andattribute a sense of belonging to being trusted as a knowledgeable person. Although Simoneacknowledged how she did not feel invisible in the interdisciplinary engineering program, sheactively chose to remain at the peripheral of the program. This work highlights the need to improvedisciplinary cultures where certain students cannot fall under the radar due to the biases of facultyand students to recognize the value of their knowledge and p erspectives in engineering classrooms.IntroductionAs the nature of engineering work explicitly calls for interdisciplinary practices, interdisciplinaryfields and programs have emerged to support the growing demand. Although interdisciplinarity isa critical approach to solving complex problems and is discussed
] in engineering leadership, and certificates [7,8,9] tosupplemental programs [10,11]. A survey of best practices on engineering leadershipeducation from over 40 colleges by Paul & Falls [12] reveal five themes that emerge as thefundamental goal of engineering leadership education programs: effective leadership,innovation and technology, independent learning, experiential learning, and systemsthinking. The analysis of the competencies developed found a diverse spread across theprograms. Overall, six key competencies emerged: communication, innovation, creativity,execution, personal drive, and teamwork. Classen, Reeve, Rottmann & Sacks [13]undertook a survey of North American universities and were able to categorize allengineering
, • communication skills, • the application of knowledge • beliefs/values, • leadership skills, from other fields to solve • cultural diversity, • working in teams, engineering problems, • creativity, • project management, • defining a design problem, • workforce trends, • cultural context of and • emerging technologies, engineering solutions, • generating solutions to an • practical use of theories, • the impact of non- engineering problem. engineering fields,The survey then asked the students to evaluate the emphasis and impact that the introductorydesign course alone had
Park Evaluators, an American Evaluation Association affiliate organization and is a member of the Amer- ican Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Extension Services Consultant for the National Center for Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science departments on diversifying their under- graduate student population. Dr. Brawner previously served as principal evaluator of the NSF-sponsored SUCCEED Coalition. She remains an active researcher with MIDFIELD, studying gender issues, trans- fers, and matriculation models in engineering.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering
collected. My initial process of sorting information into tables also helped me seesimilarities and differences among individual student’s experiences and formulate initial ideasfor presenting my findings. My subsequent passes through the data involved a cyclic process of reviewing the data, memoingabout what I saw, moving forward with my analysis, and writing up portions of the findingsbefore circling back around to reviewing and memoing as shown in Figure 3. Each step of thisprocess often emerged out of necessity as I began writing my dissertation. As I first startedwriting, I regularly returned to my data tables, field notes, and audio recordings to familiarizemyself with the context I was writing about (Procedural Validation, Process
Paper ID #36513Project–Based Learning: Piezoelectric Energy WheelBala Maheswaran (Professor) Bala Maheswaran is currently a senior faculty in the College of Engineering, Northeastern University. He has contributed and authored over one hundred publications consisting of original research and education-related papers, and conference proceedings. He has over twenty years of experience in teaching at Northeastern University. He is the Chair of the Engineering Physics Division, ASEE, Chair and executive board member, ASEE NE Section; the co-chair of TASME Conference (Technological Advances in Science, Medicine and
Paper ID #37664Work In Progress: Evolution of A Near-Peer Co-InstructionalModel for A Large-Enrollment First-Year EngineeringCourseHaritha Malladi (Assistant Professor and Director of First-Year Engineering) Haritha Malladi is an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering and the Director of First-Year Engineering at the University of Delaware. She received her Bachelor of Technology degree in Civil Engineering from National Institute of Technology, Warangal, India, and her MS and PhD in Civil Engineering from North Carolina State University. She is a teacher-scholar working in the intersection of
manner, allowing freer responses and more meaningful exploration of thetopics, as they are safely confined within a game construct. This may also more closelyapproach the engineering job conditions in which ethical reasoning is not the primary goal andso must emerge, as it would in the CAH game, in context of other goals. This approach alsoallows us to evaluate the same scenarios as described in the EERI instrument in a differentcontext. For an initial version of the game, the authors have collaboratively designed the cardsbased on a variety of sources, including historical, contemporary, and fictional cases orexamples. This initial version of the game has been play-tested with small groups of engineeringstudents in an informal setting (a
the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She received her B.S. in General Engineering from Swarthmore College, M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from MIT and Ph.D. in Medical Engineering from the Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology. Her research focuses on the computational and experimental study of fluid behavior within mammalian biology and effects on biomechanical properties of vascular tissues. Dr. Chesler teaches biofluid dynamics at the undergraduate and graduate levels. Page 14.361.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Considering Mathematical Approach
andprototyping of parts and assemblies Both small business and privately generated product ideasare turned over to Engineering Technology and Technical Graphics students for design, drawing,and prototyping.Beneficial and detrimental factors to industrial and educational cooperation are discussed.Significant increases in standardized test scores and design skills were noted in some cases afterthe cooperative development of these designs and prototypes. Various uses for product designand prototyping partnerships in education and industry are examined and their benefits tostudents, educators, administrators, and industry are examined. Individual case studies areexamined with the following general results: · Successful economic products are rare
of chilly climate, hostile culture was predominantly expressed by women.However, extreme work pressure, mysterious career pathways, and isolation were reported byboth men and women; diving catch situations (where risk averse individuals are penalized in thepromotion and advancement structure) emerged only once, and seven new classifications ofnegative workplace conditions emerged related to type of work (boring, inconsistent,underutilized); nature of the work environment (job insecurity, oppressive physical environment,poor management); and work/life conflicts.IntroductionWhile many professional fields compete for talent, the battle for brain power is often particularlysevere in high-tech, among science, engineering, and technology
opportunities, the excitement of working on novel technologies, projects,and products, and involvement in developing large, complex projects played roles in affirmingself-efficacy and sometimes goal progress in a career [19], [20], [25]. One participant expressed,“I just love to see the things that we create... it’s really nice to drive past or walk past a previousjob.” [19, p. 7]. This intrinsic affirmation shaped outcome expectations, and engineersappreciated equitable formal and informal recognition, such as bonuses, praise, or growingresponsibility, to reinforce their sense of impact and professional value [25], [19].As careers continued, a transparent, accessible and equitable structured career progressionreduced uncertainty and enhanced retention
consulting firm specializing in program and project evaluation and training in evaluation capacity building. She has been an external consultant for nearly 30 years serving businesses, government organizations, community-based organizations, and colleges and universities across the nation. In addition, Gwen has worked in executive leadership capacities as state board chair of the Indiana Minority Health Coalition (IMHC), Executive Assistant to two college/university presidents (Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology (RHIT) and Old Dominion University (ODU)), and commissioner on the Indiana Commission for Higher Education (ICHE). As the Director of Assessment at RHIT, she has worked with faculty in developing and creating
3.45 0.96 INDEPENDENT VARIABLES Program Emphases on Core Engineering Thinking2 (Alpha = .85) Generating and evaluating ideas about how to solve an engineering 3.80 0.89 problem Defining a design problem 3.78 0.93 Emerging engineering technologies 3.50 1.04 Creativity and innovation 3.72 1.03 How theories are used in engineering practice
problem 3.78 0.93 Emerging engineering technologies 3.50 1.04 Creativity and innovation 3.72 1.03 How theories are used in engineering practice 3.72 1.00 Program Emphases on Broad and Systems Perspectives2 (Alpha = .84) Understanding how non-engineering fields can help solve engineering 2.61 1.05 problems Applying knowledge
Paper ID #16545Learning Out Loud (LOL): How Comics Can Develop the Communicationand Critical Thinking Abilities of Engineering StudentsDr. Caitlin Donahue Wylie, University of Virginia Caitlin Wylie is an assistant professor of Science, Technology and Society in the University of Virginia’s School of Engineering and Applied Science.Dr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Engineering & Society Department of the School of Engineering and Applied Science. She is a past chair of the Liberal Educa- tion/Engineering & Society Division
(EE) for meeting therequirements of the companies operating within the international economy. The work isdriven by the fundamental changes produced by the economic and cultural effects ofglobalization.At the beginning of the 21st century, most of the world is moving rapidly towards a global,market-oriented, real-time economy. This transition has led to a dramatically rising level ofknow-how and use of technology. Driven by continuing market liberalization, the transitioncontinues at an accelerating rate.The increasing global competition between companies forces the routine operations (e.g.manufacturing) to be transferred to countries with low manpower costs. It also forcescompanies to adopt modern ICT (Information and Communications
degrees are in Metallurgical Engineering from Michigan Technological University and his Ph.D. is in Educational Psychology from the University of Minnesota. He has co-written eight books including Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity; Strategies for energizing large classes: From small groups to learning communities; and Teamwork and project management, 3rd Ed.Reed Stevens, University of Washington REED STEVENS is an Associate Professor in the College of Education at the University of Washington. He specializes in ethnographic and comparative approaches to studying how people learn, especially in disciplines related to mathematics, science
Paper ID #27738Instruction Design of a Mechatronics Course Based on Closed-loop 7E ModelRefined with DBR MethodDr. S. M. Mizanoor Rahman, University of West Florida Mizanoor Rahman received Ph.D. and M.Sc. degrees in Systems Engineering and Mechanical Engineer- ing respectively from Mie University at Tsu, Japan. He then worked as a research fellow at the National University of Singapore (NUS) and Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore, a researcher at Vrije University of Brussels (VUB), Belgium, and a postdoctoral associate at Clemson University, SC, USA, and New York University (NYU), NY, USA. During his
NPMs’ discussions withCiara. We coded each NPM turn for whether it elicited or probed Ciara with respect to logistics,marginalization, or disinterest. Eliciting and probing were two discussion moves that we usedfrom literature on eliciting student knowledge [38]. Here, eliciting suggests that the NPM asks aquestion that has not been addressed by Ciara so far, whereas probing suggests that Ciara sharessome information about a topic that the NPM follows-up on through additional questioning.We used subcodes to further describe how NPMs elicited or probed about logistics and for thesupportive statements they used. Unlike a priori codes for logistics, marginalization, and interest,these subcodes were emergent in our analysis. Where relevant, we
disciplines, but rather require aninterdisciplinary approach. Originally conceptualized by Rittel & Webber [2], wicked problemsare problems with multiple stakeholders and competing demands, which often contain ethical,social, political, or environmental dimensions. They are challenging to frame and scope, giventhe lack of an obvious “stopping point” when the problem to solution process is complete.Wicked problems reflect pressing societal issues like climate change, transportation and urbandevelopment, healthcare and technological unemployment – problems that frequently engage thetechnical expertise of engineers but require a breadth of disciplinary knowledge outside ofengineering as well, requiring strong collaborative skills and an intellectual
problem. Emerging engineering technologies. Defining a design problem. Creativity and innovation. Solving problems from real clients (industry, government, etc.). Producing a product (prototype, program, simulation, etc.). Systems thinking.A 1: Little/no emphasis; 2: Slight; 3: Moderate; 4: Strong; 5: Very strongTable 5.Student learning outcome scales related to interdisciplinarity. Interdisciplinary Skills (alpha=.80) Do you agree or disagree?A I value reading about topics outside of engineering. I enjoy thinking about how different fields approach the same problem in different ways. Not all engineering problems have purely technical solutions
by percentages (Likert scale) for the statement ‘I feel the project is beingdelivered in a way that supports my learning, given restrictions’Open-text comments for remote-learning model: ➢ While I highly enjoyed this course, the way information is provided to us could be clearer and easier to follow, because I was not sure if my group has all the information needed for the problem, and sometimes the TA-s weren't sure either.8 ➢ There should have been more emphasis on how we are graded and the importance of different features. It is also unfair to mark students upon uses of different technology such as which software to use to record as this was not specified, and things like microphones as these are not
Paper ID #25370Ethical Reasoning in First-Year Engineering DesignMr. Amir Hedayati Mehdiabadi, University of New Mexico Amir Hedayati is an Assistant Professor at Organization, Information & Learning Sciences program at College of University Libraries & Learning Sciences at University of New Mexico. He received a Ph.D. in Human Resource Development from University of Illinois. He has a B.S. degree in Computer Engineering from Sharif University of Technology and an M.B.A. degree from University of Tehran. He has presented his research in past years at multiple conferences including American Society for Engineering
as its implications for future instructional development and engineeringeducation practice. 2. Literature ReviewTwo areas of literature are relevant to this study: instructional development in engineering; andinstructional development during the pandemic.2.1 Instructional Development in engineeringThe need for instructional development in engineering has become increasingly important overthe past two decades [5]. This has been driven by several factors, including outcomes-basedaccreditation of engineering programs, changing demographics and attributes of engineeringstudents, advances in instructional technology and cognitive science, and the increased emphasison scholarship of teaching and learning in engineering education [6].On
formingagain.Developing effective global leadership skills is a challenge for even the most experiencedengineering managers. However, offering proper (in)formal education in the area of globalengineering management can significantly help train emerging and current leaders and canenable them to identify and overcome the barriers in a global team. This paper takes a look atkey concepts that must be taught to and understood by managers seeking success in globalmarkets. The material presented in this paper can be formally integrated as part of a core coursein a MBA global management program or can be offered as an elective towards anundergraduate business management degree. Informally, it can be used as part of an executivecoaching program and/or an internal
collaborative online platforms), emerging economies development and the role of IT/communications technology, and methodologies for measurement and assessment frameworks American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Bringing Social Justice Rhetoric and Deliberation into the Engineering Writing Classroom: the case of Amazon’s “cubicle activists” Elizabeth Fife, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Technical Communication Practice, ViterbiSchool of Engineering, Engineering in Society Program, University of Southern CaliforniaAbstractThe tech industry has seen a growth in employee protest activity against both internal policies forworkers, but also expressions of concern over
AC 2009-2335: ELICITING UNDERSERVED MIDDLE-SCHOOL YOUTHS’NOTIONS OF ENGINEERS: DRAW AN ENGINEERTirupalavanam Ganesh, Arizona State University Tirupalavanam Ganesh, Ph.D., has degrees and experience in engineering, computer science, and education. He has brought this experience to bear in previous research that examined the use of technologies in K-12 settings with diverse students. He has worked with the Children’s Museum of Houston on the development and implementation of Robotics-based STEM programming for urban youth. He is the Principal Investigator of the National Science Foundation Award# 0737616, Learning through Engineering Design and Practice.John Thieken, Arizona State University
district policies—teachers successfully introduced foundational ML principles through both formal instructional modules and informal classroom activities. This study contributes to the expanding body of STEM education research by illustrating practical strategies for empowering secondary educators to integrate machine learning and computational thinking into their instruction. The findings underscore the potential for in- terdisciplinary learning and the cultivation of critical thinking skills that are essential for preparing the next generation of STEM professionals.1. IntroductionSTEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fields are widely regarded as intellectually
career pathways. The Cooper Union is acollege located in New York City that has been delivering STEM programming in the summerfor over 30 years. The high school summer STEM program offered by Cooper Union has varioussections that have traditionally been instructed by professors specializing in one of the fourengineering majors at the college: chemical, civil, electrical, and mechanical engineering. Eachyear, the program lasted six weeks and consisted of 120 hours of informal project-based learning,with each section grounded in different engineering challenges.Starting in 2015, the institution began to offer a new section called the “Makerspace” section inorder to address the demand for modern technologies and skills sets, such as rapid