innovativefield measurements, and the highest end theoretical work for research advances in coastal, oceanand marine engineering.This paper explores the ebb and flow of coastal, ocean and marine engineering research andacademic programs demonstrating a decline in the robustness of US research relative to that inother countries. A qualitative case is made for a robust long term US investment in graduateacademic research in coastal, ocean and marine engineering accompanied by a renewed nationalinvestment in large scale experimental facilities and full scale research programs in the field.Recommendations are made for the way forward to revive this struggling profession which, ifimplemented, should produce economic dividends for the USA far in excess of the
workforce can be largely attributed to childcare needs [31].Engineers should not be involved?A small percentage of students (6%) responded that engineers should not be involved in thepandemic response (e.g. “engineers are not doctors”, “ride it out”). These responses demonstratethat there may be a lack of understanding within education programs in regards to theresponsibilities or capabilities of the civil engineering community. These responses in particularcontradict the Code of Ethics put forth by the American Society of Civil Engineers. The preambleof this code recognizes the role of civil engineers in protecting the public, stating that engineersshall “above all else protect and advance the health, safety, and welfare of the public” [7
from students.Ethics is one of the required learning outcomes under ABET [1]. Therefore, ethics content istaught in a variety of required courses in accredited engineering degree programs. Faculty reportintegrating ethics topics into a variety of different course types, teaching ethics via a variety ofpedagogies, and assessing student learning with a variety of approaches [2-8]. Faculty have alsodescribed integrating ethics topics into co-curricular activities that they mentor [9-12]. However,faculty perceptions of teaching effectiveness may differ from those of students [13, 14]. Thesedifferences might be particularly large in co-curricular settings where the majority of faculty donot formally assess the extent of student learning [9, 15].In
and belonging. The program worked to reduce the isolation, exclusion, andsilencing of non-majority individuals within the typical academic career progression in additionto adapting to support during pandemic-altered faculty challenges. Key advantages of CIMCsincluded enabling inter-institutional exchanges and reflective learning among committeemembers about similarities and differences in climate and opportunities on different campuses.This paper will review the premise and literature on peer and peer-plus mentoring as well asdescribe the process of forming and supporting the CIMCs. Formative assessments for thisongoing program will also be discussed. This paper can serve as a guide for other institutions toform communities of support for
Paper ID #26364The Effects of Calculus I on Engineering Student PersistenceAmie Baisley, Utah State University I have a B.S. in civil engineering and a M.S. in structural engineering from Arizona State University. After graduating, I became a lecturer at ASU in civil engineering. During my time teaching I really became interested in engineering education and knew I wanted to pursue a graduate degree in that field. After moving to Utah and finding the program at Utah State University, I have really enjoyed diving in to the education world. I am most interested in the sophomore level courses that engineering students
Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Engineer Development and Mentor ProgramOverviewThe electric power industry in the United States is at a critical juncture for skilled workers in allfacets of the industry. During the last decade, researchers, small and large interest groups,government agencies, and universities have been reporting on the necessity of a highly skilledand adequately trained workforce. In 2007, IEEE published a task force report1 indicating adeclining national trend in power engineering graduates. Additionally, power engineeringcurriculum requirements have declined since 2001. Now, less than 59 percent of universitiesrequire a power engineering course to fulfill the electrical engineering curriculum. The
engineering, material engineering, industrial engineering,bioengineering, construction engineering, and computer engineering. The Fulton Schooldoes not have capacity to increase overall enrollments. The Fulton strategic plan calls fora small decrease in undergraduate enrollments.The planning for a new engineering program is a collaboration between faculties of theCollege of Technology and Applied Sciences (CTAS) at ASU East Campus and the IraA. Fulton School of Engineering at ASU Tempe Campus, with support from the Collegeof Education. It is envisioned that by dividing ASU engineering programs between twocampuses the university will be better positioned to address the career goals of studentsand faculty. In addition, the development of a new
othersresponsible for their implementation. In November 2000, we asked five students from theDepartment of Industrial Engineering for their interpretations of five performance-basedoutcomes for graduates of the program. We wanted to document in their own words—not ours—what the students thought the outcomes meant and how to assess them. Four of the outcomeswere selected from a list of eleven outcomes developed by the Accreditation Board ofEngineering and Technology (ABET) for all engineering disciplines. The fifth outcome wasdeveloped by the department and was specific to industrial engineering. Four students mettogether in a series of three focus group discussions. The fifth student was interviewed alone onthree separate occasions because of scheduling
environment is important for promoting student learning incalculus courses. Indeed, all of the retained records described one or more active learningpedagogies as part of calculus course improvements (Table 2). Three tools and methods werecommon for eliciting student participation. In particular, online-learning-platforms (i.e.,technology), was described as a way to engage students and provide frequent assessment oflearning, as well as manage the workload for large classes. In addition, the use of problems andprojects to provide real-world context for students was shown to be impactful. Often,engagement in applied problems and projects was completed in groups to allow peers to teachand learn from each other. The use of technology, project- and
by the experiences reported in this paper, that the ABET Self Study preparationprocess can be improved through the use of web-based information portals. These portals neednot be extremely sophisticated in their design and can be easily implemented as a means toeducate faculty and serve as a collection and distribution point for the many elements that areinvolved in conducting the Self Study.In a similar fashion, the assessment of Student Outcomes benefits from the use of systems thateffectively measure performance, involve a large number of faculty members, and use the resultsfrom a large number of the required courses in the curriculum. Here too a method is proposed,and demonstrated by the experiences reported in this paper, to efficiently
actively engages in offering guidance in developing research studies, curriculum enhancements, and assessment methods pertaining to integration and cultivation of intercultural competence. Her expertise extends to facilitating workshops and training sessions, catering to the needs of both staff and students within Purdue University.Dr. Sakhi Aggrawal, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI) Dr. Sakhi Aggrawal is a lecturer and research scientist in Purdue University’s Department of Computer and Information Technology. Her work explores how project-management frameworks, teamwork dynamics, intercultural competencies and AI tools can enhance STEM and engineering education. She also serves as a technical program manager
Georgia primarily via research and therefore the graduate program before going to the retreat.This energy source engendered a commitment toward working to find creative ways ofstrengthening and energizing our graduate program.Process SummaryWe believe that departmental leadership can facilitate graduate program reinvigoration byconsidering the following sequential points:*Identify large needs. Key into ongoing university wide activities focusing on meeting largerneeds. Create space for discussion of large national trends and be exposed to the thoughts andideas of prominent thinkers of national educational trends. Think big!*Engage a small group to flesh out the needs statement and identify strategies to meet the needsin a pre-retreat. Have the
- Champaign American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Developing Education Programs for Airworthiness Engineering1 Large scale Airlift Humanitarian Efforts Enabled by Engineering and Airworthiness Disciplines.1.1 BackgroundAircraft of all types provide resources to support humanitarian efforts throughout the world.Humanitarian missions from the United States military have been recorded as far back as 1919,when Army planes delivered food and supplies to flood victims along the Rio Grande in Texas[1]. Ever since these early days of aviation the U.S. has engaged in missions that providedcritical supply relief to populations ravaged by either conflicts or natural
online learning environments; and b) core threshold concepts within education for sustainability literature, focusing on project management in the built environment in the 21st Century. Consultation was undertaken with the Masters Program Convenor to confirm learning expectations (i.e. with regard to graduate attributes and program aims), two other convenors whose courses are compulsory regarding their experiences, and two teaching and learning experts within the university’s engineering Faculty.– Curriculum Renewal: This comprised updating the Course Outline, creating a Study Guide, suitable criterion-referenced assessment items, and a supporting Blackboard student interface. Concurrently questionnaires were developed
show that most correlations are small. The highest correlations were LabGrade and GPA, 0.65 and 0.45 respectively. When the partial correlations are takencorrecting for GPA, the number of significant factors decreased by 30% and ACT scoresbecame strongly correlated to the lab practical score.When females (approximately 10% of the sample population) were removed, there wereno significant changes in the correlation results.IntroductionWhat makes students successful in an Electrical and Computer Engineering introductorylaboratory? If a set of prior experiences can be determined, or a set of attitudes, thenthese could be used to help improve student performance. This paper will explain theprogress of determining the prior experiences and attitudes
employed in private engineering practice,K-12 education, and government. Phase I provides some preliminary evidence that our initialassumption about the impact of the ISD program on engineering graduates may be correct. Inthe second phase of our assessment program we will perform a more detailed assessment toquantify this assumption.IntroductionIn today’s global economy, there is a large need for engineers to understand how to communicateand operate with foreign customers and co-workers. International education opportunities helpbreak down cultural barriers and provide engineers with the experience and knowledge to designunique solutions to innovate solutions in a global setting. Although there are more internationalopportunities to take
versions of surveys, initially designed and validated for (primarilyundergraduate) research project participation, are used to collect information about studentperception of the magnitude and attribution of gains in multiple areas. These surveys usequestions from the Undergraduate Research Student Self-Assessment (URSSA) instrument [2] aswell as questions initially designed to focus on particular activities and customized to focus onthe specific values provided by robotic competition program participation.This paper is organized as follows. First, background research in related and relevant topic areasare outlined. Second, the survey is discussed, and results presented. Third, the results from thesurvey are analyzed. Finally, the paper concludes
effectiveness was assessed for the Fall 2013 semester using three formats: (1) a new civilengineering sustainability literacy questionnaire administered before and after the module, (2)quality of application of the Envision Rating System to the project, and (3) instructor reflection.Results from full assessment in the Fall 2013 semester and partial assessment in the Spring 2014semester indicate the module helped introduce students to basic sustainability concepts andEnvision. However, the assessment suggests a stand-alone course within the civil engineeringcurriculum would promote a much deeper understanding of sustainability concepts, motivatingfactors, and broader applications which are beyond the capability of a single capstone designproject
Session 3663 Teaching Novices how to Program PLC’s Durward K. Sobek, II Montana State UniversityAbstractProgrammable Logic Controllers (PLC’s) are specialized microcomputers specifically designed forautomated control of industrial processes. The most commonly used programming language forPLC’s is ladder logic. This paper describes a classroom experiment designed to test theeffectiveness of a graphical tool called “I/O mapping” in improving ladder programming. Theexperimental results are consistent with instructor observation that the technique helps
Paper ID #24675Mechanical Engineering Organized Around Mathematical SophisticationDr. Louis J. Everett, University of Texas, El Paso Dr. Everett is the MacGuire Distinguished Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas El Paso. Dr. Everett’s current research is in the areas of Mechatronics, Freshman Programs and Student Engagement. Having multiple years of experience in several National Laboratories and Industries large and small, his teaching brings real world experiences to students. As a former NSF Program Director he works regularly helping faculty develop strong education proposals.Dr
class. Benefits for instructors and administrators include: (1) minimal team facilitation because thegroups tend to develop into self-managed learning teams. (2) TBL is cost effective since it can beused in large classes using the same instructor/TA costs as small classes. (3) There are fewerworries about students not being in class or failing to prepare for class. (4) Student-facultyinteractions are more like working with colleagues when students are prepared for class andinstructors have time to develop personally rewarding relationships with students5. Team-Based Learning DescriptionTeam-Based Learning (TBL) is a specific pedagogical tool that emphasizes collaborativelearning and is distinct from other cooperative or collaborative pedagogies
( N1 / 1)σ 12 − ( N 2 / 1)σ 22the categories is then given by d ? where s ? s N1 − N 2Note that the parameter s 2 is a weighted combination of the category sample variances, withrelatively more emphasis given to the category with more samples. For an effect well-separated from the control category, s will be small for a given µ1 / µ2 (since the categoryvariances σ12 and σ 22 will be small), thus d will be “large.” For cases where either category isdispersed (and therefore has a larger category variance) the increased value of s serves toreduce the distance between categories and d will be “small.”For the at-risk students in Circuits & Systems, Cohen’s effect size was
senior-levelpractitioners leads each course offering. The practitioners play an essential role in the deliveryof the course, acting as section instructors, guest speakers, interview panel members, and projectadvisors. Details regarding the responsibilities of the instructional team members are included inthe paper. The paper also describes how local practitioners are prepared for their assignments.The new course represents a valuable program assessment tool since class activities permit directmeasurement of program outcomes. Included in the paper are discussions of the courseassessment processes and the procedures used to promote grading consistency among the facultyand practitioner evaluators. Improvements made to both the course and program
Paper ID #25383Work in Progress: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of a 1-creditChemical Engineering First-Year SeminarDr. Deborah S. Goldberg, University of Maryland, College Park Deborah S. Goldberg is a full-time lecturer in the Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Maryland, College Park. She is passionate about teaching and mentoring students to prepare them for diverse careers in chemical engineering and biotechnology.Mr. Jinwang Zou, University of Maryland, College Park Jinwang Zou is a Ph.D. candidate in the Measurement, Statistics, and Evaluation Program at the University
position, Mr. Perks worked as a satellite operations officer and satellite mission planner in the Defense Military Satellite Program at Fairchild Air Force Base, WA. He began his engineering career as a design engineer for Datamarine International a small company that designed and manufactured electronic navigation equipment for sailboats and small watercraft. Prior to his engineering position, Mr. Perks worked as an electronic technician at Datamarine.Linda Shepherd, California Polytechnic State University Linda Shepherd is Professor of Political Science and Public Policy at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, California, where she has also served as founding director of the Master of
(IAS) in Washington University, theTeacher-Course Evaluation (TCE) in Arizona University, the Individual Development andEducational Assessment (IDEA) in Kansas State University.The course assessment forms in Washington University are divided into 11 types according toteaching organizational forms of small lecture/discussion courses, seminar discussion classes,classes whose purpose is the teaching of problem-solving or heuristic methods, skill-orientedclass, quiz sections, large lecture classes (such as those in math), lab sections, distancelearning (correspondence) courses, clinical experience, and etc. any of which consists of morethan 30 assessment items, which include both common indicators and individual requirements.For example, Items of
, she resigned from her faculty job and came to Connecticut for family reunion. Throughout her academic career in Australia and Sin- gapore, she had developed a very strong interest in learning psychology and educational measurement. She then opted for a second Ph.D. in educational psychology, specialized in measurement, evaluation and assessment at University of Connecticut. She earned her second Ph.D. in 2010. Li has a unique cross- disciplinary educational and research background in mechatronics engineering, specialized in control and robotics, and educational psychology, specialized in statistical analysis and program evaluation.Dr. Ronald S. Harichandran, University of New Haven Ron Harichandran is Dean of the
. Page 24.556.7Red Papers, Papers published in conference proceedings, journals, and grant proposals or Publications, & reports. GrantsLight Blue Website Any internet originated channel, such as Google or other internet searching, explicit identification of the CW website, and other websites.Light Professional Two types of professional programs were included, both of which featured theGreen Program CW as a small part of a multi-week engagement designed to provide instructors with professional development regarding their teaching practices.Brown Publisher
Teaching Fellow in the School of Engineering at Sheffield Hallam University. Afteruniversity and industrial experience as initially a computer systems design engineer at Plessey and latterly as anintegrated circuit applications engineer at Marconi he joined the university as a lecturer in electronics. Johncurrently is responsible for the coordination of learning, teaching and assessment strategy in the School ofEngineering.Tim Mulroy is a Lecturer in the School of Engineering at Sheffield Hallam University and provides academicoversight of the engineering industrial placement program for undergraduates. He is also academic coordinator forjoint programs between the university and its partner college in Malaysia. Tim started his career
79 Table 9. Introduction to Circuits at SJSU had a significant number of structural and curricular changes in addition to utilizing the flipped classroom, but results show that those changes combined with the curricular changes saw nearly 10% more students receiving A’s or B’s.Computer Science/Programming. Introduction to Programming’s variation across the threecampuses varies in content, the department in which the course is housed, and the grading structure.CSULA has a large number of students, approximately 20-30% who take the course as Credit/No Credit,which does not enable a strong direct comparison to the other campuses. Table 10 shows results atCSULA for their Intro to Programming course (EE 2450