may be other reasons impacting performance e.g. financial, from a pedagogicalperspective, the low performance of US students is due to the lack of interest in science,technology, engineering and math (STEM). One reason for this lack of interest is the unengaginglearning environments as reported in the High School Survey of Student Engagement [8]. Thissurvey which was administered to more than 42,000 high school students and covered 103 schoolsin 27 states, found that 66% of U.S. students were bored, citing uninteresting and irrelevantmaterials in the classroom. Bridgeland, Dilulio and Morrison [9] identified that the major cause(46%) of school drop-out was the uninteresting nature of the classroom. Student engagement istherefore an important
of aclass. A typical PRS usually includes a set of hardware, clickers, and software that receives theinputs from clickers and shows immediate results [7, 8]. Many case-based studies were alreadyconducted on their use and impact in classrooms and found that the learning outcomes vary basedon the applied disciplines for decades [5, 9-13]. Most research reported that students foundthemselves more engaged and more confident after adopting PRS in classroom [5, 9-11]. However,the limits of the clickers, such as the purchase and maintenance cost, the malfunction issues, andno or limit typing function [4, 9, 14], are dragging the hind legs and prevent the wildly implementof these PRS. As such, to take the advantage and avoid the drawbacks of PRS, an
collaboration between the School of Engineering and the local community hasbeen positive and very successful. In this paper, several Senior Design projects are discussed.The assessment and evaluation of ABET Student Outcomes using the Senior Design course ispresented and discussed as a means of directly measuring curriculum success. Engineering’sSenior Design course has had a direct impact on the local community, often with a significantreturn on investment for industrial partners. The significance of this community engagement hasresulted not only in the employment of all of our seniors at graduation, but also in the program’srapid growth.1. IntroductionWestern Illinois University in Macomb, Illinois was granted permission to create a new Schoolof
, havedisabilities, or have children. The program provides mentoring academic support, andprofessional development through impactful workshops on understanding your strengths, beingsuccessful as a woman in a field highly populated by men, and preparing for graduate school. Inaddition, support is provided for student travel, to increase professional development andpreparation to work in a global society. This paper reports on the ENGAGE 2BE programincluding program motivation, operations and management plans, as well as current assessmentdata and lessons learned. The information provided will aid others who are interested instrengthening support networks for undergraduate students in engineering.I. IntroductionThe American Society of Engineering Education
. Survey to Assess Student’s Knowledge about Shipbuilding & Repair A survey was designed to assess the impact of the simulation activities on the student’sknowledge about shipbuilding and repair. This survey contains questions about shipscomponents, ship design and physics principles like buoyancy. Student responses are aggregatedand average score is obtained on a scale of 1-10. Students are assessed using the same instrumentafter they have gone through the four simulation sessions. The difference in the score betweenthe pre and post survey provides a measure of change in the knowledge base of the students. Acopy of the survey is attached in Appendix A.V. Delivery Method The course is instructor-led classroom training combined
Electrical and Electronics Engineers, and NJIT Master Teacher. He has served on the board of the United States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship, and as Director of the Academy of the International Council for Small Business.Dr. Regina S. Collins, New Jersey Institute of Technology American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Teaching Impactful Entrepreneurship to Engineering StudentsAbstractEngineering education endeavors to impart the skills students need to solve technologicalchallenges, while entrepreneurship education endeavors to impart the skills needed to solve thecommercialization challenges. However, society benefits only when
a dreamStudents who had a positive experience are much more likely to be engaged at work thanstudents who didn’t. Looking more deeply, the importance of good mentoring, in terms of directfaculty/student interaction is also an important factor in future workplace engagement. Studentswith positive interactions in the vein of mentoring were 2.3 times more likely to be engaged at Page 26.722.3work than those who didn’t have those experiences.1 The results of students who participated inexperiential learning projects show that this also makes them 2.4 times more likely to feelengaged on the job.1 This suggests that experiential learning is at
understanding and learning process engagement that enable individuals toflourish in ever-changing contexts. ABET and other organizations have recently asked educatorsto promote the development of students’ lifelong learning skills through their curricula,5,6 butcalls for self-directed learning approaches are not new. In 1969, Carl Rogers articulated the needfor flexible, independent learners: “Teaching and the imparting of knowledge make sense in an unchanging environment. This is why it has been an unquestioned function for centuries. But if there is one truth about modern man, it is that he lives in an environment which is continually changing…We are, in my view, faced with an entirely new situation in education where the goal of
. I: And how would you say then the end user…affects your overall design? R: Um, it’s just keeping in mind things, like when we went to visit the school, you’re seeing this technology that’s been in these classrooms for 50+ years because there’s been nothing else developed, and you’re seeing how bulky and big it is. Just, you know, keeping things in mind like, you know, how can we reduce space? And when we went on our visit, seeing how students worked and typed and were communicating with one another, like keeping all of those things in mind, trying to guide our design.The event of visiting the users was particularly impactful for Brenda’s HCD
. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Engaging Engineering Students with Mobile Learning TechnologiesAbstractNew theories of education matched with new technologies have been rapidly transforming theway instructors teach and students learn. This paper documents one model an engineeringlibrarian has created to incorporate the ideas expressed in "connected learning pedagogy" and thetheory of constructivism (active, collaborative learning with the instructor as a guide andfacilitator) into instructional "one-shot" sessions designed to teach information literacy skills tocollege students at various stages of their careers. The sessions utilize electronic devices
focus on engineering andengineering technology faculty and graduate students to (1) increase capabilities in conductingrigorous education research and using empirical research results to develop evidence-basedcurriculum, and (2) nurture and sustain a self-supporting virtual community of engineeringeducation scholars.This paper focuses on the short-term impact of one of the workshops that are part of the project.The background section continues with describing the purpose and process of the workshop. Abrief review of literature on the development programs for engineering education research ispresented. A summary of the overall evaluation plan of the project is given which is followed bythe specific evaluation questions considered in this paper
through the use of co-roboticplatforms, in broadening and sustaining student engagement in STEM. The paper presents aweek-long residential STEM learning curriculum designed and implemented to introducestudents to hands-on engineering. The week-long program has been offered for middle schoollevel students, and its effectiveness has been studied. Pre and post surveys have beenconducted to study the impact of the experience in increasing students’ interest in roboticsand engineering. The results of this study show that co-robotic activities increased students’awareness about the role of engineering in protecting the environment and improving humanlife.1. IntroductionScience teachers across the nation have to find innovative ways to incorporate the
AC 2012-3308: A STUDY OF THE IMPACT OF PROJECT LEAD THEWAY ON ACHIEVEMENT OUTCOMES IN IOWADr. David G. Rethwisch, University of IowaDr. Melissa Chapman Haynes, Professional Data AnalystsDr. Soko S. Starobin, Iowa State University Soko Starobin is Assistant Professor of Higher Education Program and Associate Director of the Office of Community College Research and Policy at Iowa State University. Her research focuses on gender issues in STEM fields among community college students, specifically traditionally under-represented student populations.Prof. Frankie Santos Laanan, Iowa State University Frankie Santos Laanan is an associate Professor in the Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies at Iowa
initiate research for courses at community college level. For furtherclarification, two subjects are discussed which were researched and published with the helpof SUNY Erie college (ECC) – Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) students. First subject was the “Failure in Engineering of the Crashed Flight 3407 Aircraft,”which was later published in the Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Automation(JMEA) in June 2016 [6]. The article discusses the engineering issues of the Flight 3407airplane and its crash in Clarence, NY on Feb 12, 2009, reviewing the low power-to-weightratio of the airplane and its inadequacy with respect to the de-icing system of wings in badweather conditions. The article also discusses the inherently flawed propeller
engagement(Greene & Miller, 1996). This study emphasized the innate characteristics of engaged studentsand identified the need for further study exploring the impacts of classroom activities onstudents’ cognitive engagement. Appleton et al. began this work through the development oftheir Student Engagement Instrument (SEI), which was developed based on a review ofengagement-related literature and resulted in 30 items targeted at measuring general cognitiveengagement (Appleton, Christenson, Kim, & Reschly, 2006). While the SEI was initiallydeveloped for middle school and high school students, research has called for adaptations of thisinstrument to be applied to both postsecondary and course-level contexts (Appleton et al., 2006).ICAP
Communication course doesnot adequately develop engineering students’ communication skills for the workforce. Recently,the Engineering Cooperative Education and Professional Internship Program, the Department ofMechanical and Nuclear Engineering and the Department of Communication Arts and Scienceshave teamed up to develop a section of this Speech Communication course geared specifically toengineering. To develop requirements for the content of such a course, we reviewed the literatureand conducted a follow-up survey with our co-op and internship employers who indicated on theevaluation forms that communication skills needed improvement. We asked employers to rankoral communication competencies according to the extent that they need improvement. The
creation, andconnections, the three pillars of EM.[5] Similarly, Caplan et al.[6] used jigsaw techniques inengineering courses, finding that approximately 50% of students demonstrated behaviorsassociated with curiosity and entrepreneurial thinking. By providing only partial information, theactivity required students to seek out additional knowledge and fostered independent learningand engagement.[6] Another hands-on jigsaw activity by Tabrizi[8] used jigsaw activities in adigital systems course, where students were given circuit components and workedcollaboratively to build functional systems. This interactive approach promoted curiosity,creativity, and system-level problem-solving, reinforcing KEEN’s entrepreneurial outcomes.These examples
. Furthermore, Yilmaz et al. [9] demonstrated that theeffectiveness of the program was affected by the quality and diversity of hands-on activities.Building on the effective measures presented in the literature, a major focus of the program wasthe use of hands-on activities to engage students. As we previously reported [10], the first year ofthe program focused on robotics and in subsequent years we enhanced the program toincorporate a wide variety of engineering projects. The last three years of the program haveutilized engineering projects in the areas of electronics, combustion engines, electromagnetism,power systems, and robotics.This paper focuses on the overall impact of the program on students, now that the grant activitieshave concluded. In
with active learning modules (ALMs) tointroductory courses, particularly among first-year and second-year engineering college students.The traditional method of teaching has historically relied on lecturing. While this method hasbeen proven to be reasonably effective in passing on knowledge, studies have shown thatstudents are less likely to be fully engaged. Student activity during lectures is limited, and as aresult, the learning is passive due to factors such as instructor time constraints and notetaking.ALMs are defined as strategies that actively present engaging activities such as discussions inclass, case studies, and presentations, aiming to restructure the traditional passive teachingformat. A recent meta-study across STEM disciplines
students who are participating inprovided activities over a 6-week span to each school that the EOW program, through Rowan University’s Engineeringwas visited. The impact on students is best measured from Program. These activities are intentionally selected to bethe survey results. The main focus this semester was the 6th both engaging for the age group, while still stimulating angrade science class at Orchard Valley Middle School where interest in engineering education. The collegians serve not41 students were analyzed. At the school, a brief survey was only as facilitators of EOW sessions, but also as role models,conducted to assess how much the students knew prior to allowing the elementary and middle
improve the self-efficacy of community college students as it relates to research andwhether this has an impact on their long-term career plans to pursue a STEM career.Transfer-to-Excellence Research Experiences for Undergraduates ProgramIn 2011, the University of California, Berkeley developed the Transfer-to-Excellence ResearchExperiences for Undergraduates program (TTE REU), a summer research program forcommunity college students that is catalyzed by early hands-on involvement in research projectsthat apply nanotechnology and biotechnology to address energy problems in a high caliberresearch environment. The program objectives are to: 1) provide challenging science andengineering research projects in leading edge research laboratories; 2
% of Population/Survey-Phase Comments Tagged Pre- Con Post- CON Pre- FC Post- FC Figure 3: Major themes of resources used by students throughout the class. Results are normalized by total number of comments left for questions pertaining to the quality of lecture, population group, and whether pre-survey or post-survey. We believe video better engage students and would like to know their preference forinstructor-provided versus external resources. Though trends appear in Table 3-B, no result isstatistically significant suggesting no change from baseline behavior due to participation. On aweekly or more frequent basis students: communicate on the internet, review
still typicallytaught outside of the STEM major, sending the message to students that writing is not central toSTEM disciplines. To combat this issue, many have argued for writing across the curriculumand taking a discipline-specific view of writing.A challenge, even for these approaches, is engaging students in authentic writing that isfoundational to solving contextual and socially just design problems [2]. Whereas the focus ofmuch core engineering coursework is focused on building technical, disciplinary knowledge,many have argued for approaches that also prepare students to approach engineering problemsmore holistically, considering the ethics and consequences of their work [3]. For instance, instudents struggle to consider the ways their
break apurposeful life. Practiced effectively, they augment the virtues distinctive to an individual, thusgrowing character and agency for the better good. Given the centrality of technology today,engineering students will help shape our future, significantly. Yet often they lack theprofessional skillset to reach the greatest promise in their careers and as citizens. How canprofessional skills be developed through experiential practice? Blurring the line between artand science offers one route via creative engagement: playing in a conductorless orchestrawhere students practice leadership, teamwork, and communication week-in and week-out. Theonly conductorless orchestra in the world composed of engineers currently resides at OlinCollege of
students’ global sociotechnical competency, and the second question 1analyzes how the changes in sociotechnical competency impact the students’ confidence in theirengineering ability.This was the third, two-week summer session we have hosted [1]. In 2019, all US students andfaculty visited our counterparts in Colombia. In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic meant that wewere fully online, with each participant logging in individually from their work stations. In 2021,the session was hybrid. The U.S. students all met in person for two weeks, which allowed themto work together in one place while virtually engaging ASGM communities in problemdefinition, ideation
the iterative design process. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Language Impacts of Early Child Education Gabriela Morales, William Mercado, Ronald Erdei, Sarah Swofford Department of Education University of South Carolina Beaufort gmorales@email.uscb.edu, wmercado@email.uscb.edu, erdei@uscb.edu, swoffard@uscb.eduAbstract:This student paper presents our assistance to a community partner that is continually seeking toimprove its ability to serve its increasingly diverse community. More specifically, this posterfocuses on our assistance to a provider of early
equitable and inclusive STEM education. She actively engages with educators, students, and communities to promote the importance of STEM disciplines and education research in preparing the next generation for the challenges of the future. She received her Ph.D. in Educational Policy, with a concentration in Research, Measurement, and Statistics, from Georgia State University.Jasmine Choi, Georgia Institute of Technology Jasmine Choi is a Research Scientist II at the Georgia Institute of Technology in the Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC). Her research focuses on investigating evidence-based teaching and learning approaches and the impact of learning technologies in STEM K-12
Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) programs promote persistencein STEM fields, increased interest in graduate school, and development of identity as aresearcher for REU participants. While most REU programs operate on a single campus, agrowing number offer participants the opportunity to engage in research at geographicallydistributed campuses united around a common theme. Though logistically challenging, such aprogram can expand participants’ networks while maintaining a sense of cohort and community,which is important for researcher identity development. The current study investigates theoutcomes of an REU Site run across four campuses within the National Science Foundation(NSF)-funded Engineering Research Center (ERC) for Re-inventing the
;Universities[26], both pre- and post- surveys were designed through Qualtrics and disseminatedonline. The surveys consist of three major sections: 1. Demographics; 2. Knowledge and experience of tablet-enhanced learning environment; and 3. Perceptions towards impacts of tablet-enhanced learning environment on oral, written and graphical communication, and critical thinking.Individual student learning outcomes were assessed through groups of questions as describedbelow.Oral CommunicationTwo questions were used to assess students’ perceptions of gains in oral communication: 1) Doyou feel that your oral communication skills benefited/improved by having access to tablets inthe classroom? and 2) Which of these elements (if any) of tablet
concurrentcourse. In the robot project students also engage in the third stage of the total design process, namelyconcept generation, but this is not developed in a systematic manner. It is revisited in more depth inEngineering Design II.Engineering Design IIFollowing implementation of systems concepts in Design I and a revision of Engineering Design II inspring 2006, the latter now focuses on sensors and data acquisition, building on the Engineering Design Iexperience and continuing the development of systems thinking through the “Total Design” approach.The graphical programming language LabVIEW™ is employed to connect sensors to the students’ laptopcomputers via a USB data acquisition module (National Instruments USB-6009 with 14 bit resolution and