codedinstructions, and take some physical action within the environment. Machines with this flexiblecontrol capability can be classed as mechatronic systems. Therefore, it is important to produceengineers who are versed in all of the contributing disciplines necessary to create such integrateddevices. Page 10.18.1 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education Figure 1. Mechatronics lies at the intersection of several engineering fields2. The importance of an electrical or mechanical
student readiness and contribute to the development of skilled professionalsin the engineering industry. This study provides insights for educators seeking to enhance onlinehands-on learning in engineering education.IntroductionOnline engineering education has seen significant growth in recent years due to advancements indigital technologies and the need for flexible, accessible learning opportunities [1]. However,traditional hands-on engineering courses present unique challenges in the online format. Thesecourses often involve laboratory or project-based work requiring access to specialized equipmentand collaboration with peers, which can be challenging to achieve in an online setting [2]. As aresult, educators are exploring new strategies to
processing. In addition, he is also interested in the learning experiences of international students. Siqing also works as the technical development and support manager at the CATME research group.Matthew W. Ohland (Dale and Suzi Gallagher Professor of EngineeringEducation) Matthew W. Ohland is Associate Head and the Dale and Suzi Gallagher of Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. He studies the longitudinal study of engineering students and forming and managing student teams and with collaborators has been recognized for the best paper published in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008, 2011, and
VermontProf. Rachael A Oldinski American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Work in Progress: A Vertically-Integrated, Project-Focused Approach to Undergraduate Biomedical Engineering EducationIntroduction The Biomedical Engineering (BME) program at the University of Vermont (UVM) iscurrently restructuring its required curriculum into a vertically-integrated, interdisciplinary corefocused on engineering design and active learning instructional methods in order to prepare ourstudents for dynamic engineering careers in the modern era. Engineering solutions to current andfuture grand challenges are increasingly interdisciplinary, which is especially true in
AC 2007-1712: "WHAT WORKS" IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION? AMETA-ANALYSIS OF VANTH/ERC BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING MODULESDavid Cordray, Vanderbilt University David S. Cordray PhD is Professor of Psychology and Public Policy at Vanderbilt University. He is currently the Thrust Leader in Assessment and Evaluation for the VaNTH ERC. Professor Cordray has written extensively on research and evaluation methodology in education and human services areas. He has conducted experimental, quasi-experimental and meta-analytic assessments of intervention effectiveness in education, health, welfare, and other human service areas.Thomas Harris, Vanderbilt University Jennifer Gilbert is graduate student in the Department of
Paper ID #43336Assessment and Impact of a Clinical Observations and Needs Finding Courseon Biomedical Engineering Education OutcomesMs. Jacquelynn Ann Horsey, University of Arkansas Jacquelynn is an undergraduate student in the Department of Biomedical Engineering.Thomas Hudnall McGehee, University of Arkansas Thomas ”Hud” McGehee is an undergraduate student in the Department of Biomedical Engineering. While Hud’s primary research focus is on nanocomposite biomaterials for orthopedic applications, engineering education prevails as another area of interest. Hud plans to pursue higher education by utilizing his engineering
reviewing papers for the Educational Research and Methods (ERM) Divisionof ASEE are intended to promote generalized research based on empirical studies that have abroader appeal for the engineering education community1. The Journal of EngineeringEducation envisions itself to be a means of “building a community of scholars” with a mission toadvance rigorous research in engineering education2. With this increased expectation for highquality scholarly work grounded in empirical data and explicit reasoning has emerged onlineforums to support sustained collaboration among engineering education researchers such asCollaboratory for Engineering Education Research (CLEERHub.org)3, the Research inEngineering Education Network4, and PhD Consortium in
-grant and Hispanic Serving Institutions. Subbian’s educational research is focused on asset-based practices, ethics education, and formation of professional identities.Francesca A L´opez, Penn State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Appreciative Inquiry as an Intervention for Equity-Centered Engineering Education Research and Praxis1. IntroductionAppreciative Inquiry (APPI) is an asset-based research approach that has been used in a range ofdomains, including organizational development, public health, and education, to study andfacilitate social change in organizations and communities [1], [2], [3]. APPI is grounded in socialconstructivist theory, which suggests
Purdue’s chapter of the American Association of University Professors for 2020-22. She helped found, fund, and grow the PEER Collaborative, a peer mentoring group of early career and recently tenured faculty and research staff primarily evaluated based on their engineering education research productivity.Matthew W. Ohland (Dale and Suzi Gallagher Professor of EngineeringEducation) Matthew W. Ohland is Associate Head and the Dale and Suzi Gallagher of Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. He studies the longitudinal study of engineering students and forming and managing student teams and with
required undergraduate transportation engineering course(s) address a minimum set of core competencies (“learning domain”). • There should be a common set of knowledge tables that map the learning domains which could be used by instructors across universities as the basis of the required course(s). • There is a need for effective strategies that provide contextual active learning environments for students in these courses. • There is a need to develop collaborative tools for sharing transportation engineering curricular materials across instructors and institutions.In response to these outcomes, around 20 transportation engineering educators created theCurriculum Subcommittee of the Institute of
Collaborative University- Industry Agreement to Establish an Advanced Communication Laboratory”, ASEE Annual Conference, St. Louis, Missouri, June 20005. Liaw, Benjamin, “ The ECSEL’S Integrated Approach to Industry- Academe Relations”, ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education 1995 Conference.6. Gibson, J., “The Use of Industrial Design Projects as a Means for Integrating Senior Engineering Design and Engineering Economics”, ASEE Annual Conference, St. Louis, Missouri, June 20007. Loendorf, W., Richter, D., “Utilizing Collaboration for a Real World Engineering Education”, ASEE Annual Conference, Chicago, Illinois, June 20068. Broberg, H., Lin, P., “An NSF Grant with ITT Industries”, ASEE Annual Conference, St. Louis, Missouri, June
(EJEE) and the Journal of Engineering Education (JEE) havejoined in collaboration to promote an international dialogue on the role of engineering educationresearch to help advance global engineering excellence. 3 The initiative involves a series of mod-erated interactive sessions offered at a number of key international engineering education confer-ences between July 2007 and December 2008. The initiative has four goals: (1) build a network among the community of scholars and practitioners who participate in the AGCEER sessions; (2) produce a report which characterizes the nature of engineering education research, its ar- eas of inquiry, and its role within scholarly inquiry and practice of engineering education based on
Education Reform in IndiaAbstractIn this Work-In-Progress, we aim to initiate a human-centered design thinkingapproach to engineering education reform at the National Institute of Technology(NIT) Raipur, India. In using a human-centered design approach, we will developmutually collaborative solutions with, rather than only for participants, whileopening up a broader space for innovative thinking, dialogue, and reflectivepractice. Today’s global, knowledge-driven economy is giving an impetus to theengineering educators to produce more and quality engineers with a mindsettoward global innovation and an international outlook. Unfortunately, mostengineering faculty are not well prepared for this educational reform. This is alsotrue in India, a
Paper ID #17882Ascertaining the Impact of P:12 Engineering Education Initiatives: StudentImpact through Teacher ImpactDr. Marissa H. Forbes, University of Colorado, Boulder Marissa Forbes is a research associate in the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the Univer- sity of Colorado Boulder and lead editor of the TeachEngineering digital library. She previously taught middle school science and engineering and wrote K-12 STEM curricula while an NSF GK-12 graduate engineering fellow at CU. With a master’s degree in civil engineering she went on to teach advanced placement and algebra-based physics for the Denver
. & Greenwald, S., et al. (Eds.) (2007). University collaboration for innovation: Lessons from the Cambridge MIT Institute. Global Perspectives on Higher Education. Rotterdam, Sense.17. Moreland, J., Jones, A., & Barlex, D. (2008). Design and technology inside the black box. London: GL Assessment.18. Adams, R. S., Turns, J., & Atman, C. J. (2003). Educating effective engineering designers: The role of reflective practice. Design Studies, 24(3), 275-294.19. Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P-12 classrooms. Journal for Engineering Education, 97(3), 369-387.20. Thurston, A., Topping, K., Christie, D., Tolmie, A., Murray, P., & Swan, M. (2007
AC 2010-1758: CAUTION! ROUGH ROAD AHEAD - THE TRANSITION FROMINDUSTRY PROFESSIONAL TO ENGINEERING EDUCATORSteven Fleishman, Western Washington UniversityJanet Braun, Western Washington University Page 15.265.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Caution! Rough Road Ahead - the Transition from Industry Professional to Engineering EducatorAbstractThe decision to join the ranks of the engineering technology faculty at a well respecteduniversity was a no-brainer for two industry veterans. Once they got over the pay cut that is.Money isn’t everything, after all, and pales in comparison to the rewards of working with futuregenerations of
Engineering and engineering education researchers underscore anecessity that U.S. engineering graduates be capable of collaborating across national boundariesto successfully “encounter worlds of professional practice that are increasingly global in nature.”As a result, this emphasis requires engineering educators and professionals to better understandwhat constitutes a globally prepared engineer and the types of learning experiences fosterpreparation of such an engineer.This paper offers an overview of a NSF funded multi-university research program thatinvestigates how globally focused learning experiences within engineering (both co- and extra-curricular) impact students’ global preparedness. The research protocol involves three studiesand
modeling, numerical modeling, electromagnetic com- patibility and engineering education. During his career Dr. Belu published eight book chapters, several papers in referred journals and in conference proceedings in his areas of the research interests. He has also been PI or Co-PI for various research projects United States and abroad in power systems analysis and protection, load and energy demand forecasting and analysis, renewable energy, microgrids, turbulence and wave propagation, radar and remote sensing, instrumentation, atmosphere physics, electromagnetic compatibility, and engineering education
, cooperative team environments, and the exposure to multidisciplinary serviceopportunities [Felder and Brent (2003)]. Page 10.712.4 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationObjective 12: Engage faculty in the scholarship of learning and teaching.There is a pressing need to better integrate content across individual courses. Our proposedmodel accomplishes this by replacing the traditional 3-credit-hour course structure with amodular approach that depends on faculty collaboration through team teaching
successful engagement inengineering projects and problem-solving scenarios, addressing educational challenges andsupporting engineering education in project-based and collaborative settings [2].3. Methods3.1. Context and participantsThe study included a randomized sub-sample of 16 first-year engineering students out of a pool of50 students randomly selected and analyzed from 248 students enrolled in the online 100-levelcourse conducted via Microsoft Teams during the Fall 2020 semester due to COVID-19restrictions. The random selection process aimed to ensure that the sub-sample was representativeof the larger student population in the course. Applying this random sampling technique helpsreduce bias and increases the likelihood that the
Paper ID #41606Board 175: Poster: Strategies for Empathy Instruction and Assessment inBiomedical Engineering Education: A ReviewTahlia Altgold, The Ohio State University Tahlia Altgold is a first year PhD student at Ohio State University in the Department of Engineering Education. She previously received a Bachelor of Science in Materials Science and Engineering, a Bachelor of Science in Biomedical Engineering, and a Master of Science in Biomedical engineering all from Carnegie Mellon University. She is interested in how problematic implicit beliefs in engineering manifest in engineering education and biomedical engineering
Ethics Institute and the Leonhard Center for Enhancement of Engineering Education—to facilitate exchange and collaboration between philosophers and engineers. Prior to joining Penn State, he was a postdoctoral research fellow at the Science History Institute working on the history of engineering ethics education. Shih earned his PhD and MS in science and technology studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. He also has a graduate certificate in engineering education (ENGE) from Virginia Tech and a Bachelor of Science in electrical engineering from National Taiwan University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) Assisted Learning: Pushing the
multiple case study of an interorganizational collaboration: Exploring the first year of an industry partnership focused on Middle School Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 545–571, 2021.[39] A. Harriger, B. Harriger, and S. Flynn, “Building Computational Skills Via Exergames,” Technology and engineering teacher, vol. 80, no. 5, 2021.[40] G. A. Wright and S. R. Bartholomew, “Hands-on approaches to education during a pandemic,” Technology and engineering teacher, vol. 80, no. 4, 2020.[41] S. A. Warner, K. L. Shearer, G. Heidt, K. Shoemaker, “Designerly thinking: a tool for citizenship in a democratic society,” Technology and engineering teacher, vol. 80, no. 4
applications and potential impact.An essential aspect of implementing AI in the EE curriculum is fostering collaborative researchand establishing industry partnerships [21]. Engaging students in AI-related research projectsallows them to explore real-world applications and challenges, enhancing their learningexperience. Additionally, establishing connections with industry professionals provides studentsvaluable insights into current AI practices and emerging trends. These collaborative initiativesbetween academia and industry ensure a holistic and well-rounded approach to AI integration inthe EE curriculum that remains timely and relevant to industry needs.Student Survey on AI's Role in Electrical Engineering Education: Perceptions of Benefitsand
practices to incorporate social responsibility skills and collaborative and inclusive teams into the curriculum. Dr. Rivera-Jim´enez graduated from the University of Puerto Rico at Mayag¨uez with a B.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering. She earned an NSF RIEF award recognizing her effort in transitioning from a meaningful ten-year teaching faculty career into engineering education research. Before her current role, she taught STEM courses at diverse institutions such as HSI, community college, and R1 public university. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work In Progress: A Scoping Literature Review on Institutional Culture and Transformational Change in Engineering
engineering backgrounds. Inculcating AM education at the undergraduate, graduate,and professional levels could be a thought catalyst for engineering majors from diversebackgrounds and enable collaboration within different engineering sciences. The purpose of thispaper is to review literature surrounding of additive manufacturing education, with particularfocus on graduate education as a venue to educate a specialized expert workforce. Further, weidentify several key areas where foundational engineering education research can help to highlightand shape AM as an emergent field, including opportunities for learning science, online education,and workforce development; the development of interdisciplinary and agile expertise; andconsidering belongingness
AC 2010-19: BODY BY DESIGN: A MODEL FOR K-12 OUTREACH INENGINEERING EDUCATIONLisa Pruitt, University of California, BerkeleyEli Patten, University of California at BerkeleySara Atwood, University of California, Berkeley Page 15.236.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Body by Design: A model for K-12 outreach in engineering educationAbstractThere is a strong need to enhance recruitment and diversity of students in the field ofengineering. Outreach to the K-12 sector is key to improving the pipeline of students who wishto pursue an education in engineering. Countless children are interested in engineeringtechnology yet
AC 2010-1537: IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER: DEFINING AND STUDYINGINTERDISCIPLINARITY IN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONLisa Lattuca, Pennsylvania State UniversityDavid Knight, The Pennsylvania State University David Knight is a doctoral student in the Higher Education Program and a graduate research assistant in the Center for the Study of Higher Education at Penn State. Page 15.710.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 In the Eye of the Beholder: Defining and Studying Interdisciplinarity in Engineering EducationAbstractThe philosophical, practical, and empirical literature on interdisciplinarity
for applications to engineering education. Virtual laboratories canbe classified as recreative or interactive or immersive or collaborative. The hierarchy of virtuallaboratory development is shown in Fig.1. At the bottom of the pyramid are recreativelaboratories, a term coined to indicate that modeling, simulation and visualization have beenused to recreate a physical phenomenon in the virtual domain. These laboratories or simulationsare ideally suited for demonstration of many complex physical phenomena in a qualitative sense,and would generally lack interactivity – the ability of a user to manipulate the physicalphenomenon through inputs. For example, simulation and visualization of a building collapse orthe phenomenon associated with a
Session 1526 Current Directions in Earthquake Engineering Education: The University Consortium on Instructional Shake Tables S.J. Dyke, K.Z. Truman, and P.L. Gould Washington University in St. LouisAbstractAlthough considering the dynamic behavior of buildings and bridges is of fundamental impor-tance in modern structural design, undergraduate civil engineering students seldom develop anunderstanding of the way that these structures respond when acted upon by time-varying loads.Because this topic is of great social and economical importance, there is a need in current