus,additional validations (internal or external) through other means are vital to the assessment ofprogram objectives. Some such measures, which have been used by the engineering technologyprograms at this institution, are discussed in this paper. Various templates used
unknown majors. In interpreting these results,note that the program was supported that summer in part by the National Science Foundationthrough its Summer Science Camps program for under-represented minorities, and all but one ofthe participants were from East Chicago and Gary. The number of engineering/math/sciencemajors is extremely high, providing evidence that the program is working.For the 50 participants who started in summer 1994, again all under-represented minorities, 37returned for a second summer and 31 for a third summer. In 1999 40 were located; the statedmajors are 12 in engineering, 3 in science, 4 in premed or pharmacy, and 3 in computers. Again,over half are in math/science related fields.12. SummaryThe Engineering and Science