their fabrication of components on the current Baja SAE car. All of this occurred ina single 75-minute class period per week, however I still made myself available outside of classtime for midweek help.DiscussionThe contribution of this paper is the presentation of the setup and implementation of creditbearing courses that allow (and encourage) students to participate on the Baja SAE team prior totheir senior year. Since the implementation of this work is in progress, no assessment on theoutcome of the course can be produced at this time. However, a discussion of the lessonslearned, observations made, and formal and informal feedback from the students can beproduced and are provided in this section. The discussion is provided in two sections
concepts is thus improved. From an assessment perspective, the consideredreasoning applied by the students based on the option they select as their answer provides insightinto conceptual misunderstandings that the students may have, and allows for the weaknesses intheir understanding to be better evaluated.ConcepTests can be utilized in course instruction in a number of different approaches, many ofwhich involve active learning. Their potential in being used during class with students answeringvia clickers has been well-established in several studies1 as well as their use in combination withsimulations;7 other flipped classroom approaches in which students work on the problems indiscussion together is a similar opportunity for engaged student
world projects (citation), yet grading and the grading scale (ABCDF) hasremained as it was in the late 1800s (Durm 1993). The traditional letter grade model, whichconsists of an accumulation of points to specific grade thresholds (typically 90%, 80%, 70%, and60% of points) results in assessments that at times does not depict a true understanding of thestudents’ knowledge of the subject or serve as a predictor of future success in a career. There hasbeen dissatisfaction with this system by educators for years, but it remains the commondenominator for judging students' preparedness for career and turns grades “into a game, theobject of which is to maximize the number of points towards one’s grade with the lowestpossible investment of time and
changes the dynamic of the audiencefrom passive to active listeners and participants. Fun games are also used to introduce conceptssuch as analogies and illustrations to convey complex topics.The effectiveness of our approach is confirmed by assessing the students’ assignment grades preand post course which show significant improvement. Similarly, based on the student courseratings data students rated highly the relevance and usefulness of this course. We believe thatwith the skills they develop in this class, students will start their engineering careers well-prepared to progress upward professionally.1. BackgroundWhile engineering schools have aspects of technical communication in their requiredcoursework, most newly hired engineers do not
Paper ID #39387Determining the Best Policies for Second-Chance Tests for STEM StudentsMr. Chinedu Alexander Emeka, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Chinedu Emeka is a PhD Candidate in Computer Science at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His research interests include Computer Science Education and improving assessments for CS and other STEM students. Mr. Emeka also has a passion for teaching CS, and he has received two awards for his teaching.David H. Smith IV, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign David Smith is a PhD candidate at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the
. Assessment results and studentfeedback highlight the learning outcomes and perspectives on this interdisciplinary, andintercollegiate project-based learning endeavor. The authors comment on challenges andopportunities associated with such PBL efforts and provide suggestions for disseminating thesetypes of impactful PBL initiatives.IntroductionThe human labor market, which is facing technological advancements and shifting societalconditions, will encounter uncertain prospects while revolving around three categories of work inthe age of artificial intelligence [1]: finding solutions to problems with unstructuredcharacteristics, working with unfamiliar information subject to complex communicationconstraints, and performing manual tasks that are non
current course iteration without overloadingstudents. Additionally, providing students with paper surveys during class time could facilitateparticipation from all students. Overall, the end-of-project evaluation methodology provided avaluable source of feedback to improve the project and assess its effectiveness. Based on the student evaluations, the three most highly rated areas were: creating a minimumviable product (MVP) of their design, testing and evaluating the MVP, and creating block anddata-flow diagrams. Table 1 summarizes these findings. On a Scale from 1 to 10, How Effective Did You Find the Following Areas at Enhancing Your Overall Engineering Education (20 students
Paper ID #39385Second-Chance Testing as a Means of Reducing Students’ Test Anxiety andImproving OutcomesMr. Chinedu Alexander Emeka Chinedu Emeka is a PhD Candidate in Computer Science at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His research interests include Computer Science Education and improving assessments for CS and other STEM students. Mr. Emeka also has a passion for teaching CS, and he has received two awards for his teaching.Prof. Craig Zilles, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Craig Zilles is a Professor in the Computer Science department at the University of Illinois at Urbana
Paper ID #34360Student Achievement Goals with Alternative and Traditional Exam FormatsConnor Ott, University of Colorado Boulder Connor Ott is a recent graduate of the University of Colorado Boulder where he received a bachelor’s and master’s degree in Aerospace Engineering Sciences. His research primarily focuses on assessment in large engineering courses and ways to improve their effectiveness as feedback for students and instructors. He currently works as an aerospace engineer designing satellite missions at Advanced Space in Westminster, Colorado.Dr. Kathryn Anne Wingate, University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Kathryn
Paper ID #32515The Engineering Epic Finale – An Authentic Alternative Assessment Methodfor Final ExamsDr. Sara A. Atwood, Elizabethtown College Dr. Sara A. Atwood is the Dean of the School of Engineering, Math, and Computer Science and As- sociate Professor of Engineering at Elizabethtown College in Pennsylvania. She holds a BA and MS in Engineering Sciences from Dartmouth College, and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the Univer- sity of California at Berkeley. Dr. Atwood’s research interests are in engineering and the liberal arts, first-generation and low-income students, internship experiences, and alternative
students improve their interpersonal and leadership skills, which arecritical skills upon entering the work force [2].Multiple methods of team selection have been studied to optimize team performance and teamdynamics. Often, selection involves instructors attempting to form balanced design teams toobtain a mix of personalities and skills, using surveys to assess interest in the project, academicstrength, work experience, personality, access to transportation, nationality and gender, and pastpersonality conflicts. Personality tests such as the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the HermannBrain Dominance Instrument may be utilized to obtain a mix of personalities within the team[2].Some instructors may opt to select teams based on student performance
Paper ID #33069Innovating Assessment: Using Innovative Impact as a Metric to EvaluateStudent Outcomes in an Innovation-Based Learning CourseEllen M. Swartz, North Dakota State University Ellen Swartz is currently pursuing a M.S. degree in Biomedical Engineering at North Dakota State Univer- sity. Her research interests include STEM education, innovation-based learning, and agent-based mod- eling of complex adaptive systems. She previously received her B.S. degree from North Dakota State University in Electrical and Computer Engineering.Ryan Striker P.E., North Dakota State University Ryan Striker is a life-long learner
directed project teams to ensure product excellence and programhealth. How effectively students applied these tools and processes was then assessed by panels ofindustry and faculty judges at three team design review events throughout the course.To ascertain the effectiveness of the teachings and enable continuous improvement to thecurriculum, we examined student survey responses, quantitative scoring and comments by judgesduring team design reviews, and student teams’ performance in their respective competitions. Inaddition, we incorporated feedback from experts in the aerospace field in response to courseteachings and outcomes.Finally, this paper outlines future plans for scaling the curriculum to a full hands-on, lab-basedexperiential learning
a two-semester capstone sequence in the senior year [4]. Theengineering design methods course has FMEA analysis as one of the course topics anddeliverables in the risk, reliability, and failure assessment area [4]. One of the course learningoutcomes is the student’s perception of the importance and proficiency of using failure analysistools.A single-semester senior system design course in a mechanical engineering technology programincludes FMEA in Phase 3 Detail Design of the six-phase product development process used inthe course [5]. The FMEA was used to evaluate safety and revise the product designed in thecourse. Students were able to identify possible failures and actual failures that occurred duringthe design course and include these
Paper ID #34975An Assessment of an Online Flipped-style Classroom Instruction forMechanical and Aerospace Engineering StudentsDr. Sharanabasaweshwara Asundi, Old Dominion University Sharan Asundi, a native of INDIA, is a Ph.D. from University of Florida working as an Assistant Pro- fessor of Space Systems Engineering in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Old Dominion University (ODU). Currently, he is engaged in several teaching and research activities, largely focused on furthering the Space Systems Engineering Program at ODU. He has engaged in re- search collaboration with NASA Goddard as a Science
federal funding opportunity or similar market demandwhich justifies the work [2], [3]. Purpose is then re-emphasized during the course as each projectis assessed on an impact scale which rewards external activities such as symposiumpresentations, conference papers, company formation, or patent applications [4]. Mastery ispromoted by student tokens (learning objectives) which are tailored to the individual, arethreshold-based, and can be revised throughout the course. It is these student tokens, and the useof PR to prompt revision, which this paper considers.Historically, students shared their plans for and accomplishment of learning objectives (nowtokens) during synchronous in-person classroom meetings. In recent years, to support scalableand
research is related to engineering education and modeling, designing, building, instrumenting and testing complex systems ranging from spacecraft to electric vehicles.Caroline Benish American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Assessing the Value and Implementation of Interdisciplinary Activities in Academic Makerspaces and Machine ShopsIntroductionThis paper first investigates the value that engineering companies place on (1) interdisciplinaryexperiences and (2) hands-on skills learned in university makerspaces and machine shops. Asurvey was completed by 259 company representatives at the University of Wisconsin College ofEngineering (UW CoE) career
the system archetypes and principles that are included in the CST course, aswell as a list of HODAs that are used to illustrate system archetypes and principles. The paperdiscusses the objectives, preparation, and implementation of one HODA used in the CST course.The learning outcomes are assessed through students’ feedback reports that include a discussionof the hands-on activity, a depiction of the system archetype, connections to industry. Inaddition, this paper presents changes made to the HODA activities due to the COVID-19 safepractices guidelines.Literature ReviewSystems thinking [3], [4], [5] emphasizes the understanding of interdependence among parts in acomplex system. The principles and systems tools are widely used in different
Paper ID #28718Text Mining based Qualitative Student Assessment of InteractiveSimulation Learning using SIMIO Tool – A Work in ProgressDr. Aditya Akundi, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Dr. Satya Aditya Akundi is currently affiliated to the Department of Manufacturing and Industrial Engi- neering, at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley. He earned a Bachelor of Technology in Electronics and Communication Engineering from Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, India. He earned a Master of Science in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP). and a Ph.D. in
different types of engineering courses. Rather than evolving fromlearning theory or research, current grading practices have primarily arisen from canonicalpractices created three centuries ago, originally created to rank students against each other. Suchranking or competition derived practices are out of alignment with modern outcomes-basedengineering assessment practices. Specifications grading, an alternative, is a framework forassessment grounded in learning theory as well as student agency. The cornerstone ofspecifications grading is treating each assignment as a pass/fail marker of mastery using clearlydefined and transparent criteria. With limited examples in engineering, this paper provides aclear introduction to specifications grading for
-curricular experiences.To date, few published attempts have been made to define criteria that can be used to determinewhether a particular course or experience meets the desired outcomes of each competency. AtASU (Arizona State University) GCSP, an attempt has been made to define such criteria so thatthe program committee can assess the achievement of the outcomes of each competency andapprove courses and experiences in a consistent manner. These criteria have also been used tohelp GCSP students better understand what type of courses and experiences could potentiallycount toward a competency.BackgroundIn 2008, the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) identified fourteen Grand Challenges forEngineering, representing the goals necessary to realize a
research focuses on design tools; specifi- cally, the cost modeling and analysis of product development and manufacturing systems; computer-aided design methodology; and engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Assessing Communications and Teamwork Using Peer and Project Sponsor Feedback in a Capstone CourseAbstractCapstone design courses are used to bring together various aspects of a student’s curriculum intoa culminating project; they also provide an opportunity to practice and assess professional skillsusing an authentic design project. While peer feedback and sponsor feedback are often used toassess learning outcomes and even provide input into student
Chemical and Biological Engineering at the University of Colorado at Boulder. Matthew’s research in education focuses on methods that assess and increase innovation in product design, and his laboratory research seeks to understand and treat the airway dehydration present in patients with Cystic Fibrosis through mathematical modeling, rheological analysis, and systems engineering principles.Golnaz Arastoopour Irgens, University of Wisconsin, Madison Before becoming interested in education, Golnaz studied Mechanical Engineering at the University of Illi- nois at Urbana-Champaign with a minor in Spanish. While earning her Bachelor’s degree in engineering, she worked as a computer science instructor at Campus Middle School
throughout a design-build-testproject in a first year engineering course.Our one-semester course is a four-credit combined technical and communication course.Students work in teams of four or five students to design, build, and test two underwater vessels(one an unpowered bathysphere, one a remotely operated vehicle [ROV]), as well as to report onthose designs. Former students of the course participate as peer mentors, working directly with asingle team to guide design decisions and provide feedback on all facets of the design andcommunication process.In Fall 2016, we conducted an assessment of our current peer mentoring system by surveyingstudents and peer mentors. As all students in our section experience mentoring, we did not have acomparison
, geotechnical engineering, advanced pavement design and management, and surveying. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Assessment of Student Learning in Classes Utilizing Regular Quiz Schedules in Lieu of Regularly Collected Homework AssignmentsAbstractThe paper is an Evidence-Based Practice Paper that presents the justification and challenges of agroup of instructors in a mechanical and civil engineering program at the University ofEvansville, located in Evansville, IN. During a multi-year study in undergraduate engineeringcourses, the effectiveness of daily homework assignments is investigated and a comparison of analternative “quiz only” approach is made for undergraduate basic mechanics and
Sustainability from Arizona State University, and a Master’s de- gree in Environmental Management from Harvard University and a Bachelor’s degree in Environmental Science from University of New Hampshire. Before earning his doctorate, he has worked for a decade in consulting and emergency response for Triumvirate Environmental Inc. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes and ABET Accreditation: A pilot study of 4th year engineering students using concept maps Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes and ABET Accreditation: A pilot study of 4th year engineering students using concept mapsIn the 1980s a series events—a chemical gas release in Bhopal
Composition, including the creationof essays for a variety of aims and audiences, the adherence to precepts of Standard Written English, theuse of research, and the creation of argumentative strategies. After the completion of this course, studentwork will be evaluated for proficiency in ENG1270. (3 credit hours)Pre-requisite: Placement or credit in ENG1250Course Objectives:Upon successful completion of this course, students will be able to: 1. Examine literary texts with writing that expresses, analyzes, criticizes, and assesses meaning and significance. 2. Support arguments using the basic tools of rhetoric: persuasion, evidence, and appeal. 3. Utilize information, ideas, and opinions from outside sources accurately and consistently
education classes take a case study approach. This paper will describe the implementation of this hybrid GE/senior project course and will present the assessment of the first year of this program’s implementation. Introduction In January 2013, the California State University Board of Trustees mandated that, unless excepted, undergraduate degree programs, including engineering degrees, be limited to 120 units. Title 5 § 40508 [1] states that “[a]s of the fall term of the 2014-2015 academic year, no baccalaureate degree programs shall extend the unit requirement beyond 120 semester units…” This mandate and short timeline for implementation necessitated swift action for proposals to be submitted and approved via campus curriculum committees and
activities facilitated learning of new concepts. Following the activity, studentswere assigned an out of class, ~15 minute video with follow-up quiz to reemphasize the conceptslearned in class.During the activities, two faculty members and two graduate TAs circulated throughout the roomto answer questions. To aid in gauging class progress, groups had access to a flag system (e.g.green, yellow and red flags in a block on the table). Again, the reader is referred to our previouspublication16 for further details on the development and implementation of the SAIL activities.The effectiveness of the SAIL activities was assessed using a pre- and post-instruction conceptassessment based on previously published concept inventories.17,18 Questions were chosen