decisions. Our results also show that despite a perceived lack of autonomy, some GTAscontinue to act autonomously when faced with decision-making in the classroom. These resultscan help inform faculty as they seek to support GTAs in the GTAs‟ teaching responsibilities.IntroductionFor many years, graduate students have served as laboratory assistants and graders forundergraduate engineering courses. Due to recent efforts to increase hands-on activities inengineering education, many institutions are now also employing graduate teaching assistants(GTAs) as course instructors and lecturers 1-3. While researchers have studied GTAs in thehumanities and physical sciences, little is known about GTA experiences in engineering. Thepurpose of this study is to
X Thermodynamics Mukherjee and Cox, Systems Analysis and Design X 1998 Capstone Project Ritz et al., 2020 Statics and Mechanics of X Materials Sangelkar et al., 2014 Statics X Web-based Implementation Green, 2000 Signals and Systems X Paull et al., 1999 Electrical Engineering X Technology Circuits Leonard et al., 2008 Circuit Analysis I-II Xall students had the prerequisite knowledge to navigate subsequent class units. The
-cohorttransmission. Post-pandemic, the proposed method can be applied in many cohort-based learninguse cases.IntroductionSince the novel virus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) was declared a global pandemic [1] in March2020, strict social distancing measures were enacted onto the populace to ensure public healthand safety. Academic institutions were forced into school closures, and shifted towards remotecontent delivery. Over 144 million students across the globe [2], from Indonesia [3] to SaudiArabia [4], were impacted by the need to receive their education through online learning.With the increased global access to stable Information and Communication Technology (ICT)infrastructure, online learning saw an increase in popularity recently [5]. This mode of learning
Journal of Educational Technology 39, 3.16. Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74.17. Razmov, V. and Vlasseva, S. (2004) Feedback Techniques for Project-based Courses, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition,18. Ruiz-Primo, M. A. and Furtak E. M. (2006) Informal Formative Assessment and Scientific Inquiry: Exploring Teachers’ Practices and Student Learning Educational Assessment, 11(3 & 4),205–23519. Davis, B. (1997) Listening for Differences: An Evolving Conception of Mathematics Teaching, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 355-376.20. Zawojewski, J. S., Diefes-Dux, H., & Bowman, K
integrating ESIinto engineering education to foster a sense of ethical awareness and responsibility in students.IntroductionThe new ABET student outcomes put additional impetus on teaching ethics by requiring thatstudents attain “an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineeringsituations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineeringsolutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts” (outcome 4) [1]. Theoutcome mandates a higher level of learning than “an understanding of professional and ethicalresponsibility” (outcome f) [2]. The new criteria demand that programs demonstrate that theirstudents are able to recognize their responsibilities and make sound choices, higher
interactive lectures, as they are fun and good for the learningprocess,” “incorporation of more small design challenges in mixed groups,” and “more examplesof current products to help show what we’re learning.” A student stated, “I loved the groupactivities, especially in the Makerspace lab! It allowed us to try things out, which was helpfuland engaging. It was helpful because we were able to apply the design process by gatheringneeded information, work in groups, brainstorm, etc.” Another student stated, “Presentinginformation through multiple mediums like videos, readings, discussions, and Power Point slidesmade the information more interesting and memorable rather than all through lecturing.”In addition, students were asked during the focus group
academic editing.Tori Bailey, Stanford University Tori Bailey is a Ph.D. student at the Center for Design Research in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Stanford University. Her research interests include academic and professional identity development of engineering students, academic advising of engineering students, history of engineering education in the U.S., and the organization of engineering education programs. Ms. Bailey received a Bachelor's Degree in Mathematics from Spelman College and a Bachelor's Degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology where she was a NASA Women in Science and Engineering Scholar. She also holds a Master's Degree in
aforementioned content will be collectivelyanalyzed to explore the relationships between each topic, the potential shortcomings ofengineering education to sufficiently develop desirable skills, and how these shortcomings maybe addressed, as well as additional questions this analysis may have aroused.DefinitionsCritical thinking lacks a clear, exact, and consistent definition due primarily to its highlyphilosophical nature. Some experts16-28 attempt to give broad definitions, ranging from a problemsolving methodology,19 to an information filtration process,28 to a simple ‘frame of mind.’20Meanwhile, others define critical thinking through lists of specific skills related to reasoning,logic, and strategies.18,29,30While each individual’s definition and
University of Wisconsin-Madison. Her research is focused on the STEM career pipeline, especially related to engi- neering, engineering education and the molecular biosciences. In addition to her work in education re- search, she is also the Director of scientific courses at the BioPharmaceutical Technology Center Institute in Madison, WI, where she coordinates curricula in the area of molecular biology.Christine G. Nicometo, University of Wisconsin, Madison Christine G. Nicometo is an associate faculty associate in the Engineering Professional Development (EPD) Department at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Within EPD, she teaches technical commu- nication courses in three programs: Technical Communication Certificate
andcollaborative learning, discovery learning, flipped classrooms, inquiry-based learning, peer-ledinstruction, problem-based learning, case-based learning, and technology-enhanced learning [7].As these categories originate from different authors, it is a possibility that their concepts are notmutually exclusive.Previous Systematic ReviewsA systematic review of interventions in introductory circuits education is not a new approach. Bysearching the journals and conference papers for the past 10 years, we identified three systematicreviews on this subject, all of which were published in ASEE Conference proceedings. Pittersonand Streveler (2016) systematically reviewed 12 papers about the types of activities used to teachcircuits, the perceptions of students
profession Influence of culture on the engineering design International trade process Appropriate technology International ethics Likely experiences in other cultures International relationsWednesday class periods are devoted to helping students learn about the culture that they will beworking in. If the country that they will be traveling to uses a language other than English, thesedays may focus on teaching basic conversational language skills. The language lessons arehighly interactive in that they rely on students speaking to each other rather than focusing onreading competence. These periods also include presentations, sometimes by guest speakers,about the history, people, food, customs, religion
examining howhistorical and current patterns of land ownership and governance impact the development ofaffordable housing initiatives in remote and predominantly Alaska Native villages2. Guided bytheoretical lenses that emphasize the critical need for actors to identify and understand the toolsthey use for organized action (Callon 2002; Latour 2005; Vinck 2003), we track how differentmodes of complexity come into contact with and affect the planning and implementation ofengineering and building projects in remote Alaska Native communities.BackgroundIn carrying out this research, stories and ruminations have emerged that describe a diverse set ofinterconnected yet epistemologically distinct issues that those working on building projects inAlaska
designer in the Russ College of Engineering and Technology at Ohio University, Athens, Ohio. She works with faculty to design and redesign courses while following best practices in technology integration. Her research interests include learning aptitudes and facilitating class- room communication. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 An Interdisciplinary Project-Based Service Learning and Action Research Project with Mechanical Engineering and Speech-Language Pathology StudentsAbstractThe current paper addresses an imminent need for an action research study to systematicallyinvestigate the effectiveness of an interprofessional project-based service
the context of youth leadership programs, start-ups and innovation centers, and community-based initiatives. She is currently a Design Research Fellow and Lecturer at Olin College, with a focus on processes and frameworks for transformation in engineering education. Previously, she developed and launched the Energy Technology Program at Creighton University: an interdisciplinary undergraduate program in renewable energy and sustainable design. She has a B.S. in Mechanical Engi- neering from Olin College and an M.A. from Creighton University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Conversation and participation architectures: practices for creating
executive. Having worked on a diverse range of projects ranging from nuclear power plant control systems to digital libraries, he is a self-professed technology junkie — a perpetual misfit who enjoys mixing it up. In mechanical engineering circles, he is often labeled the ”information technology” guy; amongst computer science folks, he is the ”computer hardware” person; or to electrical engineers, he is the ”mechanical” person. More often than not, he is simply one with a holistic systems perspective. At Stanford, George has been senior research associate, associate director at Stanford Center for Design Research, and associate director of technology at Stanford Learning Lab.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri
engineering pedagogy.Dr. Nadia N. Kellam, Arizona State University Dr. Nadia Kellam is Associate Professor in the Polytechnic Engineering Program at Arizona State Uni- versity. Prior to this position, she was an Associate Professor at the University of Georgia, where she was co-director of the interdisciplinary engineering education research Collaborative Lounge for Un- derstanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER). In her research, she is interested in understanding how engineering students develop their professional identity, the role of emo- tion in student learning, and synergistic learning. A recent research project uncovers the narratives of exemplary engineering faculty who have
2D transition metal dichalcogenides. She is a recipient of the NSF Graduate Fellowship.Crystal E Winston, Stanford University Crystal E. Winston is a fourth year PhD candidate in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Stanford University, Stanford CA, USA. Before pursuing the PhD, Crystal received a B.S. in mechanical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA, USA in 2019 and an MPhil degree from Imperial College London, London, UK in 2021. Crystal’s research interests include origami robot design and haptics. Crystal’s research is supported by the Stanford Graduate Fellowship and the Stanford Enhancing Diversity in Graduate Education Fellowship.Rachel A. G. Adenekan, Stanford
lab manual specially written for thiscourse [22], and work in groups to complete lab reports. The relationship between chemicalengineering and post-harvesting coffee is discussed in lecture while the pre-lab quizzes brieflygo over essential lab information that students must complete prior to lab participation. Labs aredivided into two distinct parts: analysis and design. In the analysis labs, students focus onperforming “engineering analysis” on one core chemical engineering concept. These conceptsinclude process flow diagrams, mass conservation, the effects of chemical reactions,conservation of energy, flux, mass transfer, fluid mechanics, colloids, and viscosity.After students have a grasp of chemical engineering analysis, the remaining
Computing Education program at the School of Universal Computing, Construction, and Engineering Education (SUCCEED) at Florida Inter- national University (FIU). She earned her B.Sc. in Computer Science and Engineering from Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET). Kali’s research interests center on exploring the ex- periences of marginalized engineering students, with a particular focus on their hidden identity, mental health, and wellbeing. Her work aims to enhance inclusivity and diversity in engineering education, con- tributing to the larger body of research in the field.Dr. Stephen Secules, Florida International University Stephen is an Assistant Professor Engineering and Computing Education at
variouspaths through the clinic, with their differing needs signaled by the colors of their various parts.At each step they are “treated” with success and timing determined by dice and sand timers.Results are recorded on cumbersome paperwork. The system is improved by standardizing work,cross-training personnel, and finding more efficient paths through the system for some patients.A final round focuses on training and technology upgrades to lower variability and thus make theprocess more predictable, and redesigning the medical record system so that it can keep up withthe fast pace of the improved system. The result is both higher productivity and a better “patient”experience.More information on the simulations may be found in previous reports on
undergraduate research and classroomdemonstrations. 3D printing has already revolutionized the teaching of mechanical engineering,but applications in civil engineering have been somewhat limited to date. To leverage thisemerging technology and provide a problem-based learning experience to students, asemester-long 3D-printing Dynamics Design (3D3 ) Competition was developed in conjunctionwith the undergraduate dynamics course. A select group of competition participants (or “3D3Scholars”), who are concurrently enrolled in the junior-level course, completed four 3–4 weeklong challenges that are synchronous with concepts covered in the class, including rigid bodykinematics and structural dynamics. By the end of the semester, each student will have
Paper ID #37091Board 280: Evaluation of a Three-Year Research Experiences forUndergraduates Site Focused on Engineering Solutions in Support ofCommunicative DisordersDr. Todd Freeborn, The University of Alabama Todd Freeborn, PhD, is an associate professor with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineer- ing at The University of Alabama. Through NSF funding, he has coordinated REU Sites for engineering students to explore renewable resources and speech pathology and an international research experiences for students (IRES) site in partnership with the Brno University of Technology in Brno, Czechia. He is also the
play a good role in thecomprehensive questionnaire design.Example 1: The engineering professional code requires that ( ) be given priority.A. Operational standards of the project B. Economic benefits of the projectC. Public safety, health and well-being D. Technological innovations in engineeringExample 2: In the following types,which is/are engineering ethical responsibility(ies): ( ).A. Professional ethical responsibility B. Social ethical responsibilityC. Environmental ethical responsibility D. Corporate ethical responsibilityExample 3: The basic principle(s) for dealing with engineering ethics is/are ( ).A. Humanitarianism -- the basic principle of dealing with the relationship between engineeringand peopleB. Social justice
in the areas of com- posites and fibrous materials and engineering education. She received her B.Sc. in Civil Engineering from the University of the West Indies in St. Augustine, Trinidad, her M.S. in Civil Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. She joined the faculty at the University of Toledo in 2004. As the Assistant Dean of Diversity, Inclusion, and Community Engagement she leads the development and execution of initiatives and programs to facilitate the recruitment, retention, and success of women, students from underrepresented groups and first generation students. These duties are well aligned with her
. In fact, design courses, in general, have emerged as a means for students to beexposed to some flavor of what engineers actually do; and also, could learn the basic elements ofthe design process by being involved in real design projects. There have even been formalproposals for curricular goals and assessment measures for design-based curricula. Thisargument is driven by a widespread notion that the intellectual content of design is consistentlyunderestimated (1).This paper reviews research on design thinking as it relates to how designers think, learn andmake decisions, which is an important reason why design is not easy to teach. Design thinkingis, in general terms, complex processes of inquiry and learning that designers perform in
to the specialcircumstances that apply to women in engineering and the physical sciences where theirnumbers are already low and the enrollment of international students is substantial. Inaddition to reviewing national findings, we have used focus groups at Arizona StateUniversity to enrich our understanding of the everyday experience of domestic womenand international women in the target programs. This paper highlights issues that have emerged from the focus group discussions ofdomestic and international doctoral women in engineering and computer science. Ouraim is to better understand the role of national and cultural influences on what womenexperience and how they respond. We describe some of the commonalities anddifferences between
Paper ID #19609The Effects of Global Warming and Possible Engineering Solutions InvolvingRenewable EnergyMs. Elizabeth Anne Valdes, University of Florida Elizabeth Valdes is a freshman at the University of Florida. This summer she was in the Summer Engi- neering Freshman Transition Program at UF where she gained experience in working with Solidworks and Autocad. She intends on becoming a Mechanical Engineer and working in the field of renewable energy. Elizabeth is involved with FGLSAMP, the Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, and she is apart of the Emerging Scholars Program. She is the recipient of the
pursue post-master’s degree trainingdepending on their end-career goal. In explanation of the necessity of a separate professionaldoctorate, they state: “But first, What [sic] is a professional doctorate and how is it different tha[n] the other doctorates (PhDs) typically offered by research and doctoral intensive flagship universities? Simply put, professional doctorates focus on in-depth, cutting edge 1 technologies, innovation skills and the leadership and effective organization of teams and corporate unites. Such programs seek to prepare advanced level practitioners for business and industry rather than basic researchers for the academy [2].”Inherent in
prominent design teamwithin Parks College of Engineering, Aviation and Technology. Figure 6: Iron Pup Transported to Launch Stand and LaunchProject RatatoskrWith the experience gained from Iron Pup, RPL took up a larger challenge for the summer of2017. Under the college’s Aerospace Engineering senior design project, RPL created ProjectRatatoskr for the 2016-2017 academic year. The goal of Ratatoskr was to move away frombuying commercial components and towards constructing entire launch vehicles in house.Various manufacturing and design processes were implemented to allow students to construct thevarious components that make up a rocket. In house filament winding technology was used forairframe fabrication. A combination of CNC
programs and services fostering excellence and innovation in teaching at WPI and supports course-based and program-level assessment of student learning outcomes.Ms. Paula Quinn, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Through her role as Associate Director for the Center for Project-Based Learning at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Paula Quinn works to improve student learning in higher education by supporting faculty and staff at WPI and at other institutions to advance work on project-based learning. She believes project- based learning holds significant potential for increasing the diversity of students who succeed in college and who persist in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields, and she views her work