creative people aspire to be structural engineers.”4Creative people are drawn to engineering. Troublingly, however, there is evidence that thosegraduating from engineering programs are less creative than those who begin.5,6 One reason forthis may be the traditional focus of engineering education on specific procedures applied to well-constrained problems in which there is a single correct answer.7 As Surovek and Rassati state,“focusing predominately on developing analytical skills at the expense of variable solutionapproaches limits the development of the divergent thinking skills needed for innovation.”5Another reason may be that there is little formal creativity training within engineering curriculaleaving the development of necessary skills up
movement. Most of the participants had no previous experienceassembling LEGO robots.Students shared a networking lunch with faculty and other undergraduate students. During thistime, faculty gave information about the different STEM related student societies anddemonstrated robotics and other engineering applications using Matlab and Mathematica. Afterlunch, the group joined a scientific laboratory tour (Robotics Lab or Human ComputerInteraction and Eye Tracking lab). Participants did hands-on activities and asked questionsassisted by faculty and undergraduate students working in the labs. After the tours, participantsworked in pairs learning to program the LEGO robots and performing a competition activity14.Each team was given a laptop equipped
to accommodateworking adults who completed an Associates of Applied Science degree in a related field whichserves as the first two years in the 2 + 2 completion program. In this program a 2-credit coursetitled Introduction to Engineering was taken in the first semester. In 2016 a traditionalMechanical Engineering program (day courses, more traditional aged students) was added, and a3-credit course was created which has some similarities to the evening course. Additionalofferings of Software Engineering and Electrical Engineering were added in 2017 and 2018respectively which take the 3-credit version.One of the authors has taught the day course in fall 2016, spring 2017, fall 2017, fall 2018, andfall 2020. The evening course, which is offered
of the designprocess in the context of the Grand Challenges. Specifically, they asked students to identifyspecific problems in the Grand Challenge areas and develop design requirements; in this case thestudents were not asked to develop solutions10. In other first year programs, the GrandChallenges have been used to provide relevant context for hands-on engineering design andanalysis activities14-16, however, in those activities students are never asked to actually design,build, and test solutions to real world problems. In this work, real world problems related to theGrand Challenges are used as the subject of a 9 week (or longer) hands-on design project.Student teams are provided with real world problem scenarios and they work through
” Page 24.488.8· “Intro. to electronics and programming in a practical way”; “experience gained with practical circuitry.”· “Learning to work with analog and digital signals through a microcontroller”· “Learning C++”; “programming experience”; “C++ and mbed coding”; C++ algorithms· “Chance to work on things directly related to computer engineering”· “We were on our own”; “freedom to do the project in whatever way we want”; “learning how to do things outside of class”· “Learned more about how hardware works with software”; “learning about circuits and how they interact with software”; “working with the hardware and trying to get it to work well with the code”; “all the computer engineering concepts”; “learning
. This led the research team to look at trust as amajor component in engineering mentoring programs. While little mention of trust has beenfound pertaining to academic or research-based mentoring programs, an extensive model Page 23.1368.5developed to describe trust in large organizations 1 relates well to aspects of the YOU’RE@CUprogram’s mentoring model. This model, which can be seen in Figure 1, has served as a basis forexamining the development of the graduate-undergraduate relationship in our mentoringprogram.Figure 1: Perceived Trust Model, adapted from Mayor et al. (1995)1, where the factors ofability, benevolence, and integrity are
221 is taken by both civil and mechanical engineering majors, who formthe vast majority of the students in Track A. Therefore, several of the engineering projects thatwere developed for the STEPS program are mechanics related. In addition, mechanics-relatedprojects are intended to help students see how material in PHYS 218 Mechanics can be appliedto engineering projects. One question that arises is how well students who were enrolled in theSTEPS curriculum performed in ENGR 221 relative to the students who were not enrolled in theSTEPS curriculum. Therefore, the performance in ENGR 221 of groups of students will becompared. Background information on the STEPS program is provided in the following sectionto provide contextual information for
to the DoctorateTo address CEED objectives and goals set out for the program, and to address needswe have identified related to underrepresented minorities' educational attainment inSTEM fields, A Step to the Doctorate was created. 13 Population Served by A Step to the Doctorate: Virginia Tech/COE Undergraduate Demographics14 https://eng.vt.edu/about/rankings-and-figures/undergraduate-enrollment-by-gender-and-ethnicity.htmlIn order to provide background on the population served by A Step to the Doctorate,this 2020 data provided by the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech compares theundergraduate population of the College to the overall
AC 2008-674: COMPARISON OF TWO PEER EVALUATION INSTRUMENTSFOR PROJECT TEAMSKerry Meyers, University of Notre Dame Kerry L. Meyers is an Associate Professional Faculty Member and Co-coordinator of the First-Year Engineering Program at the University of Notre Dame.Matthew Ohland, Purdue Engineering Education Matthew W. Ohland is an Associate Professor and Director of First-Year Engineering in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and is the Past President of Tau Beta Pi, the engineering honor society. He received his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering with a minor in Education from the University of Florida in 1996. Previously, he served as Assistant Director of the NSF-sponsored
Paper ID #32320The Use of Virtual Design Modules in an Introduction to EngineeringCourse: Impact on Learning Outcomes and Engineering IdentityDr. Shannon Barker, University of Virginia Dr. Shannon Barker completed her PhD at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, and completed two post-doctoral fellowships at the University of Washington and Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lau- sanne, specializing in gene delivery. Shannon has been in graduate higher education leadership for seven years both at the Georgia Institute of Technology and the University of Virginia, and is currently the Undergraduate Program Director for the
Graphics Technology at Purdue polytechnic Institute, West Lafayette.Sarah Knapp, Purdue University Master of Architecture, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA PhD Candidate, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Assessing the Impact of an Interdisciplinary First-Year Experience ProgramAbstractThis research paper builds upon an ongoing exploration of a large-scale, interdisciplinary courseintegration for first-year Technology majors. Our research begins to show that the program ismaking measurable differences to students’ learning, engagement, and sense of community.Administrators and instructors from 2 colleges within the university collaborated to
costs arecovered by a grant related to increasing student success at Cal Poly Pomona. Although manypopular podcasts have sponsorships and podcast ad revenue has increased by an order ofmagnitude in the last five years – from $69M in 2015 to a projected $659M in 2020 [18] – theauthors have no immediate plans for monetizing the podcast through commercials.The Spring 2019 study provided feedback from 48 current engineering students. Since thepodcast’s target audience also includes future engineering students, input from high schoolstudents was desired as well. In Summer 2019, the lead author visited the "Cal Poly PomonaSTEAM Academy," which is a summer program at Cal Poly Pomona for local high schoolstudents who are strongly considering pursuing
Paper ID #11404Assessment of Communication, Teamwork, and Engineering Motivation inInter-Disciplinary Projects Implemented in an Introduction to EngineeringCourseDr. Haolin Zhu, Arizona State University Haolin Zhu is a faculty lecturer in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State Univer- sity. She received her Ph.D. in Solid Mechanics from Cornell University. Currently she focuses on the freshmen engineering program, as well as designing and teaching mechanical engineering courses.Dr. Ryan J Meuth, Arizona State University Dr. Ryan Meuth is a Freshmen Engineering Lecturer in the Fulton Schools of Engineering, and
externally funded projects relating to engineering education.Dr. Ryan Anderson, Montana Engineering Education Research Center Dr. Anderson received a BS in Chemical Engineering and a BA in History from Bucknell University in 2007. He obtained a PhD in Chemical and Biological Engineering at the University of British Columbia in 2012 before postdoctoral studies at City College of New York. He is currently an assistant professor at Montana State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Research Initiation: Effectively Integrating Sustainability within an Engineering Program – Project UpdateAbstractThe overall research aim of this NSF Research Initiation in
engineering; his current research is supported by NSF/DUE and NSF/CISE.Thomas Wolff, Michigan State University Thomas F. Wolff is Associate Professor of Civil Engineering and Associate Dean of Engineering for Undergraduate Studies at Michigan State University. From 1970 to 1985, he was a geotechnical engineer with the St. Louis District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Since 1985, on the faculty of MSU, he has taught undergradaute and graduate courses in geotechnical engineering and reliability analysis. His research and consulting has focused on the design and evaluation of dams, levees and hydraulic structures, and he has been involved in several studies related to the failure of New Orleans levees
. 5) Therewould be more pressure on students to succeed in MATH 119 as they would be taking it for agrade. This may negatively impact their level of participation in the engineering/computerscience portion of the bootcamp. This would likely decrease the chance of attaining the goals ofthe bootcamp related to retention in the engineering/computer science majors.Lunches were times when there were faculty-student interactions in an informal setting. Some ofthe lunches were held at local eateries around campus to allow the students to become familiarwith the local community. Staff from the MESA Engineering Program also came to many of thelunches, which helped students establish ties with this support program and to ask about otherresources in and
housing for the duration of the three-weekprogram. The main goal of the FYSE program is to strengthen engineering-related mathematicsskills, with particular focus on pre-calculus and the application of engineering problem solving.Each day during the week, the students participate in several classroom and laboratory hours ofmath-intensive curriculum aligned with practicing and strengthening engineering problem-solving skills (see Appendix A for sample syllabus from 2017). From 2012, the coursework has 5been taught by three university faculty members and instructors and assisted by a graduateassistant and undergraduate teaching assistants. In
presented as they are applied to a class project ina freshmen course with engineering technology and pre-engineering students. Conceptmaps have been implemented in a newly designed Lego Robot Project. The Lego RobotProject consisted of four pre-designed projects each with different difficulty level to besuitable for students with different experiences. The teams were led by peers who hadpreviously completed the project and were not taking the class, and by those who hadprior experience with Lego Robots and were registered for the course.Technical skills, such as designing, programming, and knowledge/use of sensors, as wellas professional skills, such as teamwork, communication, problem solving, andleadership, were included in the concept maps
AC 2008-848: IEEE’S RWEP PROGRAM TO RECRUIT AND RETAIN FIRSTYEAR STUDENTS IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, COMPUTERENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCEAmy Bell, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Amy E. Bell served as Chair of the Public Awareness Committee of IEEE’s Educational Activities Board and Director of the IEEE RWEP program from 2006-2007. She is also an Associate Professor in the Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Virginia Tech.Moshe Kam, Drexel University Dr. Moshe Kam served as Vice President of IEEE’s Educational Activities Board from 2005-2007. He is also Department Head and Robert G. Quinn Professor in the Electrical and Computer
engineer. By the end of the semester, itis expected that the students have an understanding of: how to achieve success as an engineeringundergraduate student at GVSU; the expectations of learning outcomes achieved throughGVSU’s engineering program; the engineering profession; and the nature of the world in whichengineers work. These objectives are similar to other Introduction to Engineering courses thatfocus on introducing the career of engineering as well as skills required to be successful in futureengineering courses.1-3 As with some other Introduction to Engineering courses, it is not arequired course for graduation from the engineering program.4 Some of the skills taught in thisclass include effective studying techniques, time management
national level activities have broad transportation foci. The American Association of StateHighway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) has a Transportation and Civil Engineering(TRAC) program that offers computers and related transportation focused software to elementaryand secondary schools. TRAC volunteers, typically transportation engineers from the statetransportation agencies. At a basic level, TRAC is a program designed for integration intoscience, math, and social studies classes. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) sponsors Page 8.449.1a variety of programs on workforce development, including construction career programs
Paper ID #14499Redesign of the Introduction to Engineering Course and its Impact on Stu-dents’ Knowledge and Application of the Engineering Design ProcessDr. Haolin Zhu, Arizona State University Dr. Haolin Zhu received her PhD in Solid Mechanics and Computational Science and Engineering from Cornell University. She is currently part of the freshmen engineering education team in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Currently she focuses on designing the curriculum for the freshman engineering program as well as the NAE Grand Challenge Scholars Program. She also designs and teaches courses
participates and teaches in the first-year program.Andrew Kline, Western Michigan University Andrew Kline received his PhD from Michigan Technological University and is assistant professor of chemical engineering at Western Michigan University. He is Director of the Engineering Design Center for Service Learning, and coordinates and teaches the college-wide service learning engineering design course sequence.Edmund Tsang, Western Michigan University Edmund Tsang received his BS (distinction) in Mechanical Engineering and his PhD in Metallurgy. He is the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs and Assessment, and Co-Director of the Engineering Design Center for Service-Learning at Western Michigan
Paper ID #21885First Generation Engineering Student Mentoring Program: A Case Study ofa Large Engineering School in the U.S.Dr. Bimal P. Nepal, Texas A&M University Dr. Bimal Nepal is Phillips’66 First Year Engineering Faculty Fellow and Associate Professor in the Industrial Distribution Program at Texas A&M University. His research interests include integration of supply chain management with new product development decisions, distributor service portfolio optimiza- tion, pricing optimization, supply chain risk analysis, lean and six sigma, and large scale optimization. He has authored 41 refereed articles in
lifecycle related cost:benefit analyses, similar to theactivities of environmental engineers. This drinking water activity also did not focus on a wasterelated topic.A pre-survey on drinking water was developed. The questions on the survey are listed in Table3. This pre-survey was given at the end of the initial information session that started the day ofthe EVEN focus. The results from the survey were incorporated into the slides that went withthe drinking water activity lecture later in the day. Based on the primary source of the water thatthe students’ indicated that they drink, similar students were grouped into teams for the activity.The water that they were assigned to explore was also assigned based on the survey results. Forexample, those
would also be useful • Consider moving to a “Question of the Month” format to maintain response rate• Rearrangement of Headings – • Improves logic and hopefully the readability of the final report• Relevancy, Quality and Productivity – • Confusing or redundant questions to be dropped • Goal of a higher number of completed survey returned to improve quality • Incorporate “Four Pillars” components to engage related programs• Four Pillars – • Enhance the teaching of manufacturing principles and practices in all engineering and engineering technology programs • Collaborative effort across professional societies increases productivityBibliography -1 Trends in
that exist today. Many incorrectly believe that all engineering master’sprograms fit a very narrow description; i.e., requiring ten advanced engineering coursescomplemented by a compulsory thesis of three to nine credit hours. Even some engineeringfaculty share this common, but mistaken, belief. This misinformation could result from thescarcity of comparative statistics related to engineering graduate programs. This situation mayexist because most graduate programs are not accredited by a single national organization; Page 22.327.2e.g., ABET, Inc. The authors know of no single national-level repository for the types ofstatistics provided in
Paper ID #40230Work In Progress: Creating and building a Peer Advising Program toIncrease Engagement with Pre-major Engineering StudentsMaria Mosley, The Pennsylvania State University, Academic Adviser, Engineering Advising Center Maria has worked in the Engineering Advising Center at Penn State for four years. She has worked in stu- dent support services at the University since 2008. Prior to her time at Penn State, Maria worked at several different universities in various roles within the world of Student Affairs. She has worked professionally in the field for 19 years. Maria graduated from Springfield College in
AC 2009-2126: INTRODUCING MULTITHREADED PROGRAMMING: POSIXTHREADS AND NVIDIA'S CUDAChristiaan Gribble, Grove City College Page 14.806.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Introducing multithreaded programming: POSIX Threads and NVIDIA’s CUDAAbstractThe current progression of commodity processing architectures exhibits a trend towardincreasing parallelism, requiring that undergraduate students in a wide range of technicaldisciplines gain an understanding of problem solving in massively parallel environments.However, as a comprehensive college, we cannot currently afford to dedicate an entire semester-long course to the
communications and network security, sensor integration, publicpolicy, and software development. The ECE department heads have recognized the need toupdate and upgrade programs in power engineering and closely related fields. The workshopdescribed in this paper brought together a diverse set of academic, government/NGO andindustry participants to address a range of issues including curriculum changes, facultydevelopment and student recruitment. Participants also discussed the role of power electronictechnologies, planning, automation and control to achieve smart grid performance goals.INTRODUCTIONThe first ECEDHA Energy and Power Educational Programs Development Workshop funded bythe National Science Foundation with additional support from the