computer simulations in this class in a team-baseddesign approach. Past work has shown that incorporating team-based design projects into first-year engineering courses is beneficial since it increases motivation and improves retention [1-3].In this work, a computer simulation is defined as a program that accepts inputs and performscalculations based on a mathematical model of a system with the intent of understanding thebehavior of said system [4-5]. In our freshman-level course, students used SolidWorks three-dimensional (3D) CAD software to simulate kinematic motion, structural integrity, fluid flowand heat transfer processes (conduction and convection). These types of computer simulationsare often introduced in courses taken later in a typical
, teamwork andengineering tools that aid in critical thinking, planning and data analysis. Data analysis in Excel,Programming in MATLAB and Software Design Project are three main components of thecourse. First-year engineering courses cover a variety of learning objectives outlined in ABETthat address not only technical and professional outcomes [6] but also outcomes related to teamwork. Teamwork is another important part of the course, which is heavily weighted for gradingpurposes. Teams are formed in the beginning of the semester using a random process of groupingstudents. There are application assignments each week that cover the concepts taught in lectureto assess the student’s ability to apply the knowledge to real world scenarios. Most of
; however, after the major discernment module was introduced thedifference between male and female students was no longer significant. This indicates that this modulelikely had a positive influence for women in particular. Computer Science and Engineering studentsexhibit an initially higher certainty level than other engineering majors which we hypothesize to berelated to prior high school courses taken in computer programming. Finally, certainty level in anengineering major was considered as it relates to academic preparedness and was found to beindependent.BackgroundThe current study was conducted at a medium-sized, Midwestern, selective, private institution whichoffers 5 different engineering departments (with 9 degree programs). When students
design, keeping in mind related social and ecological impacts.Melissa Dyehouse, Purdue University Melissa Dyehouse is a Postdoctoral Research Associate at the Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning (INSPIRE). She received her M.S.Ed. and Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from Purdue University with a focus on educational research methodology and assessment. Her research at INSPIRE focuses on the learning and teaching of engineering as a ”caring” discipline in the context of environmen- tal and ecological concerns.Constance A Harris, Purdue University She is a doctoral candidate in the College of Education at Purdue University. She received her B.S. degree in Political Science from the University of
an introductory course in engineering fundamentals atthe J. B. Speed School of Engineering (SSoE) at the University of Louisville (UofL). The course,titled Engineering Methods, Tools, and Practice II (ENGR 111), is the second component of atwo-course sequence and is primarily focused on application and integration of fundamentalengineering skills introduced and practiced in the first component of the sequence (ENGR 110).Fundamental skills integrated within ENGR 111 include 3D printing, basic research fundamentals,circuitry, communication, critical thinking, design, engineering ethics, hand tool usage, problemsolving, programming, project management, teamwork, and technical writing. The course isrequired for all first-year SSoE students (no
. Our conclusion discusses the challenge undergraduate CSE education faces in addressingthese perceptions and concerns in order to help students make more informed decisions aboutmajoring in CSE.IntroductionAfter years of booming interest, enrollment in computer science and engineering (CSE) is nowsuffering a startling, rapid drop in North America. Between 2000 and 2004, the fraction ofincoming undergraduates planning to major in computer science fell by over 60%, and,historically, this statistic has accurately predicted bachelor’s degree production.1 Likelyconsequences include a shortage of qualified, domestic candidates for computing-related jobsand the downsizing or even elimination of CSE programs and departments.Having recognized the
AC 2007-2076: EXPANDING UNDERSTANDING OF FIRST-YEARENGINEERING STUDENT RETENTION AND TEAM EFFECTIVENESSTHROUGH SOCIAL STYLES ASSESSMENTDaniel Knight, University of Colorado at Boulder Daniel W. Knight is the engineering assessment specialist at the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program and Laboratory. He holds a BS in psychology from Louisiana State University, and an MS degree in industrial/organizational psychology and PhD degree in counseling psychology, both from the University of Tennessee. Prior to joining the University of Colorado at Boulder, he gained extensive experience in assessment and teamwork in an engineering education context through the development and evaluation of a
design process, an ability to make measurements, knowledge ofhow things work, and experiences in a hands-on laboratory.The First-Year Engineering Program is a sequence of two courses, ENG 181 and ENG 183.Each course is composed of two major parts: a Basics segment for 3 hours per week and a Labsegment for 2 hours per week. In the second portion of the sequence, ENG 183 labs provide aquarter-long design, fabrication, and implementation project upon which student teams of fourcollaborate. Students are expected to tend to such issues as initial research, brainstorming,designing, building, testing, and implementation. They are also expected to exercise projectmanagement skills, project economics, and teamwork as they work on the project
limited amount of time. This paper describesseveral design projects that have been created for use in a freshman engineering physics classthat meet these criteria. Various techniques related to team selection, encouraging teamwork,incorporation of physics topics, keeping costs down, project results presentations, and gatheringfeedback from students are also presented.At the end of each semester of the two-semester course sequence, there is a longer, moretraditional team design project that lasts several weeks. We have found, though, that using short,single-period, team projects throughout the semester has several advantages. These include: Students are forced to build their teamwork skills as the projects cannot be completed in the
Education, 2021 Work in progress: Personality Types and Learning Preferences of First-Year Gen Z Engineering StudentsAbstractHumans learn based on their strengths and weaknesses. Many researchers have studied thecorrelation between the delivery method in classrooms and students’ learning preferences. Learningpreferences can include active, reflective, sensing, intuitive, visual, verbal, sequential and globalstyles. Researchers have studied engineering students’ learning styles to help instructors in theclassroom adjust the method of delivery and strategy to enhance student learning outcomes.However, few studies have related the personality of engineering students and their learningpreferences. Further, the few studies
AC 2009-2107: INTROENGINEERING.ORG: A STRUCTURED WIKICOMMUNITY FOR INSTRUCTORS OF FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING COURSESJay Brockman, University of Notre Dame Jay Brockman is the Associate Dean of Engineering for Educational Programs at the University of Notre Dame.Lynnwood Brown, WikiRing Partnership Lynnwood Brown is a partner in WikiRing, an international wiki design and development consulting group.Michael McDonald, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Michael McDonald is Senior Acquisitions Editor for Engineering at John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Page 14.817.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009
start to their study program. An innovative and effective approach to the course which includes both active and collaborative learning techniques.AbstractThree factors have motivated reforms in the teaching of engineering in the last few years: thedemands of industry, concerned faculty members and also recently by recommendationsmade in the European “Bologna Process”. The Technische Universität Darmstadt decided totry to meet the requirements of these reforms by introducing an innovative project-basedcourse entitled “Introduction to Mechanical Engineering“. The aim of the course and its newconceptual design is to provide first-year students with an excellent start to the Mechanicaland Process Engineering program. This paper
. If we want to prepare our future engineering workforce for data analyticsdemands, we need to understand better how engineering students learn data analysis skills, suchas identifying useful information from large data sets and translating this information in realproposals for companies. Consequently, for this work, we aim to answer the research question:How do first-year engineering students use a large data set to ask questions focused on theclient’s needs?Literature ReviewData analytics (or just “analytics”) has gained popularity among companies, but it still lacks astandard definition among the data related disciplines. Since the pioneering report “Competingon Analytics” [1], Google searches, and usage of the term “analytics” have grown
engineers to obtain 21st century skills related to communication, leadership, and cultural, humanities, and ethical sensitivities, Provide opportunities for students to gain in-depth experiences in Challenges areas, as a mechanism to prepare them for engineering careers broadly, and to prepare them to be the future innovators to help solve these challenges. Figure 1: National Academy of Engineering, Engineering Grand ChallengesBelow are details of the implementation of strategic messaging in K-12 programming, theapplication process, and first-year engineering program in support of improving studentperformance metrics:B.1.1 Pre-College Programs: The College of Engineering at University Name has a substantialPK-12
Paper ID #31284Introducing Industrial Systems Engineering to First-Year Students viaMr. Potato HeadTyler Milburn, The Ohio State UniversityCassie Wallwey, The Ohio State University Cassie Wallwey is currently a Ph.D. student in Ohio State University’s Department of Engineering Edu- cation. She is Graduate Teaching Associate for the Fundamentals of Engineering Honors program, and a Graduate Research Associate working in the RIME collaborative (https://u.osu.edu/rimetime) run by Dr. Rachel Kajfez. Her research interests include engineering student motivation and feedback in engineering classrooms. Before enrolling at Ohio
is the Assistant Dean for Student Affairs in the College of Engineering at the University of Texas at Arlington. Dr. Tiernan directs undergraduate recruiting, student activities, engineering K -12 outreach, and scholarships for the College as well as securing external funding these efforts. Dr. Tiernan also helps coordinate undergraduate research opportunities and retention programs for engineering students and collaborates with the UT Arlington College of Science on STEM outreach activities.Vu V. Pham, University of Texas at Arlington Page 22.1047.1 c American Society for
: Strategies for Developing Leadership in Everyone.Margaret B. Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Margaret Bailey is Professor of Mechanical Engineering within the Kate Gleason College of Engineer- ing at RIT and is the Founding Executive Director for the nationally recognized women in engineering program called WE@RIT. She recently accepted the role as Faculty Associate to the Provost for Female Faculty and serves as the co-chair on the President’s Commission on Women. She began her academic career as an Assistant Professor at the U. S. Military Academy at West Point, being the first woman civil- ian faculty member in her department. Margaret maintains a research program in the area of advanced thermodynamic
AC 2009-1580: THE PREENGINEERING PROGRAM INITIATIVE OF THENATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM: A NAVY FOCUSEugene Brown, Virginia Tech Eugene Brown is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech. He has worked with ONR and DoD since 2001 on educational-outreach-related work-force development issues. He teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in thermodynamics and fluid mechanics and is the author of many papers and reports describing his research in the areas of computational fluid dynamics, fluid mechanics and his work in educational outreach.Robert McGahern, DDR&E Robert McGahern is the Director of the National Defense Education Program (NDEP) Pre-Engineering Partnerships
2006-60: PROGRAM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK FOR THEINTERNATIONALLY-EDUCATED ENGINEERS QUALIFICATION PILOTPROGRAM, UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBAMarcia Friesen, University of Manitoba Marcia Friesen, P.Eng., M.Ed., is Director of the Internationally Educated Engineers Qualification Pilot Program at the University of Manitoba, Canada.Myron (Ron) Britton, University of Manitoba M.G. (Ron) Britton, Ph.D., P.Eng., is Associate Dean of Design Education at the University of Manitoba, Canada. Page 11.1033.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Assessment & Evaluation Framework of the
undergraduate programs inscience related fields.A more concentrated effort on the long-term effects of the program on the participants’ careerpathways is needed. REV/T offers opportunities to study two varied population groups whilebetter understanding their needs and identifying ways to improve their professional skills. Theprogram provides additional resources to veterans transitioning to academia and uniqueexperiences and values for the teachers that can be carried forward through to their students.Acknowledgements This project is supported by the grants: Connecting Research and Teaching through ProductInnovation: QoLT RET site EEC1161880, Research Experience for Veterans/Teachers(supplement to the QoLT Engineering Research Center EEC0540865
, sociallyrelevant design projects. While these studies provide evidence that growth mindset is importantspecifically within the context of undergraduate engineering education, they take more of anoutside-looking-in approach. In other words, they often measure students’ beliefs without anexplicit discussion of the theory with participants. Less is known about the reactions ofundergraduate engineering students when they are explicitly asked to engage with the theory ofgrowth mindset and relate it to their own learning experiences.Research QuestionThis work contributes to our understanding of beliefs about the nature of intelligence byrevealing the reactions of first-year engineering students who participated in a semester-longintervention about growth
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Depart- ment at ASU. His interests include student pathways and motivations into engineering and developing lab-based curriculum. Recently, he has developed an interest in non-traditional modes of content delivery including online classes and flipped classrooms.Dr. Haolin Zhu, Arizona State University Haolin Zhu is a faculty lecturer in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State Univer- sity. She received her Ph.D. in Solid Mechanics from Cornell University. Currently she focuses on the freshmen engineering program, as well as designing and teaching mechanical engineering courses.Dr. Chao Wang, Arizona State University Chao Wang received her Ph.D. in Electrical
Paper ID #12671Why Think about Learning? The Value of Reflective Learning in First YearEngineering DesignMrs. Natalie CT Van Tyne P.E., Colorado School of Mines Natalie Van Tyne is a Teaching Associate Professor at Colorado School of Mines, where she teaches first and second year engineering design as foundation courses for CSM’s thirteen undergraduate degree programs. She holds bachelors and masters degrees from Rutgers University, Lehigh University and Colorado School of Mines, and studies best practices in pedagogy, reflective learning and critical thinking as aids to enhanced student learning.Dr. M Brunhart-Lupo
engineering students have participated in CSLP since its inception in Spring2004. We have worked with over 50 community partners yielding more than 200 semester-lengthprojects, some of which embark on a continuation over several semesters. Our experiencecomplemented with extended evaluations after each semester shape the project selection taskthroughout the duration of the course. Decisions are based on student and client responses toevaluations and successful project utilization. The distribution of projects in the five majorgenres has shifted focus as a result.Results of the program have been encouraging, as student and client satisfaction and quality ofprojects have increased significantly. Student evaluations show great enthusiasm for the
2006-178: PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION BEST PRACTICESTUDY FOR FIRST-YEAR, MULTI-DISCIPLINARY COURSESElise Barrella, Bucknell University ELISE M. BARRELLA is a senior Civil and Environmental Engineering major at Bucknell University. Upon acceptance to Bucknell, she was selected to be a Presidential Fellow, which provided a stipend to support her research on this project. The best study practice was conducted at The University of Queensland, Australia while Elise was studying abroad for the Spring 2005 semester. In addition to her fellowship research, Elise is vice president of programming for Bucknell's student chapter of ASCE, a member of Delta Gamma sorority, and a teaching
. Choose a design that interests you personally and comment on what you regard as its commendable features. The device need not be just for business purposes; its functionality may be through its entertainment value or simplifying everyday tasks. This is similar to the “I like…” element of your first assignment of the semester in which you described the features of a familiar item. Page 11.1315.3 … … Newsworthy: Current Events or World News Discuss current or world events that in some way relate to engineering. Without limiting your areas of interest, you may like to consider offering solutions to a societal problem that has
is on par with the national average of 40-50%, includingstudents who drop out of college or change majors.1 The top three reasons students will leave anengineering-based discipline in the first year of study are: (1) the perceived lack of belonging inan engineering program, (2) issues related to difficulty of curriculum, and (3) poor teaching oradvising.2In multiple studies, peer mentor programs have been shown to increase both levels of studentsuccess during the transition to higher education and the likelihood of students identifying withthe university.3 In an effort to help new students feel included, the Department of MechanicalEngineering at the University of Utah has implemented a peer mentor program to serve allstudents new to the
Paper ID #6447Web-based audience response system for quality feedback in first year engi-neeringDr. Brian M Frank, Queen’s University Brian Frank is an associate professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering, where he has taught courses in electronics and wireless systems. He is the DuPont Canada Chair in Engineering Education Research and Development, and the Director of Program Development in the Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science where he works on engineering curriculum development, program assessment, and developing educational technology. He is a co-founder of the Canadian Engineering Education Association
both institutions andpresents results of assessments conducted to evaluate the impact of the different teachingmodalities on the desired outcomes for the course.Background/MotivationWith the rising need to include consideration of sustainability and resilience in design, life cyclethinking is becoming an important part of the engineering design process. Roth and Malladi [4]reviewed and discussed the research related to the incorporation of sustainability intoengineering program curricula and concluded the following: • Engineering programs that have incorporated sustainability into their curricula have done this primarily in upper-level undergraduate electives or at the graduate level. • The majority of undergraduate students have
Paper ID #33237Introducing Simple Harmonic Motion – A Teaching Module in a First-YearEngineering CourseDr. Christopher Horne, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University Since 2011, Dr. Horne has been a Lecturer at NC AandT State University and East Carolina University. He currently teaches freshman a course in problem solving using MATLAB. He combines twenty years’ experience in management and engineering with a passion to help students learn STEM-related material. He is a licensed professional engineer and holds masters and Ph.D. from North Carolina State University and North Carolina AandT State