Conference Session

Discussions on Research Methodology: ERM Roundtable

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emily Dringenberg, Purdue University, West Lafayette; John Alexander Mendoza-Garcia, Purdue University, West Lafayette / Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - Bogota, Colombia; Mariana Tafur-Arciniegas P.E., Purdue University, West Lafayette; Nicholas D. Fila, Purdue University; Ming-Chien Hsu, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

these considerations.IntroductionPhenomenography is a qualitative methodological approach that seeks to identify the variety ofways people experience a given phenomenon 1-3. Due to its widespread applicability to bothclassroom practice and educational research, this approach has steadily gained popularity sinceits official introduction in 1981 3,4. Today, phenomenography is recognized as one of the topemergent methodologies in engineering education 5. As the use of phenomenography has grown,so too has the variation in phenomenographic methods 6,7. While literature commonly drawsattention to the distinctions between work by Ference Marton in Sweden (e.g. purephenomenography and later “new” phenomenography 1,3,4,8) and John Bowden in Australia

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn Weed Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University; Neeraj Sonalkar, Stanford University; Ilya Avdeev, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Brian D. Thompson, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Mohamed M. Megahed, Pennsylvania State University; Pratik Subhash Pachpute, Pennsylvania State University,Great Valley

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

- kee School of Engineering) on commercializing new technologies through Lean Startup training. He is a co- founder of the UWM Student Startup Challenge program and a UWM faculty mentor of the Stanford d.school’s University Innovation Fellows program. He was also a UWM team lead for the NSF-funded Pathways to Innovation Program.Mr. Brian D. Thompson, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Brian Thompson is President of the UWM Research Foundation, Inc. He leads efforts by the UWM Research Foundation to bridge between the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and the private sector through programs that include catalyst grants and intellectual property management as well as fostering corporate partnerships, spinout companies

Conference Session

International Division (INTL) Technical Session #4: Global DEI

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael D. Preuss, Exquiri Consulting, LLC; John Albert Avila Sr., Texas A&M University; Karen L. Butler-Purry, P.E., Texas A&M University; Shannon Walton, Texas A&M University; Ahmarlay Myint, Texas A&M University; Maria Claudia Alves, Texas A&M University; John Walewski, Texas A&M University; Zenon Medina Cetina; Kim Withers; Keisha D. Bahr, Texas A&M University; Sasha Sentz; Barbara Szczerbinska, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International Division (INTL)

, Texas A&M University Maria Claudia Alves Senior Director for the Halliburton Engineering Global Programs at Texas A&M University Dr. Maria C. Alves is the Director for the Halliburton Engineering Global Programs at Texas A&M University . She has been in this position since July 2012. In this position she is responsible for interna- tionalizing the research and education activities of the Dwight Look College of Engineering. Under her leadership the college has significantly increased the number of students studying abroad, established new models of study abroad including co-op and research abroad and established meaningful connection for research and attraction of funded international graduate students

Conference Session

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies: Laboratory Pedagogy

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laura A. Garrison, York College of Pennsylvania; Timothy J. Garrison, York College of Pennsylvania

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

startedbrainstorming, discussing, and researching new ideas. At a faculty retreat some peer-reviewexamples were presented that could be applicable. These came from instructor resources in achemistry writing textbook.10 A presentation by Leipold at the 2015 ASEE Annual conferencecontained quite a few innovative ideas that could apply to this lab.11 See Appendix C for ahandout from that presentation with one of the author’s scribbled notes. Additionally, ideascame from a lecture / lab format for an Engineering Physics course.12, 13The resulting modifications to the course are listed here and partially described in the syllabusexcerpt found in Appendix D:1. CATME software was introduced to create teams and to administer peer reviews for teamwork for each lab

Conference Session

ERM: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Loweth, University of Michigan; Sara Hoffman, University of Michigan; Shanna Daly, University of Michigan; Leah Paborsky; Steve Skerlos, University of Michigan

) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Professional merit in engineering career advancement: Student perspectives and critiquesAbstractThis research paper presents findings from a preliminary study of undergraduate engineeringstudents’ perspectives on the role of professional merit in engineering career advancement. Theideology of meritocracy, i.e., the belief that personal and career successes result primarily fromindividual talent, training, and hard work, is a core part of engineering culture that may leadengineers to view social justice concerns as irrelevant to engineering. To better understand theextent to which engineering

Conference Session

Best of DEED

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Menold, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Kathryn W. Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University; Timothy W. Simpson, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Emily A. Waterman, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

interests include problem solving, invention, and creativity in science and engineer- ing, as well as robotics and computational dynamics. In addition to her membership in ASEE, she is a Senior Member of IEEE and a Fellow of ASME. Dr. Jablokow is the architect of a unique 4-course mod- ule focused on creativity and problem solving leadership and is currently developing a new methodology for cognition-based design. She is one of three instructors for Penn State’s Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) on Creativity, Innovation, and Change, and she is the founding director of the Problem Solving Research Group, whose 50+ collaborating members include faculty and students from several universities, as well as industrial

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Allison Godwin, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Brianna Benedict McIntyre, Purdue University; Jacqueline Ann Rohde, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Herman Ronald Clements III, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Heather Lee Perkins, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Joana Marques Melo, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Andrea Lidia Castillo, University of California, Irvine

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

focused on building a community of educators passionate about expanding their knowledge concerning diversity, equity, and inclusion in engineering education. Her most recent accomplishment was being recognized as one of seven AAC&U 2019 K. Patricia Cross Scholars based on her commitment to teaching and learning and civic engagement.Ms. Jacqueline Rohde, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Jacqueline Rohde is a PhD candidate at Purdue University and is the recipient of an NSF Graduate Re- search Fellowship. Her research interests in engineering education include the development student iden- tity and attitudes, with a specific focus on the pre-professional identities of engineering undergraduates who join non

Conference Session

Assessment in Mechanics Courses

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Sevier, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Vincent Prantil, Milwaukee School of Engineering

new Midwest home by bike commuting year-round. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Bridging FEA Theory and Practice with MATLAB Grader – Work in ProgressAbstractFinite element analysis (FEA) is a powerful tool that allows engineers to evaluate how well astructure can withstand a given loading environment. While commercial FEA software has awide range of capacities, it requires substantial insight and a minimum requisite skillset inundergraduate mechanics to generate meaningful results. The purpose of an undergraduate finiteelement course is to build such insight within the minds of students. This

Conference Session

Pre-College: Perceptions and Attitudes on the Pathway to Engineering (1)

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marcelo Caplan, Columbia College Chicago

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

listedonly programs primarily concerned with STEM education while others included all educationor research programs that had some STEM education part, however small.”Then, it is also available in this inventory a definition of STEM/STEAM education that bythemselves is not well defined and not provide clarity:“STEM includes physical and natural sciences, technology, engineering, and mathematicsdisciplines, topics, or issues (including environmental science education or environmentalstewardship). We recognize that various different and usually broader definitions are used for“STEM.” [1]To be able to assess if the participants and the out-of-school-time organizations’ leadershiphave had, after the intervention, a positive change in their attitude and

Conference Session

Track 1: Technical Session 7:Beyond Math Readiness: Understanding Why Some Women Pursue Engineering

Collection

2024 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Olivia Ryan, Virginia Tech Engineering Education; Susan Sajadi, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity

-ready engineering students is a direct result of the COVID-19 global‬ ‭pandemic. COVID disrupted education and significantly impacted students’ mathematics‬ ‭development compared to language arts development‬‭[9], [26]‬‭. Initial reports from the early‬ ‭pandemic (2021) stated that elementary school students could have lost five to ten months of‬ ‭learning in mathematics, with potentially similar ramifications for middle and high school‬ ‭students‬‭[27]‬‭. In addition to learning loss, adolescents‬‭had significant issues staying motivated‬ ‭and developing necessary academic skills while learning from home‬‭[28], [29]‬‭. Students'‬a‭ cademic readiness is expected to differ because of COVID, and higher education must adapt‬

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Recruiting and Retention

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nisha Abraham, University of Texas at Austin; Nina Kamath Telang, University of Texas at Austin

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

were shared with the SI Leaders, so they could use it to track students’ attendance to SI, but also as one of multiple metrics of students’ progress and overall state of well-being. Student attendance to SI sessions was used in combination with attendance in lecture, recitation, office hours, assignment completion and performance on quizzes. A scaffolded approach was developed for the team; absences from SI sessions would prompt an initial email communication from the SI Leader (a peer) and if other absences, missed/late assignments or concerns about students were identified, the instructor would reach out for ongoing check-ins. This allowed for a more holistic approach to faculty-student and SI Leader-student interactions, both inside and

Conference Session

Simulation and Programming

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Derek M Yip-Hoi, Western Washington University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

Paper ID #6201Using Simulation to Improve the Efficiency of CAM and CNC InstructionDr. Derek M Yip-Hoi, Western Washington University Dr. Derek Yip-Hoi graduated with a Ph.D. from the University of Michigan in 1997. He has worked in academia since as both a research scientist and teaching faculty. He currently is an associate professor in the department of Engineering Technology at Western Washington University. His area of specialization is CAD/CAM. In addition to ASEE, he is a member of ASME and SME. Page

Collection

2020 ASEE North Midwest Section Annual Conference

Authors

Roy Y. Myose, Wichita State University; Foo Ngai Kok; Elizabeth Rollins

difference in class size may haveaffected the GPA, perhaps more than the effect of changing to plus-minus grades. However, theresults were inconclusive because the two factors could not be studied independently. There was additional concern that the hybrid format negatively affected student retention. As aresult, faculty teaching Engineering Mechanics began an endeavor to try to understand the issuesassociated with student retention. The first step in this effort involved quantifying incomingstudent capability with tests on prerequisite material in Statics and Mechanics of Materials courses.Results showed that the pre-tests were moderately correlated with the end of semester grade pointwith Pearson correlation coefficient of ~0.45 for Statics

Conference Session

Teams, Capstone Courses, and Project Based-Learning

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Molly A. McVey, University of Kansas; Carl W. Luchies, University of Kansas; Adrian Joseph Villicana, University of Kansas

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Paper ID #18468Impact of High-Performing Teams on Student LearningDr. Molly A. McVey, University of Kansas Dr. Molly A. McVey is a post-doctoral teaching fellow at the University of Kansas School of Engineering where she works with faculty to incorporate evidence-based and student-centered teaching methods, and to research the impacts of changes made to teaching on student learning and success. Dr. McVey earned her Ph.D in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Kansas in 2012.Dr. Carl W. Luchies, University of KansasAdrian Joseph Villicana, University of Kansas I am a graduate student in the Social Psychology

Conference Session

MECH - Technical Session 5: Virtual Learning and Technology Integration

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amir Karimi, The University of Texas at San Antonio; Randall D. Manteufel, The University of Texas at San Antonio

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

the 2012 University of Texas System Regents Outstanding Teaching Award. and the 2013 UTSA President’s Distinguished Achievement Award for Teaching Excellence, the 2010, 2014, 2018 and 2019 College of Engineering Student Council Professor of the Year Award, 2008 Excellence in Teaching Award for College of Engineering, and 2004-2005 Mechanical Engineering Instructor of the year award, 1999 ASEE-GSW Outstanding New Faculty Award. Dr. Manteufel is a Fellow of ASME with teaching and research interests in the thermal sciences. In 2015-2016, he chaired the American Society for Engineering Education Gulf Southwest section and in 2018-2019 he chaired the Academy of Distinguished Teaching Scholars at UTSA. He is a registered

Conference Session

ERM: Let's Continue the Conversation about Tests! Part 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joshua Jay, University of Oklahoma; Doyle Dodd, University of Oklahoma

thematerial enough to apply themselves are tempted to utilize online sources or solution manualsfrom previous classes to achieve a satisfactory grade [2, 11]. Surprisingly, perception of solutionmanual use differs between students and instructors. Many students use solution manuals as astudy aide to evaluate their work before submission [24]. While this may be an “honest” use ofresources, instructors must have the ability to account for the students that would simply copythe solutions as their own work to submit. Homework assignment grades and associated stressfrom workload, for both students and instructors alike, are some factors that have plagued thisSSHM and substantiate concerns for assessment reformation [7].To counter many of these issues

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Focused on Female Students

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary B. Isaac, HEDGE Co.

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

embodies some or all of their aspirations, without being too smart [16], pretty [20], or geeky[10], promotes greater female interest in male-dominant fields. Lent, et al. [21] found that rolemodels could offer vicarious learning experiences that would raise the likelihood of studentschoosing a particular career. Gibson [22] suggests that role models serve different functions atdifferent stages of careers, with early stage functions consisting of developing and definingprofessional self-concept, middle stage including exposure to exemplary peers and superiors, andlate stage functions providing opportunities to learn new skills and obtain affirmation of theeffectiveness of existing skills and style.There is little existent published research focused

Conference Session

Student Diversity: attracting and retaining a diverse population of students

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Deborah Kilgore, University of Washington; Debbie Chachra, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Heidi Loshbaugh, Colorado School of Mines; Janice McCain, Howard University; Marcus Jones, Howard University; Ken Yasuhara, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

education include the role of gender and immigration status on student progress in engineering education. Her scientific research interest focus on skeletal biology and mechanics, as well as biological and bioderived materials.Heidi Loshbaugh, Colorado School of Mines HEIDI G. LOSHBAUGH is an Assistant Research Professor in the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education at Colorado School of Mines. She is also the Associate Director for CSM's Center for Engineering Education. Dr. Loshbaugh taught in CSM's EPICS program, for which she developed extensive course and faculty-support materials, and designed and implemented a leadership course and overseas summer field session. She

Conference Session

Design Across the Curriculum 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Caroline Grace Sawatzki, Saginaw Valley State University; Rajani Muraleedharan, Saginaw Valley State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

three countries as a representative of SVSU, which instilled in her a deep love for travel and fostering international partnerships. In the future, Caroline hopes to attend graduate school and seek employment in an industry that will allow her to motivate her knowledge of engineering principles, foreign languages, and cultural competency skills in service of others.Dr. Rajani Muraleedharan, Saginaw Valley State University Dr. Rajani Muraleedharan is an associate professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE), and the faculty advisor for Society of Women Engineers (SWE) at Saginaw Valley State University (SVSU), Michigan. Dr. Muraleedharan obtained her Ph.D. at Syracuse University, New York. Before joining

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gillian Roehrig, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; Ngawang Gonsar; Alison Haugh Nowariak, University of Minnesota

Paper ID #38314STEM Identity Development for Under-represented Studentsin a Research Experience for UndergraduatesGillian Roehrig (Professor)Ngawang Gonsar Ngawang Y. Gonsar, PhD. Biology Faculty, Normandale Community College, Minnesota.Alison Haugh Nowariak (Graduate Student STEM Education Researcher) Alison Haugh Nowariak is a Ph.D candidate at the University of Minnesota in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction. She is also a STEM specialist teacher for K-5th grade students in ISD 196 in Minnesota. Prior to working in the schools and attending the University of Minnesota, she worked as an undergraduate

Conference Session

Mr. Burns' Brainchild: AI in the Springfield STEM Classroom, Release the Hounds!

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

S. Shailja, University of California, Santa Barbara; Satish Kumar, University of California, Santa Barbara; Arthur Caetano, University of California, Santa Barbara; Ayush Pandey, University of California, Merced

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

at the high school level [1]. Beyond the societal fascina-tion with AI, its introduction at the high school level is anticipated to correlate positively with theretention of students from diverse backgrounds in CS and related fields. Research has consistentlyshown that the field of computer science experiences high attrition rates among women and peopleof color. This limits the participation from underrepresented minorities and perpetuates underlyingbiases among decision-makers and leaders. The scarcity of diverse role models in CS remains apersistent concern as well. These issues lead to secondary yet serious consequences. Biased andunder-scrutinized AI models in practical applications such as AI-based law enforcement [2], voterprofiling

Conference Session

NGSS & Engineering Education

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy Trauth, University of Delaware; Jenni Buckley, University of Delaware; Debra J. Coffey, University of Delaware

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

recognize the value of better integrating the teaching and learning of STEM fields.It is assumed that students who have learned disciplinary core ideas, practices, and crosscuttingconcepts of science and engineering will be scientifically literate citizens who can engage inpublic discussions on related issues and can be careful consumers of scientific and technologicalinformation, and can pursue careers of their choice, including STEM careers. Engineering designallows teachers to effectively blend disciplines and integrate math and science as a means ofbuilding student understanding of and skills for engaging in both content areas and appreciationfor both content areas (Lehman & Capobianco, 2012). Pre-college engineering education

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 9

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Rohini N. Abhyankar, Arizona State University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

workplace adjustment for engineers and the corresponding influence on job satisfaction and intentions to persist. Rohini’s other interests include faculty development and engineering pathways of graduating engineers.Dr. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Samantha Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Fulton Schools of Engineering Poly- technic School. Dr. Brunhaver recently joined Arizona State after completing her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. She also has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Northeastern University. Dr. Brunhaver’s research examines the career decision-making and professional identity formation of engineering

Conference Session

DISTINGUISHED LECTURE: 2019 Best PIC, Zone, and Diversity Papers Live Q&A

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Eric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College; Todd Haskell, Western Washington University; Jill Davishahl, Western Washington University; Lee Singleton, Whatcom Community College; Wade H. Goodridge, Utah State University

Tagged Topics

2019 Best Zone & PIC Papers

physics to other disciplines.Ms. Jill Davishahl, Western Washington University Jill Davishahl is the Director of Pre-Engineering Program Development and faculty member at West- ern Washington University. She spends her time teaching, developing and implementing innovative cur- riculum, and managing National Science Foundation grants. She is passionate about inspiring the next generation of engineering students to think outside of the box, especially those that are walking along a non-traditional pathway.Dr. Lee Singleton, Whatcom Community College Lee Singleton is a professor at Whatcom Community College, in Bellingham, WA. He holds a BS in mathematics from Harding University, a MS in mathematics and PhD in biomedical

Conference Session

Mechanics Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College; Todd R. Haskell, Western Washington University; Jill Davishahl, Western Washington University; Lee Singleton, Whatcom Community College; Wade H. Goodridge, Utah State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

University Todd Haskell is a cognitive scientist interested in learning and the development of expertise, especially in STEM fields. He is currently Associate Professor of Psychology at Western Washington University. In previous projects Dr. Haskell has worked on understanding how chemistry novices and experts navi- gate between macroscopic, symbolic, and small particle representations, and how pre-service elementary teachers translate an understanding of energy concepts from physics to other disciplines.Ms. Jill Davishahl, Western Washington University Jill Davishahl is the Director of Pre-Engineering Program Development and faculty member at West- ern Washington University. She spends her time teaching, developing and

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Technical Session 3: Diversity and Multicultural Influences in the First Year

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Maritza Paz, The University of Texas at Austin, Cockrell School of Engineering; Margo Cousins, University of Texas, Austin; Cindy D. Wilson, University of Texas, Austin; Mia K. Markey, The University of Texas at Austin

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

engineering school persistence.” Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 335-338, (2005). Page 26.1338.1517. Seymour, E. & Hewitt, N.M. (1997). Talking about leaving, why undergraduates leave the sciences. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.18. Moller-Wong, C. & Eide, A. “An Engineering Student Retention Study.” Journal of Engineering Education, 86, 7-15, (1997).19. Steele, C. Reducing Identity and Stereotype Threat: A New Hope. Whistling Vivaldi: And Other Clues to How Stereotypes Affect Us. 1st editon. New York: W.W. Norton, 2010. Xii-242. Print. Issues of Our Time (W.W. Norton & Company).20. Cohen, G.L., Garcia, J, Apfel

Conference Session

ME Demonstrations and Laboratories

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeffrey C. Hayen, Oregon Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Paper ID #18222A Rocking/Rolling Half-Disk Vibratory SystemDr. Jeffrey C. Hayen, Oregon Institute of Technology Jeffrey Hayen joined the faculty in the MMET Department at the Oregon Institute of Technology (OIT) in 2011. Before arriving at OIT, Jeffrey served as a Professor of Engineering, Mathematics, and Physics at Southwestern Oregon Community College for 16 years. Prior to that experience, he worked in the aerospace industry as a thermodynamicist and propellant analyst for high-performance upper-stage rock- ets at the Space Systems Division of the General Dynamics Corporation. He also has conducted research

Conference Session

Energy Resources, Efficiency, and Conservation

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarma Pisupati, Pennsylvania State University; Wendy Mahen, PennSylvania State University; Mark Deluca, Pennsylvania State University; Martin Gutowski, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

2006-1732: DEVELOPMENT OF HIGHLY INTERACTIVE, ON-LINE COURSE ONENERGY CONSERVATION: LEARNING STRATEGIES USED ANDEXPERIENCE GAINEDSarma Pisupati, Pennsylvania State University SARMA V. PISUPATI is an Associate Professor of Energy & Geo-Environmental Engineering Department and a Faculty Fellow of the John A Dutton e-Education Institute of the College of Earth and mineral Sciences. He is Chair of the General Education Program of the EGEE Department and has been teaching undergraduate and graduate courses at Penn State University since 1992.Wendy Mahen, PennSylvania State University WENDY L. MAHAN is Instructional Designer in the in the Teaching and Learning with Technology (TLT) wing of

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - Assessment of Design Projects and Approaches to Capstone Courses

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pun To (Douglas) Yung, Syracuse University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

championed more than 20 STEM outreach programs, impacting over 500 K-12 students. His contributions to education have been lauded with awards, including the College Educator of the Year by the Technology Alliance of Central New York (TACNY). A staunch advocate for hybrid teaching, Prof. Yung promotes a holistic learning environment rich in hands-on projects, experiential activities, and peer collaboration, a marked shift from conventional pedagogies. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Enhancing Engineering Capstone Design Preparedness: A Systematic Curriculum ApproachIntroductionEngineering education is pivotal in equipping students with the technical and

Conference Session

Innovation in ECET Programs

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Li Tan, Purdue University, North Central; Jean Jiang, Purdue University, North Central

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

students for this problem as18.4 points. Next, we calculated the instructor average rating score as follows: (18.4/20)*5=4.6,which is listed below O6 on the third row in Table 3. As we mentioned before, grading thestudent’s projects yielded the instructor average rating score for outcome 8 (O8). The instructoraverage rating scores for assessing the rest of course learning outcomes are included in Table 3.The average rating scores from both the student survey and the instructor assessment can serveas a reference for the faculty to improve the course. For example, any course learning outcomeachieving an average rating score below 3.5 will raise a concern and require an action plan to fixthe issue