promote their learning. In the JiTTIL project strategies and tools were developed to promotestudent engagement in introductory materials classes based on three major principles from thebook, How People Learn. The first principle is that instructors should be aware of and utilizestudents' prior knowledge to inform instruction. Prior knowledge and misconceptions areassessed at semester beginning with a Materials Concept Inventory (MCI) while conceptualchange is assessed at semester end by giving the MCI again and calculating conceptual gains.More detail on misconceptions and conceptual gain for five specific topics was determined withpre-post topical concept quizzes. The second principle is for instructors to actively engagestudents with one
approaches employed to navigate and triumph in this remarkableadventure.A. Procedures and Preparations: Within the comprehensive preparations for the 10-day fieldtrip to the United Arab Emirates (UAE), the first author took a crucial step by crafting andsubmitting the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to the University’s Center for GlobalEducation. This pivotal document, accompanied by its supporting documents and petitions,played a fundamental role in orchestrating the faculty-led trip. The MoU meticulously delineatedthe trip's goals, objectives, logistics, and safety measures, providing a structured framework forthe educational venture. Beyond serving as an informational guide, the MoU served as a linchpinfor securing essential funding and
Paper ID #41957Experiences of Students with Physical Disabilities in Engineering: A LiteratureReviewJulian Rodrigo Sosa-Molano, Florida International University Julian is a graduate research assistant at Florida International University. He holds a BSc in Electronics Engineering from Pontificia Universidad Javeriana in Colombia and a MSc in Electrical and Computer Engineering from The University of Arizona. He is pursuing his PhD degree in Engineering and Computing Education at Florida International University. He has professional experience in Information Technology, Semiconductors, and Telecommunications in international
: emerging solutions in crisis times,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 8, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10139.[2] M. B. Nejad and E. B. Nejad, “Virtual Education and its Importance as a New Method in Educational System,” International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 8–12, Sep. 2011.[3] M. Neo and K. Neo, “Innovative teaching: Using multimedia in a problem-based learning environment,” Educational Technology & Society, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 19-31, Jan. 2001.[4] M. Pearson, L. Singelmann, R. Striker, E. A. Vazquez, and E. M. Swartz, “Benefits of Long-distance Collaboration in Higher Education Institutions to Train Students in Innovation Practices,” Virtual Online
NSF’ssupport and also thank the students involved with this work.References1. G. Song, J. Lopez, K. Otero, J. Ruby, A. Shepherd, J. Salinas, R. Kastor, R. Bannerot, J. Blankenship, A. Ng, B. Stembridge, and P. Ruchhoeft, “Introducing Emerging Technology into the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum,” Proceedings, 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Page 10.847.12 Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June 20-23, 2004. “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering
mathematical tools to determine a solution. In the classroom environment, operational knowledge is exemplified in the classical homework and exam problems. With operational knowledge, a student can ‘predict’ a quantitative result; however without conceptual knowledge he or she may have difficulty explaining what the result means. 3. Integral knowledge is the synthesis of the conceptual and operational. This synthesis is unique to the engineering profession and is essential for technology development. With this knowledge, engineers that know can do. Page 7.938.2 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering
Science Foundation (NSF) and the Army Research Laboratory (ARL). Her research interests are in the areas of semiconductor processing and advanced interconnect schemes. Dr. Burkett was a co-chair representing the IEEE Education Society for the 2011 Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference. She is a senior member of IEEE, a member of the AVS: Science and Technology Society, and ASEE.Prof. David F. Bahr, Purdue University, West Lafayette Prof. David Bahr is currently head of Materials Engineering at Purdue University. Prior to his appoint- ment at Purdue, he served as the director of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at Washington State University and as the WSU director of Undergraduate Research from 2006 to 2010. He
literacy as a goal for introductory statistics courses," Journal of Statistics Education, vol. 10, no. 3, 2002, doi: 10.1080/10691898.2002.11910678.[19] H. MacGillivray, "Technology, statistical thinking, and engineering students," in International Conference in Teaching Statistics (ICOTS6), Cape Town, South Africa, 2002.[20] ABET. "2022-2023 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs." https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2022-2023/ (accessed Jan. 05, 2025).[21] J. L. Romeu, "On the statistics education of American engineers," Journal of the Reliability Information Analysis Center, vol. 20, pp. 14-20, 2012.[22] E. National Academy of
Technology Officer at Medaptive Health and nearly 20 years at the IBM T. J. Watson Research Center. Dr. Ebling is an ACM Distinguished Scientist.Dr. Ryan Edward Dougherty, United States Military Academy Dr. Ryan Dougherty is an assistant professor at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He earned his Ph.D. and B.S. degrees in Computer Science from Arizona State University. His research interests include theoretical Computer Science, evolutionary computing, combinatorial algorithms and Computer Science education. Dr. Dougherty spent a year as a visiting assistant professor at Colgate University. He has also been on several program committees in Computer Science education.Dr. Nicholas Clark, University of St
, and29% were first generation college students.Once students were admitted to EXCEED, we communicated to them primarily via e-mail. Allstudents were sent a detailed handbook which included information about student expectations,housing, College of Engineering map, meals, emergency contact information, parkinginstructions and agenda for the first day of arrival.During the EXCEED summer program, the students lived together in a residence hall and hadscheduled events for the full day and evenings. These activities were focused around the fivemain objectives of the program: acculturate the students to the College of Engineering and theuniversity, enhance math and writing preparation, build community amongst the cohort ofstudents, enhance study
, and is reported in this paper. The instrument had beenvalidated by experts in problem solving and cooperative problem-based learning. The overallreliability of the instrument is considered high with Cronbach alpha of 0.94.IntroductionEngineering schools today are facing challenges they have never faced before. Today’sengineers are entering into a world marked by rapid and global change. Factors such astechnological advancements, the need to be able to resolve problems quickly, the ability toconsider open-ended problems, the ability to cope well under information overload, etc., putfuture engineers under unfamiliar pressure. The only way to cope with this pressure efficiently isthrough acquiring advanced thinking and problem solving skills
Science Foundation that provides resources for the research and development of distributed medical monitoring technologies and learning tools that utilize biomedical contexts. His research focuses on (1) plug-and-play, point-of-care medical monitoring systems that utilize interoperability standards, (2) wearable sensors and signal processing techniques for the determination of human and animal physiological status, and (3) educational tools and techniques that maximize learning and student interest. Dr. Warren is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.Jianchu Yao, East Carolina University Jianchu (Jason) Yao
Paper ID #29180Development and Teacher Perceptions of an Avatar-Based Performance Taskfor Elementary Teachers to Practice Post-Testing ArgumentationDiscussions in Engineering Design (RTP)Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue Ph.D., Towson University Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Ph.D., is Professor of Science and Engineering Education in the Department of Physics, Astronomy and Geosciences at Towson University. She has a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering, worked briefly as a process engineer, and taught high school physics and pre-engineering. She has taught engineering and science to children in multiple formal and informal settings
architecture wasdeveloped to continuously support between 16-24 people living in a 1G space station.Independence from Earth resupply will have been achieved after five years of successfuloperation.The design project revolves around creating a novel architecture which simulates Earth-likegravity. Necessary design considerations included incorporating the practical constraints of time,money, staff availability, and aiming to engage undergraduate students in active learning. Activelearning refers to the level of academic student engagement in and out of classroom within thesubjects, as compared to passive lecturing of information. Specific facets of such learning 1incorporated into this project included
including administrative appointments. She has experience in teaching at the undergraduate and the graduate level. In addition to her academic work, Dr. Erdil worked as an engineer in sheet metal manufacturing and pipe fabrication industry for five years. She holds B.S. in Computer Engineering, M.S. in Industrial Engineering. She received her Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering from Binghamton University (SUNY). Her background and research are in quality and productivity improvement using statistical tools, lean methods and use of information technology in operations management. Her work is primarily in manufacturing and healthcare delivery operations.Dr. Jean Nocito-Gobel, University of New Haven Jean Nocito
Measurement of Co-Curricular Support: Insights from an Exploratory Factor AnalysisAbstractThe purpose of this work-in-progress paper is to share insights from current efforts to developand test the validity of an instrument to measure undergraduate students’ perceived support inscience, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). The development and refinement ofour survey instrument ultimately functions to extend, operationalize, and empirically test theModel of Co-curricular Support (MCCS). The MCCS is a conceptual framework of studentsupport that demonstrates the breadth of assistance currently used to support undergraduatestudents in STEM, particularly those from underrepresented groups. We are currently
Paper ID #30126Learning Circulation & Hemodynamics using an Interactive SimulationPackage through a Graphic User InterfaceDr. Qi Dunsworth, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College Qi Dunsworth is the Director of Teaching Initiatives at Penn State Erie, The Behrend College. She holds a master’s degree in Communication Studies and a Ph.D. in Educational Technology. At Behrend, she supports faculty in classroom teaching and the scholarship of teaching and learning. She has created a series of faculty teaching workshops and is the recipient of several grants for course revision, educational research, and professional
and associate professor at the University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information & Learning Sciences program and in the Chemical & Biological Engineering Department. She served as Co-PI on an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revolutionizing Engineering Departments project. She was selected as a National Academy of Education / Spencer Post- doctoral Fellow and a 2018 NSF CAREER awardee in engineering education research. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions; this includes a two-strand research program focused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by
coming to Penn State Mr. Chiampi worked in the information technology industry for over 10 years. His primary research interest is the application of Virtual Reality (VR) on engineering education. He recently received funding to create a VR lab to investigate the extent VR can be used to augment surveying education.Mr. Jason Robert Kepner, The Pennsylvania State UniversityLuke Jacob KepnerMr. David Neilson c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Development and Integration of Immersive 360-Videos in Surveying Engineering EducationAbstractThis paper discusses the development and integration of immersive 360-videos in surveyingengineering education. Education of
that engineering students are well preparedto navigate the new challenges that arise as a result of the changing dynamics in the growinglyinterconnected global community. In the book, Educating Engineers: Designing for the future ofthe field, Sheri D. Sheppard et al. (2008) 20 highlight that engineers cannot continue to functionas a “neutral problem-solver” because the work of engineers has a global impact. In a similarvein, Miller (2007) 14 makes an argument for engineers to be prepared beyond technology andtechnical skills. Twenty-first century prepared engineers will need competencies “in teamwork,communication, entrepreneurial thinking, creativity and design, and cross-disciplinary thinkingin a global context” (Miller, 2007, p. 1) .A range
engine, resulting in a total petroleum energyreduction of 40-50%.The vehicle uses an efficient 1.3-liter turbo-charged diesel engine, which can use bio-diesel ortraditional diesel fuel. The combined power systems can produce more than 185 kilowatts ofpower. The control system includes a feature employing GPS, traffic information, and terrainmaps, which, in combination with the multi-mode power system, can deliver 50-plus miles pergallon (mpg) combined fuel efficiency, compared to the stock combined efficiency of 22 mpg.The EcoEagles have implemented a multi-disciplinary approach to the design and manufacturingof the EcoCAR. Departments within the Colleges of Engineering, Arts and Sciences, andBusiness will collaborate in order to design and
are judged by interdisciplinary criteria” [3]. Therefore, in instituting this model inengineering curricula, those factors that make engineering design as much of a social activity as amathematical process are neglected [2]. Neglected factors include the “systems methodology” and“engineering design” related processes such as need identification, problem formulation, development ofalternatives, and analysis and decision-making using prototypes and judgment. Also neglected are socialaspects such as cultural and environmental influences and processes such as working with a group ofindividuals. All of these factors, plus many more, are what drive the demands of technology and productinnovation today. These demands have evolved the current
to communication instruction. Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion: An international journal. 31(7).4. Lingard, R. W. (2008). Teaching and assessing teamwork skills in engineering and computer science. Conference proceedings form the International Institute of Information and Systemics.5. Sullivan, K., & Kedrowicz, A. A. (2010). The female teacher’s body in engineering: Student resistance to identity challenges. Presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.6. Faulkner, W. (2000). The power and the pleasure? A research agenda for "making gender stick" to engineers. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 25(1), 87-119.7. Tonso, K., (2007). On the
., vol. 97, pp. 2526-2533, 2020.[2] Bai, Y., Gao, C., Goda, B., "Lessons learned from teaching cybersecurity courses during COVID-19," Proc. Ann. Conf. Information Technology Education, 6 pages, 2020. doi: 10.1145/3368308.3415394[3] Chhetri, C., " "I lost track of things": Student experiences of remote learning in the COVID-19 pandemic," Proc. Ann. Conf. Information Technology Education, 6 pages, 2020. doi: 10.1145/3368308.3415413[4] Vielma, K., Brey, E.M., "Using evaluative data to assess virtual learning experiences for students during COVID-19," Biomedical Eng. Educ., 2020. doi: 10.1007/s43683-020- 00027-8[5] Gelles, L.A., Lord, S.M. Hoople, G.D., Chen, D.A., Alejandro Mejia, J
own world views which have been developed and formed over their lifetimes [2]. Students'world views often differ greatly from that of scientists and engineers. Often, due in large part tothese differences, students emerge from our classes with serious misconceptions [3] -[ 7]. In recent years, a number of writing techniques have evolved that make use of variouswriting-to-learn strategies within the domains of engineering, mathematics, and the sciences [8] -[15]. The use of writing in introductory physics classes for non-majors may help students developtheir critical thinking and problem-solving skills. In addition, writing can help them identify andconfront their misconceptions about a specific topic in physics. Science classes in
engages more than 2,200 K-12 students in engineering throughout the academic year and summer months. She is also a contributing cur- riculum writer and editor for the TeachEngineering digital library, also an NSF-funded project. Janet holds a BA in Communication from CU-Boulder and is currently pursuing a master’s degree in Information and Learning Technology at CU-Denver.Ms. Samantha Maierhofer, University of Colorado, Boulder Samantha Maierhofer is a Discovery Learning Apprentice at CU’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. She is currently a sophomore studying Mechanical Engineering at CU. Her research interest is in the area of team dynamics on the engineering undergraduate experience. Her current duties
, intrusiveadvising, regular progress reports from instructors, and peer and faculty mentoring. Co-curricular support includes community-building activities, a minimum of two mandatory themeseminars based on evidence-based best practices, and two required "choice" activities, includingparticipation in career fairs, industry information sessions, student clubs, K-12 outreach,undergraduate research, and study abroad. The College of Engineering's network of existingsupport programs is being leveraged in tandem with strategically planned activities to providethe cohorts with academic, financial, career development, and personal support. Explicitlyproviding CREATE scholars with the resources that are part of the hidden curriculum [6] willgive them additional
Paper ID #32950Women in Engineering: 3D Printing Interests, Habits, and PersistenceAlexa Tannebaum, Duke UniversityDr. Sophia T. Santillan, Duke University Sophia Santillan joined Duke as an assistant professor of the practice in summer 2017. As a STEM educa- tor, she is interested in the effect of emerging technology and research on student learning and classroom practice. After earning her bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral degrees from Duke, Santillan taught at the United States Naval Academy as an assistant professor and at the high school level, where she taught across the four-year math curriculum, including
, and will be used to inform an ethnographic protocol. In addition to using theethnography results to further develop the minor, we will present the results to contribute to theunderstanding of innovation as well as curriculum development.Background As the Pathways to General Education program was introduced, faculty members wereinvited to propose pathways minors. Faculty in multiple disciplines were already collaborating indeveloping classes on the topic of innovation, and took the Pathways initiative as an opportunityto turn three existing courses into a pathways minor. Faculty in the departments of EngineeringEducation, Science and Technology in Society, Management, and Industrial Design have sinceworked through the minor development
decades of academic and industrialexperience and emerging evidence suggests that there is a further scope in making theeducation of students whole and complete by adding two new subjects to the generaleducation requirements: scientific framework for external excellence and scientificframework for internal excellence. These topics teach students: (1) How to do all that theydo in life in the best possible manner (science of external excellence) and (2) How to betheir internal best (science and practices of internal excellence). The introduction of topic(2) is important because in the absence of an adequate level of internal excellence,external excellence programs including the best of the best quality initiatives, fall short ofexpectations