2005-274 WEPAN The Women in Engineering Programs and Advocates Network Bevlee A. Watford President, WEPAN Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity 215 Hancock Hall (0275), Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061 540-231-3244 FAX 540-231-1831, ceed@vt.edu Linda Scherr President-Elect, WEPANAbstractWEPAN, Women in Engineering Programs & Advocates Network, is a non-profit organizationfocused on strengthening the engineering workforce by
Paper ID #20549Understanding the Impact of Strategic Team Formation in Early Program-ming EducationProf. Tony Andrew Lowe, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Tony Lowe is a PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has a BSEE from Rose- Hulman Institute of Technology and a MSIT from Capella. He currently teaches as an adjunct Assistant Professor at CTU Online and has been an on-and-off corporate educator and full time software architect for twenty years.Dr. Sean P. Brophy, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Sean Brophy is a mechanical engineer
AC 2011-1388: OAKLAND UNIVERSITY/ALTAIR ENGINEERING TECH-NICAL BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE CORPORATE INTERNSHIP PRO-GRAMDavid W Schmueser, Altair Engineering Inc. Dr. David Schmueser is the Business Development Manager of University Programs in the United States for Altair Engineering, with primary responsibility for identifying and implementing Altair’s advanced engineering software and grid computing technologies for curriculum and research applications. With more than 30 years of experience in engineering research, project technical management, and en- gineering instruction, Schmueser’s strategic role at Altair focuses on the development and execution of Altair’s university marketing and sales plan, fellowship program
Nelson Pearson is an Ph.D. student at the University of Nevada, Reno. His research interest includes, social networks and the integration of diverse populations, engineering culture as well as engineering pedagogy. His education includes a B.S. and M.S. in Civil Engineering from the University of Nevada, Reno.Ms. Jacqueline Ann Rohde, Clemson University Jacqueline Rohde is a senior undergraduate student in Bioengineering at Clemson University. Her re- search in engineering education focuses on the development student identity and attitudes with respect to engineering. She is a member of the National Scholars Program, Clemson University’s most prestigious merit-based scholarship. She is also involved in efforts to
. To provide a high quality undergraduate engineering education within a small university environment culminating in a degree in ME from a nationally recognized engineering program. 8. To facilitate and contribute to the economic development of the region.B. Program Outcomes and AssessmentIn this section, the assessment procedures that are being followed for this program are described:first, the student learning outcomes are presented; how the outcomes are related to ABET 2002Criterion 3 and program objectives is presented next; and finally the assessment procedurescurrently followed are presented in brief.B.1. Student Learning OutcomesUsing the ABET 2002 Criterion 3 and the program educational objectives as a guide
by adult mentors and their Page 13.584.7own imaginations, FLL students solve real-world engineering challenges, develop important lifeskills, and learn to make positive contributions to society.”9 FIRST (For Inspiration andRecognition of Science and Technology) states that their mission is “to inspire young people tobe science and technology leaders, by engaging them in exciting mentor-based programs thatbuild science, engineering and technology skills, that inspire innovation, and that foster well-rounded life capabilities including self-confidence, communication and leadership.”10 Thecompetitions have a yearly theme and are conducted each
Session 2660 Collaborative Engineering Programs at Frostburg State University Chandrasekhar Thamire, Sami Ainane Frostburg State University/University of Maryland, College ParkAbstractThis paper describes the engineering programs at Frostburg State University, Maryland,developed jointly by the University of Maryland, College Park (UMCP), and Frostburg StateUniversity (FSU). The programs were established in 1997 to serve the students from thesurrounding rural areas and thus to serve as a vehicle to enhance the economic development ofthe region. Nearly a three-fourth of courses in the program are taught
Paper ID #44731Defining the Murky Middle for an Engineering ProgramDr. Kenneth R. Leitch P.E., West Texas A&M University Kenneth R. Leitch holds a Ph.D. in civil engineering from New Mexico State University and M.B.A. from Colorado Christian University. He is an Associate Professor of civil engineering at West Texas A&M University in Canyon, Texas. He is a registered P.E. in Texas and Indiana. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 1 Defining the Murky Middle for an Engineering Program Paola Alonzo, Pamela
. His research focuses on diverse areas such as: D ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Smart System Projects in Computer Engineering ProgramAbstractThe purpose of capstone design project courses is to provide graduating senior students with theopportunity to demonstrate understanding of the concepts they have learned during their studiesand to apply their professional skills and knowledge in a single experience and prepare them forwork in industry. As with many computer science and engineering programs, students of thecomputer engineering program at Utah Valley University (UVU) conclude their degree programswith a semester capstone design experience. The intent is for students to utilize
Paper ID #6370Introduction of a Digital Logic Project in a First-Year Honors EngineeringCourseDr. Diana G. de la Rosa-Pohl, University of Houston (CoE) Diana de la Rosa-Pohl is an instructor in the Cullen College of Engineering at the University of Houston. She developed the first-year experience for the Honors Engineering Program and also teaches the two- course sequence. Her research interests include project-based learning in engineering education and the alignment of engineering education with professional practice.Dr. Stuart A. Long, University of Houston (CoE) Stuart A. Long was born in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on
, published and disseminated a draftCommentary that will accompany the new program criteria. The Commentary helps faculty,program evaluators, and other constituents interpret the program criteria. While a separatepaper2 is being submitted on the details of the Commentary content, this paper will summarizehow this Commentary relates to the rest of the committee’s work.The gap. The BOK2 is an aspirational and visionary document which may not account for all ofthe real-world constraints faced by engineering programs in terms of mandated maximum unitsin an undergraduate program and additional requirements imposed by a state government or auniversity. Conversely, the ABET program criteria define the minimum requirements for aprogram to receive
, studying faculty motivation to change classroom practices, and exploring ethical decision-making in engineering students. She also has established a national presence in engineering education; she is a fellow in the American Society of Engineering Education, is an Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Education, and past chair of the Educational Research and Methods Division of ASEE.Prof. Debbie Chachra, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Debbie Chachra is an Associate Professor of Materials Science at the Franklin W. Olin college of Engi- neering. Her education-related research interests include self-efficacy, design, intrinsic motivation, and gender. She speaks and consults on curricular design, student
large summer program to 150 undergraduates each year, with 25 courses taught inEnglish. This will be expanded to 250 students in 2008. They also have a dual degree M.S.program whereby a student obtains a M.S. from Georgia Tech as well as from a partner Frenchuniversity in about 18 months.23Georgia Tech recently announced its “International Plan.” Students from any discipline spendtwo terms abroad and take courses in international relations and cultural issues. They alsocomplete a capstone course in which their international skills are used.24 Michigan has a similarprogram in Global Engineering that involves completing 24 credit hours of course work alongwith a study abroad experience.25 A number of other universities offer some sort of global
of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC) which was initiallydesigned to increase the number of minorities pursuing PhDs in medicine and the sciences [10, 11].What makes ENGAGE 2BE different from other educational programs is the focus ondeveloping undergraduates’ self-confidence in their abilities to succeed in undergraduate studies,pursuing graduate school, and extended mentoring for our high-needs target population of low-income, first generation, students of immigrants and migrant worker families. Development ofthis self-confidence is especially important as student performance is impacted by self-confidence and self-identity as it relates to engineering[12]. The program would be the first of itskind in the College of Engineering where
Paper ID #7566Teaching SI Units in Engineering and Technology ProgramesDr. Edward E Osakue, Texas Southern University Dr. Edward E. Osakue is an associate professor in the Department of Industrial Technology at Texas Southern University in Houston, USA. He is a graduate faculty and the coordinator of the Design Tech- nology concentration. Dr. Osakue had worked previously at ITT Technical Institute, Houston South campus as Education Supervisor and Program Chair for CAD Program. He received his doctoral degree in mechanical engineering from the University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada; in 1999. Dr. Os- akue
Paper ID #23490Work in Progress: Developing a Model for Student-led Peer Mentorship Pro-gramsDr. Krystal S. Corbett, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Krystal Corbett is a lecturer for the Mechanical Engineering Department at Louisiana Tech Univer- sity. She teaches in their prestigious Living with the Lab first year program as well as other mechanical engineering related courses. She received her B.S. and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering (2008/2010), M.S. in Mathematics (2012), and Ph.D. in Engineering Education (2012) at Louisiana Tech University. Formerly, she was the Director of Curricula at the Cyber Innovation Center (CIC
drawn to educational outreach because she herself had received so little career advice. She eventually ran the educational outreach program at Exxon. After 25 years, 20 at Exxon and 5 in the high tech industry, an unexpected layoff came at a bad time, she was also newly widowed. Job offers that were once plentiful were nowhere to be found. The first, and only, offer to finally appear was to teach physical science at Bayonne High School, for a significant pay cut. A new adventure began. In the ten years since then, she got to start up a research program, an engineering program, a science club, two FIRST Tech Challenge robotics teams, and brought in several new programs such as Technology Students Association, Young
Paper ID #20245How First-Year Engineering Students Develop Visualizations for Mathemat-ical ModelsDr. Kelsey Joy Rodgers, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach Kelsey Rodgers is an assistant professor in the Engineering Fundamentals Department at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. She teaches a MATLAB programming course to mostly first-year engineering students. She primarily investigates how students develop mathematical models and simulations and ef- fective feedback. She graduated from the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University with a doctorate in engineering education. She previous
form ofcourse grades,15 course evaluations,16 and surveys5,4,6 over a number of years to evaluate theimpact of courses or mentorship programs. This study looks to understand first-year students’design practices and group work by studying two groups working on an in-class design and buildchallenge though qualitative analysis of video data with quantitative summaries.In this study we adapt the Design Activity coding scheme developed by Atman et al12 and theaddition of Design-Related Conversational moves developed by Wendell17 to allow for theexamination of how groups with multiple participants engage in engineering design when theyare tasked with producing a physical artifact to meet a challenge. Our analysis using the revisedmethodology
Session 0607 Advanced Manufacturing Program and Laboratories For Engineering Majors Reza Sanati Mehrizy Afsaneh Minaie Associate Professor Assistant Professor sanatire@uvsc.edu rsanatire@uvsc.edu School of Computer Science and Engineering Utah Valley State College Orem, Utah 84058 Eric Tillstrom
- orating with other faculty members in the classroom and is invested in research, classes and assignments that provide overlap and continuity within the engineering curriculum and engineering pipeline. Nick is also a mentor for the REU program at Olin which studies the educational experiences of undergraduate engineers.Ms. Lauren Van Beek, University of St. Thomas Lauren Van Beek is an undergraduate studying Mechanical Engineering at the University of St. Thomas.Laura Ann Lilienkamp, Smith College c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Student Identity Development through Self-Directed Learning in the First SemesterAbstractThis research paper investigates
Kansas State University BS Kansas State University Current position: Associate Professor, College of Education, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Understanding Female STEM Faculty Experiences of Subtle Gender Bias from Microaggressions PerspectiveABSTRACTResearch has repeatedly discussed the lack of women in many Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields. It has been suggested that the “chilly climate” -feeling unwelcomed or discriminated- pushes women away from STEM fields. This leads tomany women leave STEM fields at multiple stages, thus creating the “leaking pipeline”phenomenon. The experiences of
South Dakota State University (SDSU); both degrees are in Agricultural Engineering. He holds a B.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Chittagong in Bangladesh. Dr. Latif has authored/co-authored numerous refereed journal articles and peer reviewed conference proceedings articles and has made national and interna- tional conference presentations. His publication record includes articles related to academic program development and assessment of academic programs. Dr. Latif was the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Engineering Technology.Dr. Mohammad A. Zahraee, Purdue University, Calumet (Tech) Mohammad A. Zahraee became Assistant Dean for Graduate Studies at School of Technology in 2010. He holds
leadership pedagogy, but are also confronted with disciplinespecific needs and a rapidly changing world. Given the breadth of the engineering profession,and the lack of an engineering leadership domain definition, specific program objectives in placetoday depend in large part upon the worldview of those administrating the program or teachingthe course. A literature review on the topic revealed a broad field of perspectives indicative ofthe early stages of domain definition.2 Thus, program facets related to engineering leadership(e.g., innovation and technology product design, and managing complex systems) requireprogram-specific assessment to determine efficacy. Other outcomes such as knowledge ofleadership theory, leadership skills, and project
another student success advantage; namely, they encounter less complexcurricula.IntroductionOver the past few years we have developed a number of metrics for quantifying the complexityof academic program curricula.5, 7, 11 This has led to the development of a curricular complexitymetric that directly relates how the structure of a curriculum impacts a student’s ability to progressthrough that curriculum to graduation. We refer to the general study of how program curriculaimpact student academic success as curricular analytics. Research in this area demonstrates thataccording to these complexity metrics, engineering programs tend to be among the most complexcurricula at a university. This is attributed to the large number of prerequisites that
a part of this campus for many years. Scholarships are provided to the interested andqualified female high school students living in rural areas to participate in a week long program.These programs provide real life experience about college living and technical careers.Engineering and science badge programs have been developed with local Girl Scoutorganizations. Aerospace initiatives were developed earlier with funding from the WisconsinSpace Grant Consortium. Continuation and expansion will assist Girl Scout leaders provideSTEM opportunities for Girl Scout troops. Work with Girl Scout councils will continue as anengineering and other STEM related badge programs are developed for middle school girls.XXX female engineering students designed
component in their design. At the beginning of each course,students interests and aspirations are gaged by providing students with a list of biomedicalengineering projects and challenges. Students were asked to select and rank their top choices. Earlyon, students were encouraged to identify a medical/clinical disease/challenge, and to focus theirefforts on projects related to that specific medical/clinical disease/challenge in multiple courses.This way students could start a project that spans the course of multiple academic years buildingstudents’ knowledge and capacity in a specific area of interest related to a specific medical/clinicaldisease/challenge.A unique laboratory in the program is the Biomaterials & Tissue Engineering Lab. Such
Paper ID #8883Ethical Reasoning Development in Project-based LearningDr. Elizabeth A McBride-Pluskwik, Iron Range Engineering, a program of Minnesota State University, Mankato Elizabeth leads the Business and Statistics competencies at Iron Range Engineering, a project-based en- gineering education program located in northern Minnesota. She served as Assistant Professor of Ac- counting at St. Ambrose University in Davenport, IA before joining IRE in 2012. Previously, she was the Controller for MSI Mold Builders in Cedar Rapids, IA, and an Auditor/Tax Accountant for McGladrey & Pullen, CPAs, in Cedar Rapids, IA. Her
processes.B. Curriculum RequirementsThe standard requires a balance between qualitative and quantitative concepts with therequirement of at least one third of the courses being qualitative management related material.Curricular requirements thus focus on the management side of engineering management. Muchof engineering management is conceptually qualitative. Quantitative concepts are required to tiethe discipline to the field of engineering. Thus, there is a requirement for both types of concepts.Hick’s (1999) study found that qualitative concepts were the most likely to be missing. Thisstandard ensures that the program is, in fact, an engineering management program. The centralfocus must be on management in some context, at some level.The remainder
achievement.The process focuses on student achievement in relation to outcomes. To demonstrateachievement of competencies expected of students graduating from a program in engineering, itis necessary to identify outcomes for courses that are needed to achieve identified programoutcomes. Thus, student learning outcomes, based on program outcomes and course outcomesmust be continually assessed and would serve as the basis for plans to improve programs andcurricula in the programs. Improvement in program outcomes will depend on changing andimproving the curriculum through the course outcomes.Available literature indicates a focus on course outcomes as the way to demonstrate achievementof program outcomes 16-19. But course outcomes can give only limited