] with only a small number of recentstudies in more advanced engineering topics such as shear stress [24], [34], motion in dynamicsystems [35] and drift/diffusion [27].Based on the gaps we identified in the literature, the project’s main contributions are to 1)understand how the context of engineering tasks and the visual representations within the taskhinder students’ ability to learn engineering concepts and apply them during their problemsolving and 2) leverage cross-disciplinary analysis so we can move beyond specific mistakes andinstead identify potential causes that encourage students to make those mistakes despite directinstruction, which has been identified as a need in prior cross-disciplinary studies [28].MethodsConsistent with the
, Washington, DC, 2015.[5] P. W. Routon, “The effect of 21st century military service on civilian labor and educational outcomes,” J. of Labor Res., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 15-38, 2014.[6] Institute for Veterans and Military Families, “The business case for hiring a veteran: Beyond the clichés,” Institute for Veterans and Military Families, Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, March 2012.[7] J. Redford, and K. M. Hoyer, “Stats in brief: First-generation and continuing-generation college students: A comparison of high school and postsecondary experiences,” U.S. Department of Education, Institute for Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, DC, September, 2017.[8] J. Engle and V
, andpreparation of the students.References1 Shelley, J. S. (2009) Assessing Student Learning Outcomes in a Broadcast Learning Environment: Application ofthe Dynamics Concepts Inventory, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Sessions 2630,Austin, TX: ASEE.2 Ragan, L.C. (2000) Good Teaching is Good Teaching: the relationship between guiding principles for distanceand general education; Journal of General Education; 49(1).3 Kohn, Alfie;(1996) Beyond Discipline: From Compliance to Community; Association for Supervision &Curriculum Development.4 Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., &Wittrock, M.C. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing
safety• ENG will direct additional funds towards three Signature Initiatives – Nanoelectronics for 2020 and Beyond – Sustainable Nanomanufacturing – Nanotechnology for Solar Energy Collection and Conversion8National Robotics Initiative• ENG will support – Assistive mechanisms for those with physical disabilities and/or cognitive impairments – Systems integration that enables ubiquitous, advanced robotics to be realized – Next-generation robotics for manufacturing, healthcare and rehabilitation, surveillance and security, education and training, and transportation FY 2013 Request $10 M9ENG collaborates through
include a section on science. While the results of these tests may not behigh stakes in terms of sanctions on a school, district or individual teacher, they certainly havehigh stakes for the students as their scores determine whether or not they will graduate from highschool. As a result, there is an ongoing tension between STEM-related reforms, often initiated byfederal agencies and universities, and test preparation practices K-12 educators perceive willresult in higher scores on standardized tests. To further complicate matters, standardized testsconsist of largely multiple choice questions and are therefore not necessarily reliable indicatorsof students’ reasoning and problem solving skills (Burkhardt, 2012). Despite researchers
Summer Stevens became doctoral student in Virginia Tech’s Engineering Education program after obtaining a BS in Civil Engineering from the University of Utah. She also looks forward to completing an MS in Structural Engineering at Virginia Tech. Summer’s career goals revolve around becoming a civil engineering or engineering education professor, or conversely, a university outreach program coordinator. Her current research interests include validating crochet as a form of tinkering, K-12 engineering identity, artistic understandings of engineering, family rights for engineers, engineering student mental health, engineering ethics education, and mass timber construction. ©American Society for
, belonging must exist for an individual to have the desire togain knowledge or learn [6]. Therefore the concept of belonging has recently been studied moreand more as to what degree or significance it plays in students learning [11],[6],[7]. Itsimportance was observed at the K12 level for some time with its influence on psychological andacademic outcomes [6],[7].Although when trying to translate what is being done on the K12 level to postsecondary, it hasproven difficult for researchers to agree on how to accurately measure this psychologicalphenomenon [6]. Much of the most recent prominent literature examining undergraduatestudents and engineers has been done through theoretical modeling and quantitativeinstrumentation. Reminiscent of a top-down
thoughts andobservations that would otherwise be lost [14]. Faculty reflection logs may therefore offer aformative tool for deepening instructors’ understanding of their students’ sociotechnicalthinking. In addition, the insight gained from analyzing these reflection logs can serve as a guideto other faculty looking to implement sociotechnical thinking in their classrooms and curricula.The research presented in this paper is focused on the following question: RQ1. In what ways do faculty share similar and different insights with respect to the integration of sociotechnical thinking within their engineering classes as reflected through faculty reflection logs?MethodsFor this paper, we analyzed data collected from
that graduates can solve engineering design problems, and that students’ educationculminates in a major design experience. There is no specific language in either which statesthat design must be a component of all, or even the majority of classes in a curriculum. Thereare, however, two primary reasons to include a design component in the majority of engineeringscience classes: design provides a necessary link from theoretical material to its application inthe real world, and design presents a clear avenue for achieving additional student learning ob-jectives beyond the development of analytical skills and basic engineering knowledge. If one’sgoal is to have students graduate being both competent and comfortable applying rigorous engi-neering
Quinnipiac University that is common to all fourengineering disciplines offered. Among the three common courses, it is the only one with atechnical content, requiring analytical work and problem solving. The importance of EngineeringEconomics in Engineering Curricula has been carefully examined in literature, see e.g. Zoghi(2015)18, and the cross-disciplinary nature of the classes were recognized and utilized in teachingpractice through team-based (Martinazzi, 1998)19 and project-based (LeBlanc and Boulanger,2014)20 methods. Commonality across the engineering programs ensures a large class size andmultiple sections. Having multiple sections, and a sufficient sample size in each section, providesthe opportunity for control and treatment groups within
theirFYEPs, but they do indicate that training is provided through other venues at the universitywhich helps them improve their teaching.IntroductionGraduate teaching assistants (GTAs) are a vital component to engineering courses includingmany first-year engineering programs (FYEPs). FYEPs tend to be large in size, having multiplesections of the same class requiring the use of GTAs whose roles vary across institutions frominstructional staff to lab supervisors to graders.1-4 Despite the widespread use of GTAs inengineering, especially in FYEPs, little is known about GTA’s experiences from the perspectiveof the GTA. While there are studies that describe and evaluate preparation courses for GTAs,evaluations tend to be short-term (e.g., right after the
never submits a correct answer to that question.Figure 8 shows the histogram of the number of attempts made for such questions. From this wesee that students typically give up fairly quickly if they can’t successfully solve a question, withvery few students persisting beyond three incorrect attempts.In contrast to never-solved questions, we say that question j for student i is eventually solved ifthe student submits at least one correct solution to that question. Figure 8(c) shows the histogramof the number of attempts at eventually-solved questions, which has a slightly higher mean (9.0attempts) than all questions, as the never-solved questions have a much lower mean.Figure 8(d) shows the number of incorrect attempts made by students on
redshow progressively more challenging labs that require more independence from students.The labs are described below. They progressively become more challenging and open to creativeproblem solving, requiring students to show more independence as their skill set expands. • Lab1 - Introduction to the Particle Photon: A step-by-step guide that walks students through the setup process to register their boards and set them up with wifi credentials to enable them to connect to the cloud. • Lab2 - Sensors and Actuators: The lab starts by showing students how to use a light sensor, reading analog voltages on an input pin on the board. Then students are asked to design the circuit and write programs to interface with other sensors
of Systems, Productivity Press, 1990.10 Womack, James P., and Jones, D., Lean Thinking, Simon and Schuster, 1996.11 Spear, S. and Bowen, K., “The DNA of the Toyota Production System,” HBR, 1999.12 Johnson, H. T. and Bröms, A., Profit Beyond Measure: Extraordinary Results through Attention toWork and People, Simon and Schuster, 2000.13 Cochran, D. S., Duda, J., Linck, J., and Arinez, J., “The Manufacturing System DesignDecomposition,” SME Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 20, No. 6., 2000/2001.14 Suh, N. P., Cochran, D. S., and Lima, P. C., “Manufacturing System Design,” Annals of 48th GeneralAssembly of CIRP, Vol. 47, No. 2, 1998, pp. 627-639.15 Cochran, D. S., “The Need for a Systems Approach to Enhance and Sustain Lean
Campbell-Montalvo is a cultural anthropologist who focuses on understanding how a range of people (including women, historically excluded racial/ethnic groups, and LGBTQIA+ students) are served in undergraduate STEM contexts, with an emphasis on engineering and biology. She is a postdoc- toral research associate in the Neag School of Education in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at the University of Connecticut. In addition, Campbell-Montalvo is Co-PI on a $500,000 NSF grant that seeks to improve inclusion in biology education and biology education research through the Inclusive Environments and Metrics in Biology Education and Research network. Prior to her current role, Dr. Campbell-Montalvo was the
Research,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Proceedings, Columbus, OH, 2017.[12] J. Walther, N. W. Sochacka, and N. N. Kellam, “Quality in interpretive engineering education research: Reflections on an example study,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 626–659, 2013.[13] A. Kirn et al., “Building Supports for Diversity through Engineering Teams,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Proceedings, Columbus, OH, 2017.[14] K. G. Nelson, D. F. Shell, J. Husman, E. J. Fishman, and L. K. Soh, “Motivational and self-regulated learning profiles of students taking a foundational engineering course,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol
also brings out questions and discussion during parts of several more class periods asstudents progress through it. Image data are introduced as an example of two dimensional arrays.Basic concepts such as edges in images being changes in brightness are explained so thatstudents can understand the processing they will perform. The project as implemented at UNRconsists of a menu driven image processing program with several functions including file readand write, negative, rotate, threshold, and basic filter. The necessary programming does notinvolve anything beyond what is normally covered in the course.At the beginning of the project students are given a function to read a black and white portablegray map (PGM) file and use this as a model to
projects and problem-solving challenges, and attended otherSTEAM related activitiesThese summer programs attract high school students from the inner city of Chicago exposingthem to STEAM disciplines and careers through rigorous classes, laboratories and real lifeexperiences. At the same time the programs provide them with the full college and careerreadiness experience. The main goals of this program are to: (1) introduce students to a widevariety of STEAM fields, (2) increase student’s engineering mathematics and scienceknowledge, and (3) facilitate students to learn about different STEAM fields they might beinterested in pursuing.To assess the impact of the program, the participants took a pre and post content knowledge testthat included basic
College Students’ Mental Health in the United States: Interview Survey Study,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, September 2020.[8] McKinsey & Co. Report, “Women in the Workplace,” 2021.[9] R. Finfrock and N. Klingbeil, “Examining the Impacts of the Wright State Model for Engineering Mathematics Education through Curricular Analytics,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition, June 2023.[10] K. Watson, S. Sorby, E. Cady, and J. El-Sayed, “Engineering the Inclusive Mindset for the Future: A Blueprint for Systemic Change in Engineering Education,” National Science Foundation Award #2212721, nsf.gov., 2022. [Accessed February 6, 2024].[11] The Gallup-Purdue Index Report, 2014.[12] P. Kelly and B. Makh, “Course Design Institute
professorate. The reason for this desire for change varies widely. Whetherthey are hoping to give back to the profession after a successful career, found that their passion isteaching or building the body of knowledge through research, or hope to find a better lifestyle;educators with a deep set of industry experiences have much to offer their new employers. Butthey also face a unique set of challenges in adjusting to academic life that other new, moretraditional, members of the faculty may not encounter. These challenges include successfullyadjusting to the politics and inner workings of the academy, when they may already have adeeply ingrained set of expectations for the workplace; balancing life and work during thechallenging start-up and pre
one key disadvantage. Experiments requiring an AC signal generator and oscilloscope couldnot be completed in a student’s home because the necessary test equipment was beyond themeans of the average student. Thus off-campus students still used computer simulations toperform such classic experiments as the full-wave rectifier, transistor amplifiers, and the op-ampintegrator. The kit has gone through a number of stages to continuously improve its effectivenessas a teaching tool. Off-campus students receive this kit free-of-charge as part of their study pack.A typical kit contains about $30 in components, including a breadboard and pack of jumperwires.In the absence of low-cost signal generators and oscilloscopes, we developed a prototype
approaches and curricula have beendeveloped in many other areas of education in professional schools (nursing, law,engineering), college-level courses, and kindergarten through 12th grade” [4] and list someexamples reported in the literature. Donald R. Woods reported a new program in chemicalengineering improved students' marks as well as their response to the learning environment,problem-solving skills, and lifetime learning skills [5]. Flemming K. Fink from AalborgUniversity in Denmark, one of the main advocates of PBL in the world, introduced theirexperience in establishing a university in a region with little industrial activities; Fink’s workshows that PBL played an instrumental role in preparing an engineering workforce thatstimulated the
pursue Page 24.1140.4engineering degrees have the support and resources that they need to be successful. Over the pastthree years, Drexel University College of Engineering hosted a Summer Diversity Program foraccepted incoming students. The goal of this program is to provide academic and social supportto help women and minority students who choose to become engineers persist through their firstyear and beyond. The program originally was one week long; however the program wasexpanded to two weeks in the second year to include more core content and to accommodatestudent requests for a more relaxed schedule.RecruitmentSince the Program is focused on
academic institutions. We interviewed 24 individuals in Fall2014 and Spring 2015; interviews lasted between 30 and 90 minutes. Interviewees worked in avariety of settings across campus, including financial aid and health services. We alsointerviewed a First-Year Engineering (FYE) staff member.To better understand the broader context of SVEs’ educational experiences beyond departmentsof engineering, we explore the IAs’ perspectives on their duties in serving student veterans andtheir suggestions for improving policies and programs, both at the university level and withinengineering. We also examine some implications of these perspectives for engineeringeducation. We focus this study on two research questions: 1. How do IAs describe their roles
limited to a smallsample, the fact that most students actively highlighted communication and teamwork as one ofthe defining features of their education indicates a stronger appreciation of these skills than Page 24.1374.14average engineering students.It has also been suggested that project-based learning has the potential of moving engineeringeducation beyond “problem-solving” toward the more comprehensive paradigm of “problemdefinition and solution.”14 The three programs I studied all provide rich opportunities forstudents to work on open-ended design projects, through which students learn to identifyproblems out of complex, quasi-real world
. Enrollment is limited tofifteen to twenty students, with preference given to entering freshmen; of the nineteen BENG 87seminar courses offered since the Fall of 2003, the average starting enrollment has been 15±1(mean±stdev). The small number of students allows close interaction between the students andfaculty, and because of this, the course is generally run as a discussion between faculty andstudents. Usually faculty encourage discussion and student interaction, whether by askingquestions directly to the students or by having students contribute information or questions theyhave found through their own independent research or through their assignments. The overall expected course outcome from these intimate seminar discussions is
. He received his PhD in biomedical engineering from Drexel University and was an NSF Graduate STEM Fellow in K-12 Education (GK-12).Dr. Diane C. Bates, The College of New Jersey Dr. Diane C. Bates is a Professor of Sociology, with research interest and expertise in education in quantitative methods and retention in higher education in STEM disciplines.J. Lynn Gazley, The College of New Jersey J. Lynn Gazley is Associate Professor of Sociology at TCNJ. Her research interests focus on diversity and inclusion in the sciences, and how these processes shape scientific knowledge-making. She has served as a Research Associate and Visiting Scholar with Northwestern University’s Scientific Careers Research and Development
get to go on. And, the crazy things that they’re learning with the circuits, and stuff that’s far beyond what they’ve ever taught us in high school. And I just became so curious about it. … So I found engineering on my own through my friends. ~Diane And actually I started hanging out with the smarter kids. Most of them were interested in science; all of them were good at science. So, just being surrounded by that many students, that many peers, that were good at science and were genuinely interested in becoming either a scientist, doctor, or engineer kind of pushed me forward a little bit. … I chose engineering … because most of my friends are in engineering or science. ~Luke Some of
intellectual humility and assessment thereof in engineering education holdspromise because intellectual humility is associated with a mastery approach to learning thatfuels lifelong learning and is a characteristic employers value in engineers.IntroductionKnowledge surveys (KS), as introduced by Nuhfer and Knipp [1], are intended to provideinstructors feedback on student learning through self-assessment of mastery of topics and typesof questions (i.e. Bloom’s taxonomy). While there have been varying reports on the correlationof student self-assessment through knowledge surveys and student performance [2], [3], thereare clear benefits for students by highlighting course objectives/content, serving as a learningguide, and strengthening self-assessment
shift the role of the instructor from "sage" to "guide"3 while allowing increasedinstructor-student interaction time and an increase in active-learning opportunities for students.A confluence of factors including technology, increased attention on STEM education, andmarket conditions have yielded a vast array of tools for capture and dissemination of educationalcontent as well as automated and individualized formative and summative assessment. In turnthis "flipped" classroom approach has found broad adoption in K-12 education and more recentlyin higher education institutions. However, in the context of STEM (Science, Technology, Math,& Engineering) education (and computer engineering, in particular) sparse literature exists onwhich