, and cybersecu- rity. Currently, she is on a research team examining the impacts of the Summer Engineering Education for Kids out-of-school program for racially underrepresented youth.Ms. Tikyna Dandridge, Purdue University Tikyna Dandrige is a doctoral student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University.Mr. Donovan Colquitt, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Donovan Colquitt is currently a PhD student at Purdue University. He has interests in engineering and entrepreneurship education for K-12 students in urban contexts. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Promoting the Participation of Elementary School African Americans
computational modelingacross the physics and engineering curriculum will be covered. Issues incorporatingcomputational modeling across the curriculum will also be discussed.1 IntroductionModern scientific research relies on three equally important tools; theory, experiment, andcomputational modeling[1]. Despite the importance of computational modeling, and while thenumber of departments incorporating computation into homework and projects has grown, fewshow consistent use of computation in active engagement in the classroom or exams[2].The American Physics Society, in conjunction with the American Association of PhysicsTeachers released a report titled ”Phys21- Preparing Physics Students for 21st CenturyCareers”[3], looking at what skills our students
out-of-class historic project.For much of the life of the course, the Panama Canal served as the Example Project. Morerecently, the Great Flood of 1927 on the lower Mississippi River was the Example Project.Student activities throughout the course are designed to not only create positive engagement inthe course material but are also specifically designed to enable measurement (assessment) ofstudent achievement. Integral elements include student presentations (written and oral),incorporation of leadership and ethics, discussion of the broader interactions of society andengineering practice, and a professional practice perspective of civil engineering projects. This
cognitive, emotional, intrapersonal, andinterpersonal capacities. Beyond individual faculty development, Abigail [11] conducted a meta-analysis on the Communities of Practice (CoP)-groups of people who interact on an ongoingbasis by sharing concerns and engaging in deepening their knowledge and expertise on commonpractices. Crucially, participants in CoP engage together within the context of an authenticlearning experience. Such context effectively encourages deep learning and changes in teaching-related practices, as well as identifying factors that impact CoP effectiveness (includingtemporal, personal, organizational, and environmental considerations) [12].Growth-Oriented Mindset in Faculty and Impact on their Students in STEMEmbracing a growth
. National Science Foundation, “Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering – Data tables”. [Online]. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf21321/data-tables. [Accessed: 01-Nov-2021].2. National Science Foundation, “Field of degree: Women,” Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering. [Online]. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf21321/report/field-of-degree-women. [Accessed: 01-Nov- 2021].3. D. Budny, C. A. Paul, and B. B. Newborg, “Impact of peer mentoring on freshmen engineering students,” Journal of STEM Education, vol. 11, pp. 5-6, 2010.4. S. Alqudah et al., “S-STEM engaged engineering scholars: Insights from year 1,” in Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and
Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on NSF projects in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect conceptual change and associated impact on students’ attitude, achievement, and per- sistence. The other is on the factors that promote persistence and success in retention of undergraduate students in engineering. He was a coauthor for best paper award in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2013.Ms. Kendra Rae BeeleyDr. Eugene Judson, Arizona State University Eugene Judson is an Associate
summit is to: 1) develop on-campus opportunitiesfor visiting undergraduate and master’s students to learn about advanced degree programs andresearch opportunities; 2) facilitate in-person interaction among faculty to build relationships andexplore potential opportunities to initiate and foster collaborations; and 3) to facilitate discussionabout shared degree programs and inter-institutional agreements. As part of the initiative, theprogram offers several workshops for students to attend and provides a unique context for facultyto engage in discussion on partnerships and explore research and teaching opportunities. Startingin 2018, the program organizers built on the previous efforts and initiated a research study tobetter understand
SOLID principles. Specifically forSOLID principles, we developed two questions each for the Single Responsibility Principle (S),Open Closed Principle (O), Liskov Substitution principle (L), Interface Segregation Principle (I)and Dependency Inversion Principle (D).We ensured that each question had one single correct answer, but that the questions encouragedstudents to think beyond obvious answer choices. We also ensured that the PI questions spurredstudents to discuss possible answer choices by making distractors realistic. Our goal was toformulate questions that required students to engage at the higher levels of Bloom’s taxonomy,where they synthesize and analyze allied concepts to answer the given question, and not simplyrecall from memory [29
for teaching highly technical concepts. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Considerations for Software-defined Radio Use within a Project-based Learning SubjectAbstractIn this paper we reflect on the use of software-defined radio (SDR) within a project-basedlearning (PBL) subject at the master’s level that incorporates a semester-long wirelesscommunication design project. PBL as a pedagogy is an important tool for addressing disparitiesexisting between the capabilities with which engineering students graduate and those demandedby employers. Ideally, it enables ‘dual impact’ activities in which both technical and professionalskills can be developed concurrently
sustainability capstone course is an interdisciplinary course thatincludes students from different backgrounds. Students come together in groups of 4-5 to workwith external stakeholders in different sustainability projects. These projects are real worldchallenges that companies face and throughout the semester students work on finding real worldsolutions which have real world impacts on external organizations. Teamwork and hands-onlearning engage students in the highest levels of learning. Blooms taxonomy organizes learningobjectives into six hierarchical levels of complexity and depth: Remember, Understand, Apply,Analyze, Evaluate, and Create. These levels move from basic recall of information to higher-order thinking skills like critical analysis and
variety of topics, and learning theories inparticular, drawing from sources such as Mindset [19], How People Learn [9] [10], motivation[20] and Bloom’s Taxonomy [21]. Students learn about the learning theories, but also carry outactivities and participate in case studies to actively examine their own learning and biases.Because sense of belonging to a greater community is such a strong component of studentidentity (“I am an engineer”) and success, the course focuses not just on learning andassessment of learning, but also has a greater context of societal factors that impact a student’sability to learn and persist. Therefore topics such as gender bias [22] and stereotype threat [23]are important component of course content. Because these topics
Department of Secondary Education University of Wyoming mike.borowczak@uwyo.edu , andrea.burrows@uwyo.eduWith the adoption of pedagogical practices such as Authentic Science and Inquiry-based projects withincollegiate level classrooms, researchers focused on delivering advanced concepts investigated the level ofstudent success in conducting authentic science during a six-week long inquiry project. Two main questionsare explored: 1) do students working on self-guided, problem-based projects, engage in active inquiry? and2) is there alignment between exemplar active inquiry projects and other assessments? This pilot researchstudy focuses on twelve self-selected projects from a group
]. In thismodel, team effectiveness is shaped by the individual's beliefs about the team's interpersonal context,leading to their willingness to engage in learning behavior. The faculty involved in this researchimplemented teamwork-related pedagogies that foster collaboration by making diversity and inclusion acentral feature of student skill development. This research is used to explore how this evaluation toolcan be used to help faculty evaluate the impact of their teamwork-related pedagogical activities onstudent team effectiveness and learning.2. Literature Review2.1 Collaboration in Teams.In a collaborative learning environment, students are brought together to simultaneously work on atechnical task and learn by doing this task work while
enrichmentprograms. The key components of the project at ECSU are Curriculum Enhancement Activities(CEA) and an Aerospace Education Laboratory (AEL). NASA Aerospace Academy program atECSU aligns with existing literature on enhancing student interest and engagement in STEM,particularly in informal settings.Aerospace Academy (AA) Program at ECSUThe NASA AA program at ECSU is a partnership between an institution of higher learning,school districts, state agencies, private foundation, and other outreach/community engagementprograms. The AA program at ECSU is unique in that it introduces groups traditionallyunderrepresented in STEM fields to careers in aerospace and aviation through a balanced mix oftheory, hands-on activities, field trips, and guest seminars
engaged in the processes of:considering different problems and project ideas; communicating their ideas with each other,consulting experts, and instructors; considering pros and cons of their ideas; considering themarket, competition, costs, and end-user; exploring different solutions to a chosen problem; andchoosing their project idea to move forward with for the rest of the quarter. These align with theepistemic practices of envisioning multiple solutions, communicating effectively, andconsidering problems in context [10]. However, these class observations only tell part of theirstory. The students’ notebooks help to illuminate the processes and strategies they used whenidentifying the problem, ideating on possible solutions, and selecting the
. The work described in this paper was built on this idea and strived to create anImmersive Virtual Reality (IVR) educational serious game where Introduction to Engineeringstudents at Mission College (a community college in Santa Clara, CA) could design full-scalesimulated wind turbines. These students could then see the impact of their design choicesthrough the representation of modeled turbines and the corresponding illumination of a campuspark based on the calculated conversion of wind energy to electrical energy. The design anddevelopment of this work was done in large part by four Mission College students over thesummers of 2020 and 2021 and advised by two faculty members, one from Mission College andone from the University of Brighton
, autonomy is one of the key concepts of self-determination theory (SDT) [22]. This ITEST project titled, Developing STEM Identity in RuralAudiences through Community-Based Engineering Design (DeSIRE), is guided by and groundedin self-determination theory as demonstrated in our Theory of Action. Our Theory of Action,illustrated in Figure 1, is based on the expectation that students and teachers entered the DeSIREITEST program with varying degrees of prior STEM exposure, interest, and experience.Researchers within our research-practice partnership expected that these differences wouldimpact how the student and teacher participants would approach and engage in the programcomponents and strategies, leading to differentiation in the outcomes for each
identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems1 (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility1 With regard to outcome (e), LE is particularly useful for developing the ability to reflect on andthink critically about the process of problem definition. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering Education Page 7.971.1 (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and
impact of thisprofessional development opportunity on teachers’ understanding of nanotechnology and STEM,as well as their commitment to inquiry-based teaching practices. In addition, we attempted toidentify the impact of the teachers’ integration of nanotechnology into their classrooms on theirstudents’ attitudes towards STEM fields (namely, science, mathematics, engineering andtechnology), students’ perceptions of their 21st Century Learning skills, and career interests. Weutilized both survey and observational data to address these objectives, as indicated in Table 1.We addressed each of the questions shown in Table 1 sequentially and in separate phases. In thefirst phase, we looked in-depth at survey responses from all teachers who
to further investigatethese challenges through detailed focus-group discussions. These discussions are designed toexplore the complexities of the challenges students face, assess the impact of remote labs acrossthree levels of inequalities, and propose potential solutions and interventions. Data from the focusgroups will elucidate the ’how’ and ’why’ behind the survey data collected from students,offering a deeper, human-centered view of their experiences with digital inequalities. Insightsfrom this research will provide critical input for developing and assessing remote labs tailoredspecifically for radio-frequency communications courses.IntroductionRemote laboratories have gained significant traction in engineering education due to their
community of practice [22], [23]. School Teams attend a2-week summer institute where they spend time engaged in electrical engineering projects thatthey will later implement with their STEM clubs. The other half of the time equips educatorswith research-based, strategy-driven content about stereotypes, bias, and micro-messaging thatcan limit students’ pursuit and success in STEM pathways [24]. Content on growth mindset,affirming micro-messages, and self-efficacy introduces principles related to improving STEMinclusion, access, and equity. This content prepares participants for their action research projectswhich challenge participants to apply their new knowledge and usedata-informed-decision-making to improve STEM
use this robotic arm inrecruitment activities. In the following sections, more details will be provided on thedevelopment, plans, and preliminary outcomes of this work-in-progress project.Robotic Arm Developed as a Summer Engineering Internship ProjectThanks to the generous donations, we were able to offer an internal hands-on experience calledSummer Engineering Internship (SEI) to students in the Engineering Physics and AppliedPhysics majors over the past few years. This program engages students with 128 hours of hands-on engineering internship-like experience, mentored by two engineering faculty members. Theprogram aims to provide undergraduate students, with little engineering experience, an enrichingand relevant experience for their
methods 3. Simple and intuitive—teaching “in a straightforward and predictable manner’’ 4. Perceptible information—ensuring that course material is accessible to students regardless of their “sensory abilities’’ 5. Tolerance for error—building diversity of learning “pace and prerequisite skills’’ into course process 6. Low physical effort—designing instruction “to minimize . . . physical effort’’ so that students can attend to essential learning 7. Size and space for approach and use—engaging the classroom space in ways that addresses diverse student needs based on “body size, posture, mobility, and communication’’ 8. A community of learners—teaching and learning environment supports and
seek the bachelor degree for advancement in their current place of work or to expand theirexpertise. For example, we have several patent attorneys who need their EE diploma to widen therange of their expertise.The different demographics of the online students pursuing the Bachelor of Science in ElectricalEngineering have a major impact on how they pursue the degree compared to on-campus students.Being older and typically married, they need to be able to complete their degrees with flexibleschedules and are subjected to delays in their progress towards the degree as a result of being sick,losing their jobs, having marital problems, or being transferred by their companies to differentlocations across the country or around the world. Because of
gained as a workshop facilitator. He especially noted that attention to detail, timemanagement, and the ability to explain difficult technical content were skills that he developedas a leader of workshops. Workshop facilitators develop professional and interpersonal skills thatonly enhance their technical acumen. We believe they excel in the workplace and becomeengineering leaders in their companies. Page 25.958.7Concluding RemarksOur MEP community has been in existence for thirty-eight years and has served many thousandsof students. One of the key tenets underpinning the philosophy of our programming is that whenstudents are engaged in
, faculty, and industry goals are attained; and, 5) disseminate both theproducts and the partnership process to maximize the impact both regionally andnationally. a. Enhancement and Development Activities for Faculty:WindSenators ProgramIn the summer of 2011 CREATE sent another high school teacher to the Kid WindWindSenators program in order to increase the number of qualified California windSenators as the demand for Kid Wind training continues to increase in CREATE’ssouthern and central California region. The one week training program uses theWindWise curriculum, which was developed in partnership with NormandeauAssociates, and other curricular tools to introduce teachers to a variety of techniques andmaterials to engage students in wind energy
online program, it was important to revisit the expectations for program participation.Special consideration was given to designing the curriculum and schedule, and to fosteringstudent and family engagement leading up to the program to drive student and familyengagement and buy-in for the virtual experience.Overall concerns about low engagement and program completion due to screen-fatigue and lowbuy-in were considerations in the program redesign. Although screen-fatigue was a concern,retaining synchronous communications, especially for near-peer and peer-to-peer interactions,would contribute significantly to the overall feel of the virtual program. The program wouldcenter on synchronous Zoom conferencing with supplemental content provided
underrepresentedgroups in STEM fields, including women[18].One reason why CRP is important in STEM education is that it helps to address thecultural and social barriers that can prevent students from engaging in STEMdisciplines. For example, students from marginalized communities may not seethemselves represented in STEM fields or may not have access to the resources andsupport needed to succeed in these fields. By incorporating the experiences andperspectives of these students into the curriculum, CRP can help to create a moreinclusive and welcoming learning environment that fosters student engagement andsuccess[19].In addition to addressing cultural and social barriers, CRP can also increase therelevance and meaningfulness of STEM education for students. When
. Early stages of engineering identity formation in academiaare marked by exposure to hands-on learning and problem-solving exercises, while advancedstages involve complex real-world applications. The study conducted in [11] revealed thatstudents who engage in project-based learning and internships are more likely to solidify theirengineering identity. The authors of [12] found different results when they incorporated non-traditional learning methods, like project-based learning, reflection assignments and e-portfoliosto reinforce engineering identity and competence and expose the students to other identities, e.g.,entrepreneur and leader. This study found that there was no noticeable change in engineeringidentity metrics compared to students in
University of Pennsylvania and School District of Philadelphia rely on a successful partnership in order to close the STEM equity gap, enhance learning, and increase access and awareness, for students, teachers, parents and community members. IntroductionThe collaboration between the Secondary Robotics Initiative (SRI) and School of Engineeringand Applied Science (SEAS) serves as a model of a sustainable K-12 and universitypartnership. The Secondary Robotics Initiative provides pre-engineering programs for 6th -12thgrade students. Linked with the GRASP3 (General Robotics, Automation, Sensing andPerception) laboratory at SEAS, the SRI empowers both students and teachers while