Lab. Currently, he is a Professor of Chemistry at Pasadena City College and runs an undergraduate research program attempting to infuse active learning in conjunction with remotely accessible microscopes into K-12 and university science curriculum. He is actively in- volved in bring micro nanotechnology technician programs to Community College campuses being a part of the Remotely Accessible Instruments in Nanotechnology (RAIN) Network and the Nanotechnology Professional Development Partnership (NPDP) Program.Prof. Jillian L Blatti, Pasadena City College Jillian L. Blatti is a chemistry professor at Pasadena City College. She was part of the algae biotechnology community as a graduate student at the
from reports like The Engineer of 2020 that the successful practice ofengineering in today’s workplace requires the integration of a broad range of skills and abilitiesthat often go well beyond standard engineering curricula.2 This can include interpersonal skillssuch as teamwork, communication and persuasion, and business skills such as entrepreneurship,budget management, customer knowledge and marketing.The key question this pilot research hopes to answer is … how can engineering educators meetthe dual challenge of preparing students for the rigor of an engineering career whilesimultaneously providing relevant perspectives that prepare engineering graduates for successin the workplace? In this paper we refer to the teaching of core
of an audio podcast titled, “The Engineering StudentExperience,” whose purpose is to help current and future engineering students thrive in collegeand beyond through long-form conversations with practicing engineers, engineering faculty, andengineering students.In the United States, the demand for engineers is projected to grow at a rate three times greaterthan other fields, but degree production will not keep pace [1]. One possible factor is lack ofknowledge about the field of engineering. Although the Next Generation Science Standardsincorporate some fundamental engineering concepts in K-12 education [2], many teachers werenot exposed to the field of engineering during college, limiting their students’ exposure andaccess to this field [3
Deleuzian theory. Open Learning, 31(3), 219-232,2016.[7] A. Stewart, Rhizocurre: A Deleuzo-Guattarian approach to curriculum autobiography.International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 28(10), 1169-1185, 2015.[8] I. Semetsky, Deleuze as a philosopher of education: Affective knowledge/Effective learning.European Legacy, 14(4), 443-456, 2009.[9] C. Wolfgang, Productive uncertainties: Deleuze/Guattari, Feminist Theory and disciplinaryboundary crossings, Visual Art Research, 39(1), 52-69, 2013.[10] G. Poole, Academic disciplines: Homes or barricades? In C. Kreber (Ed.), The universityand its disciplines: Teaching and learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries (pp. 50-57). New York, NY: Routledge, 2009.[11] R. Riggio,& K. Saggi
through the 2008-2009 academic year. The comments of theauthors, representing both a librarian and an engineering faculty member, will provide a widerviewpoint that may inform planners at other institutions who are interested in expanding andintegrating information literacy instruction across their engineering curriculum.IntroductionThe need for information-literate engineering students continues to be addressed in the literatureas well as by the ABET standards regarding the ability to engage in life-long learning.1,2,3Freshmen/first-year students are often targeted as the logical beginning for an informationliteracy program4,5,6, but additional instruction over succeeding years is highly desirable to buildon that initial introduction to library
. Page 26.1735.2IntroductionThe drive to train more holistic engineers places an additional degree of complexity onengineering education, forcing educators to reach beyond just technical skills1. Additionally,many of the professional skills and attitudinal dispositions that are emphasized by engineeringprofessional societies are difficult to implement in engineering courses and to assess. Examplesof these skills come from the accreditation board of ABET’s criterion 3; “an understanding ofprofessional and ethical responsibility”, “the broad education necessary to understand the impactof engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context” 2. TheAmerican Society for Civil Engineering’s second edition Body of Knowledge
3.14 learning beyond the baccalaureate degree. (i) 9. Awareness of professional issues in engineering practice, 2.32 including ethical responsibility, the creative enterprise, and loyalty and commitment to the profession. (f) 10. Awareness of contemporary issues in engineering 2.29 practice, including economic, social, political, and environmental issues and global impact. (h,j) * Mapping of ME program outcomes to the ABET prescribed a through k outcomes.12 Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of Texas at Arlington Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering
Computing, Human-Centered Computing Division at Clemson University. Her research focuses on gaining a better understand of how students learn and apply STEM and computing content in their everyday lives. She is particularly inter- ested in the iterative design, refinement, and sustainability of curriculum and program development to support computing and STEM learning in formal and informal learning environments. She has designed and piloted a mobile application course for undergraduate non-CS majors through her participation last summer in the national pilot of the new AP CS Principles course. She is currently designing mobile application curriculum with MIT AP Inventor for 8th grade mathematics classes and middle
engineering education, pp. 1–17, 2010 Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1076158.pdf.[2] K. Mattern, J. Radunzel, and P. Westrick. “Development of STEM Readiness Benchmarks to Assist Educational and Career Decision Making.” ACT Research Report Series, 2015 (3). ACT, Inc., 2014[3] A. Sithole, E. T. Chiyaka, P. McCarthy, D.M. Mupinga, B.K. Bucklein, and J. Kibirige. “Student Attraction, Persistence and Retention in STEM Programs: Successes and Continuing Challenges”. Higher Education Studies, 7(1), pp.46-59, 2017[4] E. R. Kurban, and A. F. Cabrera. “Building readiness and intention towards STEM fields of study: using HSLS: 09 and SEM to examine this complex process
educational experience, it is important to understand the purpose ofeducation for the desired group of students. Dewey, in his book on experience and education,proposes that the purpose of education is to build the capacity of youth to take on futureresponsibilities and be successful in life, through the acquisition of organized bodies ofinformation and prepared forms of skill that are effectively transferred from the instructionalmaterial3. Some amount of contextualization is necessary to appropriately design anyeducational structure for a given setting. A growing body of research suggests that overallstudent achievement is likely to increase when students are able to learn at their own pace, with avariety of teaching styles and formats available to
the students felt more confident that they could complete a more complexrobot. Overall, student’s self-reported knowledge of servos, motors and using manufacturingequipment increased based on survey results. The activity described in this paper has had a largeimpact on overall manufacturing confidence and course outcome for students.IntroductionUndergraduate mechanical engineering education usually places a high priority on designexperience. This is partly driven by the requirements the Accreditation Board for Engineeringand Technology (ABET) sets for engineering degrees1 . ABET criteria (a) through (k) includedesign explicitly, especially through criteria (c) and (b). The ABET criteria also implicitlyinclude design through requirements for
weaknesses, providing a platform forcontinued improvement and discovery. Continued assessment of soft skills, aesthetic andtechnology aids in course and program evaluation as well as defining successful teaching styles.Soft skills can help with course consistency in rapidly changing technology and set a basefor continued course assessmentThe soft skills such as communication, teamwork, decision making, critical thinking andproblem solving skills are important concepts. They are so important that most of the TAC ofABET “a-k” criteria are “soft skills” [2]. A rapidly changing technology course can beevaluated through assessment measures by incorporating and evaluating specific soft skills.These soft skills can be put into practice and applied within
[6].Project-based learning (PBL) is a student-centered, socially interactive learning method thatrequires students to pursue a shared real-world goal with other participants through ongoingcommunication and knowledge sharing [7]. PBL helps students build higher-order thinking skillsand engages them in their own learning process as they try to solve ill-defined challenges thatcannot be solved by one person- they require the synthesis of skills and knowledge of the groupcollectively [8]. For example, Guyotte quoted a student who articulated how she perceived thebenefits of PBL, “this class was more like an experience than a class, and that’s how I feelcollege should be.” [1]. PBL has been shown to be a beneficial approach to motivate learning
, Maine. Page 26.388.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Concentrated Solar, Dual-Axis Tracking, Multi-junction GaAs Cell Photovoltaic System Design for Efficient Solar Energy Conversion AbstractInexpensive photovoltaic (PV) arrays make use of inherently inefficient mono-junction solarcells. Higher efficiency multi-junction PV cells are available but in small sizes and at muchhigher cost. One method of reducing the overall cost yet yielding a high efficiency is through aninexpensive concentrating
), 309-326.10. Redish, E. F., & Smith, K. A. (2008). “Looking beyond content: Skill development for engineers”.Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 295-307.11. Sohmer, R., Michaels, S., O’Connor, M. C., & Resnick, L. (2009). “Guided construction ofknowledge in the classroom”., 105-130. Schwarz, B., Dreyfus, T. Hershkowitz, R., (EDs),Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction, Routledge.12. Hestenes, D. (1997). “Modeling methodology for physics teachers”. In March AIP ConferenceProceedings, 935-958. IOP Institute of Physics Publishing LTD.13. Woods, D. R., Felder, R. M., Rugarcia, A., & Stice, J. E. (2000). “The Future of Engineeringeducation III. Developing critical skills”. Change, 4, 48-52.14. National Research
design course, in which thetendency is to solely utilize engineering software to obtain calculations rather than applyingrigorous mathematical techniques to validate their results. In this study, such predicament isaddressed by strengthening pedagogical practices through the incorporation of physical visualsupplements during lectures as early as the students’ first Mechanical Engineering course calledEngineering Mechanics, and thus enhance the physical understanding of fundamental concepts. Inparticular, three visual sensor-based supplements were created: crane model, Baltimore-bridgemodel, and a four-cylinder engine model. The uniqueness of such physical models is theincorporation of a real-time monitoring system which allows the students to
course-required student interactions.Evaluate - The designer assesses the objectives that they identified during the analysis phase. • Value - When considering value, the designer uses multiple methods to assess the efficacy of their teaching. This can be difficult with one shot instruction, but this feedback can be insightful in designing future instruction. • Evolution - The designer can look beyond student assessments and consider their own reflections as they seek to improve the course. Writing a short reflection after you teach, especially if you try something new, may be valuable in helping you to reflect and improve.Three Examples of INCLUSIVE ADDIE in Information Literacy Instruction in the
perspective. Entrepreneurs often have significant common characteristics asidentified by Donald Kuratko, in his book, “ Entrepreneurship, Theory, Practice and Process”notes that; “The characteristics of seeking opportunities, taking risks beyond security, andhaving the tenacity to push an idea through to reality combine into a special perspective thatpermeates entrepreneurs. [4]” Real world work environments provide concrete experiences forengineering students in an actual entrepreneurial work setting. This creates a unique opportunityto enrich their engineering. According to Blessing, Mekemson and Pistrui; “While someengineering schools are beginning to integrate entrepreneurship and business concepts into thecurriculum, many ABET –accredited
Public Research Universities,” Journal of College Counseling, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 6-20, 2014, doi: 10.1002/j.2161-1882.2014.00044.x.[19] E. Liptow, K. Chen, R. Parent, J. Duerr, and D. Henson “A Sense of Belonging: Creating a Community for First-generation, Underrepresented Groups and Minorities through an Engineering Student Success Course,” Proceedings of the 123rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, June 26-29, 2016, doi: 10.18260/p.26439.[20] D. Verdin, A. Godwin, A. Kirn, L. Benson, and G. Potvin, “Understanding How Engineering Identity and Belongingness Predict Grit for First-Generation College Students,” Proceedings of the Collaborative Network for Engineering and
Paper ID #39903Burnout: The Cost of Masking Neurodiversity in Graduate STEM ProgramsMs. Connie Mosher Syharat, University of Connecticut Connie Mosher Syharat is a Ph.D. student in Curriculum and Instruction and a Research Assistant at the University of Connecticut as a part of two neurodiversity-centered NSF-funded projects, Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (NSF:RED) ”Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engi- neering Innovation” and Innovations in Graduate Education (NSF:IGE) Encouraging the Participation of Neurodiverse Students in STEM Graduate Programs to Radically Enhance the Creativity of the
researchershave supported student success in prior efforts through a deeper understanding of students’abilities and experiences beyond the classroom. Thus, further exploring the impact of non-cognitive competencies on engineering student success has great potential to inform new andexisting strategies to further improve the way engineering is learned, taught, and practiced.References[1] W. E. Sedlacek and J. Adams-Gaston, “Predicting the academic success of student‐ athletes using SAT and noncognitive variables,” J. Couns. Dev., vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 724– 727, 1992.[2] R. C. Atkinson and S. Geiser, “Relfections on a century of college admission tests,” Educ. Res., vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 665–676, 2009.[3] M. Scheidt, R. Senkpeil, J. Chen
with applications through senior design education. Her research focuses on teaching systems thinking and sustainable design in team-based engineering design courses. Mengyu Li is an Instructional Assistant Professor in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering (ISE) at the University of Florida (UF). She teaches numerous undergraduate and graduate level ISE courses, including: Supply Chain Management, Senior Design Project, Systems Design, and Systems Architecture. She has also re- ceived the UF Rising Star Award in 2021 for her commitment to ongoing educational improvements and excellence. Prior to her current position, Mengyu worked as a product developer at a manufacturing company, where she was
and Innovation Management graduate program. Previously, Meg served as the Director of the Career & Corporate Connection’s office at the Smeal College of Business at Penn State University. Meg is a board certified coach with experience in developing students’ leadership and professional competencies through teaching and one-on-one coach- ing. She is most interested in developing student competencies in leadership to impact their successful transition to the workplace and career success.Dr. Dena Lang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Lang is currently the Associate Director of the Engineering Leadership Research Program at Penn State University. She holds a BS in Mechanical Engineering from West
produce a software environment calledROBOLAB®, based on National Instruments’s product LabVIEW®. Over the last four yearsthe FIRST LEGO League (FLL) robotics competition organized for middle school childrenhas grown from 200 to 30,000 students in Europe and the USA - all of whom have gainedengineering design and programming skills working on teams. These children will enteruniversities within a few short years with a solid foundation of computer applications inengineering systems. The educational challenge will be to provide a compelling learningexperience for these first-year students as well as for those who have had no opportunity toperform engineering tasks in K-12 classes. In this paper we propose that the LEGO hardware/software
. Joshua D. Summers, Clemson University American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Leadership and communication network identification and analysis with Dependency Structure Matrices in student design teamsAbstractA case study is presented that explores informal leadership emergence within capstone studentdesign teams. The study focused on a ten-person, multi-university, multi-disciplinary, two-semester design project focused on unmanned aircraft solution design and build. This study usesa sociometric survey instrument to determine perceived leadership and communicationrelationships between team members. These relationships are modeled through dependencystructure
AC 2007-1535: LEARN AND SERVE – DESIGN PROJECTS FOR THECOMMUNITYMariappan Jawaharlal, California State Polytechnic University-Pomona Dr. Mariappan “Jawa” Jawaharlal is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at California State Polytechnic University (Cal Poly Pomona). Before joining Cal Poly Pomona, Dr. Jawaharlal founded and developed APlusStudent.com, Inc., an online supplemental education company focusing on K-12 math. He also served as a faculty at Rowan University, NJ and General Motors Institute (renamed as Kettering University), MI. Dr. Jawaharlal is recognized as an outstanding educator for his innovative and engaging teaching pedagogy.Amir Rezaei, California State Polytechnic
reducesstudent engagement, understanding, and retention in STEM fields [15]. Active learningtechniques, including class discussion and problem-solving, have been shown to boost studentunderstanding of STEM concepts beyond traditional lecture [16]. However, some of these so-called “active learning” interventions still were fairly low-involvement techniques, such as usinga personal response system or completing a worksheet [16]. As mentioned above, there has beena push for greater student involvement in their own learning through flipped classrooms [6], [7]and a team-based focus [8], [9]. Our focus is on co-creation, a learning technique that has takendifferent forms depending on its application. Sometimes, co-creation is an alternative term for“student
research project and then we present ananalysis of our qualitative data through the lens of the conceptual framework and then use fourcase studies to bring the findings to life. We close with a discussion of the findings and someimplications for practice in both universities and the workplace.Literature ReviewThe scholarly field of engineering leadership is relatively new, and much existing researchfocuses on university-based programs and experiences. This literature review builds on threeother bodies of research: (1) General theories of engineering leadership in the workplace acrossall career stages; (2) Research on leadership in the hiring and recruitment of early careerengineers; (3) Literature on the socialization and workplace adjustment of
been to the implicit claim that holistic service presupposes professional autonomy. Engineers have tended to work, after all, as employees in large organizations. Anglo-‐American scholars have struggled with the engineers’ acceptance of private industry as an appropriate venue for their work. David Noble put the issue most starkly by characterizing the normative holism of engineering service through private industry as essentially false consciousness. Engineers are a “domesticated breed,” he claimed. “However firmly [they] convinced themselves that they served the interests of society as a whole, they in reality served only the dominant class in
their counterparts, recognizing thecomplexity that such problems can entail beyond the scope of what they have directlyexperienced through this intervention.Perceptions of engineering and the project:The intervention generally did not end up causing a significant increase in student interest inusing engineering to solve real-world problems/improving the quality of life in Africa/their homecountry/community. This could be because specific links from the project to other potentialapplications were not provided, making the extension of these technical skills to other locally-relevant problems weak. There was, however, an increase in this response with small effect sizefor those students who did not have any prior design-build experience. This