K-12 outreach, undergraduate Figure 7 : Recently completed Engineering and Aviation Complexengineering courses, and experiential learning and research projects. Ms. Kalah Cross, a juniorindustrial engineering major at MSU, who was selected for the exchange program, worked withtwo other undergraduate engineering juniors at the host institution to set up some of the equipmentin the laboratory that will be utilized for K-12 outreach program in 2018 summer and beyond. 7A 4 degree of freedom (DOF) SCARA robot and a 6-DOF industrial robotic arm with an integratedvision system are among the various advanced robotic devices in the process of being installed inthe UMES RAM laboratory
labels. The student recognizedthat the axes were missing, but incorrectly prompted the AI by stating: “The legend does notwork”. This is a concern because ChatGPT did not correct the students’ mistake on terminology,but rather agreed and adjusted the axes labels to match the exam requirements. Another studentcommented in the lab assignment “It just gave me the formula that is used to calculate a randomnumber given a range. [...] It didn’t give much beyond that.” This does not agree with thetranscript of the students’ interaction with the AI, which provides a detailed explanation behindthe formula listed. This suggests the student did not carefully read through the AI’s response orpossibly does not understand the explanation.4 DiscussionA
lexicon-based tools, BERT’s ability to process text bidirectionally allows it tohandle long-form, context-rich reviews with greater precision. Although BERT has been appliedto various domains, including movie reviews and ideological texts, its utility in educationalplatforms like Coursera remains underexplored. This paper sets out to fill that gap by assessingand comparing the performance of traditional sentiment analysis tools (VADER, AFINN) andBERT on a dataset of over 1.45 million Coursera reviews.Extending beyond basic sentiment classification, this research proposes a hybrid framework thatcombines BERT’s deep contextual understanding with the efficiency of lexicon‑based tools toprobe sentiment patterns across important course aspects—such as
Paper ID #17882Ascertaining the Impact of P:12 Engineering Education Initiatives: StudentImpact through Teacher ImpactDr. Marissa H. Forbes, University of Colorado, Boulder Marissa Forbes is a research associate in the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the Univer- sity of Colorado Boulder and lead editor of the TeachEngineering digital library. She previously taught middle school science and engineering and wrote K-12 STEM curricula while an NSF GK-12 graduate engineering fellow at CU. With a master’s degree in civil engineering she went on to teach advanced placement and algebra-based physics for the Denver
belonging for the graduate student mentors. This research study aims toaddress these questions through the lens of the community-driven mentoring circle structure ofthe GradTrack Scholars program [4].GradTrack is a virtual mentorship program that strives to build an inclusive and supportivecommunity geared toward increasing the success of undergraduate and graduate URMengineering students who are excited about Graduate Education [4]. The program has a uniqueonline mentoring circle structure, pairing 2 graduate student mentors with 4-6 URMundergraduate student mentees from across the US. The program was established and ran a pilotin 2021. It completed its second year in Fall 2022, recording an increase in interest and growth ofboth graduate mentors
is the Frank and Jean Raymond Foundation Inc. Endowed Associate Professor in Multidisciplinary Engineering and Affiliated Faculty in Aerospace Engineering in the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. She also serves as Director of the Craig and Galen Brown Engineering Honors Program. She received her BS, MS, and PhD from the College of Engineering at Texas A&M. Kristi works to improve the undergraduate engineering experience through evaluating preparation in areas, such as mathematics and physics, evaluating engineering identity and its impact on retention, incorporating non-traditional teaching methods into the classroom, and engaging her students with interactive methods
Foundation (Grant No. 1125457) and managed by Stanford University andVentureWell, formerly the National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance (NCIIA).The research reported here was also supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S.Department of Education, through Grant R305B140009 to the Board of Trustees of the LelandStanford Junior University. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not representviews of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education or the Board of Trustees of the LelandStanford Junior University.References[1] K. Crenshaw, “Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics,” University of
: (1) A set of validated mathematical programmingproblems adapted from Project Euler and adjusted for the level of the course, (2) A detailed 14-criteria grading rubric covering correctness, efficiency, data structures usage, code readability, andtesting, (3) The Claude 3.7 Sonnet accessed through the website, and (4) A custom gradinginterface that randomizes feedback source assignment and tracks grader interactions. All studentcode submissions will be processed through a standardized pipeline that anonymizes identifiersbefore analysis. The infrastructure includes automated test cases for objective correctnessverification and manual grading protocols for subjective criteria.For the LLM condition, each submission will be processed through a
will be analyzing data. Ultimately, we anticipate that our preliminary lessons and subsequent findings will ignite discussion of how engineering departments can proactively reach beyond industry partners and explore on campus experiential opportunities for students.References 1. Baber, T., & Fortenberry, N. (2008). The academic value of cooperative education: A literature review. Paper presented at the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 22, 2008 - June 24, 2008, Pittsburg, PA, United states. 2. Borrego, M., Pierrakos, O., & Lo, J. (2008). Preliminary findings from a quantitative study: What are students learning during cooperative education experiences? Paper presented at the ASEE
, showing noagreement beyond chance or a random pattern of agreement/disagreement [25], and small kappavalues showing fair or slight agreements in the evaluations.The mixed result of using LLM in education is consistent with the literature, where severalstudies have shown that LLM facilitates content creation [3] and evaluation [26]. At the sametime, some studies found that LLM could generate sensible yet wrong responses, especiallywhen subjective criteria are involved [27]. Furthermore, as this work-in-progress study, thesemixed results in agreements may be due to the inherently subjective nature of SMART criteriaused for LO evaluations, requiring evaluators to understand the course content and goalholistically. Therefore, there is potential to
compared. Finally, the paperwill provide suggestions and a set of preliminary best practices for faculty who would like tobring SJ- and SR-themed PBL into their own courses.Engineering problems are complex and have many constraints that go beyond technicalconstraints, such as fulfilling corporate interests, meeting community priorities, and protectingthe environment. Often, these problems are difficult to solve in ways that are satisfying to allinvolved parties, and are intertwined with complex societal elements such as activist debates,nationalism, and poverty. Thus, engineering problems are complex, and often lead to challengingethical situations for engineers1.In 2005, the National Academy of Engineers’ Engineer of 2020 stated that there is “a
, and learning as socio- culturally organized phenomena. A major strand of his research explores the varied trajectories taken by students as they attempt to enter professional disciplines such as engineering, and focuses on the dilem- mas encountered by students as they move through these institutionalized trajectories. He is co-editor of a 2010 National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, Learning Research as a Human Science. Other work has appeared in Linguistics and Education; Mind, Culture, and Activity; Anthropology & Education Quarterly, the Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science; the Journal of Engineering Education; and the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research. His teaching interests
instructional concepts tailored to immerse students in international study contexts. This approach fosters intercultural collaboration, empowering students to cultivate essential competencies that transcend cultural boundaries. Beyond his academic role, Dr. May assumes the position of President at the ”International Association of Online Engineering (IAOE),” a nonprofit organization with a global mandate to advocate for the broader advancement, distribution, and practical application of Online Engineering (OE) technologies. His leadership underscores his commitment to leveraging technological innovation for societal progress. Furthermore, he serves as the Editor-in-Chief for the ”International Journal of Emerging
served as a member of the EDC K-12 Engineering Task Force. He continues to be an active transformational leader using his experience in national defense, academia, and the information technology industry to affect a dynamic program.Dr. Rachelle Hollander, National Academy of Engineering Rachelle Hollander directs the National Academy of Engineering’s Center for Engineering Ethics and Society (CEES). CEES manages the NAE Online Ethics Center (http://www.onlineethics.org/). For many years, Hollander directed the science and engineering ethics activities at the National Science Foundation. In 2006, Hollander received the Olmsted Award ”for innovative contributions to the liberal arts within en- gineering education” from
students did notreceive targeted instruction in productive and inclusive teaming. To decrease student challengeswith teamwork in their senior design courses and to produce competent and credible engineeringgraduates, we aim to incorporate teamwork knowledge and skill instruction into the curricula in ascaffolded, progressive manner. We have a unique opportunity given that our unit supports threedisciplinary programs that have substantial overlapping curricula and has numerous opportunitiesfor team activities at all course levels (first through fourth year), despite large class sizes.As a first step to enriching the curriculum with teaming instruction, modules and activities forthe senior level lab and design courses have been implemented. Using
engineering graduate student at the University of Nebraska—Lincoln. Before returning to further his university education with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering and a serendipitous opportunity for graduate education at UNL, he served for the better part of a decade as a public-school educator, creating and implementing exploratory STEM activities as supplemental curriculum for K-8 students.Dr. Tareq Daher, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Tareq Daher graduated from the University of Mutah – Jordan with a B.S. in Computer Science with a focus on developing educational tools. He pursued a Master’s Degree in Educational Studies at the University of Nebraska -Lincoln (UNL). While pursing his Master Degree he worked as the
the teacher to have some more customizability.” In contrast, theMetavoltVR centered on specific concepts and knowledge points embedded in the coursework inthe ECE curriculum, with a clear tendency to correlate and supplement classroom learning at thecurrent institution. As students commented, “it took a syllabus type approach and… mimickedthe Electrical and Computer Engineering degree that we all go through here.” Therefore, muchcredit was attributed to MetavoltVR for its course relevancy and coursework supplementationconsiderations. Students regarded “the point of this app is also to further grasp students’attention, to interest them beyond just the course material,” and they saw a potential that“instead of teachers just lecturing from
/resources/1 5. D. Rae and D.E. Melton. “Developing an entrepreneurial mindset in US engineering education: an international view of the KEEN project,” The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, vol. 7, pp: 1-16, 2016. 6. R. Nagel, K. Holland, K. Gipson, J. Henriques and K. Paterson. “Creating an Ecosystem that Fosters Innovation and Entrepreneurial Mindset at an Undergraduate Institution through Pathways to Innovation,” Advances in Engineering Education, Spring 2020. 7. W. Clark and M. Besterfield-Sacre, “Full Court Press as a Come-From-Behind Strategy to Win the Innovation and Entrepreneurship Game: A Case Study at the University of Pittsburgh,” Advances in Engineering Education, Spring 2020.
Academic Pathways Study (APS) research elementof CAEE is a multi-institution, mixed-method, longitudinal study which examines engineeringstudents’ learning and development as they move into, through, and beyond their undergraduateinstitutions. Data were collected from students at each of four institutions: Mountain TechnicalInstitute (MT), a public university specializing in teaching engineering and technology; OliverUniversity, a private historically black mid-Atlantic institution; University of West State, a largepublic university in the Northwest U.S.; and University of Coleman, a medium-sized privateuniversity on the West Coast (pseudonyms).The Academic Pathways Study uses a concurrent triangulation mixed-methods design, in whichboth
Manufacturing Engineering in 2011 and worked in industry for a few years before returning to school. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Through ‘Collaborative Autoethnography’: Researchers Explore Their Role as Participants in Characterizing the Identities of Engineering Education Graduate Students in CanadaAbstractThis research paper is an examination of four researchers’ methodological approaches to anexplanatory case study investigating the identities and experiences of the graduate studentpopulation engaged in engineering education scholarship in Canada. The researchers aremembers of this target population from four separate institutions across Canada. To attend toprocedural
: National Academies Press,2021.[3] A. Johnson and T. Williams, "Mentorship as a catalyst for STEM success: A longitudinalstudy," J. High. Educ. Policy, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 78–92, 2023.[4] K. Lee and P. Thompson, "Enhancing self-efficacy in STEM through structured mentorshipprograms," Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 201–215, 2023.[5] M. Rodriguez, J. Smith, and R. Taylor, "The impact of research experiences on STEMretention: A systematic review," J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 891–912, 2022.[6] S. Kim, J. Lee, and H. Park, "Developing STEM identity through mentorship: Insights fromunderrepresented students," J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 113, no. 5, pp. 890–905, 2021.[7] X. Chen, Y. Wang, and L. Zhang, "The role of undergraduate research
realm of doingthings that they already had skills to do. Students were responsible for defining the scope ofwork and they would avoid or work around issues that required additional research and training.While the new program was markedly better than the previous one, it still precluded the studentsfrom developing confidence in moving beyond the safety of known tools, methods, and analysis.Student’s perception of the class improved but many students still felt the exercise was more of a“hurdle to jump through” than the kind of experience that genuinely prepared them forprofessional practice.2009 Alumni SurveyRecognizing the importance of developing business practice skills, the BYU CE Departmentoffered a Master’s of Engineering Management (MEM
/abfa64.[18] Ciaran Hughes, Doug Finke, Dan-Adrian German, C. Merzbacher, P. Vora, and H. Lewandowski. Assessing the needs of the quantum industry. IEEE Transactions on Education, 65:592–601, 2021. doi: 10.1109/TE.2022.3153841.[19] Tunde Kushimo and B. Thacker. Investigating students’ strengths and difficulties in quantum computing. 2023 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), 03:33–39, 2022. doi: 10.1109/QCE57702.2023.20322.[20] M. Mykhailova and K. Svore. Teaching quantum computing through a practical software-driven approach: Experience report. Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 2020. doi: 10.1145/3328778.3366952.[21] Laura N. Gatti and R
Paper ID #48324Data-Driven Insights into AI-Powered Learning: Analyzing Student Interactionswith AI-bot in Engineering EducationAbdulrahman AlRabah, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Abdulrahman AlRabah holds a Master of Science (M.S.) in Computer Science from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from California State University, Northridge. With experience across various industries, including oil and gas and co-founding a food & beverage company, his research focuses on optimizing AI feedback through customized large language models (LLMs) and
research papers. He is honored with Undergraduate Educator Award in 2012 and Geoffrey G. Eichholz Faculty Teaching Award in 2015 from the Center for Enhancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL) at Georgia Tech.Dr. Carol J Thurman, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Carol Thurman serves as the Academic Assessment Manager for Georgia Tech’s Center for Serve- Learn-Sustain. She holds a doctorate in Educational Policy Studies with a concentration in Research, Measurement, and Statistics. Dr. Thurman’s professional experience includes higher education academic and program assessment, program evaluation, project management, teaching K-12 both in the U.S. and internationally, teaching university research and statistics courses
the students’ mental health [9], [17].This negative reaction is thought to be related to the belief that graduate student productivity isunder threat if mental health conversations arise, resulting in faculty being more likely todisengage in those conversations [13]. These actions are contrary to the psychosocial supportnecessary for effective mentoring relationships, which graduate students identify as a valuedsupport [18]. Furthermore, these actions demonstrate a lack of self-awareness since the mentorsappear not to understand how their disengagement or negative reaction is impacting the studentmentees’ mental and emotional well-being. Beyond the psychological and emotional support of the mentee, psychosocial supportfunctions
been approved, and candidateshad been identified through the Kabul University Dean of Engineering Faculty. We completedthe hiring process by interviewing the candidates, making four selections, and coordinating thepreparation of their contracts.Three of the initial four hires proved to be highly successful. The first two were recent graduatesof Kabul University’s five-year civil and mechanical engineering bachelor’s degree programs.Despite their lack of graduate education (there are currently no functioning graduate programs inAfghanistan), these young professors possess relatively strong technical abilities and Englishlanguage skills, a notably pro-western outlook, and exceptional commitment to serving theircountry through engineering
Engineering from Marquette University, the MS in Mechanical Engineering from Marquette University, the MS in Industrial Engineering from the University of Wisconsin - Madison, and the Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering with a specialization in Health Systems Management from the University of Wisconsin - Madison. She is the lead instructor for the Engineering Service Learning, Engineering Entrepreneurship and Health Care Engineering courses at FGCU, coordinates the Introduction to the Engineering Profession course, and is involved in many outreach programs in the local K-12 schools.Simeon Komisar, Florida Gulf Coast University Simeon J. Komisar joined Florida Gulf Coast University as Program
students and online international higher education19, 34. It is also appropriate becauseit has been used to highlight how geographical and psychological distance among students inonline higher education settings can be bridged through learner autonomy, dialogue, andcourse structure in many disciplines. For instance, in a study regarding the use of virtuallaboratories in a STEM-focused biology class, researchers used the transactional distancetheory to illustrate how virtual laboratories may have positive impacts on the relationshipsbetween the learner and the content as well as the learner and the interface17. That same studyalso used the transactional distance theory to illustrate how virtual laboratories may havenegative impacts on the
Committee. Inthe course, phase behavior, density, viscosity, interfacial tension, and composition of oil, gas,and brine systems are discussed. Course curriculum includes laboratory measurements,interpretation of lab data for engineering applications, flash calculations with k-values andequation of state and an introduction to fluid property software. CSR had previously not beentaught in the course, as it focused on the technical curriculum. In Fall 2016, CSR was introducedto the class through one assignment in which students watched a video about Chevron’s AlderGas Field Project and answered questions about Chevron’s Health, Safety, Security,Environment and Social Responsibility (HSSE-SR) and Sustainable Development practices.Fall 2016 Senior