post-graduation. In each case, wewill be taking a sequential mixed-methods approach consisting of surveys followed byinterviews. The five research questions are: (1) What professional competencies do alumniidentify as most developed through their EWB-USA experiences as undergraduates? (2) What isthe nature of how undergraduate participation in EWB-USA may bridge the experiences offormal post-secondary engineering education and professional practice? (3) How do variations inthe nature of involvement with and/or the structure of EWB-USA programs impact the aboveelements? (4) How are Alumni of EWB-USA perceived by other members of industry, relativeto their peers? (5) How do the above elements vary between female versus male students
]. However, the data reveal systemic barriers that extend beyond individual adaptability.Teachers’ reliance on self-directed learning to navigate AI tools or hybrid assessmentsunderscores a gap between policy aspirations and on-the-ground support. While national policiesadvocate for STEM integration[15], the absence of localized professional developmentframeworks leaves teachers ill-equipped to implement interdisciplinary pedagogies[8]. Thismisalignment mirrors findings from De Neve and Devos (2017), which argue that teacherautonomy without structured collaboration risks fragmented innovation[5]. The strategicalignment of projects with government priorities, while securing resources, inadvertently narrowsthe scope of student inquiry, a dilemma
between our research team and a local library, whichhosted the sessions in its well-equipped maker space. This partnership offered students access totools, materials, and resources that supported hands-on engineering exploration. The library’scommunity-focused environment also provided an inviting space where students couldcollaborate, share ideas, and engage in creative problem-solving. During each session, studentswere introduced to foundational engineering concepts through tasks that combined creativity,technical skills, and critical thinking. The activities included: ● Makey-Makey Piano: Students used Makey-Makey kits to create a piano using everyday objects like bananas or aluminum foil. This task introduced them to basic circuits and
value it inrelation to their future [35], [36]. Engineering interest typically focuses on the emotional orfeelings aspect of interest and includes whether or not a student likes or enjoys the subject [7],[24]. This interest is initiated through a situational interaction between a person and momentary,environmental stimuli. This interest may or may not persist over time and develop into anindividual interest. An individual interest is an interest that exists separate from the initiatingstimuli and describes an abiding desire to engage with the content over time [35]. For this work,engineering and disciplinary interests are interpreted as an established, individual interest sinceparticipants made decisions extending beyond a situational
to explain theresearch process and the impact of research in society.Background and MotivationUndergraduate research (UGR) is a high-impact practice in undergraduate education, with someof the benefits of UGR include helping students to understand their career options in science andengineering, including gaining a greater understanding of the many roles needed in the sciences[1], developing a professional identity within those roles [1]–[3], understanding the balancebetween independent work and collaboration [4], and helping students to set their own careergoals [5]. With respect to furthering their education, UGR has been shown to help students gainresilience to persist through failure [3], [6], improve their research practices and
Institute. (n.d.) Implicit bias. Retrieve from .https://perception.org/research/implicit-bias/https://perception.org/research/implicit-bias/Sentell, W. (2019 August 3). Louisiana public schools still struggle in national rankings; 'Lookat where we started. The Advocate.https://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/politics/elections/article_e1ca45a8-b2e5-11e9-a5a6-1b94dfeccfff.html.Siller, T. R., Rosales, A., Haines, J., & Benally, A. (2009). Development of UndergraduateStudents' Professional Skills. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education andPractice 135(3), 102-108.Stephens, C., & Friesen, K. L. (2015). Building Piece by Piece: Teaching EngineeringLeadership through Integrated Modules. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual
rely on the growth of technology to improve their researchcapabilities and further their findings within studies. Qualitative research fields, specifically, havebenefitted from growing technology, especially relating data collection (e.g. audio/visualrecordings, transcription services) and analysis (e.g. statistical software packages, word processingtechnology) [1]. However, an area that is underutilized by qualitative researchers is artificialintelligence (AI). AI and its sub-fields present a space for qualitative researchers to build uponexisting research to enhance future studies through computational methods and modeling. In thispaper we will focus on the potential for agent-based modeling (ABM), one such sub-field of AI,to contribute to
becauseit provides an educational medium students find both interesting and exciting [6]. From aSTEM perspective, robotics are also quite diverse, meaning students must generally learnabout topics from various branches of STEM in order to build a successful robot. In factall four subjects (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) play a critical role[7], for example in many Lego Mindstorm applications math is used in the programmingto calculate angles to move the robots, and various principles of science are used forunderstanding thrust, velocity, amplitude, acceleration, and much more), making roboticsvaluable beyond their initial shelf appeal. Additionally, robotics programs have alsoproven to be effective in peaking student interest in
Tech Cheryl Carrico is a research faculty member for Virginia Tech. Her current research focus relates to STEM career pathways (K-12 through early career) and conceptual understanding of core engineering principles. Dr. Carrico owns a research and consulting company specializing in research evaluations and industry consulting. Dr. Carrico received her B.S. in chemical engineering from Virginia Tech, Masters of Engineering from North Carolina State University, MBA from King University, and PhD in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Dr. Carrico is a certified project management professional (PMP) and licensed professional engineer (P.E.).Dr. Veronica van Montfrans Postdoctoral Associate in the Department of
the GIS softwarefrom ESRI, the industry standard ArcGIS 9.3. This became official in March 2009 and thelicense is valid through 2014. This is the result of an agreement between Women in Technology,the Hawaii Department of Education and ESRI, and provides an incredible opportunity toschools to ramp up their use of geospatial technologies.Hawaii is the first state in the nation to have statewide GIS access from K -16, and leads thenation in student access to GIS software. Women in Technology is the point of distribution forthe software through: http://www.womenintech.com/GISDistributionCenter/ .ConclusionThe modern engineering industry needs a workforce skilled in geospatial technologies. It hasbeen the work of Women in Technology to help
engage in what was labeled as“precursors to engineering behavior”.1-3 These precursors include asking questions/stating goals,explanations, construction, problem solving and evaluating design.4 However, as “children” growup and enter undergraduate engineering courses, many of these behaviors are now absent, untildeveloped again through the undergraduate engineering curriculum and professional workexperience.5Recently, several design process models have been developed for younger children, includingthose put forth by the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)6, the PBS television showDesign Squad 7 and the Museum of Science in Boston’s Engineering is Elementary curriculum8 (toname a few). Within NGSS, engineering design is integrated throughout
process.AcknowledgementsFirst, we would like to thank Susan Arnold-Christian, assistant director for the Center for theEnhancement of Enginering Diversity (CEED), for her support of this project. In particular, wethank her for discussing each step in the benchmarking process with the lead author in detail. Wewould also like to thank Dr. Eileen Van Aken of the Virginia Tech Department of Industrial &Systems Engineering for her support during the initial phase of this study.References1. A. T. Jeffers, A. G. Safferman and S. I. Safferman, Understanding K-12 engineering outreach programs, Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice, 130(2), 2004, pp. 95-108.2. J. F. Sullivan, S. E. Davis, J. L. Degrazia and D. W. Carlson, Beyond
engineering projects through presentations or the observation ofothers performing research. This approach may give the impression that teachers are capable ofdeveloping curricular materials, but only engineers are capable of solving authentic engineeringproblems. This “look but don’t touch” model potentially only reinforces the belief, “if I can’t dothis, my students sure can’t.” With this RET model, participants are likely to gain a limitedperspective on authentic engineering practices and less likely to able to convey to their studentswhat engineers actually do.Figure 1: Models of RET sitesWe believe that our RET site has been successful because we have focused on directly linkingthe teachers’ summer engineering research experience with their K-12
related career fields.Role of pre-college engineering outreach interventionsPre-college engineering outreach interventions are vital to the maintenance of the engineeringpipeline and to the continued success of the engineering profession as a whole. In addition tocombating the decline in the number of U.S. engineers, these programs seek not only to increaseengineering enrollment but also to diversify the field of engineering6. To meet these objectives,outreach programs introduce K-12 students to engineering through fun and engaging, hands-onactivities and interactions with engineers, scientists, and students in engineering.At The Ohio State University (OSU), pre-college engineering outreach interventions play animportant role in attracting women
Conceptual Framework for Engineering Design Experiences in High SchoolAbstractThe infusion of engineering design into high school settings can help develop students’ criticalthinking skills and expose them to engineering careers at an early age. However, since theadvent of engineering design in pre-college milieus, researchers, educators, and curriculumdevelopers alike have been brooding over ways to introduce this equivocal subject into the k-12realm. Due to its interdisciplinary nature engineering design has also struggled to find a home inclassroom settings moving between technology education, to science classrooms and eveninformal learning environments. These factors considered it is our belief that the science
academic achievement. Seligman, considered oneof the founding fathers of Positive Psychology, has found that the skills to build personalstrengths differ from those that mitigate weaknesses (Seligman, 2013). Under this premise,interventions that buffer against student failure differ from those that support students to buildthe range of cognitive and personal outcomes valued in engineering.With the goal of broadening success metrics for undergraduate engineering students beyond justacademic competencies, we define and operationalize “engineering thriving” as a series ofcompetencies relevant to engineering student success and optimal functioning. We operationalizeengineering thriving through a novel conceptual framework that includes more
Paper ID #23088Engagement in Practice: Infusing the STEM Pipeline Through CommunityEngaged LearningSara Jordan-Bloch, Clayman Institute for Gender Research at Stanford University Sara Jordan-Bloch is a sociologist and the Director of Leadership Research and Programs at the Clayman Institute for Gender Research at Stanford University. She is a core team member of the Voice & Influence program, designed to help men and women be as effective as possible and create workplaces where all people can thrive. Jordan-Bloch also leads the Seeds of Change initiative, which aims to provide young women and girls with frameworks
Page 11.396.4 Active participation of youth is essential to reenergizing and sustaining the civic spirit of communities. Through skill development in the areas of collaboration and leadership, and the application of these capacities to meaningful roles in community, youth can play a fundamental role in addressing the social issues that are destined to impact their lives and those of future generations.9Third, InnoWorks is structured on the belief that college-age mentors are ideal role modelsbecause of their similarities in age and experience with the middle-school students. Theirknowledge of and passion for science and engineering can provide InnoWorks youth withpositive influences throughout and beyond the program.The national call for
% expected to spend 3-6 hours, 5%expected to spend 6-12 hours, and 5% were uncertain about the exact time commitment required.The analysis of the faculty survey results suggests that, despite faculty members’ awareness ofthe DEI concepts and general willingness to implement DEI activities in the classroom, we donot observe strong evidence of concrete actions taken in DEI training and actual DEI practices inthe classroom, as well as a time commitment beyond three hours to prepare and carry out DEIpractices.We have observed that faculty members who participated in DEI workshops are slightly moreinclined to incorporate DEI activities in their courses (8 out of 10) than those who did notparticipate in such workshops (7 out of 9). Additionally, faculty
impact adolescents’ successfulpathways to computing experiences, curricula, and professions and the relationship betweengender and race with regards to those variables.7 Thus, this paper reports on residential summercomputing camps, focusing on curricular implementation as well as preliminary analyses ofsurvey data collected from middle and high school students addressing what drew them to applyfor and attend a computer camp as well as what kinds of courses and tools will retain theirinterest and curiosity beyond an extracurricular summer experience.Camp OverviewIn 2015, 80 out of 154 applicants were invited to attend the camps. 18 middle school (MS) boys,21 high school (HS) boys, 20 middle school (MS) girls, and 18 high school (HS) girls (77
identifycommunity needs and community-driven solutions [2-5]. It goes beyond documentaryphotography, a method rooted in systems of oppression, by providing participants the ability tonarrate their own experiences and co-construct knowledge [6-9].Related WorkPrior work by Waisome et al. explored the experiences of minoritized engineering undergraduatestudents at a predominantly white institution through photovoice. The work identified sixcommon themes among students: (1) finding comfort, (2) building community, (3) fitting in, (4)experiencing frustration, (5) overcoming imposter syndrome, and (6) valuing mentorship [10].Prior work by Henderson et al. across several studies has examined engineering identity, as wellas facilitators and barriers to student
students. The Cyber Discovery model goes beyond project-based curricula that simply instructs teachers on how to deliver a project. Rather, the modelutilizes project-driven curricula that empowers teachers with the fundamentals to teach STEMand encourages the use of projects to drive the fundamentals home. These lessons and the otherskills developed through the program can later be applied in the classroom. High Schoolteachers are encouraged to provide feedback throughout this process, as they know theirstudents’ capabilities and interests best.Additionally, workshops serve as an opportunity for the university faculty and the high schoolteachers to collaborate and to develop a mentoring relationship. The mutual respect and spirit ofcollaboration
Integrated STEM Instructional Leadership (PreK-6) Post-Baccalaureate Certificate Program at TU. She currently serves as the Chair of the Pre-College Engineering Education Division of ASEE, and is a member of the ASEE Board of Directors Committee on P12 Engineering Education.Ms. Elizabeth A. Parry, North Carolina State University Elizabeth (Liz) Parry Elizabeth Parry is an engineer and consultant in K-12 Integrated STEM through Engineering Curriculum, Coaching and Professional Development and a Coordinator and Instructor of Introduction to Engineering at the College of Engineering at North Carolina State University. For the past sixteen years, she has worked extensively with students from kindergarten to graduate school
Engineering Education (IACEE) Council and serves as the Vice President for Products and Services on the IACEE Executive Committee. Additionally, she is a member of the National University Telecommunications Network (NUTN) Advisory Board.Mr. Edward G. Borbely, University of MichiganDr. Nelson C. Baker, Georgia Institute of Technology Page 25.1093.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Quality Standards for Continuing Professional Development Organizations and Quality Management through Self-Assessment and BenchmarkingAbstractCPD administrators
teachers to theproject. Next, the Dean of Undergraduate Academics provided an introduction to NYU-Poly.Moreover, the director of an outreach center discussed NYU-Poly’s diverse array of educationaland outreach activities geared towards the K-12 educators. Finally, an Associate Dean ofUndergraduate Admissions discussed various opportunities for teachers to enhance theirstudents’ educational experiences through lab tours, college credits, etc. Following the Welcome Breakfast, the teachers were introduced to the participatingengineering research labs and lab safety. In addition, experimental demonstrations of a variety ofeducational and research projects were given to stimulate teachers’ interest in the RET summerworkshop. Finally, teachers
University, a mid-size Mid-Atlantic public university, we set out to foster anEntrepreneurial Mindset in our first-year engineering students by modifying the ProductArchaeology framework that was first developed by K. Lewis, et al. [1]. In our implementation,we allowed student teams to choose from a bank of products and guided them through the fourphases of product archaeology (preparation, excavation, evaluation, and explanation). For theevaluation phase, each team developed and executed three or more qualitative experiments fortheir product. At the conclusion of the project, students wrote a report that addressed the fourphases of product archaeology, including the results of their quantitative experiments. Eachreport was graded using an
takes the form of evidence-based reasoning (as opposed to being rooted inopinion or without reference to evidence). The recently published Framework for K-12 ScienceEducation: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas identified eight key practices inscience and engineering.3 One of those, “Engaging in Argument from Evidence,” is described asfollows for engineering: In engineering, reasoning and argument are essential for finding the best solution to a problem. At an early design stage, competing ideas must be compared (and possibly combined) to achieve an initial design, and the choices are made through argumentation
gaps in knowledgebetween science, technology, engineering, and math is a desire most teachers have. Usingunique ways to introduce information to their students through labs, and demonstrations, is a taskproviding teachers the opportunity to utilize their creativity. This demonstration is an example ofways in which teachers assists their students in making connections between advances in STEMand everyday life activities. This demonstration will also help students understand theimportance of the collaboration between different disciplines. The technique discussed in thispaper is one that is utilized by scientists and engineers to design new materials with newfunctionality that assists doctors in repairing tissue in the human body. One
AC 2008-2810: EVALUATING A COMPREHENSIVE MIDDLE SCHOOLOUTREACH PROGRAM—THE RESULTSJuanita Jo Matkins, College of William and Mary Juanita Jo Matkins is an Assistant Professor of Science Education at the College of William and Mary. She was a K-12 teacher for 18 years, and the Virginia recipient of the 1995 Presidential Award for Excellence in Secondary Science Teaching. She has written and published several papers and reports on various issues in teacher education, including assessment, gender and multicultural issues in science education.John A. McLaughlin, McLauglin Associates John McLaughlin is a senior consultant in strategic planning, performance measurement, and program
Paper ID #43141Addressing Societal Challenges through Graduate-level Community-engagedDesign Projects (Traditional Research Paper) ˜ George Mason UniversityDr. Samuel A Acuna, Samuel Acu˜na is a research professor in the Department of Bioengineering at George Mason University. He is a biomechanical engineer interested in rehabilitation engineering and human-centered product design. He develops new technologies to address movement disorders that develop after injury, such as stroke, amputation, or traumatic brain injury. He is particularly interested in solving engineering problems for the hospital &