was a male associateprofessor in civil engineering at a large university in the Midwest, with more than five years full-time employment at a higher education institution. The practicing engineer was female with Masterof Science and Associate of Science degrees. The engineer graduated from a small size Masters-level university, and worked one or more semesters as an intern and a graduate research assistant.The engineer had more than five years full-time employment in civil engineering industry, asshown in Table 1. All the participants took part in the study voluntarily and were given $20 fortheir participation. Table 1. Profile of participants Participant number of size of institution area of industry
to work at the school. Be ready toask lots of questions during your on-campus visit. Think about what you really care about interms of your working environment and colleagues and make sure you get those questionsanswered during the interview process.Be courteous to all people you meet, regardless of whether the meeting is part of the formalinterview. This includes hotel staff, your taxi driver, university staff, and people you meet whilewalking across campus or in town. Many teaching schools are in small towns where everyoneknows everyone and your casual meetings could influence the search committee. We even knowof a large research university whose search committee asks the hotel managers about thebehavior of faculty candidates. Also, take
, barriers, and best practices to educate others and support organizational improvement. Prior to joining the University, Ashleigh managed and directed many training and pathway programs that support students from underrepresented backgrounds in STEM, and facilitated workshops that enhance the academic, personal, and professional development of students at North Carolina State University and Louisiana State University. She is a member of the National Organization for the Professional Advancement of Black Chemists and Chemical Engineers (NOBCChE) and Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. She holds degrees in chemistry from Wofford College (B.S.), North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (M.S.), and Louisiana
partnership is to attract and retain women, Hispanics, African Americans, and otherminorities individuals to engineering. Students participating in the program are exposed andtrained on NASA’s mission, given seminars on the realities of the workplace, diversity, andgender issues. Students attend to their regular curriculum during the academic year, whileworking on projects for NASA. This model is being tested at various levels to transfer it toindustry at large. Our preliminary results indicate that such partnership provides a win-win-winsituation for the student, industry, and faculty. This article discusses the partnership model andits implementation.1. The partnership modelThe partnership seeks to establish a combined research and educational
Paper ID #42620A introductory-level, student-taught biomedical neuroengineering course for1st year undeclared engineering undergraduate studentsNyota Prakash Patel, University of VirginiaDeepika Sahoo, University of VirginiaDr. Shannon Barker, University of Virginia Dr. Shannon Barker is an Associate Professor and Undergraduate Program Director at UVA BME ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Background and MotivationEngineers are required to conceive, design, and maintain products, processes, and systems acrossmany sectors to meet societal needs [1]. Projects often require training in fundamentals andacross
word counts and analyzing the number and type ofrevisions (using the MS Word Compare Tool).Finally, a survey was administered to 28 of the 29 participants (One student declined toparticipate in the study). The response rate was 22 (79 % of those surveyed). One purpose of thesurvey was to assess students’ perception of the value of the different learning experiences,including the online resources, the presentation, reviewers’ comments, small group instruction,and ongoing feedback during the revision process. Students rated their experiences on a five-point Likert scale from “not at all valuable” (1) to extremely valuable” (5). Additionally, studentswere asked to report about the challenges and benefits of participating on interdisciplinary
” during lab sessions to help pique student interest in not only what they aredoing now (as procedural labs can often feel boring), but also to excite them for what theirtraining makes possible.With a large team, consistent grading can also present a challenge. It is recommended that youprovide example student submissions (“good, bad, and ugly”) that are scored by a “mastergrader” to demonstrate strong, formative feedback. These can be an excellent tool for studentsand TAs alike to learn how a grading rubric is to be applied to an assignment. To improve thefeedback mechanism, tools provided by Canvas or Gradescope, for example, allow for TAs togenerate and reuse feedback while grading assessments. Anyone who has been responsible forgrading
is off-setting the cost ofbuying such energy at going consumer rates. The initial investment for each technology is basedupon the retail purchase price of grid-tied power generation system, typical mounting hardwarecost, and an estimated installation cost. Factors that offset the capital expense are the federal taxcredits and rebates available through state programs. The expected life of the system and anominal recurring maintenance cost complete the factors used to compute the internal rate ofreturn. Some inputs have more uncertainty than others, thus variations in the installation cost,long term performance, and life expectancy are made to assess their effect on the rate of return.Seven areas near well known cities with significantly
Engineering than independently organizing further attempts atstandalone, engineering-only workshop offerings. It also offered CTL the chance to addressmental health at the TA Conference for the first time on a larger scale. With the counselingcenter and ET&L taking care of producing and facilitating the session, CTL bore the logisticsand cost of including an additional session in their program description, room reservations, andregistration process. This was much appreciated by the ET&L consultant, whose office has lessstaffing and funding.Lesson: Don’t start from scratch.Although the counseling center had extensive experience with a standard workshop presentation,it was largely lecture-based and was designed for a longer duration than what
emerging technology in the classroom to prepare the next generation of engineers and other students for the challenges of the future. Jeff was honored in 2014 with an Outstanding Projects and Leaders Lifetime Achievement Award by the American Society of Civil Engineers. He holds a bachelor’s degree in civil engineering from University of Cincinnati, master’s and doctoral degrees from Purdue University, and is a registered professional engineer in Wisconsin. Jeff grew up in a construction family where his father ran the field operations for a small regional con- tractor in northeast Ohio. He spent his youth working in construction, learning the value of hard work, integrity, organization, and leadership. He has
these effects and properties. Most crucial defect types have specific thermaland optical signatures which can be identified and characterized by imaging. Many newtechnologies, such as solar cells, solid-state lighting, superconductivity, medicalimaging, as well as many proposed nanotechnologies, can falter in commercializationbecause they encounter serious difficulties when scaled up for large-area manufacture.Imaging provides tremendous capabilities and insights that cannot be achieved orrealized with traditional “point sensors” such as temperature or voltage probes, orpressure and strain gauges, either in basic research and process engineering, as forexample, to assess and assure areal uniformity of chemical, structural, optical
Assistant Dean for Graduate Student Services at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she earned Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engineering from the University of Michigan. She has published more than two dozen peer-reviewed works related to her interests in educational technology and enhancing undergraduate education through hands-on learning. Luchini-Colbry is also the Director of the Engineering Futures Program of Tau Beta Pi, the Engineering Honor Society, which provides interactive seminars on interpersonal communications and problem solving skills for engineering
engagement and learning experience but also effectivelyimprove academic performance. REFERENCES[1] J. Hartley and I. K. Davies, "Note‐taking: A critical review," Programmed learning and educational technology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 207-224, 1978.[2] T. Tips, "Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers," ed: Boston, Mass: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2002.[3] M. Weimer, "Effective strategies for improving college teaching and learning," The Teaching Professor, pp. 1-9, 2014.[4] M. Prince, "Does active learning work? A review of the research," Journal of engineering education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223-231, 2004.[5] J. E. Caldwell, "Clickers in the large
. As part of the dissemination plan for this project, the Public Works for PublicLearning Conference brought together representatives from both large and small public worksprojects from around the world to share their successes in using these projects for raising publicawareness. This paper summarizes some of the key lessons from this project.IntroductionLarge- and small-scale public works projects are important in the smooth operation of everycommunity, yet a majority of the population has little awareness of how these projects work andwhat their functions are. Few non-engineers understand the engineering challenges of deliveringclean water, disposing of our sewage, or changing a traditional intersection into a round-about, aproject that
critically examined existing active learning materials used for face-to-face delivery of thecourse and adapted them for online course delivery. The authors monitored the levels of studentengagement in each group and surveyed individual students to measure their perceived level ofengagement with course activities. Our initial assessment data suggest that students attendingsynchronous class meetings were slightly more engaged with the course materials than thosewho did not. Students interacting with the active learning course materials, whethersynchronously or asynchronously, felt more engaged with the course than they would have witha traditional online lecture course.BackgroundMany courses offered by the College of Engineering and Computer Science
mirrorsstrongly to the Gates Foundation.44 As a funding body, the Gates Foundation has much greaterinfluence on how organizations design projects than one relatively small non-governmentalorganization. Additionally, Polak undercuts engineering design principles when he asserts thatdesigners should follow a linear, 12-step process.3 Designers following Polak’s approach need tohave extended presence in communities. Despite encouraging designers to have extendedcommunity engagement, Polak relies on one-time interviews to understand the highly dynamiccontexts associated with living in poverty.63 Emphasizing IDE’s successes in a public arena canblock internal organization learning.Engineering educators designing service-learning programs encounter different
Paper ID #25614Military-Bound and Veteran Student Views on Socially Responsible Engi-neeringDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environ- mental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She has served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living- learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and
Engineering, andNuclear Engineering. Specific “Big” projects for students and faculty (one or two faculty perclass) that were implemented with undergrads in a small and teaching focused Liberal ArtsUniversity with limited resources over the past 15 years are as follows: 1. Solar car vehicle and drivetrain completed and entered into national competition 2. Downhole oil well control and sensor system with 2000 ft fiber optics and wireless link 3. TUSAT 1 DualCube nanosatellites 4. TEST Satellite with Air Force nanosatellite program (several grad school MS projects) 5. BUSAT development with Boston University 6. New Science Building design with new sustainable technologies ($42M project) and Mobile Energy Lab on large trailer
the skin ispopulated with a large array of touch sensors, a flexible tactile skin sensor can bedeveloped. Although this sensor does not communicate with the brain or the centralnervous system, nonetheless the information it provides can be used in a variety of formsto aid the user.Similarly, a tactile sensor that provides almost-continuous information about an object,forces involved, and shapes, can be used in many robotic applications, including hapticsand animatronics applications. This can be extended to advanced toys that can react tohuman touch and behave accordingly.In this project, stretchable, deformable, tactile sensors were developed to provide a largearray of sensory information that may be used by a microprocessor for other
introduced in this sectionof the course, the latter of which is used for the Core Project in Section 3. Students are notrequired to have any prerequisite programming knowledge, which has resulted in a moreconceptual approach to understanding code structure, loops, and automation as opposed tohaving students write a Python script from scratch.Objectives: 2, 4, 5, 6, 7Number of classes: 3GIS concepts: Raster data sets; spatial analysis tools; creating and modifying features; workflowsand tool automationCivil engineering concepts: Elevation surfaces; slopes; land use; riparian buffers; zoningcalculations; open space; subdivisions; site layouts; setbacksExample project: Site assessment and zoning calculations for undeveloped tract of landSection 3
wasprovided with an expected design content and steps to be followed. The evidence of learningincluded a final project report with description, analysis, experimental results, and power pointpresentation.2. Design and 3-D Printing in Green Energy Manufacturing The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) is charged with the task of“Quality assurance in higher education” for programs in applied science, computing, engineering,and technology. Institutions pursuing accreditation must demonstrate that the program meets a setof general criteria. Of particular interest are the requirements of Criteria #2, #3, and #5, which arefocused on Program Educational Objectives, Program Outcomes and Assessment, and Faculty20-21 . Design is a
other ET cohorts at the college, particularly since one of the study’s limitations was its small sample size.4. Also, an expansion of the program to include other majors, both associate degree majors as well as baccalaureate students and more female students would verify its generalizability to other populations in the college.5. Replicating the study with the same faculty would add validity and be valuable to test if the findings could be repeated.6. As one of the study’s limitations was that the outcomes could be limited to the selection of instructors, replicating the study with other faculty would examine whether the study’s findings were dependent on a particular faculty team or if other faculty might evoke the same
Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) [4] advocates thisapproach of providing small hints that allow a student to progress from their current state ofknowledge forward towards a solution. If the hint is too large and the student is given the answer,learning is limited. There exist a number of approaches in CBL to personalize the learningenvironment, but these are mostly limited because the software does not have the informationneeded to understand the student’s thought process. For example a common approach in CBLuses multiple-choice questions. But when the student selects an answer, the software cannotdetect if the student selected the answer by guessing, nor can it understand the reason behind thestudent’s mistake. This is also true for most
activities. It may also be nearlyimpossible for the students to develop in-depth knowledge on experimental design throughcompletely open-end, so-called “sink or swim”, laboratory design projects.Implementation of theme-specific laboratory design projectThe mechanical engineering program at Youngstown State University has been continuouslyupgrading its educational objectives and assessment plan since 1998 when a comprehensiveassessment plan was implemented. It sets a high priority for meeting Outcome (b) - Ability todesign and conduct experiments, of ABET 2000. For proper assessment of Outcome (b), the Page 25.646.2program developed assessment rubrics
also prepare students for real-world challenges by simulatingprofessional scenarios and encouraging hands-on learning experiences.Despite these benefits, VR’s adoption in civil engineering education has been limited by severalpractical and logistical challenges. This technology can involve considerable initial costs, limitingaccess to only those with substantial resources. Additionally, both educators and students may facea steep learning curve to effectively use VR systems, which can take time away from core learningobjectives [10]. Another challenge lies in scalability; VR systems are often designed for individualor small-group interaction, making it difficult to accommodate large classes, which are commonin civil engineering programs
2006-483: MEASURING ENGINEERING CLASSROOM COMMUNITY:LEARNING AND CONNECTEDNESS OF STUDENTSTodd Johnson, Washington State University Dr. Johnson is Assistant Professor in Educational Psychology. His primary teaching activity includes theoretical foundations of learning and instruction, educational statistics, educational measurement,assessment of learning, and program evaluation. He served as Co-PI on an NSF ?Bridging Engineering Education? grant called the CyberMentor (Mathematics and Engineering via New Technologies: Outreach and Recruitment) project. A major part of this grant was to promote and develop partnerships and interdisciplinary initiatives connecting education, engineering, K-12
describedin Table 2 on a five-point Likert scale (“Definitely will not”, “Probably will not”, “Might ormight not”, “Probably will” and “Definitely will”).Table 2: The Eight EMS Career Options in Q20 (A) Work as an (B) Work as an (C) Work as an (D) Work as an employee for employee for a small employee for a medium- employee for a non- the government, military, or business or start-up or large-size business profit organization public agency (excluding a company school or college/university) (E) Work as a teacher (F) Work as a faculty (G) Found or start your (H) Found or start your own or educational
components. For assessment purposes,the instructors felt that the individual course grades needed to be adjusted to accommodate forthe portion of the grade that is defined by group work in these courses. Individual grades are areflection of a student’s actual work, whereas the group grade is easily confounded by the effectsof their team mates (positively and negatively).Assigning grades to individuals for a group project is important because instructors want toassign grades based on effort. Since all students in a group typically receive the same grade for agroup assignment (e.g. a group report), group grades have the undesirable effect of obscuring astudent’s true performance, especially if group work constitutes a large portion of the final
-state.edu) is a Professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department atKansas State University. Research and teaching interests include signal processing, the development of advancedinstrumentation, low-noise analog design, audio electronics, electroacoustics, and multidisciplinary education. Healso maintains an active interest in music, playing piano, organ and bass in various local bands and ensembles.FREDERICK W. BURRACK (fburrack@k-state.edu) is the Director of the Office of Assessment at Kansas StateUniversity, and is an Associate Professor in K-State’s School of Music, Theatre and Dance. He also oversees thegraduate program for the Music Program. Burrack’s research interests include student-learning assessment methods,cross
[4] and OpenLDAP [5] in an enterprise environment. Students learn tointegrate directory services with other commonly-used applications, i.e., email. Directory services are also used to provide single sign-on to allow users authenticate once and gain access to the resources on multiple systems in a mixed network. The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we present the design of the CNSA curriculum. In Section 3, wepresent the course implementation, including schedule, topics and lab setup. In Section 4 we discuss the course assessment. Theconclusion is in Section 5.2. THE CNSA CURRICULUM The CNSA program aims to prepare students to work in some of today's most challenging and exciting career choices: computer