visible on the exams and the exams were graded in random order. • For the Thermal Inquiry Project (TIP), students were given the assignment to investigate two “inquiries” of their choice over the course of the semester. For each inquiry, students generated a report and mini-poster. The main purpose of the projects was to provide students with a project to get them “thinking about thermodynamics beyond the textbook” (TIP student handout). Each project was done with a partner and projects had a total of five points possible for each of five domains: Ability to Communicate Effectively (Paper), Ability to Communicate Effectively (Poster); Ability to Identify and Formulate Engineering Problems in
Program and works in the Engineering Education Research Center (EERC) in the Swanson School of Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. Scott has received funding through NSF to conduct research on the impact of game-based learning on the development of first-year students’ ethical reason- ing, as well as research on the development of culturally responsive ethics education in global contexts. He is an active member of the Kern Engineering Entrepreneurship Network (KEEN), the Institute of In- dustrial and Systems Engineering (IISE), the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), and serves on the First-Year Engineering Education (FYEE) Conference Steering Committee
. The third thread is a “self-introduction” where students can introducethemselves to the class. It was very nice to see self-introductions at the start of the class andcatch a glimpse of some personalities. This initialized a sense of community. Ray and Tabas [16]deployed a survey in their online class. Their survey indicates that 8% and 54% of the studentsstrongly agree or agree that the discussion boards provided the biggest impact on community.However, in our class, following the self-introductions, most students communicated by email,which is consistent with the findings of Brewer [14] whose research indicates that email is thepreferred and most used mean of communication among engineering professionals.A folder including all the lectures
that students had to understand and engage in disciplinarypractices. The teachers reported making changes to activities based on their perceptions ofstudent understanding and engagement and to save time which led to different experiences forstudents in each class section, specifically a more teacher-centered implementation for theinclusive class. Teachers also suggested specific professional development and educativesupports to help teachers to support all students to engage in engineering tasks. Thus, it isimportant to understand teachers’ beliefs to build support for teachers in their implementation ofengineering projects that meet the needs of their students and ensure that students have accessand support to engage in engineering
technology programs that highlight student skills development in ways that engage and attract individuals towards STEAM and STEM fields by showcasing how those skills impact the current project in real-world ways that people can understand and be involved in. As part of a university that is focused on supporting the 21st century student demographic he continues to innovate and research on how we can design new methods of learning to educate both our students and communities on how STEM and STEAM make up a large part of that vision and our future.Prof. Oscar Antonio Perez, University of Texas, El Paso Prof. Oscar Perez received his B.S. and Masters in Electrical Engineering from the University of Texas at El Paso with a
Belonging in an Academic SettingA sense of belonging in an academic setting has been shown to correlate with grades, self andpeer perceptions, involvement in research and student life organizations, and emotional andbehavioral engagement within the classroom [10]. Student peer-to-peer relationships and theirimpact on sense of belonging is a topic that has been well-researched [12]. Qualities of theserelationships that have been shown to increase belonging are support, extracurricular activities,and interactions [13]. While campus-wide student involvement has been shown to impact senseof belonging [14], this study will focus on student-to-course connections and how that affectstheir sense of belonging.Integration into a college environment, such as
that the primary goal is to produce high-quality engineers and empower thesestudents to be prepared for the challenges of industry. Another recurring theme regarding theteaching mission was ensuring that students possessed not only the necessary technical skills, butalso the necessary soft skills for solving societal engineering problems and making a noticeableimpact in their communities. While overall feelings about teaching were positive, several aspects of teaching werehighlighted as disliked, such as the amount of grading and the focus on assessments. Given thatthese interviews took place in the Spring 2021 semester when the university was engaged inCOVID-mitigation strategies, including significant increases in online teaching, it
publications, he has crafted multiple augmented reality tools to enhance student comprehension in lessons. His recent research focuses on the collaboration within augmented reality educational applications and its impact on student skills. Personal Website: https://malekelkouzi.com/ Google Scholar : https://scholar.google.ca/citations?user=9yDr. Omar I.M Bani-Taha, Carleton UniversityRichard Reeve, Queen’s University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Fostering Collaborative Learning in Elementary Classrooms: An Investigation of Augmented Reality Science Applications as a Supportive Tool Abstract. The goal of this article is to look at the use of Augmented Reality (AR
Figure 2. Figure 1. Example guided inquiry activity on crystals and glasses (after Douglas 2013).2 Figure 2. Learning catalytics4 “Concept check” example for “Crystals and Page 26.898.4 glasses” activity, student view (left) and instructor view and results (right).Assessment Methods and Statistical Analyses: The effectiveness of the POGIL method wasevaluated using both objective and subjective measures. The overall impact of in-class activitieson student performance was evaluated by correlating attendance data to the final course grade.Attendance was determined from exit ticket
learned through this assignment. c. Will you approach design problems differently now? How?Written response of the students was collected and graded using a rubric. The rubric is includedin an appendix to this paper. In the next section we have included some excerpts of the answersprovided by students to the questions posed in this assignment. The initials of the quoted studentis also listed next to the quote.Sample Student ResponsesIn this section we have included excerpts of some of the responses from students.Response to the question on I-375 project“This design furthered oppression of black neighborhoods, did not take into account those whowould be directly impacted nor share the knowledge and tools with the community, was
AC 2007-2600: WHAT MAKES A SUCCESSFUL SERVICE LEARNING PROJECTFOR FRESHMAN ENGINEERSLaura Lund, University of PittsburghDan Budny, University of Pittsburgh Page 12.1606.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 What makes a successful Service Learning Project for Freshman EngineersAbstractService learning can be a valuable educational tool for freshman engineers which helps todevelop their sense of value and direction, teaches team dynamics and professionalcommunication skills, and engages the students in the community surrounding their university.A fundamental challenge in developing a successful and rewarding experience for
project-based learning, whose learning outcomes focus on improving these technical and durable skills.The first module is a mechanically oriented product design that incorporates physicalprototyping. Students worked in teams to develop a three-dimensional model that can beassembled using parts that were laser-cut from a single 8x10 sheet of wood. The second modulefocuses on performing life cycle assessment to compare the environmental impacts of commonconsumer goods. Student teams picked two common product choices and performed astreamlined analysis to determine which product consumed fewer resources and/or releasedfewer emissions. Prior work by the authors describes these modules in detail [1], [2].At our institution, Introduction to Engineering
and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data3. an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs4. an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams5. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems6. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility7. an ability to communicate effectively8. the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context9. a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning10. a knowledge of contemporary issues11. an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.Each program must have an assessment
organizations with a strong, positive engineering culture have higher groupsatisfaction, retention, engagement, and productivity. They also tend to generate more innovationand are simply more enjoyable to be a part of. Essentially, a positive culture can lead to highersuccess for students, staff, and faculty. But universally-recognized cultural features ofengineering education – heavy workload, challenging curriculum, prescriptive structure,suffering and shared hardship, meritocracy of difficulty, simultaneous competition andcollaboration – are a particular challenge because they get internalized by those in theengineering community and persist without anyone directly communicating them. Thesemessages can have both positive and negative impacts on
global nature of the marketplace requires engineering students to be able to workacross different cultures as a major differentiator in the competition for engineering jobs. Agrowing number of US engineering students opt to develop their ability through study abroadexperience. However, a given study abroad experience elicits vastly different responses amongstudents: for some students, the experience is life-altering while for others, it is decidedly not.This project stems from these observations and from a desire to ensure that global experiencesare highly impactful for all students, and not just a select group. Building on the literature onexperiential learning, this research hypothesizes that student impacts could be related to
an unfamiliartechnology tool (i.e. the BBC micro:bit), both of which were viewed with apprehension by mostparticipants. Based on facilitator experiences, it may be asking too much of educators to learn to code anduse an unfamiliar technology tool while also introducing engineering design, computational thinking, andengaging students in outdoor learning. Best practices for creating and implementing effective professionaldevelopment for educators call for programs of sustained length to have an impact on teacher practice.However, in our experience, long-term engagement with multiple PD training sessions was difficult toschedule, did not guarantee educator buy-in, and was not met with as much enthusiasm as short-term PDexperiences.While the
umbrella project.Multidisciplinary student teams were to choose a sustainability-related issue that could beaddressed as a project under this umbrella to improve the academic experience of studentsthrough the application of principles taught in the course. An example of a project undertakenwas campus transportation, to be made inexpensively and efficiently with minimalenvironmental and societal impact (i.e. on the surrounding neighborhoods); alternatives(automobiles, campus shuttle service, rental bicycles, walking) were assessed for convenience,cost to students and to the university, resources use, health/safety of students and impact on thelarger community and the environment18.A variety of channels are used to disseminate student deliverables
of our introductory engineering courses, APPL 101 ExploringEngineering, which exposes students to several aspects of the design process that are oftenoverlooked in first year design experiences. With a series of mini-design activities, studentsdevelop mathematical models and simulations, and use their predictions to inform their systemdesign. Then, they use biomimicry to brainstorm design ideas and a sustainability analysis tostudy the impact of their design on the sustainability issues. Through these activities, studentslearn programming skills in MATLAB, interpret the results of those simulations, and makeconnections with other fields, such as environmental sciences and biology. These activitiesappeal to students in many different
recognized as a critical professional skill in support ofengineering design work. As such, there are a growing number of curricular initiatives to supportthe development of engineering students' empathy as a design skill [14]. These initiatives span avariety of approaches, including stakeholder engagement in human-centered design, service-learning projects, and curriculum on ethical impacts of our engineering work [18]. However,within engineering, students identified empathy as a critical interpersonal skill for buildingrelationships in their everyday lives, yet struggled to see how empathy is involved in theirengineering work [19]. This disconnect highlights the importance of emphasizing empathy as notonly an engineering design skill, but also as a
) 96.15 80Please refer to table 3 for the summary. Compare this data with the College’s general studentretention data: 78% retention from first to second semester, 66% retention from second to thirdsemester, the retention rate drops to 50% by the fourth semester. The results evidently showsignificant improvement on retaining the Engineering cohorts (who were impacted by the newcurriculum) as compared to the general Northern student population.III) Specific Objectives for Goal 3:a) In terms of Undergraduate Research the specific objectives were: i) Between 4 and 8 upper-division students will engage in research activities during the academic year during years 2 and 3. ii) At least 4 upper-division students will engage in
relations byproviding campuses with something tangible to point to that says, “this is what we’re doingto address the need for leadership development”. Good community, alumni and industryrelations benefits fundraising, engagement in career fairs and hiring practices, and overallpositive community public relations.Finally, let’s not lose sight of the impact on the students. A course like this, in their firstyear shows institutional commitment and embeds the importance of leadership from the startto help students establish critical skills that will carry with them throughout their college andprofessional careers. We have existence proof that iterative change can happen withoutwholesale curriculum redesign - though that may be what is ultimately
online tutoring platforms such as Chegg andCourseHero, to name a few. Initially established to offer more affordable textbook options tostudents from various disciplines, the scope of these platforms expanded to online tutoringservices, where students could receive direct assistance on their academic tasks 1,2 . The systemallows students to post specific homework and exam questions, to which tutors respond withdetailed answers. However, this convenience for students has led to potential misuse, increasingconcerns around academic integrity within the community in critical fields engineeringtechnology 3 .Similarly, Generative Artificial Intelligence (G-AI) platforms such as ChatGPT, Google Bard, andGithub Copilot offer real-time personalized
[16]. Perhaps these data indicate that students are aware of diversityissues, but lack the communication and conflict resolution strategies necessary to effectivelypromote an equitable and inclusive climate.At Penn State, the Aerospace Engineering Department offers four primary capstone courses inthe areas of spacecraft, aircraft, rotorcraft, and autonomous vehicle design. The courses eachspan a full year, with topics in the Fall semester focusing on the systems engineering process andconceptual/preliminary design technical topics, while the Spring semester concentrates ondetailed design, analysis, and modeling verification. Of the four courses offered, the majorityfollow a Design-Analyze-Report process with a paper study produced as the end
to the professionalethics behavior after graduation. This can be done by involving the students in projects such as: 1. Public campaign in local communities on nuclear energy 2. Radiation monitoring around nuclear facilities 3. Cost benefit analysis of new reactor designs 4. Environmental impact analysis of nuclear facilitiesExample on Proposed Use of Service Learning for Ethics Teaching in Nuclear EngineeringTo further illustrate the use of service learning, details are given below for a proposed project onradiation monitoring around nuclear facilities. Besides the technical issues, ethics teaching canbe done as follows: 1. Students are encouraged to follow the guidelines on radiation monitoring around nuclear
remote learning context (during COVID-related remote learning)?• How does climate change impact on my local community, my state, and the world?• What are the ethical dilemmas and possible benefits of AI and robotics in our everyday life?• How can we strengthen community partners businesses and endeavors through internships and design work?These inquiries were advanced in a design cycle fashion that engaged students in investigatingchallenges and celebrations of community and how to advance and act within these contexts forgood. From 9th through 12th grade, students made use of engineering literacies and tools, such asroot cause analysis, 5 whys, stakeholder mapping, pitches, and design challenges. We found thatthe co-development of
, wheredesigners spent more time modelling their design.The implementation of a virtual design studio can be an innovative augmentation of the physicalstudio that impacts peer communication and engagement. The focus on student-centricinteractions through asynchronous tools within these virtual environments can expose students toa variety of perspectives outside of the tutor in a conventional studio [31]. It is thus important todistinguish how peer-led critiques are affected by the change to a virtual and asynchronouslearning space.3. Methods3.1 Case studyWe performed this present study in a 12-week management engineering capstone design coursethat was held virtually in the Spring 2020 term, due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In the course,17 student teams
, we wanted to introduce an element of civic engagement andcommunity service. As engineers, they are part of a community in which they are impartingsolutions to make the world a better place. However, the current curriculum doesn’t put it intopractice. One of the areas that there are definite deficiencies is recruiting students fromunderrepresented populations. Most engineering schools have less than 25% female students. Ina study published by the US Department of Education, only 21.3% of conferred engineeringdegrees were awarded to women [2]. There are cultural barriers and an inherent bias in the fieldagainst women [3]. This is further noted in a study presented in 2003 women did not seethemselves as engineers and their view of engineering
Senior Lecturer, University of WyomingAbstractEducators revisit their teaching philosophy statement (TPS) when applying for new jobs orpromotion and tenure. However, sharing our teaching philosophy with our students could make asignificant difference. This research presents the results of creating a visual model of myteaching philosophy and sharing it with my students. My teaching philosophy informs mystudents that we learn in teams to gain not only technical knowledge but also skills and ethics. Itexpresses to students that my core values are to care, share, and be fair. I care about their life-long learning, as well as achieving fair grades. The visual model also shows the different levelsof engagement and communication; student-to-student and
while guidingstudents through hands-on design projects. These projects focus on an engineering designpedagogy that provides students an opportunity to engage with CAD and digital fabricationtechnologies in the classroom to create, build, and refine their designs. WISEngineering’sprojects immerse students in engineering habits of mind such as systems thinking, creativity,optimism, and collaboration, in conjunction with standards-based mathematics and scienceconcepts.The Community Center Challenge (CC) project, formerly referred to as the Community BuildingChallenge (CBC), is a two-week long WISEngineering instructional module that asks students todesign and construct a model for a new community center while facilitating instruction ofCommon Core
needs of a diverse student body [14]. Many two-yeardegree institution types are open access and have institutional priorities focused on increasingdiversity and inclusive practices among both the students and faculty [1]. Although the inclusionof women traditionally underrepresented in STEM disciplines in higher education settings is anational concern, the advancement of women at institutions that offer support networks andinstitutional practices such as two-year degree institutions contribute to women’s advancementand diversity in the talent pipeline. This research study investigates systemic approaches at two-year degree offering institutions that have led to the progression of women in STEM fields andthe inclusion of women in academic