a life changingexperience that propels them on a professional trajectory of social entrepreneurialism, activismand sustainable technological development. Fostering the development of such a uniqueexperience within the traditional engineering education paradigm has been a trying process. Themany challenges have ranged from organizational, to technical, and even interpersonal. Yet, theoutcomes so far have been greatly rewarding both educationally and professionally, and haveshown great promise for accomplishing the goals of the project.2. Background Students Nate Houk, Kyle Siegel, Leah Glynn, and Meghan Grey founded the Universityof Southern California’s chapter of “Engineers Without Borders” (EWB-USC) in the fall of2006. Initial
must emerge throughbiomedical engineering research. One purpose of this collaborative REU-RET approach is toestablish a strong outreach program at USC that enables undergraduates and urban teachers toboth understand and fully participate in potentially world changing research that offers solutionsfor seemingly unsolvable problems in engineering and medicine. Two essential strengths of the REU-RET collaborative program are the fact that it hasattracted non-traditional engineering students into engineering research and it has made urbanteachers aware of the importance of embedding this research in their classroom curriculum.Students from all backgrounds readily understand the importance of developing advancedbiomedical technologies to
Paper ID #15548Comparison of Traditional, Flipped, and Hybrid Teaching Methods in anElectrical Engineering Circuit Analysis CourseDr. Faisal Kaleem, Metropolitan State University al Kaleem received his Ph.D. degree in Electrical Engineering from Florida International University (FIU), Miami, FL. Since 1998 he has been serving as an educator in different institutions. Currently, he is serving as an Associate Professor in the department of Information and Computer Sciences at Metropolitan State University as well as a Senior Fellow at the Technological Leadership Institute (TLI) at University of Minnesota. Dr. Kaleem is
smiles upon receiving credibleinformation about this potential employee’s preparation for engineering professional work. Theinterviewer then focuses discussion on performances behind the graduate’s scores and on jobresponsibilities that either fit the individual or that may be particularly challenging for this prospectiveemployee. The interview concludes with both parties confident of the interview’s effectiveness and finaloutcome.What is different about this picture? What gives the employer and prospective employee confidence in thevalue of information on the score sheet? In this case, scores were based on evidence from multiplesources: instructor, peers, and outside evaluators. Scores were earned in a capstone design project thatsimulated
grows, new challengeswill emerge, as will new opportunities to transform undergraduate engineering education in ameaningful way. References[1] Wenger, E. (2006). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. Retrieved from http://wenger-trayner.com/introduction-to-communities-of-practice/[2] Kimble, C., Hildreth, P., & Bourdon, I (Eds.). (2008). Communities of Practice: Creating learning environmentsfor education. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.[3] Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.[4] Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.[5] Wegner, E. & Wegner-Trayner, B. (2011
. Engineering graduates are expected to contributeeffectively as members of multidisciplinary engineering design teams. Enabling this successrequires that engineering design educators develop an understanding of the diverse disciplinaryperspectives on engineering design and of the evolving perspectives of their students.This paper first describes the disciplinary perspectives that emerged as a result of somepreliminary research on engineering design education, and then describes the development of aninstrument for evaluating individual understandings of engineering design. Disciplinaryperspectives were explored through interviewing the instructors of four capstone design coursesin different engineering disciplines within a large engineering Faculty
and the underpinning courses and theirprerequisites. The results of these four activities, to date, will be presented together with strategyrevisions planned for summer 2011.IntroductionBoise State University, with the largest enrollment and highest academic admission standardsamong Idaho’s public universities, is the state’s comprehensive metropolitan research university.The university has been experiencing, year after year, exceptional growth to meet the needs ofthe area’s emerging technology economy. The Boise metropolitan area has recently earnednational Top 10 rankings for overall patents, high-tech output, business and career climate,livability, and engineers per capita.1-5The College of Engineering was formed in 1997 as a result of the
, Practice-Oriented, Experiential Education, Self-Efficacy Under-Representation in EngineeringIn the next fifty years, the minority population in the United States will continue to increase at a much faster ratethan the non-minority population. In fact, data derived from the U.S. Census Bureau 2000 & EngineeringWorkforce Commission 2000 shows that “underrepresented minorities now comprise over 25% of the U.S.Population, yet still comprise only 6.4% of total engineering labor force.”According to the 2010 [8] report issued by the National Academies titled „Expanding Underrepresented MinorityParticipation: America’s Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads’, the U.S. must involve under-represented minorities
engineering projects andprovide a catalog for instructors to choose a project that fits the goals of their course. This paperwill first describe previous literature on first year introduction to engineering courses and theirprojects. A description of the survey used to collect information about introduction toengineering design courses follows. Results from the survey are described, as well as an analysissimplifying choice of a project for instructors either new to teaching introductory courses orthose wishing to find a project that better suits their goals.BackgroundRange of 1st year courses: general to disciplinary, contentEven though many universities require a first-year course as an introduction to engineering, thevariability of the focus
technology,’‘unfamiliarity with green buildings and materials,’ ‘inappropriate scheduling, ‘and ‘poorworkmanship’” [4]. Consequently, it is possible to question undergraduate architecturecourses and whether they are properly preparing students for their professional performance.Similarly, it is required for architecture students to develop academic skills. Academic skillshave an interdisciplinary characteristic. Nevertheless, architecture students need them due tothe nature of their career which cannot be completely classified as an art or science subject.Even though design it at the center of their focus, it is linked to plastic and technical aspects,which conform architecture. Hence, diverse study techniques must be adopted by the studentsto
Paper ID #38787Work in Progress: Evaluation of 360 Coaching to Support Whole-StudentAdvising in the First-YearDr. Sophia T. Santillan, Duke University Sophia Santillan joined Duke as an assistant professor of the practice in summer 2017. As a STEM educator, she is interested in the effect of emerging technology and research on student learning and classroom practice. After earning her bachelor’s, masterDr. Linda P. Franzoni, Duke UniversityDr. Stacy L. Tantum, Duke University Stacy Tantum received the B.S. in Electrical Engineering and Economics from Tufts University in 1994, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical
his PhD program, he completed several research fellowships in STEM education and technology design as UBC Public Scholar Initiative Awardee, Mitacs-Canada and UBC Go Global Scholar at the University of California-Los Angeles, University of Cambridge in England, and ETH-Zurich.Prof. Susan Nesbit P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver As a Professor of Teaching in Civil Engineering, I have lead the development of sustainability curriculum and taught several courses, at all levels, that introduce engineering students to sustainability engineering concepts. I have co-authored papers and presentations in sustainability engineering education research. I am also a trained Instructional Skills Workshop facilitator
placed-based visual learning and using distance learning methodologies to facilitate rural classrooms equality. Watts is passionate about distance learning, accessibility, and Appalachia. She believes there is a classroom for everyone. Natasha has a Bachelor’s Degree in Broadcasting and Electronic Media, with a minor in Appalachian Studies and a Master’s of Science in Career and Technical Education with an emphasis on occupational training and development from Eastern Kentucky University, and an Ed.D. in Educational Technology and Leadership from Morehead State University. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Teaching Ethical
information that can prepare learners to solve complex problems. Complex problems can range from difficult,technical research problems to market strategy development where many variables are illdefined. The content forming the research hypothesis and models that are leading to education focused recommendations are based on both classroom and industrial experience. The concept is that the classroom environment does not typically lend itself easily to the instruction of techniques that are used to solve complex problems in industry or even more challenging; investigations in the academic research environment. This paper will focus on the comparison of the classroom to industry, so as to illuminate the education opportunities for the majority of
the data theyreceived into one of Henderson, et al.’s, Four Categories of Change Strategies model18,illustrated in Figure 1. We see our efforts as falling into the area of emergent intendedoutcome and individual aspects changed, that is, developing reflective teachers. Figure 1. Mapped data from Besterfield-Sacre17, et al., based on Henderson,18 et al., Four Categories of Change Strategies model Page 26.551.5Best Practices in Engineering Education SessionsSince the early 1990’s there has been a series of meetings at the campus level to ‘talkabout teaching.’ These meetings were generally very informal, and covered topics acrossa wide range of
strengths, and the load on each member. Theseunits are combined with MATLAB instruction that enables the students to write a script thatanalyzes candidate bridge designs. Two recent developments have assisted the course redesign.First, we have developed an automated grading system to administer distribution, grading, andsubmission of MATLAB homeworks. Second, custom publishing is used to create a textbookthat includes information on each course topic. During the last week of the semester, studentgroups present their designs in an oral presentation, and each bridge is destructively tested forstrength. Cost and benefit analyses are performed immediately during the contest, and a winneris declared on the last day of class. So far student feedback on
arrivalof the team.Assessing our Assessment ProcessesThe paper system established to support the assessment efforts of Cal Poly’s engineeringprograms has worked well throughout the transition/learning phase of ABET’s EC 2000. Butcommon threads have begun to emerge that could help consolidate engineering assessmentefforts for a more productive process.EAC staff has identified the key documents faculty are responsible to fill out for the ABETaccreditation: ABET Course Syllabi, Faculty Vita, and the Course Classification Form (CCF).The EAC is proposing to convert the paper system to a form-based web site where facultymembers can enter/edit information regarding their specific course (CCF or Syllabus) or theirvita. By having faculty update their course
within the chosen college community. Two conceptsclearly emerge from the literature: 1) successful freshman are more satisfied when theyfeel that their learning will somehow have usefulness in later life; and, 2) freshman needto understand and accept the relevancy of the college experience to their personaldevelopment. (Gardner and Upcraft, 1989) To foster realization of these conditions forits first-year students, the School of Engineering implemented a unique partnership withrecent engineering alumni. The Alumni Mentoring Program (AMP) pairs first-yearengineering students as protégés with recent engineering alumni as mentors to provideregular opportunity for learning beyond the classroom. The AMP is configured within thecontext of a required
placement examination with regard toplacement within the curriculum and subsequent academic success. A few students shared thatthey understood the value after the fact, when it was “too late”. One student recommended thatstudents be allowed to review the exam and subsequent placement in the curriculum with anadvisor.Summer Orientation is intended to provide students with information and provide anunderstanding of what to expect in the fall. Students indicated that orientation did not help themto feel more prepared. Rather, they felt that orientation was overwhelming; too muchinformation and a lack of personal connectedness. Page 6.209.3
Paper ID #43380Introducing Social and Environmental Sustainability Aspects Cohesively throughoutthe Student Experience: One Course at a Time while Considering the Programas a WholeDr. Elisabeth Smela, University of Maryland, College Park Elisabeth Smela is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Maryland. She received a BS in physics from MIT and a PhD in electrical engineering from the University of Pennsylvania. Previously, Dr. Smela had worked as a research scientist in Link¨oping, Sweden and in Risø, Denmark before becoming Vice President of Research and Development at Santa Fe Science and Technology
produces focused and comprehensive assessment, butalso has the added advantage of integrating the communication work directly into thedevelopment of the work in science and technology within the undergraduate curriculum. Wehave successfully used this approach in several engineering courses, most recently in MSE390 –Communication II.BackgroundMSE390 – Communication IIIn their first year of study, all students* in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering at theUniversity of Toronto take APS111 and APS112, Engineering Strategies and Practice (ESP),courses which emphasize the link between the design and communication processes. In theirsecond year, students stream into individual departments; each department in the Faculty has itsown curriculum
State with her Ph.D. in Engineering Education, and also holds a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology and a M.S. in Industrial Engineering and Operations Research from the Pennsylvania State University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Self-reflection: Lessons learned from three years of teaching as an international Ph.D. student engineering instructorAbstract: Graduate students, especially Ph.D. students, often work as teaching assistants (TAs) tosupport themselves financially. Recently, there has been a rise in the number of pre-doctoral orgraduate student instructors, particularly in large public universities. These pre
referringphrase analyses [16], and 2) thematic analysis. The script and referring phrase analyses involvelabeling transcripts of collected data with specific codes and find patterns in the data to ease theanalysis and document writing. Meanwhile, the thematic analysis involves labeling thetranscripts data in an open-ended manner extracting meaningful themes that emerge from thedata itself.Script analysis is conducted to provide a general description of the cognitive processes thatinterviewees used during a problem-solving task. Fonteyn et al. [16] proposed four themes forcoding the interview data for instances where the interviewees: 1) attentively considered theinformation (Study), 2) made a decision on the significance of information (Conclude), 3
to connect researchto practice and impact engineering students. This approach involved creating scenarios andprobing questions from the composite narratives for sharing the research findings in academicand industrial educational settings. Lastly, we discuss the benefits and limitations of thismethodology, highlighting the research findings brought into focus using this methodology andcomparing and contrasting these results with those that emerged using an inductive-deductivethematic analysis approach to the data also taken in this research project.Key Words: Composite narratives, Methodology, Participant confidentiality, Research to practiceapproachesIntroductionComposite narratives are a way to combine aspects of multiple interviews into a
- searches pragmatic aspects of expressing authority over knowledge in conversational interaction. She also works as a Graduate Teaching Consultant at UC San Diego’s Engaged Teaching Hub where she is focused on learning and promoting evidence-based teaching practices.Dr. Leah Klement, UC San DiegoMr. Paul Andreas Hadjipieris Paul Hadjipieris is an instructional designer at the University of California San Diego. He holds an MA, in history from Edinboro University of Pennsylvania. His research agenda is on emerging educational tech- nologies and their application to the classroom. He is deeply involved in SoTL research at the University of California San Diego and currently working with faculty on course design and manuscript
Paper ID #25126Mapping & Strengthening Curriculum-Based Industry/Academia Intersec-tionsKatherine McConnell, University of Colorado Boulder/Denver Katherine McConnell is a Senior Professional Development Advisor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder. She is currently a student at the University of Col- orado Denver pursuing an EdD in Leadership for Educational Equity with a concentration in Professional Learning and Technology. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Mapping & Strengthening Curriculum-Based
engineering disaster, or a timeline showing the history of a specific technological innovation.Extended Case Studies Multi-part questions that ask about different aspects of a detailed engineering scenario and that are built using real-world parameters. For example, asking students to make different kinds of calculations related to the function and profitability of a particular kind of power plant.Industry-Based Guest Lectures Lectures led by a guest presenter who shared information about how their work within a specific industry or
most products,pervasive computing devices require technological functionality, user-centered form, andan adept marketing plan. In addition, pervasive computing products require designunderstanding of technologies that work computationally rather than mechanically, andbusiness models that provide services more than selling a device1. More generally,interdisciplinary teaming is increasingly acknowledged as a skill needed in undergraduateengineering education, as evidenced by the ABET outcome of being able to workeffectively in multidisciplinary teams and numerous cross-disciplinary studies, includingan Oxford Handbook in 20102. Our work focuses on interdisciplinary teaming in designsettings, acknowledging that design is central to conceptions of
Consultancy Services as an Assistant Systems Engineer from 2011–2012 in India. He has worked as an Assistant Professor (2014–2018) in the department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, KLE Technological University, India. He is a certified IUCEE International Engineering Educator. He was awarded the ’Ing.Paed.IGIP’ title at ICTIEE, 2018. He is serving as an Associate Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education Transformations (JEET). He is interested in conducting engineering education research, and his interests include student retention in online and in-person engineering courses/programs, data mining and learning analytics in engineering education, broadening student participation in engineering, faculty
past few years as they have navigatedtheir promotion and/or tenure processes while carrying the primary responsibilities for the careand education of children who have been diagnosed with a specific learning disability (SLD).The accounts presented below is represented in the form of collaborative autoethnographyhighlighting the balancing act of working in their engineering departments and the inequitiesthese women faculty of color have faced in still meeting the demands of their careers whilejuggling motherhood. Since the authors are already underrepresented in engineering, they optedto remove their names and identifying information from the quotes used in the manuscript tominimize any work-related retaliation. The readers are cautioned