putting the project in context socially. Thehydrants had to go in physical places, on private property – and the students had to personallypresent the design variants to the community in order to get buy-in on the layout. Thus theproject provided a valuable real-world experience in engaging the project’s stakeholders that isnot present in most engineering courses.Finally, this case study also illustrates one shortcoming of the multidisciplinary approach withinthe constraints of an academic curriculum. The lone Electrical Engineering major on the teamwas not a very strong academic performer. Since there were no other Electrical Engineeringspecialists on the team, the final electrical design was not satisfactorily completed.4.0 Where is the common
sensor development projectduring each summer as a multidisciplinary team, in addition to side independent researchprojects with individual faculty mentors. The primary goal was to teach the participants – mainlyelectrical, mechanical, and aerospace engineering undergraduate students and K-12 teachers –about systems engineering methodology, including design, build, integration, and test, with acomplementary benefit of the participants practicing their communication and teamwork skills.The systems engineering projects that the participants designed during the summer months willbe described, with an emphasis on lessons learned from recruiting and managing the team.1. IntroductionThe University of North Dakota hosted a Research Experiences for
thestudents, the mentoring program evolved to be conducted by upper division scholars in the secondyear. The current model helps scholars to develop leadership skills.1-2. Summer Bridge Program (SBP)Designed collaboratively by faculty and students, SBP is offered to each new cohort and continuingstudents across the three institutions as a starting point for them to become part of a local STEMcommunity and engage in a larger community across the Collaboratory. Students get to know oneanother and program faculty and learn about the support services available to them on campus.1-3. Course Networking (CN)CN is an online academic networking platform that provides scholars an opportunity to showcasetheir accomplishments and verify their project
-Secondary4.4 BEAT Student Reach and Activity ImpactThe reach and student impact for each activity offered through the BEAT program is measuredby the following conditions: • Number of course implementations per activity • Average course attendance numbers during these implementations - including multiple course sections, where relevant. • Program year in which each activity was implemented. This tracks cumulative projections based on the first two conditions.It is estimated that more than 2300 students have been reached through the implementation ofvarious BEAT activities in classrooms of middle and high schools as well as universities. Thefollowing table (3) shows the breakdown of the number of students impacted per
,extracurricular high school students, and a graduate student. Bringing this heterogeneity intoharmony was a significant undertaking. We discuss some challenges we faced while managingthe project and the ways in which we navigated those challenges. This work has value for themultidisciplinary engineering community by offering resources and recommendations forintegrating engineering and the arts within an experiential project-based learning context. Wedescribe challenges related to disciplinary language, real-time feedback, project timelines, andproject documentation.IntroductionMultidisciplinary project-based learning can have a valuable impact on undergraduateengineering students by providing opportunities for hands-on learning, real-world problemsolving
through the CU Teach Engineering program. Additionally, she mentors graduate and undergraduate engineering Fellows who teach in local K-12 classrooms through the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program’s TEAMS initiative, is on the development team for the TeachEngineering digital library, and is faculty advisor for CU-Boulder’s Society of Women Engineers (SWE). Her primary research interests include the impacts of project-based service-learning on student identity, pathways and retention to and through K-12 and undergraduate engineering, teacher education and curriculum development.Dr. Janet Y. Tsai, University of Colorado, Boulder Janet Y. Tsai is a researcher and instructor in the Engineering Plus program at the
description of the EarSketch environment and curriculum. We alsopresent an overview of the classroom environments in which EarSketch has been implemented todate, including professional development feedback, student artifacts, student engagement data,and student achievement. The authors believe that EarSketch has the potential to serve as anintroductory programming unit for a variety of courses in both pre-college and college settings.Based on initial data, EarSketch is an effective method for teaching programming of musicalcontent and is effective in improving motivation to succeed on computing problems.IntroductionIn disciplines ranging from science to the humanities to the arts, computational thinking hasbecome central to how we create, communicate
researchers to the country. The objective of the preliminary exploratory visit was toassess potential issues such as safety, possible gender problems, general living and researchconditions, support from the TUM, the impact of language, and so forth. The outcome of theexploratory visit was completely positive and all potential issues were successfully addressed.For the most part, most of the perceived issues were simply unfounded. Based on this verypositive start the decision was made to proceed. Of the many possible impressions andrevelations that occurred during the initial exploratory visit, two were memorable. The firstoccurred during a tour of the country. In Moldova, communication towers are relatively commonand widespread. These towers are
engineeringethics course have indicated that this case, as designed and facilitated, successfully generatedstudents’ emotional engagement. In the future, we will further analyze students’ responses to thecase activities in order to explore the impact of this case study, situated in its pedagogicalframework, on students’ ethical reasoning development and perspective taking tendencies.As a final note, at the time of this writing, the oil spill, its impact, and BP ramifications are stillpresent in the news. In light of this ongoing case, the content described should be considereddynamic rather than static. Nonetheless, to the extent possible, the structured framework andethical reasoning approach should be held constant in future revisions or course offerings
Construction Design and Cost Analysis CE Design and Spring 2 23-24 Final Report including all prior work Synthesis III 25-27* Client and Public Presentations *Course includes 2-3 weeks at the end of the term for other course business and project delays.With approximately 10 teams of four students, the three “CE Design and Synthesis” courses,CE486-488-489, are shared by two Course Instructors (five teams per instructor). These coursesfocus on management topics, common whole-system design considerations, and teamorganization. Coaches are kept informed through regular communications and departmentmeeting updates throughout the year.The “Technical Design and Synthesis
Mental Retardation; VA Hospital; Nashua Center; Shore Educational Collaborative; Coastal Education Collaborative; Life Links; Helping Hands; New England Education Consortium; Seven Hills; Boston Home; and the Wang Middle School Special Education Program. The students learned about the impact of such designs on the quality of life for individuals with special needs; learned about electrical theory, technology, and application; and designed and fabricated devices. The partner organizations provided engaging on-campus presentations for freshman courses, describing client context and needs; helpful communication and feedback between student and clients, such as a Service-Learning Project Checklist; and
classroom or out of the classroom. Active andcooperative learning, learning communities, service learning, problem-based learning and teamprojects are some instances of such efforts. In spite of all the support and emphasis on engagingstudents, it is not widely practiced in engineering courses. Engineering education community Page 23.85.2similar to other teaching and learning communities needs pedagogies of engagement that canhelp to develop a new generation of engineers who are resourceful, engaged workers and citizensthat America now requires 1.In this paper, considering the new generation of students’ interests, a new engagement methodfor
it has impacted students’ sense of belonging.1 IntroductionCollaborative learning is an evidence-based instructional practice that has been adopted by manyinstructors in STEM courses in higher education. Research indicates that engaging students incollaborative activities is associated with increased student persistence, and improves studentlearning outcomes and retention [1, 2]. Successful and productive collaborations are rarelyguaranteed, however they can be greatly improved by a careful design of the task [3] and the useof available technologies, to both promote collaborations among students and support theinstructors implementing these activities [4, 5, 6, 7]. However, most of the evidence-basedpractices for collaborative learning
, science, and mathematics ( TEST) 2. an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors ( BITES and TEST) 3. an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences ( Project and Written Assignment) 4. an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts (BITES)7.0 AcknowledgmentThe author would like to acknowledge the efforts of the students in
will most likely receive the same answer – systems engineers.Recognizing this future need for systems engineers in the aerospace community, an aerospaceengineering department at a major US university, The University of Texas at Austin, partneredwith NASA’s ESMD to sponsor the development of a systems engineering curriculum. Thecurriculum includes an undergraduate course focusing on systems engineering for aerospaceengineers with an accompanying laboratory course that introduces students to the spacecraftsubsystems and methods for assessing their performance. This course and lab combination isintended as a prerequisite to the senior-level capstone spacecraft /mission design course and as atraining ground for students involved in UT’s student
meritocracy. Furthermore, the faculty instructor occupies a higher position of institutionally-sanctioned power within the course, and negative reviews from faculty could impact peer educators’ chances of getting rehired for this prestigious (and paid) position. Peer educators might also be a student in that faculty member’s upper division course in future. As such, we feel a tension that perhaps the ethical action here would be to focus our reform efforts on faculty first. However, we also feel that we are in a weaker position to create change among engineering faculty, especially as many of our research team members are not affiliated with
to lack of prior knowledge on the topic” “I think you need to change the lectures based on the age level of the group. Because the majority of my group took chemistry, some of the material was review”To combat this, topics that would be considered “review” were always paired with an interactiveactivity to encourage engagement and discussion from the students who have already seen thetopic while still teaching the important information to those who have not.Transfer of Learning ImplementationOur approach to improving comprehension through transfer of learning was realized in threemajor ways throughout the week. One way was the design project, which will be covered inmore detail in the following section. The second was through
.” Deloitte Insights, 2018.[2] “Creating pathways for tomorrow’s workforce today,” Deloitte Insights. Available: http://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/manufacturing/manufacturing-industry- diversity.html[3] M. Cameron, “2019–20 National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS:20) First Look at the Impact of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic on Undergraduate Student Enrollment, Housing, and Finances (Preliminary Data)”.[4] “Community College FAQs,” Community College Research Center. Accessed: Mar. 05, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/community-college-faqs.html[5] P. Osterman, “Employment and Training for Mature Adults: The Current System and Moving Forward,” Brookings Institution, Nov. 2019.[6] S
investigates (1) primary influences for involvement with engineering, (2)interest and engagement in engineering and design-based learning, and (3) the lasting impact ofBeyond Blackboards on girls’ personal, educational, and engineering progress. Severalinstruments were used to assess attitudinal changes, including student surveys, teacherinterviews, and comparison to national data (Trends in International Mathematics and ScienceStudy). Findings indicate a positive shift in students’ interest in engineering as a career, as wellas the extent of students’ educational expectations. Additionally, female role models, socialperceptions, and self-concepts are predominant in shaping girls’ experiences with engineering.By working to change engineering attitudes
specified, and ABET reinforced, that mechanical engineering graduatesneed to be able to accurately apply design analysis and mechanical design principles withinrealistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainability. In addition, students need to function on multidisciplinaryteams, have good communication skills, and use modern engineering tools to solve problems.These requirements suggest that engineering courses should be using real life project-basedlearning throughout the curriculum. Research has also indicated that a good percentage of thehigh quality students who are dropping out of engineering are doing so because they have eitherlost interest or actually come
different from that of students who have known privilege.Many of our students have never had a teacher or parent tell them to have faith in their abilities,or that they are truly capable of realizing what their intellect might imagine. Creatingexperiences that help such students find and respect their own creativity has been an intensefocus of our curricular development. Finally, our approach to community engagement continues to evolve. We initially offeredgeneral open hours to individuals from the community with little attention to what thoseindividuals actually wanted to do. Some participants from the community saw Inworks as justanother “Maker Space,” albeit, and very well-equipped one. It took a while for us to articulatethe message that
, audio/videorecordings, student work and surveys); on our six years of collaborative engagement with thedepartment faculty; and on our ability to provide sufficient description that readers can followour interpretations [33]. Each researcher independently reviewed data, then we discussed andmerged interpretations.ResultsWe summarize design problems presented to students enrolled in first year through junior corechemical engineering courses, along with the instructors’ assessment of its impacts, based onstudent engagement and performance. We evaluate each design problem using the proposedframework. We note if the design problem was discarded or significantly revised.Edible Car (Discarded)The edible car problem, according to the instructor, served
actually responsible, and what kind of institutional failure allowed sucha plan to be implemented. 2. Is simple to understand yet is complex enough to engage students in the problem solving process. 3. Allows for more than one right answer and viewpoint. 4. Can be discussed in one 75-minute class period. 5. Is not overly long or complex. 6. Allows “the instructor to prepare without feeling overloaded.”8I divide the students into groups, give them a few minutes to read the case, and have them followthe instructions written on the case study. They discuss the case in their small groups, and thenwe reconvene to discuss the case as a class.Ethical analysisThe central issue in the case study is whether vehicle code software should
and use technology intensively. Emerging technology is one of the hallmarks ofhis teaching, and Krishna uses an empathetic syllabus with flexible guidelines where intellectualcuriosity is intact and social connections and personal accommodations are included. Duringthe pandemic he changed his syllabus to make it more community focused. He included flexibleguidelines so that intellectual curiosity, social connections, and personal accommodationswould all remain intact. The student success model that Krishna has designed is supported byequally important elements inside and outside the classroom, including engagement, retention,access, community, active learning, peer support, assessment, and resources. During thepandemic, when students could
. In these instances, team members had difficulty sharing ideas between each other, orlacked a consistent method of communication, which is a characteristic of a less mature, orsurface, designer. A strong shared communication method, on the contrary, is capable of,“enabling problem scoping and solution archiving by enhancing collaboration andcommunication,” [2]. This project was initiated during a pandemic at the height of emergentremote work situations, and difficulty with communication was a surface modeling characteristicseen in four of the seven interviewee cases. Two representative quotes are included to betterdemonstrate how these team members approached understanding the project."[Student] and myself would be asked, you know, to kind of
-solving. The option of online chat with technical support team provides users quick solutions to issues they are facing. In a broader sense, EPD credit programs offer easy-to-find links to a variety of support services. Direct links to the library, administration, cloud storage, online discussion rooms, and alumni communities can be found on most course pages. The support services not only promote connections between and among faculty and students but also offer the ability for students to work together as study groups and to learn from each other. • This UID principle concerns impact of the instructor delivering a course. Our faculty is highly engaged in discussion forums in Moodle, weekly web conferences with Blackboard
primary Atlanta high schools decided topursue STEM/engineering degrees [5]. The mentorship program had a significant impact onincreasing enrollment in Georgia Tech and its engineering programs.The University of Texas at Austin does not currently have a program mirroring the above effortsspecifically for increasing enrollment in the Cockrell School of Engineering with a focus on thecollege application process geared towards Title I schools.Research Questions:Below are the primary research questions that shaped the development of the program. ❖ What are some key obstacles Title I school students face in pursuing higher education, and how can this program help students overcome these challenges? ❖ How can the concepts be effectively
, creativity and an understanding of thesocial, political and economic contexts of engineering. The F.W. Olin Foundation decided thebest way to maximize its impact was to help create a college to address these emerging needs.The Foundation's commitment in excess of $400 million to Olin College remains one of thelargest such commitments in the history of American higher education.The college officially opened in Fall 2002 to its inaugural freshman class. During the prior year,thirty student "partners" worked with Olin's faculty to create and test an innovative curriculumthat infused a rigorous engineering education with business and entrepreneurship as well as thearts, humanities and social sciences. They developed a hands-on, interdisciplinary
sufficiently reduce thefrustrations of a novice programmer [8]. Thus our goal was to create a new toolbox consisting ofsimple commands and house it as a GitHub repository allowing for continual collaborativedevelopment to increase usability while reducing the anxiety caused by implementing thesoftware and interacting with real-world conditions.From our experience, we have found that robots serve as an excellent teaching tool to makeprogramming accessible and are engaging to students of diverse backgrounds. The hands-on,collaborative environment and live feedback from algorithms can make logic and coding moreapproachable to those more hesitant or timid about their programming abilities. The use of robotscan be exciting to students; it can grab the
100kin10, which wasincubated by Carnegie, over 150 otherindividual commitments to answer thecall, collectively impacted over 40,000STEM teachers.• Includes funders that havecollectively and committed over $60Min towards the goal. AP Engineering Course• Still in planning phase• Important opportunity to add “E” to STEM, increase student awareness of engineering• One of the few opportunities to have a national impact in a decentralized system• Support from Engineering Deans is critical! Graduating More Undergraduate Engineers• 1 Million STEM Graduates Goal: The President, based on a PCAST analysis, has called for producing one million additional college graduates with STEM degrees over the next decade. Fastest path is increased