AC 2012-4902: WORKING COLLABORATIVELY AMONG UNIVERSI-TIES: A DENSE NETWORK APPROACHProf. Cynthia C. Fry, Baylor University Cynthia C. Fry is a Senior Lecturer of computer science and Assistant Dean of the School of Engineering and Computer Science, Baylor University.Dr. Sridhar S. Condoor, Saint Louis University Sridhar Condoor is a professor in the Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Department. He is also the Program Director for Mechanical Engineering, a KEEN fellow, a Coleman Fellow, and the Editor of the Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship. Condoor teaches sustainability, product design, and entrepreneurship. His research interests are in the areas of design theory and methodology, technology
Paper ID #30571Student Perception of Mathematical Modeling Before and After Completinga Two Joint Robot Computer Simulation Task (RTP)Mrs. Laurel Johnston, Boise State University Laurel Johnston is a master’s student in the STEM Education program at Boise State University. She has over eight years of teaching experience in high school science and mathematics. She enjoys integrating engineering concepts in the classroom to help increase student engagement and understanding.Dr. Noah Salzman, Boise State University Noah Salzman is an Assistant Professor at Boise State University, where he is a member of the Electrical and
academia. The UT-Austin ASEE student chapter was established in the fall of 1996.The steps taken to establish this student chapter are described by Matsumoto et al. 1 The primarypurposes of the student chapter at UT-Austin are: · to encourage students to consider careers in academia; · to enhance the teaching and presentation skills of prospective educators; · to develop the skills needed to establish and lead a research program; · to assist students in their search for academic positions. · to encourage undergraduate students to consider graduate school. The ASEE student chapter at UT-Austin has evaluated its effectiveness in achieving theseobjectives by surveying former graduate
Paper ID #17994Engineering Allies: The Personalities of Cisgender Engineering StudentsMs. Jacqueline Ann Rohde, Clemson University Jacqueline Rohde is a senior undergraduate student in Bioengineering at Clemson University. Her re- search in engineering education focuses on the development student identity and attitudes with respect to engineering. She is a member of the National Scholars Program, Clemson University’s most prestigious merit-based scholarship. She is also involved in efforts to include the Grand Challenges of Engineering into the general engineering curricula at Clemson University.Dr. Adam Kirn, University
. Being graphical innature, they show the conceptual, relational, and hierarchical nature9 of topics in a course orseries of courses.How instructors use concept mapsConcept maps have a rich history of application in the medical education literature8-10 Forinstance, concept maps have been used to evaluate student learning of CD-ROM basededucational materials in MRI imagining10. Hay, et al., showed that concept maps could be used,even in small classes of only six medical students, to investigate how deeply and richly studentsperceived new topics after a short-term assignment requiring use and assimilation of a 6-8 hourlong electronic teaching tool that covered both case studies and more rote learning through atutorial. Students drew a map of their
of time and money. The other class6 specified that the student teams construct a heat Page 15.993.3exchanger given design conditions. This resulted in a wide variety of designs, and a wide variety 2of success for those designs, and also included budget analysis. The students were observed tohave enjoyed the class, and the assessment found the experience to be successful.Another PBL project in an electrical engineering program, but based on a heat transfer project,was performed with regard to a heat sink on a computer chip7. The students involved in thisproject were first year graduate students
results in a small sample size.AcknowledgementThe authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the National Science Foundation for theirsupport of this work under the TUES program (DUE # 1244852). Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.ReferencesAllen, L. (2002). Consenting adults in private—union and management perspectives on peer observation of teaching, LTSN Generic Centre.Bell, M. (2002). Peer observation of teaching in Australia. LTSN Generic Centre.Davids, L. K., Pembridge, J. J., & Allam, Y. (2015). Video-annotated peer review (VAPR): Considerations for development and implementation
worthwhile endeavor. To better mitigate these struggles, they used completion-basedgrading, project-based assessment, and found stakeholders that were realistically connected tothe research. Such insights from faculties’ perspectives exclude the students' learning outcomesfrom taking courses that adopt CUREs, indicating future research into this area is needed. Fromthese results, we found that faculty see a future in the implementation of CUREs in theengineering discipline and recognize the value of research experiences in undergraduateengineering courses.This relatively small sample (n = 21) of CUREs reveals a high potential for future applicationand advancement of CUREs within engineering courses. Toward this end, we believe theengineering
Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright © 2002. American Society for Engineering EducationIntroductionPurpose of the paper is to explore and answer the following important questions raisedfrequently by all stakeholders of an educational program.1. What evidence is there at the university/college/department level that outcomes-based accreditation is fostering an environment of innovation and continuous programimprovement?2. How are institutions/programs sustaining the use of assessment in qualityeducational processes?3. What evidence is there, that outcomes assessment and the implementation ofquality processes are producing innovation in educational programs?4. How has the change in accreditation standards
dialogue was ABET‟s EC 2000, in which anoutcomes assessment model, based on a taxonomy of learning that placed learning on a scaleranging from initial exposure to cultivated ability and mastery—this taxonomy was circulatingwithin engineering education circles at least since the 1970s—replaced the former quantitativeapproach to accreditation.44 Clearly, all this also involved changes in the practice of engineeringeducation reform that requires further reflection and analysis.Conclusions and ImplicationsIn summary, the history of attempts to integrate engineering and liberal education goes back tothe beginnings of this society, and the origins of formal engineering education at large. Not justmany, but all of the efforts described above also
schools," Science Education, vol. 101, no. (5), pp. 681-715, 29 May 2017.[12] C. Ballen and N. Mason, "Longitudinal analysis of a diversity support program in biology: a national call for further assessment.," Bioscience, vol. 67, no. (4), pp. 367-373, 2017.[13] N. Erdogan and C. Stuessy, "Examining the Role of Inclusive STEM Schools in the College and Career Readiness of Students in the United States:A Multi-Group Analysis on the Outcome of Student Achievement," Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, vol. 15, no. (6), pp. 1517-1529, December 2015.National Science Foundation Funded Projects Cited (In Order of Placement)DUE: 1800678 E. Craft, Collaborative Research – HSI ATE Hub -Diversifying the
ago, while assessing and evaluatingthe effectiveness of the existing curricula is a tedious and tough job. In the past decades, with thediversity of the needs of society and the students’ career paths, the professional requirements havebeen significantly different from ten years ago. The standard-based curriculum could not matchthe needs for a while.Typically, most higher education institutions adopt a standards-based curriculum. The standards-based curriculum is a body of knowledge that students are expected to learn based on theirparticipation in the school experience, including teaching and learning. A standards-based 2024 ASEE Southeastern Section Conferencecurriculum often covers broad descriptions of content
and success of explicit models ofscientific inquiry6, guiding students through explicit models of engineering designprocesses can help students and teachers understand design processes. Although there isno “one” engineering design method, providing some kind of explicit support for studentscan help provide insight into understanding and undertaking engineering design,particularly for precollege settings12. Text-based methods to model and supportengineering design have been successful in such programs as Project Lead the Way13 andEngineering is Elementary14. However, technology-enhanced environments have specificaffordances to help support learning and model authentic practices15, 16, 17, 18, 19.Technology-enhanced environments can provide
Paper ID #19075Incorporating Metrology Concepts into an Engineering Physics MeasurementsLaboratoryDr. Harold T. Evensen, University of Wisconsin-Platteville Hal Evensen is a earned his doctorate in Engineering Physics from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where he performed research in the area of plasma nuclear fusion. He joined UW-Platteville in 1999, and formerly served as program coordinator for both its Engineering Physics and Microsystems & Nanoma- terials programs. He conducts research with students involving carbon nanotube electronics and sensors. c American Society for Engineering
-12 Science Coordinator for an inner ring public school district near St. Louis, Mo. A satellite engineer for McDonnell Douglas (now Boeing) for 10 years prior to her career in STEM education, McMahon was the Director and a Co-principal In- vestigator for one of the 88 National Science Foundation (NSF) Local Systemic Change Initiative grants awarded nationwide for science and math education reform. For 15 years, she taught physics and as- tronomy in Washington University’s graduate course series for in-service K-8 teachers. McMahon was the Founding Director of MySci, an innovative and award-winning mobile science outreach program for K-2 students. In that role, she led a collaborative partnership of scientists and science
science and engineering fields. Accordingly, publications regardingsuch academic programs for girls in science and engineering comprise another importantsector of pertinent literature. Large-scale initiatives like the TexPREP, Connecticut Pre-Engineering Program, and High Schools That Work include fully-integrated courseworkfor middle and high school students—a majority of whom represent women and minoritygroups. Reports on programs like this typically describe program design and details,funding issues, demographic data of the participants, and both qualitative and quantitativedata to bolster analysis of program success. Programs of this type generally includestudents of both genders but are designed for specific groups based on such factors
in Blackboard that provided instruction about twodistinct scientific processes (sequential and emergent processes), heat transfer, diffusion andmicrofluidics. An experimental study with 60 juniors and seniors undergraduate engineeringstudents was conducted at a large Midwestern US university. Experimental and control cohortscompleted the on-line multimedia modules including macroscopic and microscopic simulationsof heat transfer and diffusion processes. Quantitative data were collected through multiple-choice questions assessing conceptual knowledge of diffusion, heat transfer, and microfluidics.In addition, qualitative data were collected through participants’ verbal explanations of theirmultiple choice answers. Both quantitative and
, orproblem space, which drives the activity and leads to outcomes; and mediating artifacts or toolsengaged by the subject in pursuit of the object [17].Second-generation CHAT, pioneered by Leontiev [22] and operationalized by Engeström [23],expands activity systems to include factors related to collective, as opposed to individual, activity.In second-generation CHAT, an activity system (depicted by one of the two large triangles inFigure 1), is comprised of six interacting elements: the subject; object; and tools, as describedabove; and also the community of other actors in the activity system; the division of labor amongmembers of the community; and the rules, explicit or unspoken, that regulate actions [23]. In thisstudy, we are interested in two
setting.Online Learning Effectiveness There is some hesitancy in the academic world about how effective online learning is forstudents. The previous president of Stanford University, John L. Hennessy, stated clearly thegoal for online learning: “While the gold standard of small in-person classes led by greatinstructors will remain, online courses will be shown to be an effective learning environment,especially in comparison with large lecture-style courses” [6, p. 3]. It is important to note thatmost educators hold the traditional classroom setting to be the standard to which online coursesshould be compared. However, John Hennessy differentiates large lecture courses from smallseminar courses. The difference is significant, since the
Affairs and Assistant Teaching Professor in Engineering and Public Policy, as well as Education Director and researcher in the Green De- sign Institute at Carnegie Mellon University. In her role in Engineering and Public Policy, Dr. Matthews oversees the undergraduate programs in EPP. In the Green Design Institute, her research centers on the development and deployment of the Economic Input-Output Life Cycle Assessment tool. As Education Director, she oversees education and outreach initiatives for the Green Design Institute. She is the coor- dinator and instructor of outreach programs to K-12 students and teachers in school settings and informal educational events. She received her B.S.E. in Civil Engineering from
Page 22.1565.4The setting for this study was four universities across the United States, each chosen to representa variety of student demographics. The universities chosen are shown in Table 1. The firstinstitution, EPUB, is a large public university on the east coast, while MPUB is a large publicuniversity in the Midwest. The third institution, SPUB, is a small public university on the eastcoast and WPRI is a large private university on the west coast. All four institutions have largeengineering populations. For each institution we have shown the estimated total engineeringstudent population using university supplied class sizes. We have also included the number ofstudents who responded to the instrument, and computed the overall response
instructor due to administrativelogistics in a traditional classroom setting and to meager allowable budgets for suchundertakings. In this paper we offer our experience in working seven affordable active learningdesign exercises into the regular classroom for a large number (1200+) of first-year engineeringstudents. These seven exercises are a sampling from our first-year hands-on effort that waspiloted in fall 2000,3 expanded to full implementation in fall 2001,4 and continued through fall2004. Assessment of the learning impact of our hands-on effort, as perceived by students and byfaculty, is presented elsewhere.4, 5 Here we offer a brief summary of each exercise thathighlights learning objectives and anecdotal observations of student response
increasedinvolvement with the material. As you become more comfortable with active learning exercisesand group work, you can expand their use in the classroom. Conversely, if you are not comfortablewith a particular exercise, the students will pick up on that, and the exercise has a much lesserchance for success. In summary, the introduction of active learning does not have to mean the abandonment oflectures and the formation of a large number of self-paced challenging group exercises. Not onlycan it be insinuated into the traditional classroom format, I believe that it has a better chance forlong-term success if it is introduced in this fashion.Bibliography1. T. A. Angelo and K. P. Cross. Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers
AC 2009-1574: UNDERSTANDING PLAGIARISM USING BOARDMAN'SSOFT-SYSTEMS METHODOLOGYShobi Sivadasan, Stevens Institute of Technology Currently pursuing her Ph.D. in Systems Engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology. She completed her Masters in Engineering Management from Stevens in 2006 and Bachelors of Engineering in Applied Electronics and Instrumentation from India in 1998. She currently serves as Lecturer and SDOE Program Manager at the School of Systems and Enterprises at Stevens.Brian Sauser, Stevens Institute of Technology Currently Assistant Professor in Systems Engineering at the School of Systems and Enterprises at Stevens Institute of Technology. He completed his Ph.D. in
Paper ID #22077Early-career Engineers at the Workplace: Meaningful Highs, Lows, and In-novative Work EffortsMr. Mathias J. Klenk, Technical University of Munich Mathias graduated from Technical University of Munich (TUM) with a B.Sc. ’15 and M.Sc ’17 in Man- agement and Technology. His majors were Computer Science, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. He was also a participant in the entrepreneurial qualification program ”Manage&More”. This is a program of the center for innovation and business creation at the Technical University Munich (”UnternehmerTUM”) which supports innovation and startup projects. While at
2006-256: THE ETHICS BLOG: STUDENTS MAKING CONNECTIONS AMONGETHICS, THERMODYNAMICS, AND LIFEDonna Riley, Smith College Donna Riley is Assistant Professor in the Picker Engineering Program at Smith College. Her work focuses on implementing liberative pedagogies in engineering education.Ida Ngambeki, Smith College Ida Ngambeki is a student at Smith College.Lionel Claris, Smith College Lionel Claris holds a master's degree in education from Smith College and currently teaches Spanish and French to elementary school students in Springfield, MA. He is a passionate advocate for new ways of thinking about learning, involved locally in the Holistic School Project of Amherst and the Re
program at the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs. His interests are in power electronics as well as green/renewable energy. Page 23.654.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Hands-on Learning of Commercial Electrical Wiring Practices for Electrical Engineering Students Through Two-University Cooperative EffortAbstractDevelopment of hands-on training hardware to teach commercial electrical wiring practices atone university extended to another. Motivation is students who graduate to electricalengineering positions without any
primarily on conducting interdisciplinary design feasibility assessments across the engineering, market- ing, finance and manufacturing domains. Prior to this, he held positions in New Product Development at Ford Motor Company and Onsrud Cutter. He currently serves as lead instructor for the Baylor En- gineering Capstone Design program and teaches additional courses in the areas of Engineering Design, Technology Entrepreneurship, and Professional Development. Mr. Donndelinger has published three book chapters in addition to 30 articles in peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings and has been awarded two United States patents. Mr. Donndelinger earned an M.S. in Industrial Engineering and a B.S. in Mechanical
such asseparations.“Biology is a better preparation for medical school”. This and similar statements for othermajors/choices of future careers show little or no research into the facts. Freshmen have no realtraining yet, so they make decisions based on their gut instincts. Sometimes they are right,sometimes they are not.“I feel no connection to the department”. Chemical engineering at NJIT is a relatively largedepartment in terms of faculty, but a relatively small department in terms of undergraduateenrollment. Thus the freshman student sees a large list of faculty names in the department, andyet nobody he/she knows has ever had or met any of them. Whether this is justifiable or not, itcreates a negative impression of the department in the
survey was developed by thecurriculum committee and administered through invitation in targeted core courses for studentsin each year of the program. Thus, most, but not all, students were invited to participate. Thethree questions address challenges, useful resources and strategies, and perspectives ofassessment as follows: 1. Describe one big challenge you have faced as a student in the shift to remote teaching last spring or this fall. 2. What is one resource or strategy you have used to support your learning during the shift from face-to-face to remote teaching? Describe how it helped. 3. The ways that instructors give exams and other assessments of your course understanding has changed with the shift to remote