within the scope of the syllabus for the course. In this study, a courserepeated over three years was considered. Students were directed to undertake engineeringdesigns in specialized areas of transportation engineering, technology and management. Designtopics related to these areas ranged from Flexible Pavements, Rigid Pavements, Asphalt PavingTechnology and Pavement Rehabilitation, to Signalized Traffic Intersections. These topicscovered not only conventional transportation systems but also intelligent transportation systems.The students’ presentations were peer-graded.The extent of improvement in design, discovery, and learning was documented extensively byapplying appropriate statistical tests. Assessment, grading formula and results are
understand our students’ experience with a 3D-printed heat exchanger designproject. 3D printing is becoming an important enabling technology in new heat exchanger designs.For example, commercial companies like Fast Radius [10] and EOS [11] have commerciallyavailable 3D printed heat exchangers. There is also a significant amount of research being doneusing 3D printing to improve heat exchanger design [12] [13] [14]. Therefore, it is important thatstudents have experience with 3D printed thermal designs as they enter the workforce orgraduate school. The article below describes an 8-week heat exchanger design-build-test project in a capstonethermal sciences course at Trine University. Described are the course, the requirements andconstraints of the
Engineering Education, 2007 Alternative Methods for Producing Wind Tunnel Models for Student Projects in Fluid MechanicsAbstractProject-based approaches to engineering education make it desirable for students to createfunctional wind tunnel models for testing of original designs in fluid mechanics courses. Thispaper compares several rapid-prototyping (RP) methods with conventional mold/cast techniquesfor fabrication of fluid-dynamic models on the basis of cost, production time, ease-of-use, andaccessibility of equipment and materials. RP technologies considered include stereolithography(SLA), selective laser sintering (SLS), fused-deposition modeling (FDM), 3-D printing
perABET’s new Engineering Criteria 2000.Focus of ABET’s EC2000ABET’s periodic review of engineering programs is well accepted as a form of programassessment and quality assurance. Since its enactment, Engineering Criteria 2000 have beenwell publicized in various sources, and effective Fall 2001, all programs coming up foraccreditation review, are being evaluated for compliance against these criteria. These essentiallyconsist of eight criteria with a goal of continuous program improvement as opposed to the earlierfocus on rigid quantitative inputs5. These criteria encompass: (1) Students, (2) ProgramEducational Objectives, (3) Program Outcomes and Assessment, (4) Professional Component,(5) Faculty, (6) Facilities, (7) Institutional Support and
constructiveand productive way. This study gives an overview of simulations and games used to assistpedagogy and efforts at improving teamwork in design courses. This information is utilized todiscuss the implementation and effect of a pedagogical board game, "Teaming Tribulations."This game is intended to simulate the arguments that might occur within a design teamdiscussion in a zero-stakes environment. In Teaming Tribulations, students are asked to create aquick design in response to a simple prompt. They then share their designs during the judgment-free "Concept Generation Phase." In the next phase of the game, "Concept Selection andDebate," they must debate with their teammates to select the best design to submit for theirfictional group project
asmoother transition into the workforce [15], [16]. For educators, EdTech offers valuable tools toanalyze, identify and strengthen areas where students need improvement [27]. It enhancescommunication between instructors and students through information and communicationtechnology (ICT) applications, supporting competency development in both groups [27]. EdTechfosters personalized and self-paced learning, allowing course customization to meet individualstudent needs and improve learning outcomes [25], [27], [28].Challenges that affect EdTech integration include a lack of awareness of EdTech’s potential andthe substantial training instructors often require to effectively adopt new pedagogical approachesgiven EdTech adoption [14], [15]. Widespread
Paper ID #19585Chalkboard vs. Paper: Technique for Improving Collaboration in ActiveLearning ActivitiesDr. Hadas Ritz, Cornell University, College of Engineering Hadas Ritz is a lecturer in the Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Cornell Uni- versity. She teaches required and elective courses covering a wide range of topics in the undergraduate Mechanical Engineering curriculum, including introductory calculus. Her main teaching interests include solid mechanics and finite element analysis. Ritz was recognized with a 2013 Cornell College of Engi- neering Excellence in Teaching Award. She received
that Skill Training is an Employee's Responsibility and a Part of Life Long Learning • Plans and Commitments to Skill Improvement in Learning Associated with the Work Environment • Understanding that Life-Long Education is a Professional Responsibility of Every Engineer • Demonstrated Ability to go Beyond the Professors' Course Expectations • Demonstrated Interest in Pursuing Advanced Degrees • Plans to Acquire Experience on Multi-Product, Multi-Discipline Product Design and development Teams • Plans to Participate in Life-Long Development Reading Plan • Plans and Commitment to Attain Advanced Educational Degrees • Plans to Secure Choice Assignments on Multidiscipline Product Teamsand the others(j
AC 2011-897: IDENTIFYING AND DEFINING RELATIONSHIPS: TECH-NIQUES FOR IMPROVING STUDENT SYSTEMIC THINKINGCecelia M. Wigal, University of Tennessee, Chattanooga Cecelia M. Wigal received her Ph.D. in 1998 from Northwestern University and is presently a Professor of Engineering and Assistant Dean of the College of Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga (UTC). Her primary areas of interest and expertise include complex process and system analysis, process improvement analysis, and information system analysis with respect to usability and effectiveness. Dr. Wigal is also interested in engineering education reform to address present and future student and national and international
help students learn English pronunciation. We also evaluate the effectiveness andefficiency of the method in helping ESL learners improve their pronunciation.Literature ReviewEnglish pronunciation is crucial to English-language learners because “pronunciation is thelanguage feature that most readily identifies speakers as nonnative.”5 ESL learners who havepronunciation weaknesses can be hard to understand, and they can feel embarrassment inconversation. Pronunciation is so important that “in the International Phonetic Association’sdeclaration of principles of second-language teaching, the spoken language is held to be primary,and training in phonetics is important for both teachers and learners.”6English PhoneticsAll languages have two
accreditation criteria as an instrument for fostering implementationof the BOK; it summarizes the development process leading to new draft BOK-compliantaccreditation criteria; and, finally, it provides a detailed description and analysis of theproducts—proposed Basic Level Civil Engineering Program Criteria, Advanced Level GeneralCriteria, and the associated draft ASCE Commentary.The ultimate purpose of this paper is to share the new draft criteria with a broader audience andto solicit feedback that will further improve the quality, relevance, and effectiveness of theseproducts.Background: Policy 465 and the Body of KnowledgeRapid technological advancement, globalization, and ever-increasing political, social,environmental, and economic constraints are
end of the semester to collect additional data on students’ perception on theself-assessment exercise. The result of the study suggests a positive correlation between theTeaching Assistant (TA) grades and the students self-assigned grades. Results also show that theaverage grade assigned by the TA was consistently higher than the average grade assigned by thestudents. Even though the students’ acknowledged self-assessment helps them engage in thecourse and potentially improve their grades, the results indicate that they will only do that withan incentive.IntroductionInvolving students through classroom activities is critical for student engagement andunderstanding. For math-based courses as in most engineering courses, it is imperative
assessment in large learning environments to foster high-quality learning opportunities. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Efforts to Improve Undergraduate Grader Consistency: A Qualitative AnalysisAbstract In this research paper, we explore the difficult decisions faced by large-scale, multi-section courses in early undergraduate engineering education regarding fair and consistentassessment of student learning across sections. Our previous analysis of grading patterns ofundergraduate graders in a first-year engineering course revealed that divergent decisions likelystemmed from two sources: insufficient grader training and ambiguities in rubrics
, Electrical Engineering, Computer Engineering, and Computer Science.The project requires effective cooperation between diverse design teams, and includes asignificant focus on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI).The paper outlines four SMART goals: Enhance Internal Education and Team Culture, FosteringInclusive Sub-Team Integration, Strengthen Cross-Sub-Team Collaboration, and Data Analysisfor Continuous Improvement. Baseline data and the impacts on students' attitudes are presentedwithin the framework of capstone design projects.Key conclusions underscore the role of education, inclusivity, collaboration, and data-drivendecision-making in the specific context of capstone design projects. Foreseen challenges provideopportunities for proactive
Session xxxx Using Student Learning Outcomes Assessment to Assure EC2000 Program Effectiveness Dr. Fong Mak, Dr. Stephen Frezza Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Gannon University Erie, PAAbstractThe Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) Department of Gannon University has deviseda process in which faculty define specific graded (key) assignments that are linked to the(course-level) student learning objectives. Each student must meet or exceed the minimumpassing criteria
possessvarying degrees of knowledge or expertise regarding the outcomes or knowledge being judged. Whenorganizing assessments or competitions, effectively executing the event is the main goal and there may be noformal attempt to measure interrater agreement or to improve the level of consensus, ie. interrater agreement, inthe assessments or competitions over time. Our goal is to provide evidence supporting the use of interventionsthat do, in fact, improve interrater agreement as well as the perceived fairness of the event.In competition and proposal assessment situations, it is important to measure consensus between judges.Measuring consensus between judges can expose problems within the judging process such as a difference inexpectations between judges
engineering technology students on the management aspects of engineering.Added emphasis on the improvement programs successfully being used by manufacturers hasbeen included in many engineering courses. It is also stressed that total implementations ofimprovement programs are not always necessary, but partial implementations spotlightingspecific areas of concern are also very effective. The overall goal is to graduate engineers thatare prepared to face the engineering management challenges of a continually changingmanufacturing environment.Bibliography1. Agus, A., & Sagir, R. M. (2001). The structural relationships between total quality management, competitive advantage and bottom line financial performance: An empirical study of Malaysian
skills such asself-awareness, empathy, and listening, but only 32 students from the whole college are selectedfor it each year. Therefore, our hypothesis is that most students in capstone teams receiveminimal instruction related to psychological and effective teamwork.At CPP, all students participating in the senior capstone course are asked to complete auniversity-wide assessment. The teamwork survey was included in that university assessment toall engineering students participating in the senior capstone. We also distributed a companionsurvey to faculty to find out how many currently teach teamwork principles. This survey showedthat most faculty provided students with training to set team norms (i.e. how to complete a teamcontract or team MOU
industry.While the traditional systems of departmental teaching remain prevalent in writing instruction,some conclude that this style of teaching is counterproductive for engineers1. This cohortadvocates that a curriculum centering around technical writing and succinct descriptions ofprocesses, rather than analysis of themes in fiction novels, is a better, and more effective, use ofan engineering student’s time and energy. One such program is the semester-longUndergraduate Advanced Writing Communication for Engineers course offered at the Universityof Southern California, in which students gain writing and public speaking skills by writing forthe school’s engineering magazine2. The audience of the magazine is diverse, and thereforechallenges students to
Paper ID #38901Student-led program to improve equity in Ph.D. oral qualifying examsMeredith Leigh Hooper, California Institute of Technology This author was an equal first author contributor to this work. Meredith Hooper is an Aeronautics PhD student studying under Professor Mory Gharib in the Graduate Aerospace Laboratories of the California Institute of Technology (GALCIT). Meredith is a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow, leader within the GALCIT Graduate Student Council, and Co-Director of the Caltech Project for Effective Teaching (CPET). Her PhD research uses a combination of machine learning and
library search strategies; moreover,we have seen improved learning transfer to subsequent course activities. For these reasons, wefind that gamification offers motivation in the educational setting that activates the competitivenature of engineering students, while enabling faster development of skills than prior methods.1. IntroductionThe world of libraries is foreign to most undergraduate engineering students. They arecomfortable in the lab and in the classroom, but research is not an activity they take to readily oreasily. In a cornerstone design course (called Praxis 1) at the University of Toronto, we haveattempted to change the students’ attitude and comfort by introducing them to the library throughan orientation tutorial. Students in the
,the state of Texas provided funding for universities to use to improve the retention of students inthe engineering and computer sciences. The Computer Science and Engineering Department ofthe University of Texas at Arlington (CSE@UTA) has chosen to implement the Infinity Project5in its freshman introductory computer science course as one effort to improve its studentretention rates under this state-funded program. Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of Texas at Arlington Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationThe Infinity Project was initially designed to target high school upperclassmen and has been
the web service was given to students over 2020 Summer Final 6 100 1.2 ± 1.2 % four terms and five courses. Generally, the exam web service worked properly. Some errors where noted and further 2020 Fall Midterm 10 115 0.1% ± 0.3 % improvements would be necessary before the exam web service 2020 Fall Final 10 132 0.0% ± 0.0 % would be appropriate for wide application. In the prototype 2021 Spring Midterm 16 125 2.2% ± 1.4
Manufacturing Class by Adding an Experimental SessionAbstractThe author of this paper has been teaching a graduate-level manufacturing class: MMAE 546Advanced Manufacturing Engineering. The author has made an effort to improve the class byadding an experimental session to this previously lecture-only class, and this effort will bepresented in this paper. The effect of the experimental session on the students’ learning qualityimprovement and study interest stimulation will be discussed. Students’ comments and feedbackare also provided.IntroductionSince the author joined the Department of Mechanical, Materials and Aerospace Engineering(MMAE) of University A in 2007, he has been teaching the graduate-level class MMAE 546Advanced
stakes writing in the time span of one semester. Howmuch does “peer review” influence the student’s writing. Additional areas of interest would bethe effects of requiring an oral presentation and/or defense on the writing ability of the student,and the pros and cons of keeping a journal.IntroductionFew faculty members would deny the importance of writing in their academic discipline or therole writing plays in mastering material, shaping ideas, and developing critical thinking skills.Writing helps students learn the subject matter: “they understand and retain course materialmuch better when they write about it.” 3 “Proceedings of the 2006 Mid-Atlantic Conference of the American Society for
Paper ID #38073Using Trained Tutors to Improve Mechanical Engineering TechnologyStudent WritingDr. David Clippinger, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend Dr. David Clippinger is a faculty member in Mechanical Engineering Technology at the Pennsylvania State University, Erie–the Behrend College. His interests are ship dynamics, measurement & instrumen- tation, and assessment, especially of student writing.Ms. Ruth Camille Pflueger, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College Ruth Pflueger has been the director of the Learning Resource Center at Penn State Behrend for 20 years, where she is also an affiliate
paper proposes a method for assessing the effectiveness of an outcome-based InformationSystems (IS) Curriculum. Two sets of learning outcomes are identified to provide focus to an IScurriculum: the college major learning outcomes, which form the basis of the curriculum andserve as a focus for curricular design and improvement and the University learning outcomes,which are higher-level outcomes. Master course syllabi are developed for all courses in thecurriculum and posted on the University Intranet and on Blackboard®. All master course syllabiinclude the course contributions to specific learning outcomes. Instructors use the mastersyllabus to design course content and develop learning experiences that are used to addressparticular learning
. Engineeringstudents enter the workplace with a lack of critical thinking, inability to effectively communicate,and an absence of skills in identification/evaluation of problems in their respective fields.4 Skillssuch as these are obtainable through practical and visual laboratory experimentation. To address this issue, convection heat transfer was the area of experimentation that waschosen for our focus on improving the practicality of the laboratory experience. Specifically, theaim is to do at it at an affordable cost while maintaining the ability to improve the undergraduatestudents’ conceptual understanding through practical visualization.Fundamental Theory Convection heat transfer was chosen due to its complex dependency of on several
offering an immersive and interactive learning tool, this study seeks to bridgethe gap between theoretical instruction and practical comprehension, aligning with moderneducational approaches that prioritize experiential learning and technology integration toincrease cognitive engagement [8]. The study involved engineering students at various levels ofexperience to assess the application’s impact across a range of backgrounds. This researchemploys a quantitative survey to assess spatial ability and gather feedback on the application’susability and effectiveness. The findings will guide iterative improvements to the application,ensuring it meets educational needs and aligns with pedagogical best practices. Although thefocus is on rebar
Paper ID #37367UX design research for improving student experience inonline laboratoriesAmy Ragland Amy is a passionate educator who believes in accessibility and equal access to education for all. A part of the UGA Online Learning team, Amy has extensive experience in developing, designing, and supporting impactful online courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels. Outside of her work at UGA, Amy has experience as a library media specialist and technology instructor in K12 classrooms. As an instructor, a course developer, and a human, Amy believes that online-delivered courses remove barriers to