Sciences from the University of California, San Fran- cisco (2012), and was an HHMI postdoctoral science teaching fellow, conducting education research, at Iowa State University from 2012 to 2014. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Group Problem Solving Coupled with Hands-on Activities: Conceptual Gains and Student Confidence in an Introductory Biomechanics CourseIntroductionIntroduction to Biomechanics is a required sophomore-level course focusing on the applicationof statics and mechanics to biologic tissue at the University of Pennsylvania. To succeed,students must have an understanding of both mathematical and applicable physical
Paper ID #33690Impact of Flipped Classroom Model on High-workload and Low-incomeStudents in Upper-division Computer ScienceDr. Alberto Cureg Cruz, California State University, Bakersfield Dr. Cruz is an Assistant Professor of Computer Science, Principal Investigator of the Computer Percep- tion Laboratory (COMPLAB), and board member of the Center for Environmental Studies (CES) at the California State University, Bakersfield (CSUB). He received the B.S in Electrical Engineering from the University of California, Riverside (UCR) in 2008 and the Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from UCR in 2014 as a Fellow of the NSF
assembly; • Performance of iterative optimization of key components based on structural analysis results, cost, and material/component availability; • Generation of two complete drawing “packages”, prototype and production, including complete assembly, sub-assemblies, and detail component drawings (thirty-eight separate drawings) suitable for hand-off to industry; • Generation of complete product specifications; • Procurement of all materials and components for prototype build; • Fabrication and build of a functional, high level alpha/low level beta prototype; • Performance of fundamental functional testing of prototype; • Performance of engineering cost analysis; • Completely document, report
2006-203: A HANDS-ON, INTERDISCIPLINARY LABORATORY PROGRAM ANDEDUCATIONAL MODEL TO STRENGTHEN A RADAR CURRICULUM FORBROAD DISTRIBUTIONMark Yeary, University of Oklahoma Dr. Mark Yeary is an Assistant Professor in the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Oklahoma. He has many years of experience as a teaching assistant, lecturer, and assistant professor. Since January of 1993, he has taught many students in various laboratories and lecture courses, culminating in approximately 11 years of teaching experience. For the 1999-00 academic year, he received the Outstanding Professor Award, given by the Texas A&M student chapters of IEEE and Eta Kappa Nu, and IBM in Austin
, 1995.6. Catalano, G. D., Tonso, K. L., “The Sunrayce ’95 Idea: Adding Hands-on Design to an Engineering Curriculum,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 193-199, Jul., 1996.7. Cooper, S. C., Miller, G. R., “A Suite of Computer-Based Tools for Teaching Mechanics of Materials,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, pp. 41-49, 1996.8. Dunn, R., Dunn, K. Teaching Students through Their Individual Learning Styles: A Practical Approach. Reston, Virginia: Prentice Hall, 1978.9. Eder, W. E., “Comparisons – Learning Theories, Design Theory, Science,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 111-119, Apr., 1994.10. Felder, R. M., Brent, R., “Navigating the Bumpy Road to Student-Centered Instruction,” College Teaching, 44(2), pp. 43
Paper ID #35153Can online summer camps work? Evidence from adapting a high schoolhands-on water quality module for online deliveryMary Elizabeth Foltz, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Mary E. Foltz is a PhD candidate in the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Her research focuses on denitrification in agricultural systems and ways to decrease nitrous oxide emissions from denitrification. She has developed and taught five high school science courses and been involved in engineering outreach programs through the university and community. After
design-only version vs. full-scale hands-on experimentation show increasedappreciation of the field of nanotechnology, as well as in the students’ perceptions of theirmarketability.* An expanded version of this manuscript has been submitted for publication in International Journal of EngineeringEducation. Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Regional Conference 274 INTRODUCTIONThe field of engineering involves the application of known scientific principles to harvest the threebasic resources of human kind—energy, materials, and
modules are structured as a series of self-contained package of bioinformatics materials thatcould be incorporated into selected science courses. The pedagogical approach would includekey concepts, hands-on exercises, and active learning. The majority of these modules consist ofone to two weeks worth of classroom materials. These modules are currently being developed incollaboration with faculty of Computer science, Mathematics, Physics, Biology, Chemistry, andEngineering. Some of the targeted courses include: Database systems, Design and Analysis ofAlgorithms, Genetics, Biochemistry, Statistics, and Biotechnology.These modules focus on either principles and/or practical aspects of bioinformatics. Modulesemphasizing on bioinformatics principles
Paper ID #39357Work-in-Progress: Hands-on group activities for large fluid mechanicsclasses in a traditional lecture hall settingDr. Fiona C. Levey, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Dr. Fiona Levey is an Associate Teaching Professor the Department of Mechanical and Materials Engi- neering at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. She teaches materials science and thermal fluids classes and advises capstone design projects. She employs active learning and project-based learning in her curricu- lum, using varied approaches for different levels, and correlating course design and teaching techniques to learning outcomes. Dr. Levey
learning, andto foster interactive involvement of the learner with the educational materials” 7. Notably,these goals can be well supported by current technology trends. Yet, van Dam et al.7maintains there is no one-size-fit-all solution for educational technology. Furthermore,without accommodating for diverse learning styles, software media can be as limiting asfixed media. Extend the thought of accommodation for diverse learning styles to the currentclassroom, an environment that now includes an increasingly diverse range of learnersand their associated needs. Students that struggle with a range of behavioral, cognitive,and learning impediments work alongside students with a range of learning styles. Andwith engineering projects, which
Paper ID #7457Using High-Altitude Ballooning to Give Freshmen a Hands-on Introductionto the ”Space” Side of AerospaceDr. James Flaten, MN Space Grant / Univ. of Minnesota Dr. James Flaten is the associate director of the Minnesota Space Grant Consortium, a NASA higher ed- ucation program whose goals include promoting interest in space science and space exploration. Though housed in the Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics (AEM) Department at the University of Minnesota – Twin Cities, Dr. Flaten’s academic background is actually in experimental physics and he has also taught many physics, astronomy, and basic engineering
and conferences in Aerospace Engineering. He also currently serves as an Associate Editor of the Aerospace Science and Technology Journal, the Canadian Aeronautics and Space Journal and the International Journal of Unmanned Systems Engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Feedback reinforcement of classroom learning of aerospace design and performance concepts through a hands-on design- build-fly-redesign loop – work in progressIntroductionThis is a work in progress, and consequently, various aspects of this approach, including thestatistical evaluation of its efficacy need further investigation. The author intend thisinvestigation to continue
functionwithin real-world limitations [11]. Thus, CT is embedded in engineering design, making it acritical skill for engineers in their education journey and professional practice.There are frequent discussions on effective CT development methods, model-eliciting, andsimulation activities [12]. It is also common for robotics and programming to be used as a meansfor the teaching of CT skills. Hands-on approaches appear consistently across CT researchbecause they evoke experiences that make the application of CT observable, thus making theconcept more tangible [13]. Studies have also highlighted the importance of incorporating CTinto formal and informal learning settings to enhance students’ CT skills and engagement [14].While engineering has always
-SUTD fellowship and NSF Graduate Research Fellow- ship. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Scaling Hands-On Learning Principles in Manufacturing through Augmented Reality Disassembly and Inspection of a Consumer Product1. IntroductionIn recent decades, synergistic advances in materials, automation, and information technologyhave transformed factories and enabled the globalization of production. As the world’spopulation continues to grow, advanced products use more sophisticated manufacturingprocesses, and supply chains become more distributed and digitized, manufacturingfundamentals remain critical to increasing
Paper ID #17458Development of a Low-cost, Portable, and Programmable Solar Module toFacilitate Hands-on Experiments and Improve Student LearningDr. Sandip Das, Kennesaw State University Sandip Das is currently an Assistant Professor in the Electrical Engineering Department at Kennesaw State University. Dr. Das received his Ph.D. and M.E. in Electrical Engineering from University of South Car- olina, Columbia, in 2014 and 2012 respectively. He earned his B.E. in Electrical Engineering from Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology (IIEST, Shibpur, India) in 2004. His current research interests include
Paper ID #13362Entering the First Year of a Multi-disciplinary, Hands-on, Competency-BasedLearning Experience: Hopes and concerns of students, parents and facultyDr. Marisa Exter, Purdue University Marisa Exter is an Assistant Professor of Learning Design and Technology in the College of Education at Purdue University. Dr. Exter’s research aims to provide recommendations to improve or enhance university-level design and technology programs (such as Instructional Design, Computer Science, and Engineering). Some of her previous research has focused on software designers’ formal and non-formal educational experiences and use
, online engineering courses are mainly based on pre-recorded video materials andsimulations. Therefore hands-on experience, despite its value for active and sensory learningstyles9-12, is rarely offered in through these new delivery formats. This paper and associatedworkshop describes the development and testing of a novel take-home laboratory module Proceedings of the 2013 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Conference Copyright © 2013, American Society for Engineering Education 522designed to supplement the experience of our students taking their first course in ControlsSystem
Paper ID #10969The Attitudes of Elementary Teachers towards Elementary Engineering (re-search to practice)Dr. Cathy P. Lachapelle, Museum of Science Dr. Cathy Lachapelle is the director of research and evaluation for EiE. She leads the assessment efforts for the EiE curriculum, designing assessment instruments, pilot and field testing them, and conducting research on how children use the EiE materials. She has worked on a number of research and evaluation projects related to K-16 STEM education, including the Women’s Experiences in College Engineering (WECE) study of factors influencing the persistence of undergraduate
, students havea tendency to rely on “old solutions over innovation and possible improvement” (p. 767). Inaddition, students felt that they were not taught to have an open mind while solving problemsand did not develop multiple solutions. The findings of the same study also revealed that whencompared to students in humanities and sciences, engineering students were the ones who hadthe most “room for creativity improvement”. Research shows that students who value creativity in engineering design tasks andbelieve that they are creative, are more likely to generate creative solutions when solving designproblems [5]. As such, in the teaching of creativity in engineering students, faculty andpractitioners play an important role. Engineering
-Bergquist, A., Richards, S., & Wilkinson, K. (2005). The robotic autonomy mobile robots course: Robot design, curriculum design, and educational assessment. Autonomous Robots, 18(1), 103- 127. 7. Robinson, M. (2005). Robotics-driven activities: Can they improve middle school science learning? Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 25(1), 73-84. 8. Beer, R. D., Chiel, H. J., & Drushel, R. F. (1999). Using robotics to teach science and engineering. Communications of the ACM, 42(6), 85-92. 9. Maja J Matari´c. Robotics education for all ages. In AAAI Spring Symposium on Accessible, Hands-on AI and Robotics Education, Palo Alto, CA, March 22-24 2004. 10. Autonomous Robots as a Generic Teaching
Division.Prof. Joshua M Pearce, Department of Materials Science & Engineering and Department of Electrical &Computer Engineering, Michigan Technological University Dr. Joshua M. Pearce received his Ph.D. in Materials Engineering from the Pennsylvania State University and holds Chemistry and Physics degrees from the same institution. He currently is an Associate Professor cross-appointed in the Department of Materials Science & Engineering and in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at the Michigan Technological University where he runs the Open Sustainability Technology Research Group. His research concentrates on the use of open source appropriate technology to find collaborative solutions to
Paper ID #18418Mechanical Engineering Capstone Projects in Rehabilitation DesignDr. Carl A. Nelson P.E., University of Nebraska-Lincoln Carl Nelson is a Professor of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at the University of Nebraska- Lincoln.Dr. Judith Marie Burnfield, Madonna Rehabilitation Hospitals’ Institute for Rehabilitation Science and Engi-neering Judith M. Burnfield, PhD, PT, is Director of the Institute for Rehabilitation Science and Engineering, Di- rector of the Movement and Neurosciences Center and the Clifton Chair in Physical Therapy and Move- ment Sciences at Madonna Rehabilitation Hospital. Dr. Burnfield
about the use of solid modeling as avisualization tool for deep learning of engineering mechanics principles. There is a need for deepunderstanding of technical content in courses such as Mechanics of Materials and MachineComponent Design in order to lay the foundation for robust prototypes in Capstone Design. Atypical classroom experience in mid-program engineering science courses involves lecturefollowed by assigning problems from the text. Associated lecture notes and explanations alongwith assigned problems and their solutions are in a two dimensional form, i.e., presented asprinted output or handwriting on a page. The equations used are also in two dimensional in form,reducing physical behavior to analytical expressions and cross sectional
Associate Professor cross-appointed in the Department of Materials Science & Engineering and in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at the Michigan Technological University where he runs the Open Sustainability Technology Research Group. His research concentrates on the use of open source appropriate technology to find collaborative solutions to problems in sustainability and poverty reduction. His research spans areas of electronic device physics and materials engineering of solar photo- voltaic cells, and RepRap 3-D printing, but also includes applied sustainability and energy policy. He is the author of the Open-Source Lab:How to Build Your Own Hardware and Reduce Research Costs.Mr. Gerald Anzalone
ofcognitive capacity and work on classifying problems with students, apart from the problem-solving process.Tang and Bai [4] describe how they have used Cognitive Load Theory to design effectivelearning exercises in an engineering dynamics class. By focusing on a specific step within a five-step problem solving process, each exercise is designed to build competence related to that step,without overloading the students’ cognitive load. As knowledge and skills related to each stepare developed, students can progress toward acquiring better schema for identifying and solvingproblems more efficiently.The second theory of learning, Threshold Concept Theory, can be used to explain how studentslearn the material and develop expertise in it. Threshold
Figure 7, although the number of these students arevery small comparted to the total enrollment in ECS, the experience students had in theIntroduction to Engineering (EGGN 100) course did show a positive impact on the retentionrates in general. The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd year retention of the cohort increased by 17%, 17%, and30%, respectively even after changing to a non-ECS major.Figure 6: Yearly first, second and third year retention rate of the undeclared engineering majorswho declared engineering and computer science majors afterwards.The data shows that with the introduction of the hands-on project based introduction toengineering course, retention rate and four-year, five-year, and six-year graduation rates of theundeclared engineering majors
Paper ID #34426Lab Every Day!! Lab Every Day?? *&%#ing Lab Every Day!? ExaminingStudent Attitudes in a Core Engineering Course Using Hands-on LearningEvery Day of ClassDr. Erin A. Henslee, Wake Forest University Dr. Erin Henslee is a Founding Faculty and Assistant Professor of Engineering at Wake Forest University. Her research spans biomedical engineering, e-sports, and STEM education. Prior to joining Wake Forest she was a Researcher Development Officer at the University of Surrey where she supported Early Career Researchers. She received her BS degrees in Engineering Science and Mechanics and Mathematics from Virginia
paralinguistic channels of communication, including vocal and spatialmodalities, such as pauses, interruptions, and gestures 31, 32.Our research team’s approach to collecting rich in situ data reflects our interest in capturing theevolutionary nature of students’ engineering design processes. During classroom activities, wetypically set up small, tripod-based cameras on randomly selected student groups, often withadditional microphone units to capture sound adequately. We then act as extra sets of hands forteachers, offering materials, answering questions, and asking students about their designsolutions. In this study, two researchers, including first author, were present in the classroom,supporting Ms. M and observing an interacting with students. As
AC 2011-1557: ONLINE INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS IN A HYBRIDINTRODUCTORY ENGINEERING GRAPHICS COURSE: AN INVENTORYOF SOLID MODELING CONCEPTSTheodore J. Branoff, North Carolina State University Dr. Branoff is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mathematics, Science and Technology Edu- cation at North Carolina State University. A member of ASEE since 1987, he has served as Chair of the Engineering Design Graphics Division of ASEE and as Associate Editor in charge of paper reviews for the Engineering Design Graphics Journal. He is currently President of the International Society for Geometry and Graphics. Dr. Branoff’s research interests include spatial visualization in undergraduate students and the effects of
the SDSM&T RET program has enjoyed great success as expressed by past participants.There are five core outcomes that resurface year after year when participants are asked to qualifythe value of the program. Each of the five core outcomes overlap with one another yet present aunique perspective. Beginning with first hand knowledge of science and engineering; teacherswho participate in RET programs generally do not have an extensive research background. Bygiving teachers the opportunity to be a contributing member of the research enterprise theyproudly speak of the first hand knowledge they now posses. This first hand knowledge whenexpressed brings with it validity in the eyes of students.Validity being the second core outcome, the impact