LEARNING THROUGH A COLLEGE BASED TUTORING PROGRAMAbstractTechnology and technology education changes by the hour making it extremely difficult foruniversity and college instructors and professors stay current on the latest advances in the field,preparing course materials and delivering lectures. It is equally difficult for the students to keepup with this information and they are often left without the opportunity to engage in additionalinteraction that they might need to understand the materials and successfully complete thecourse. Professors have office hours however, this time is limited and that time is rarely adequateleaving the student without the resources he or she might need.In order to address this need, the College of
the students persevered with tutoring. • Focus groups at the end of the semester will be conducted to assess student satisfaction with the faculty-tutoring service. • Midterms and final grades will also be included in the analysis in the coming weeks.At the end of the 15-week semester, high, middle, and low levels of participation intutoring will be compared to those students who did not attend faculty tutoring.The mentoring experienceIn addition to providing informal mentoring support for students who will receivetutoring in the adjunct academy, a mentoring network is being established with practicingengineers and technology experts who will offer to meet with engineering students
industry standard, database accessible, and firewalls passable. Thisprotocol has been demonstrated to be reliable and bidirectional.Flashcom software sends information and manages the server through TCP. Flashcom has itsown administrator tools that can manage the user account and configure the ports which allowthe Internet user access. This technology guarantees the information, which is sent out orreceived by Flashcom, to pass through the firewall without missing data.Another advantage of Flashcom is its ability to pass only the changed data to the clients. Forexample, when an end user changes a variable, from 2 to 3, Flashcom will send 3 to all theclients whose variable is not 3. This technology helps to reduce data transmission over theInternet
conferences to train interested faculty. We in the Physicsengineering technology and other curricula in our community Department will continue to conduct AI assisted pedagogy,college. The supremacy of using AI as a writing tool to improve consistent with CUNY Graduate Center.lab report narration was verified readily, although theimprovement of conceptual understanding through literacy wasobserved to be minimal in a cohort of students. An information II. FIRST LEVEL IMPLEMENTATIONpedagogy of converting assessment in multiple choice question A general issue of using generic information generated byformat to an informational format with AI driven lab narration AI in describing a lab could be
they all had one thing in common. They allwanted to be in the forefront of instruction of new and emerging information technology (IT)software tools. Faculty “teams” from eight mentee colleges and five mentor colleges took part inthis initial gathering of this innovative, collaborative program that was conceived by theMicrosoft Corp. and managed by the American Association of Community Colleges (AACC).The program matched colleges that were already leaders in information technology education(i.e. the mentors) with colleges that were interested in either developing their existing ITprograms or starting new programs (i.e. the mentees). This highly successful program wascontinually expanded through a yearly grant application process so that by the
within themanufacturing industry is important for understanding outcomes of technological aspects asindustry seeks to improve manufacturing. The workshop was a 1-day event with an opendiscussion. Assessments were conducted using information from registrations and post workshopsurveys.IntroductionThis paper outlines the results of the workshop on “Advanced Manufacturing Technologies”organized by the Department of Engineering Technology at Drexel University in June 2017. Thispaper is not confined to summarizing the discussions and conclusions of the workshop, but alsoelaborates on themes identified at the workshop to substantiate what advanced manufacturingtechnologies might become in the future. The US Government has set its focus on
his sabbatical to study entrepreneurship in Indiana and assist start-ups as Educator/Entrepreneur in Resi- dence at Indiana Venture Center. He has been Advisor/Director for several high tech firms and has been involved in national efforts to integrate entrepreneurship and engineering education. Since his retirement from full-time teaching, Mason has co-authored an updated edition of Forecasting and Management of Technology, teaches part-time, continues his research and writing on innovation and entrepreneurship, and works in an advisory capacity with several emerging firms. Mason received his Ph.D. in economics from the University of Pittsburgh and his B.A. in economics from Geneva College.Mr. Brian Charles Dougherty
. in economics from the University of Texas at Austin in 2002 after receiving her MS in economics from Illinois State University in 1995 and her BA in economics from Illinois Wesleyan University in 1994. Her research focuses on applied econometric analyses of labor market and macroeconomic topics.Patrick kinnicutt, Central Michigan University Dr. Patrick Kinnicutt received his SB and SM degrees in Civil and Environmental Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1989 and 1991, respectively. He received his PhD in Information Technology in Civil Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1995. Dr. Kinnicutt is currently an Assistant Professor of
promoting sustained economic growth, all of which address emerging societal needs of the21st century. However, concerns have been raised about the current education system's ability toproduce engineers equipped to meet the rapidly growing demands of a global, dynamicworkplace and the evolving nature of engineering work [1]. While educational technologies(EdTech) are powerful tools for transforming learning and improving educational outcomes, theplentitude of EdTech poses challenges for effective adoption in engineering classroom settings.In addition, rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing(NLP) are accelerating the development of new EdTech tools, increasing the burden on educatorsfor evaluating and
2006-1101: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT RESULTS OF THE NC-LSAMPPROJECTMarcia Williams, North Carolina A&T State University Marcia Williams is the Coordinator of Sponsored Programs for the College of Engineering at North Carolina A&T State University and Statewide Coordinator for the NC Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (NC-LSAMP). She received a B.S. in Industrial Technology (Manufacturing) from North Carolina A&T State University, and a MBA from Wake Forest University. She has sixteen years of experience in sponsored program administration.Gerald Watson, North Carolina A&T State University Jerry Watson is a Ph.D. candidate in Industrial Engineering at North Carolina A&
college. Use of theePortfolio is an important part of the assessment component of this 3-year long study.IntroductionA portfolio is a purposeful collection of artifacts to demonstrate effort, progress, andachievement. Within an educational setting a portfolio can be prepared in the context of acourse, a program, or an institution; the author of the portfolio can be the student, a facultymember, an administrator, or an organization (department, program, etc.); and the purpose of theportfolio may be developmental, evaluative, and/or representative.1 With the ever increasing useand advancement of technology, the electronic portfolio (ePortfolio) is emerging as a viableoption to the traditional paper portfolio. The University of California, Berkeley
beliefs about one’sinfluence over their fate. Their study also demonstrates that cultural attributes of the group,technology factors such as adequate information and scheduling infrastructure, and humanresources such as training, on-site coordination and administrative support are critical to thesuccess of these projects. Van Ryssen, et al.2 strongly believe that setting up intercultural overseas collaborationunder imperfect circumstances and limited access to technological resources is a valuablecomplement to traditional text book learning. Collaborations have a problem-solving aspect thatguarantees that new skills are learned and attitudes are changed. Pollard, et al.4 have encountered many logistical problems in overseas
particular dimensions. The instrument was checked for validity andreliability and found to be an accurate measurement of the preferential learning styles14.Design of research apparatus (Pedagogical Tool)Selecting an effective medium to present the theoretical material for the experimentalgroup was of paramount importance. A web based tutorial solution was chosen over astand-alone fully executable program as it could be launched on the University intranet,this was an ideal to ensure complete student accessibility. Along with access, severalother advantages were identified with a web-based solution: • The information technology division (ITD) within the University has a consistent build on all student computer profiles in the College. This
, and distractions from the technology. We believe an awareness of thesedifficulties will help others who try to replace multiple-choice questions with open-endedresponses in their classes. Furthermore, we have developed and described some useful strategiesfor overcoming these challenges.BackgroundIn recent years, educators have enthusiastically embraced the use of individual student responsedevices (“clickers”) to incorporate more active learning into the higher education setting.Relatively inexpensive and easy to use, these classroom communication devices allow forindividual student metacognition and real-time formative assessment even in very large classes.Much anecdotal evidence and a growing body of emerging data indicate that the use of
; Exposition Copyright ©2005, American Society for Engineering Education”document for university partners common characteristics of successful research basedprofessional development programs.44Yet training teachers and recruiting and educating tomorrow’s nanoscale scientists and engineersrepresents only part of the equation. Another significant part is educating and informing thenation’s citizenry - including business and community leaders, moms and dads, elected officials,the media, social scientists, and ethicists - on these new technologies transforming our world,and engaging these citizens in envisioning the kind of world we hope to shape through thesetechnologies.Public Engagement with Research in an Emerging Nanotech
new technology andengineering content to the K-12 curriculum. In each of these efforts, the role of the school subject known as “Technology Education” hasbeen recognized and validated. In addition to describing the role of Technology Education in K-12 engineering education, Technically Speaking drew this conclusion: “the committee believesthat the value of K-12 engineering curricula and of professional development for teachers of K-12 engineering would be increased by stronger connections to technological literacy, asdescribed in such documents as the Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Studyof Technology”7.Despite the rapidly emerging engineering in K-12 education agenda and the close relationshipTechnology Education has to
. Page 12.267.7SSEP Data SetTable 2 shows general information for the high school girls participating in the survey. Becausethey have self-selected to attend a science and engineering summer camp, it is not surprising thatthey report liking math, science and technology class (91%), and using computers (89%). Mostreport that they are good at using computers (73%) and generally get good grades in school(95%). Many also report that they like their English/Language Arts classes (64%). The majorityagree that they would like to learn more about AI (61%), but many are neutral on the subject(29%). Neutral
) Examining fewer alternativesThe importance of developing search rules, stopping rules, and decision rules was highlighted byRaab & Gignezer [19]. This led to the question, does the nature of the task impact on theeffectiveness of the participant? Or is it simply the level at which they (the problem-solver) havedeveloped their search rule, stopping rule, and/or decision rule.The capacity to highlight trends in problem-solving and individual heuristics that could bemonitored and tracked across a broad range (five themed areas) was considered. The divergentnature of technology meant that the method employed in codifying and assessing would have to bedeveloped in a proactive/ reactive manner.MethodTest toolThe Information Communication Technology
community.This paper will explore appropriate technology in the context of our work in the small, ruralcommunity of Duchity, Haiti that began in November 2010. We begin with a conceptual maptracing the relations and distinctions between appropriate technology, socio-technical systems,humanitarian engineering, and the Capabilities Approach. Each of these has been closelyexamined in book-length studies. Thus, our treatment here will necessarily be brief but essentialto avoid the mistakes of paternalism outlined so well in Easterly’s The White Man’s Burden.Next, we examine how two issues central to RCR (Responsible Conduct of Research), avoidingpaternalism and facilitating informed consent, transfer to this context of appropriate technology,but with
flood management.The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) of the United States has only afraction of the river data translated into a digital GIS. They primarily contract out the dutiesof managing and updating the most recent possible flood map information for some of themost frequently flooded areas of the United States. See picture 2 as an example of whatFEMA may use as a reference before, during, and after a flooding event. Picture 2: Example of a web-enabled application for FEMA response workers to use.In Germany, there is much less land to cover but it is important to note that on average thedensity of people living in a flood plain is greater than the United States, therefore, much ofthe new technology approaches to flood mapping
to students’ development and internalization ofactive learning processes. Because these processes are needed to support life-longlearning, portfolios have the potential to contribute to professional development wellbeyond the college years. With the current generation of students being greatlyinfluenced by information technology 14 —reflected in, for example, an overwhelminginterest in Facebook 15, and the ease with which e-portfolios can be shared among variousconstituents as compared to paper portfolios, e-portfolios offer students a great learningopportunity that can guide them in becoming engaged learners. In this study we wantedto leverage these advantages and use e-portfolios as a formative assessment techniquethat would simultaneously
Paper ID #7450Materials Science Students’ Perceptions and Usage Intentions of Computa-tionDr. Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University, West Lafayette is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Computer and Information Technology at Purdue Univer- sity West Lafayette. Magana’s research interests are centered on the integration of cyberinfrastructure, computation, and computational tools and methods to: (a) leverage the understanding of complex phe- nomena in science and engineering and (b) support scientific inquiry learning and innovation. Specific efforts focus on studying cyberinfrastructure affordances and
the College of Education at the University of Wyoming. Page 11.1339.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Thinking and Doing Math and Science with Engineering: A PartnershipIntroductionDuring the summers of 2004 and 2005, the Colleges of Engineering and Education at theUniversity of Wyoming teamed up to provide engineering topics-based workshops for K-12teachers. The workshop topics focused upon contemporary engineering technology andapplications, providing a foundation for inquiry-based lessons in K-12 math and scienceclassrooms.In this paper, the authors summarize the
Section 3430 On Teaching Engineering Ethics: A Challenge to the Engineering Professoriate Billy V. Koen Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas/Austin, USA koen@uts.cc.utexas.edu1. IntroductionWhen the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) established EvaluationCriterion 3: Outcome #f, it signaled a renewed interest in instruction in ethics at colleges ofengineering in the United States.[1] Outcome #f states that “Engineering programs mustdemonstrate that their graduates have an understanding
development of the TST program in the summer of 2013. Withinweeks the number of participating faculty shrank to roughly 15, whose affiliations varied widelyranging from engineering technology to theatre. These remaining faculty were exposed to aseries of individual and team exploration exercises intended strengthen the bond among theparticipants. The initial design of two distinct learning experiences emerged in the spring of2014. Their purpose was to examine real-world open-ended problems from different lenses. A“Seminar” experience would address the problem from a cultural and societal lens while a“Design Studio” experience would examine the problem from a science and technologyperspective. The notion of “competency” was adopted through research
broad interdisciplinaryinterest and have been recognized as one of the significant emerging technologies by theNational Science Foundation1 2 and the general press 3 4. Using wireless sensor networks as amotivating technology, this paper discusses a new course for electrical and computer engineering(ECE) and mechanical engineering (ME) freshman at the University of Vermont (UVM). Thecourse provides students with a hands-on experience in which interdisciplinary team work,technical communications and hardware design is emphasized. The engineering program atUVM is relatively small with three departments (electrical and computer, civil andenvironmental and mechanical engineering) and with ~100 freshman entering each year. Thusthe methodology
apoint in time. Although the Internet-based laboratory facilities have a number of potentialbenefits, these drawbacks hinder the process of gaining of their popularity. Towards this theauthors used a unique facility to offer a regular undergraduate laboratory course within anelectrical engineering technology program10. The study is conducted through a grant from theNational Science Foundation (Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement program).Although, there are a number of remote facilities reported, as far as the authors’ knowledge, thismay be the first system of this kind that is used to offer a complete laboratory course over theInternet as a part of a regular academic program. This paper will provide a brief description of the
the use of this technology. It willalways be recommended that faculty align students’ perspectives and expectations aboutobjectives and the learning process when introducing web-based forums that are eventuallymanaged by students with only limited faculty supervision.References1. Wang, Wei-Hsing, “An Overview of Technology Trends and Innovation Potential in Recording, Storing,Dissemination, Presentation, Application and Creation of Knowledge”, Emerging Information TechnologyConference 2005, v 2005, Emerging Information Technology Conference 2005, 2005, p 173-177.2. Su, Cheng-Chao, “An Open Source Platform for Educators”, Proceedings - 5th IEEE International Conference onAdvanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2005, v 2005, Proceedings - 5th
AC 2007-2219: STUDENT/TEACHER TEAM BIOTECHNOLOGY/GENETICSWORKSHOPVirgil Cox, Gaston College Virgil G. Cox, OE , Dean of Engineering and Industrial Technologies at Gaston College for almost twenty years Dean Cox has taught courses in a broad range of engineering disciplines, has evaluated many programs and courses and published over 10 articles dealing with technology and education in refereed journals. Dean Cox was also an Associate Professor of Ocean Engineering at Maine Maritime Academy. Dean Cox is a retiree of the US Navy and a Veteran. Dean Cox received his B.S., MSEE, and Ocean Engineers degrees from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Mary Beth Ross, Gaston College
this class for the first time. All sections of thecourse were team taught by two faculty members, one with a mechanical background, the otherelectrical. Both had prior experience teaching freshmen at other institutions, and were chosenbased on their positive record of teaching and mentoring students. Retention of new students inthe program was an additional goal with the choice of these faculty members.The Initial SurveyDuring the first class meeting of ETGR 1100, Engineering Technology Computer Applications,students were given an informal survey. They were asked to rank their level of proficiency invarious computer applications on a scale from 1 to 10, with 10 being the most proficient. Thepurpose of the survey was to determine the