master’s degree in Earth and Environmental Resource Management from the University of South Carolina and a bachelor of engineering degree in Electrical/Electronics Engineer- ing from Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria. Her research interests include sustainable infrastructure particularly energy and transportation systems, sociotechnical system analysis, innovation adoption and engineering educationStephen Phillips, University of Waterloo Graduate student studying Civil Engineering at the University of Waterloo. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 An Innovative Teaching Method to Increase Engagement in the Classroom: A Case Study in Science and
States. Graduates reported that theirundergraduate training, and consequential familiarity with project-based work and comforttackling uncertainty or unfamiliar tasks, enabled self-directed learning for workplaceresponsibilities. For 6/15 alumni, metacognition played a role beyond engineering problem-solving as it was applied in the service of social and cultural considerations of engineering work.The study provides promising evidence that metacognitive skill development, taught throughstudent-defined open-ended projects and reflective activities, can have benefits for lifelonglearning orientations. Building on this research to investigate different program structures, and toconsider local idiosyncrasies, will elicit a more comprehensive
the normal peerdiagrams as well as their own initial solutions. Specifically, the research questions in thisstudy are: 1. What challenges do engineering undergraduate students encounter when they generate free body diagrams to interpret system equilibrium? Page 23.858.5 2. How do engineering undergraduate students compare their work with pseudo peer diagrams and revise their own diagrams?MethodologiesParticipantsThe participants in this study were 14 students who graduated from an honors version ofthe first year engineering (FYE) course at a large middle west university. These studentsself-selected into the course and were
Paper ID #13227An Exploratory Study of the Role of Modeling and Simulation in Supportingor Hindering Engineering Students’ Problem Solving SkillsUzma Shaikh, Purdue University Uzma Shaikh is a Graduate Student in the Department of Computer and Information Technology at Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana. She is currently working as a Research Assistant in the field of Computer and Education Technology. Shaikh’s research focuses on using visual simulations along with scientific inquiry learning for understanding concepts related to unobservable macroscopic phenomena.Dr. Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University, West
AC 2010-1467: TOWARD A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF ACADEMIC ANDSOCIAL INTEGRATION: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF FACTORS RELATED TOPERSISTENCE IN ENGINEERINGJustin Micomonaco, Michigan State University Justin Micomonaco is a doctoral candidate in Higher, Adult and Lifelong Education at Michigan State University. His research interests include organizational development and various aspects of undergraduate education including living-learning communities, teaching and learning, and preparation of faculty in STEM.Jon Sticklen, Michigan State University Page 15.1267.1© American Society for Engineering Education
, Cobblestone Applied Research & Evaluation, Inc. Dr. Eddy received her doctorate in Applied Cognitive Psychology and has spent her career focused on applying the principles of learning and cognition to evaluation of educational programs. Her work in- cludes published articles and client technical reports as President of Cobblestone Applied Research & Evaluation, Inc. and a faculty member at Claremont Graduate University (CGU). Work at Cobblestone focuses on advancing the numbers of underrepresented minority students in Science, Technology, Engi- neering and Mathematics (STEM) fields. Dr. Eddy has conducted evaluation or applied research studies on numerous university projects including clients programs funded by the
Paper ID #34092Work in Progress: A Cross-sectional Survey Study for Understanding andAddressing the Needs of Engineering Students During COVID-19Dr. Isabel Hilliger, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile Isabel Hilliger is the Associate Director for Assessment and Evaluation at the Engineering Education Division in Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile (UC). Isabel received a PhD in Engineering Sciences from UC and an MA in Education Policy from Stanford University. Her current research promotes the use of methodologies and analytical tools for continuous curriculum improvement in Higher Education. She has
CAE Inc. Montreal Canada and Lockheed Martin, Nether- lands. He has taught at McGill and Concordia University, Canada. He is currently a visiting Associate Professor at Elizabeth City State University. His research interests are in the area of aviation, aerodynam- ics, control system design, modeling, simulation, aircraft, and unmanned aerial vehicles, teaching and mentoring undergraduate and graduate students. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work in Progress (WIP): Determining a Mathematical Model to Study the Relationship Between Pedagogical Strategies and the Attainment of Student Learning OutcomesAbstractIn this paper, a linear dynamic
Paper ID #33294A Study on the Impact of Using Industry Standard Tools and Practices onSoftware Engineering Courses ProjectsDr. Tajmilur Rahman, Gannon University Tajmilur Rahman PhD, is an assistant professor in the department of Computer and Information Science at Gannon University in Erie, Pennsylvania. His overarching research interest is to investigate release engineering practices in software systems. His research works are driven by the desire to determine the empirical factors that lead to a successful software development and release. His research interests also include understanding the significance of software
Paper ID #24602Work in Progress: Pilot Study of an Engineering Modified Problem-SolvingInventory using Civil Engineering Undergraduate StudentsDr. Adam Phillips, Washington State University Dr. Adam Phillips is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and the Coughlin Distinguished Professor of Structural Engineering at Washington State University. His primary research interests are in the areas of earthquake engineering, hybrid structural systems, resilient and sustainable design, and steel design.Colin Alec Lambie, Washington State University Graduate Research Assistant
Paper ID #33574Assessing Drawing Self-efficacy: A Validation Study Using ExploratoryFactor Analysis (EFA) for the Drawing Self-efficacy Instrument (DSEI)Ms. Donna Jaison, Texas A&M University Donna Jaison is a PhD student under Dr. Karan Watson and Dr. Tracy Hammond in the Multidisciplinary Engineering Department at Texas A&M University, College Station. She is a Graduate research assistant at the Institute of Engineering Education and Innovation (IEEI) at Texas A&M University under director Dr. Tracy Hammond. She completed her MEng. in Computer Engineering with specialization in VLSI from Texas A&M
AC 2011-1498: STUDYING THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF TESTSCORES FOR MATHEMATICAL AND SPATIAL REASONING TASKSFOR ENGINEERING STUDENTSLaura L. Pauley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Laura L. Pauley, professor of mechanical engineering, joined the The Pennsylvania State University fac- ulty in 1988. From 2000 to 2007, she served as the Professor-in-Charge of Undergraduate Programs in Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering. In 2003, Laura received the Penn State Undergraduate Program Leadership Award. Dr. Pauley teaches courses in the thermal sciences and conducts research in computa- tional fluid mechanics and engineering education. She received degrees in mechanical engineering from University of
students’ professional formation, the role of reflection in engineering learning, and interpretive research methodologies in the emerging field of engineering education research. His teaching focuses on innovative approaches to introducing systems thinking and creativity into the environmental engineering program at the University of Georgia. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Academic help-seeking as a stand-alone, metacognitive action: An empirical study of experiences and behaviors in undergraduate engineering studentsAbstractContemporary research investigating academic help-seeking behavior (HSB) is predominantlyK-12 in focus. Few studies have
and long range interactions, and its associated microstructural properties and time evolution. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 The Interplay between Engineering Students’ Modeling and Simulation Practices and their use of External Representations: An Exploratory Study (Research)Background and MotivationAdvances in computer and information technology facilitate innovation and education in science andengineering by enabling the processing, simulation, and visualization of unprecedented amounts of data.Modern computational tools allow us to address complex problems affecting health, energy, security, andoverall quality of life, and future scientists and
Paper ID #34332Thinking as Argument: A Theoretical Framework for Studying how FacultyArrive at Their Deeply-held Beliefs About Inequity in EngineeringJeremy Grifski, Ohio State University Jeremy Grifski is a Graduate Research Associate in the department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. Previously, he completed an undergraduate degree in Computer Engineering at Case Western Reserve University and went on to work for General Electric Transportation as a part of their Edison Engineering Development Program. Recently, Jeremy completed a Master’s in Computer Science and Engineering under Dr. Atiq and is
the students with feedback on intermittentsolutions - can be especially challenging when it is hoped that students will understand andrespond to the feedback in ways that indicate learning has taken place. The aim of this study isto examine how students in a first-year engineering course perceive and respond to feedbackreceived from a Graduate Teaching Assistant (GTA) and their peers as they iterate throughmultiple drafts of their solutions to Model-Eliciting Activities (MEAs). In this paper, we reportcase findings based upon three interviews each from four students from a single team thatparticipated in the interviews following three MEAs implemented in a single semester. Findingsindicated all four students struggled with the feedback
, Jaskirat has investigated the use of Virtual Reality-based in- struction and its impact on student motivation to learn complex 3D concepts in materials science. Jaskirat Singh Batra is a graduate of the Academy for Future Faculty and Teaching-as-Research Fellows programs, and he was selected as a Graduate Teaching Fellow in the College of Engineering in 2018-2019. Prior to that, Jaskirat served as a Research Mentor for a research-based lab course and a Teaching Assistant for several classroom-based undergraduate courses. He wants to utilize his diverse teaching and research ex- perience to promote the use of evidence-based educational technology in training STEM students. He has also worked for 2 years as Graduate
Professor of Chemical Engineering at Bucknell University. She graduated from Ohio State University in 2015 with a PhD in Chemical Engineering, and is interested in student learning in engineering. In particular, her work focuses on various aspects of students’ develop- ment from novice to expert, including development of engineering intuition, as well as critical thinking, problem-solving, and communication skills. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 WIP: Using Critical Incident Technique to Illuminate the Relationship between Engineering Identity and Academic MotivationIntroduction This work in progress research paper presents preliminary work on a project
Institute of Technology. His research interests are engineering students beliefs about knowledge and education and how those beliefs interact with the engineering education experience.Prof. Richard Mangum, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott Richard T. Mangum is an assistant professor at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott Campus. He graduated from Texas Tech University with a PhD in Technical Communication and Rhetoric. He is interested in helping engineering students discover the relevancy of technical communication in their academic pursuits and future career paths. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021
engineering program in Appalachia. The focus of my research is understanding how Appalachian students engage their cultural capital to excel in undergraduate engineering programs.Dr. Lisa Benson, Clemson University Lisa Benson is a Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, and the past editor of the Journal of Engineering Education. Her research focuses on the interactions between student motivation and their learning experiences. Her projects include studies of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their development of problem-solving skills, self-regulated learning practices, and epistemic beliefs. Other projects in the Benson group involve
Session 1655 Helping Our International Students Succeed in Communication Julie L. P. Jessop University of IowaIntroductionWe are seeing more international students in graduate studies as American students chooseindustry rather than academia. Maybe this trend will change as the economy goes through adownswing and jobs become scarcer, but maybe not. Regardless, if we expect internationalstudents to perform at a similar level with American students in written and oral communicationforms, we need to provide them with sufficient instruction and practice. We cannot
Paper ID #41704Board 78: How Do Grades Matter? A Work in Progress Study on the Influenceof Grades on Engineering Students’ Motivation & Decision MakingDr. Cassie Wallwey, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Cassie Wallwey, PhD is a Collegiate Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her research interests include studying effective feedback in engineering and mathematics courses, improving engineering student motivation and success, and understanding exclusion in engineering to fight its weed-out culture. Cassie has her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Ohio State
fully online or return to campus for a hybrid learningenvironment in the fall 2020 semester. Approximately 10 percent of students chose the fullyonline option for the fall 2020 semester. The university released safety guidelines for in-personand hybrid events, such as approval requirements for student organized events, maximumnumber of attendees, and restrictions on outside visitors. These guidelines were updatedthroughout the course of the semester as county guidelines changed.Data Collection Our research team comprised two graduate students and one faculty member. Theresearch team members each have research and work experiences related to student support andservices. The Institutional Review Board at this institution approved our study
Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationOur initial step has been to design the program and conduct a formal study of how twoindependent groups experienced the program. We are currently using the data to gain insight onthe impact of the program and learn how to improve it. In this paper, we will a) describe theprogram and concurrent research study, b) present case studies for a sample of the participants,with a focus on characterizing their experiences, and c) identify implications for continuousimprovement.Background and Motivation for Focusing on Engineering Graduate StudentsThere are strong reasons to focus on helping graduate students become more effective educators.Here we
integrated(holistic) professional graduate education for working professionals as a “system for lifelong learning” thatenables their continuous professional development thereby continuously strengthening U.S. innovativecapacity for competitiveness. Attention is drawn to the need to integrate graduate studies with experientiallearning and the advanced practice of engineering for systematic development, innovation, and leadership oftechnology in industry.1. IntroductionWhereas professional master and doctoral programs were originally established in engineering as analternative to research-based graduate education for young resident students to pursue professionallyoriented studies prior to practice. Today, most engineering professionals enter the U.S
creativetechnology development. Today, we must no longer think of graduate education and research as synonymous.All too often, universities have viewed educational change as implementing new academic programs to fit intotheir existing research-oriented departments, with business as usual. This is not what the NationalCollaborative Task Force proposes. We propose a new vision of professional graduate education: one that willprovide U.S. engineers opportunity for further professional graduate study, not in the traditional sense, but as Page 8.615.3a new “system for lifelong learning” that enables continuous professional growth throughout the
Paper ID #32411A Systematic Review of Argument-assessment Frameworks in EngineeringEducationMadison E. Andrews, University of Texas at Austin Madison Andrews is a STEM Education doctoral student and graduate research assistant for the Center for Engineering Education at the University of Texas at Austin. She received her B.S. in Mechanical En- gineering from Clemson University in 2017 and her M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin in 2020.Mr. Priyadarshan N. Patil, University of Texas at Austin Priyadarshan Patil is an Operations Research doctoral candidate and graduate research assistant for
and Computer Engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. She has a Master’s Degree in Power System and is also working as an Assistant Professor and Department Chair in the Electronics Technology at Lake Washington Institute of Technology, Kirkland.Ms. Shruti Misra, University of Washington Shruti is a graduate student in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Washington, Seat- tle. Her research interest is broadly focused on studying innovation in university-industry partnerships. She is interested in the various ways that universities and industry come together and participate in driving technological innovation at the regional and global level. American
- ing Environments, How Do We Know What Students are Learning?, and instructional methods in ele- mentary and middle school mathematics and science. He has authored books on curriculum design and teaching children about scientific inquiry. Current research interests focus on creating environments for ”good talk” in elementary and middle school classrooms, and also on advancing the use of knowledge building pedagogy in higher education. His most recent article (2013) is entitled ”Tasks and Talk: The Relationship Between Teachers’ Goals and Student Discourse,” in Social Studies Research and Practice.Dr. Rebecca Mazur, Collaborative for Educational ServicesProf. Beth McGinnis-Cavanaugh, Springfield Technical Community College
, 2015).There are six necessary steps to perform a CFA: 1). define a factor model, 2). collect the data, 3).obtain the correlation or variance-covariance matrix of the data, 4). fit the model to the data, 5).evaluate model adequacy, and 6). compare with other models (Brown, 2015). One more step isrequired to modify the factor model based on some modification indexes in some cases.However, this step is beyond the scope of CFA (Beaujean, 2014).Measurement Invariance and Multiple Group CFAEducational and psychological research often compare groups on observed variables andunobserved factors (Milfont & Fischer, 2010). Such studies often include a comparison among1). multiple points in time (e.g., cross-sectional or longitudinal or both), 2