2006-1732: DEVELOPMENT OF HIGHLY INTERACTIVE, ON-LINE COURSE ONENERGY CONSERVATION: LEARNING STRATEGIES USED ANDEXPERIENCE GAINEDSarma Pisupati, Pennsylvania State University SARMA V. PISUPATI is an Associate Professor of Energy & Geo-Environmental Engineering Department and a Faculty Fellow of the John A Dutton e-Education Institute of the College of Earth and mineral Sciences. He is Chair of the General Education Program of the EGEE Department and has been teaching undergraduate and graduate courses at Penn State University since 1992.Wendy Mahen, PennSylvania State University WENDY L. MAHAN is Instructional Designer in the in the Teaching and Learning with Technology (TLT) wing of
moderntechnological systems that directly affect human life, or developing small-scalerepresentations of large and complex systems. Student Learning Objectives 2a.) Disassemble and reassemble a small electrical appliance and be able to identify the power supply, the power train, and the different mechanical and electrical components. 2b.) Manually collect data from an experiment, and tabulate, process and graph the data using a computer spreadsheet program. 2c.) Explain the technological aspects of different real-world applications of technology. 2d.) List the major components of a variety of real-world applications of technology.ExamplesDisassemble and identify the components of a desktop
-junction compensator (LT1025) is introduced. Figure 5 shows the outline of thesystem presented in the laboratory exercise which students are asked to implement usingProject GUISE. This exercise did not include a connection diagram of the ProjectGUISE instrument since the detailed configuration of the thermometer would dependupon the temperature range and the type of thermocouple. Page 12.1201.6Fig. 4. Project GUISE instrument configured to illustrate phase-sensitive demodulationwith two SPDT analog switches actuated by cosine and sine sync signals. The heavylines represent coaxial cables. The small loops shown at switch inputs IN0B and IN2Bindicate that the
(National Foundation of AmericanPolicy [NFAP], 2017). Policymakers have begun to acknowledge this large international studentpopulation—for example, the aforementioned NASEM’s report includes citizenship in diversityindices along with traditional measures, particularly in STEM graduate education [2]. Despitethese inclusion efforts and acknowledgment at the government level, the current research onengineering graduate students’ experiences lack sufficient consideration of international students[6]. In addition to international students, there is another group of students who has beenoverlooked both in engineering and higher education—master’s students. Despite the longhistory of master’s programs, which began early in the U.S. higher
Paper ID #40462Resources and Exercises for STEM Educators and Students Navigating the”Misinformation Age”Ms. Alexis P. Nordin, Mississippi State University Alexis is currently an instructor in the Shackouls Technical Communication Program in Mississippi State University’s James Worth Bagley College of Engineering. She has taught technical writing and various other writing- and communication-based courses at MSU since 2004. She holds bachelor’s and master’s degrees in English from Mississippi State University and Louisiana State University and is certified as a Teacher of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL).Mr
-trained computer design specialists, we have undertaken a major revision ofour undergraduate curriculum by incorporating the latest logic design tools. However,the available hardware and software limit the design to simple logic circuits. Also, thestudents are not exposed in any meaningful way to large-scale programmable devices(FPGA’s) that are required to handle the increasing complexity of digital systems. Page 6.457.2 2 The Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering has recently introduced an undergraduate degree program in Computer Engineering (started in Fall 1998). In this paper we will report
met. The assessment of the identified ABET performance indicators at the end of the semester were above the acceptable threshold and comparable with the in-person course. This experience demonstrates that through innovation, some of the engineering laboratory courses can be taught remotely without sacrificing any experiments.1. Introduction One of the most meaningful measures of an engineering program is for its graduates to be able to perform from the first day on the job. It is only through a fine interplay of the theory and practice that such an outcome can be achieved. Hence, it is imperative that when developing courses and curricula, we keep a theory to practice outcome in mind. What distinguishes the new graduates in
suite [6], it includes: Demand Planning Distribution Planning Manufacturing Planning Transportation Planning Advanced Scheduling Summary and ConclusionSelecting software for supply chain management presents a daunting task in a large, multifacetedorganization - but also for a small, single process business. Typically, the software experts lacksupply chain expertise and the supply chain experts often possess limited understanding ofinformation technology. Furthermore, systems alone rarely provide the solution to supply chainproblems; instead, most system implementation efforts require process reengineering andoccasionally major organizational upheaval [7
practice and gain knowledge.Georgieva reported that the majority of students in their program did not use solution manualsfor blind copying. All students in the classes improved their tests scores significantly and aremarkable increase in the students’ motivations and interests was observed.It also has been reported that if solution manuals are made available to students, they are lessdiscouraged and intimidated by problems8. If not misused, solution manuals are a helpfulresource that is available to students anywhere, anytime, without having to ask for it. Withsolution manuals available, students worked on more problems, both assigned and unassigned.Both papers7,8 report that some predicted negative consequences, such as less learning
everyday, such as the ubiquitous Apple iPhone.Viewpoint B: A Wasteful EnterpriseWith the astronomical financial deficit this country faces, and with so many people in immediateneed of government services, we can no longer afford to continue the largely fruitless spaceprogram. Sure, we went to the moon and we had many successful space shuttle missions, butwhat exactly is the purpose? We have already determined that all planets within realisticdistance cannot support life as we know it.Survey ResultsFigure 4 shows where students stand on the space program. A majority of 61% of engineerschose viewpoint A, the final frontier, which means they largely believe space exploration shouldgo forward. Conversely, nonengineers were almost equally divided on
or calculus I along with other first year basic courses.However, the large majority of students have not yet taken college physics. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationProject Stage One – Introduction to Team ProjectsThe project begins with a brief introduction in class using a standard project assignment sheet.The students are informed of the guidelines of the project, of the grading parameters, and of theproject timetable. Two mandatory web searches, one on Rube Goldberg and one on the historyof timers, are assigned. The students had already been given instruction on performing
- tion. While at Oklahoma State, he developed courses in photonics and engineering design. After serving for two and a half years as a program director in engineering education at the National Science Founda- tion, he took a chair position in electrical engineering at Bucknell University. He is currently interested in engineering design education, engineering education policy, and the philosophy of engineering education.Dr. Thomas De Pree, University of New Mexico Thomas A. De Pree is an ASERT-IRACDA postdoctoral fellow in the School of Medicine at University of New Mexico (2020-2023), where he holds a research appointment with the UNM Metal Exposure and Toxicity Assessment on Tribal Lands in the Southwest (METALS
Paper ID #27406Just Add Context? Analyzing Student Perceptions of Decontextualized andContextualized Engineering Problems and their Use of Storytelling toCreate ContextDr. Nicole Farkas Mogul, University of Maryland, College Park Nicole Mogul is a professor of engineering ethics and Assistant Director of the Science, Technology and Society at the University of Maryland, College Park. Co-author, David Tomblin is the Director of the Science, Technology and Society Program of College Park Scholars at the University of Maryland, College Park. Co-author, Tim Reedy, is a graduate assistant in the Science, Technology and Society
Paper ID #15756Becoming Boundary Spanning Engineers: Research Methods and Prelimi-nary FindingsProf. Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He is also an Associate Director of Purdue’s Office of Global Engineering Programs, leads the Global Engineering Education Collaboratory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from
reverse some of the effects from these deficiencies.Exercise has now been recognized as increasing the plasticity and cognitive abilities of the brain [2], [3],[4], [5], [6]. In an interesting review article entitled “Revenge of the “Sit,”” exercise is seen as increasingmetabolism that is important for synaptic plasticity for memory and learning [2] and has been verifiedby several other studies [3], [4], [5], [6]. One large long-term study from Australia showed that exercisenarrowed the left superior frontal sulcus, associated with processing speed and executive function, inthe volunteers that performed 8 hours of mild exercise [walking] or 3.5 hours of moderate exercise[cycling or dancing] a week [3]. Increasing activity beyond the moderate
present but also the coming generations, even those whose faces are yet beneath thesurface of the ground – the unborn of the future Nation.”7 The Iroquois’ promise of makingdecisions with the welfare and well being of least seven generations into the future led to asustainable life style, valued natural resources for the sake of the current generation.Nations, corporations, and individuals all over the world are taking up the challenge to make adifference. For example, in the U.S. where politics and lobbing can play a large role inproliferating unfounded assumptions that environmental regulations are bad for jobs and theeconomy. Two hundred twenty three companies signed a letter in November 2014 supporting theU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Paper ID #8751The Traditional Engineer vs. The Innovative EngineeerDr. Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Daniel M. Ferguson is the recipient of three NSF awards supporting research in engineering education. Prior to coming to Purdue he was Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship at Ohio Northern University and Associate Director of the Inter-professional Studies Program and Senior Lecturer at Illinois Institute of Technology. His research interests include engineering innovativeness, entrepreneurial engineering, teamwork, and mindset changes and learning strategies of both engineering students
develop categories to grouptogether similar codes. For example, the Collaborative Communication category included thefollowing codes: Lack of Internal Collaborative Communication and Lack of ExternalCollaboration (shown in Table 2). Table 2: Finalized Codebook from Iterative Analysis*The finalized codebook included a fifth column containing examples from student interviews, but we did not include these herefor the sake of being brief. We discuss examples from participants in the Discussion section.In order to quantitatively assess the agreement between researchers during the iterative analysisprocess, we performed an inter-rater reliability (IRR) test using a macro program in Microsoftword (IRR) [15-16]. For the IRR
which may compensate Apple released their first operating system. It is based on the for small shortcomings in features and flexibility. As a Disk Operating System (DOS) system which is well known as consequence, the operating system is not secure the black screen and command line. Microsoft dominated the enough. In this case, a third party third party may market of operating system after they released Windows 95. provide a security application, such as Norton [12]. This new domination of the operating system world was held (and, many would argue, still is) for many reasons [21]. • FACTOR 4: Graphic User
, the issue must be addressed laterthan might be preferable – if it is to be addressed at all. Further, if no program to mitigatestudents’ lack of understanding of learning practices exists – or students are not involved in aprogram – at the college freshman level, the solution, if any, must be effected after the freshmanyear.In a largely student-structured, project based learning environment, junior and senior engineeringstudents were included in a study [6] to enhance lifelong learning via metacognition.Cunningham et al. [7] included sophomores in the first phase of their study. Their approach wasto provide students with short videos and assignments to provide background and framework formetacognition.Clearly, non-freshmen undergraduates have
functions in customized hardware. These functions include drawing a line, drawing a polygon, drawing a cycle, and filling these shapes. 5. Image processing and machine vision accelerators. Algorithms used in image processing and machine vision must process a large number of pixel data. They are computation intensive and the custom hardware can be developed to accelerate the operation 19. Evaluation The video theme is part of the effort to create a “spiral lab framework” 20. Its effectiveness isevaluated by an array of assessment instruments, including contents tests, lab works, studentsurvey, and student interviews. The data collection is in progress and the preliminary result isreported in a separate article20.6
educational mission to teach explicitly the institution’s and profession’svalues, how to identify and assess relevant facts, and how to critically evaluate an argument. Ourteaching of critical thinking in engineering needs to expand to include information literacy andbroader conceptions of criticality. 23 Our arguments, if they are of high quality, will win the day,if we take the time to lay them out clearly for students. The time has come we when can nolonger take multicultural arguments for granted as commonly accepted knowledge, such that itsuffices to lightly reference them in the introductions to our research on diversity in STEM. Thisrequires a deeper, concerted effort to truly understand our students and the debates of the day inwhich they are
Technical Committee on Semiconductor Manufacturing Automation.Miss Yun Dai, University of California Santa BarbaraDr. Stephen C-Y. Lu, University of Southern California Stephen Lu is the David Packard Chair in Manufacturing Engineering at University of Southern Califor- nia. His current professional interests include design thinking, collaborative engineering, technological innovation, and education reform. He has over 330 technical publications in these areas. He directs the Master of Science of Product Development Engineering degree program at USC. He is a senior Fellow of ASME and CIRP, and the founding Director of the iPodia Alliance (www.ipodialliance.org) – a global consortium of 11 leading universities that uses
capacity. The usefulness of these tools inactive learning cannot be understated, but they were found to primarily focus on simulations oftasks rather than recreating an environment. To address this, we propose the use of CiscoModeling Labs (CML) for Education, a flexible platform that emulates real networking software,enabling students to practice from any location at any time.Cisco Packet Tracer is a network simulation and visualization tool that allows users to design,configure, and simulate network topologies, and is often used in conjunction with the CiscoNetworking Academy program for teaching basic network concepts. CML is intended to berealistic and it is used for designing, testing, and validating complex network designs in real-world
Paper ID #7894A proposal for using problem posing to connect learning of basic theory withengineering designDr. Richard L Marcellus, Northern Illinois University Richard Marcellus is an Associate Professor in the Industrial and Systems Engineering Department at Northern Illinois University. His current research interest is definition and performance evaluation of statistical process control policies. He has taught numerous courses in applied probability, including stochastic operations research, reliability engineering, queueing methods, dynamic programming, and quality control
theprinciples of science.Undergraduate research programs are particularly effective in enhancing critical thinking and com-munication skills. Students learn to think independently while carrying out research, to criticallyanalyze data, and to present results. In that way, students develop skills which are of great valueduring professional life 12 . Those projects which are carried out in cooperation with external part-ners, such as universities and employers enhance the communication and teamwork abilities ofstudents even more 11 .Such research-based education has a greater impact on the career desires and aspirations of thestudents. It is assessed that many students in the future will pursue a career in their field of studywhen they are working on
the SL, a participant is expressing a readiness to tell their story, small or large. TheSL is a precursor to the participant’s storytelling. We came to recognize each SL as a call towhich we carefully responded in ways that encouraged culturally-informed trust-building. Over 3the course of two semi-structured interviews and two member check interviews with each of the24 participants, we honed and documented our methodology for recognizing and responding toSLs. A year later, in a secondary analysis of the dataset, we documented the methodology thatevolved during the initial research study, and we present that methodology in this paper.Sounding
-generation) or (also) on small and distributed photovoltaic units installed, for example, on the roof of consumers’ houses (micro-generation); transportation solution of people living in big cities can rely on private automobile or public system, etc. 2) Each one of these possible solutions impacts and shapes society (and the environment) in a specific way. Agro-ecology depends on peasants’ knowledge, which empowers them; it is ecologically sustainable and labor-intensive (providing a lot of jobs in the countryside), not allowing mechanization. On the other hand, the green revolution agriculture does not rely on peasants’ knowledge, which disempowers them; it is
Page 13.762.12 Assessment and evaluation of the TC2K Criterion 2 Program Outcomeshas now been in the field for six years. Nevertheless, the engineering technologycommunity continues to struggle at times to find appropriate opportunities,venues, and techniques to development student skills consistent with those lessvgejpkecn."oqtg"ÐuqhvÑ yet essential skills that allow engineers to effectivelyfunction and grow as members of the society that they serve. This paperdemonstrates that even a general multi-disciplined junior seminar can be a viablemedium for implementing process improvement initiatives supporting thesecritical outcomes. Certainly, this one-hour course should not represent thecomplete treatment of the outcomes within the
Northeastern University and her M.S. and Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Stanford University.Dr. Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University Dr. Adam Carberry is an associate professor at Arizona State University in the Fulton Schools of Engi- neering, The Polytechnic School. He earned a B.S. in Materials Science Engineering from Alfred Univer- sity, and received his M.S. and Ph.D., both from Tufts University, in Chemistry and Engineering Education respectively. His research investigates the development of new classroom innovations, assessment tech- niques, and identifying new ways to empirically understand how engineering students and educators learn. He currently serves as the Graduate Program Chair for the