reshaping practice-oriented, postgraduate professionalengineering education to enhance the U.S. engineering workforce for competitiveness. The NationalCollaborative Task Force is embarking on an ambitious effort to create centers for postgraduateprofessional education that better serve the needs of the U.S. engineering workforce in industry forleadership of creative technology development & innovation to strengthen the nation’s innovativecapacity for competitiveness. The National Collaborative was formed as a joint initiative of the ASEE-Graduate Studies Division (GSD), College Industry Partnership Division (CIP), and Corporate MembersCouncil (CMC) to implement sustainable reform. The intent of this stage of work is to set the
Collaborative Task Force for reformof professionally oriented engineering graduate education to make it more relevant to the needsof industry and to ensure a strong U.S. engineering workforce for competitiveness. The mission,purpose, methods, motivations, talents, and experience of engineering professionals whoconceptualize, design, develop, innovate, and lead the purposeful development of new andimproved technology are quite different from those of the academic scientific researcher. It isnow evident that innovative professional graduate education programs do not fit organizationallyinto traditional disciplinary research-oriented academic departments. This paper focuses on newtypes of innovative organizations that are required to initiate, develop
collaborative projects have dealt with the winding of digital tape media. Thesetape packs are used in many storage settings where high capacity and secure storage areessential. To meet the ever-increasing storage needs of the computer industry, the tape storagedevices must be constantly improved, and innovations must be incorporated into the designand manufacturing processes. Digital tape storage is one key market for Imation, and as thesole U.S.-based manufacturer of digital storage media, digital tape manufacturing bringsmany engineering design challenges. The nature of these challenges and their possiblesolutions are exactly what students should encounter within capstone design courses andgraduate projects in order to receive a “real-world” research
Institute of Technology 7 /Western Carolina University 8 AbstractThis is the fourth paper in the special panel session of the National Collaborative Task Force onEngineering Graduate Education Reform to ensure a strong U.S. engineering workforce forcompetitiveness. Whereas research cultures have been built into the nation’s schools of engineering toenhance the educational experience of research-oriented graduate students, it is now evident that acomplementary but different culture is needed also to make professionally oriented engineering graduateeducation more relevant to the needs of industry and to further the advanced professional education of themajority of the nation’s engineers who are pursuing
held leadership roles, including Head of the Electrical and Electronics Engineering Department at Mbarara University of Science and Technology. He also serves as the overall coordinator of industrial internships within the faculty, a role he is passionate about, ensuring the continued success of university-industry partnerships. His research interests include enhancing professional skills among engineering students, designing academia-industry educational interventions, student assessments, and facilitating school-to-workplace transitions. Vicent is an active member of IEEE and the Engineering Education Research Network (EERN) for Africa, where he collaborates to improve engineering education across Africa and
competitiveness.1. IntroductionThis paper reports on the progress of the National Collaborative Task Force on Engineering GraduateEducation Reform in deigning practice-oriented, postgraduate professional engineering education toenhance the U.S. engineering workforce for competitiveness. The National Collaborative Task Force isembarking on an ambitious effort to create centers for postgraduate professional education across thecountry that better serve the needs of the U.S. engineering workforce in industry for leadership of creativetechnology development and innovation to strengthen the nation’s innovative capacity forcompetitiveness. The National Collaborative is a joint initiative of the ASEE-Graduate Studies Division,College Industry Partnership
workplaces. Dr. Desing graduated from Ohio State with her Ph.D. in Engineering Education, and also holds a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology and a M.S. in Industrial Engineering and Operations Research from the Pennsylvania State University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Design and Evaluation of a New, Student-Centered Multidisciplinary Course in Mechanical Engineering: Artificial OrgansAbstract: There is a growing need for healthcare applications across various fields, particularly inSTEM. For mechanical engineering students, their future prospects extend beyond traditional areassuch as energy, manufacturing, mechanical design
institutions and under what conditions this collaboration might occur.Data Collection and AnalysisThe survey is being distributed to professionals across a range of biotechnology companies,including startups, mid-sized organizations, and large corporations, to capture diverse industryperspectives. Specifically, the data is being collected from ~15 international and nationalcompanies with local branches with whom we have previous interactions and partnerships oractive collaborations in student education and networking events. These companies are alsopart of our Industrial Advisory Board (IAB) and serve as advisors in our academic programs.Responses are collected through an online confidential survey platform to facilitate
Innovation: A Progress Report of the National Collaborative Initiative,” Proceedings of the 2009 National Meeting of ASEE, Austin, TX, June, 20092. Stanford, T. G., D.A. Keating and R. N. Olsen, “Strengthening the U.S. Workforce for Technology Innovation: Professional Graduate Education that Supports the Method Engineers Use to Create, Develop, and Innovate New Technology,” Proceedings of the 2009 National Meeting of ASEE, Austin, TX, June, 20093. Olson, R. N., R. Holmes, D. A. Keating, and T. G. Stanford, “Ensuring a Strong Engineering Workforce for Technology Innovation: Creating a Culture for Innovation in Industry,” Proceedings of the 2008 National Meeting of ASEE, Pittsburgh, PA, June, 20084. Dunlap, D. D., D. A
Paper ID #48389The Staying Power of Socializing Engineers: A Systematized ReviewMr. Craig M. Spears, Texas A&M University Craig M. Spears is an Associate Professor of the Practice for the First Year Engineering Program in the Engineering Academic and Student Affairs (EASA) department at Texas A&M University. He holds both an M.Eng. and a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Texas A&M, as well as a Graduate Business Certification from the Mays Business School. With extensive experience in both academia and industry, Craig has taught a variety of engineering courses, while also helping develop programs to enhance
was observed.Qualitative responses are used to inform continuous improvement efforts. This paper outlines thestructure of the program, key educational components, and its impact on both fellows and thetechnologies they advance, highlighting its role in bridging the gap between academic researchand industry and facilitating collaboration and interdisciplinary work, engaging various externalindividuals, organizations, and companies. As a harbinger for future college-industry relationalpathways, the IF Program model integrates several important engineering innovation themes:industry mentors; entrepreneurial and commercialization case studies; and engineeringprofessional development.Strategic Plan / initiativeThe Innovation Fellows Program
andindustrial challenges, including best practices, with the intention of reducing risks,getting things done using sound methods, technologies and collaborative peer groupexperience as support mechanisms.The audience of this library is engineering science and technology students, engineeringmanagement students, design, industrial engineering, design and process engineers, ITstudents / professionals, as well as biomedical engineering and medical science students.At its most fundamental level, our library is a• Knowledge documentation method, architecture, tool and resource, an• Instructional method characterized by the integrated approach to engineering, science, management, IT, and medical sciences, in which we use challenging 'real world
educators in the field.IntroductionMany industrial and engineering technology programs offer laboratory-oriented manufacturingcourses with the mission of providing students with a practical experience in product design andmanufacturing. Common courses in these programs may include manufacturing automation,computer-integrated manufacturing and/or numerical control systems1,2,3. These courses typicallycover a wide range of topics such as control theory, robotics, and programmable logiccontrollers, and limited coverage of computer numerical control (CNC) and computer-aideddesign/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM).This paper describes a new laboratory-oriented course at the industrial technology (IT) programof California Polytechnic State
the needs of creative engineering practice in industry toenhance U.S. technological innovation and competitiveness. This paper implements the findingsof the National Collaborative as a model pilot effort at a major university. The Masters forEngineering Professionals to be introduced at New Jersey Institute of Technology is reflective ofthe skills, knowledge and actions required for early career development in developingengineering leaders for the first stage of Direct Leadership [Levels 1-3 Engineering]. Thepostgraduate engineering curriculum has been designed as a matrix of advanced studies versusskills, knowledge and actions required for Level 3 engineering. Program emphasis is placed uponengineering creativity, innovation, and its
them. CIT-E has remained active since the conclusion ofthe grant. Through the organization of yearly workshops, it has been welcoming new membersand providing participants an opportunity to grow as educators, increase their professionalnetwork, and develop new materials collaboratively. This paper describes the results of an impactanalysis of CIT-E through the lens of a community of practice.IntroductionThe Center for Infrastructure Transformation and Education (CIT-E, pronounced “city”) is anexisting, thriving community of practice (CoP) with a shared domain of interest in supportingmore effective Civil and Environmental Engineering education [1]. The CIT-E CoP exists in bothphysical and cyber environments. In-person workshops have been held
willthen have the opportunity to continue their studies through the ECU distancelearning network and complete the aforementioned Bachelor of Science Degree.This paper examines the bio-manufacturing industry and the development of theNorth Carolina BioNetwork. It then explains how the 2+2 degree completionprogram was developed, the identification of learning objectives, and the processof building a collaborative relationship with a community college system.Bio-manufacturing IndustryThe United States Department of Labor Employment and Training Administrationreported that the biotechnology industry would have an employment level of814,900 by 200710. Not only will there be a rise in biotechnology jobs, but bio-manufacturing positions excellent pay
Paper ID #31132Investing in the Future: Bringing Research and Industry intoSimulation-based Manufacturing EducationDr. Faisal Aqlan, The Pennsylvania State University, The Behrend College Dr. Faisal Aqlan is an assistant professor of Industrial Engineering at The Pennsylvania State Univer- sity, The Behrend College. He received his PhD in Industrial and Systems Engineering form The State University of New York at Binghamton in 2013. He has industry experience with IBM Corporation and Innovation Associates Company. His research interests include manufacturing education, simulation and automation, process improvement
same time, industry is increasingly committed to the adoption of new, lean processes.These factors will challenge industry’s ability to provide the necessary new learning. Acompelling case can be made for the U.S. university system to offer a purpose-built professionalcurriculum for life-long engineering education.The National Collaborative for Graduate Education Reform is a partnership of leaders from U.S.Universities and Industries committed to delivery of such a life-learning system. Thecollaboration recognizes that the U.S. has an innovation driven economy and that the engineeringworkforce creates our useable technology and innovation ensuring our national competitiveness.Lifelong development of the graduate engineering workforce is its
University, Nashville, TN 37232-2675AbstractHands-on learning of x-ray imaging principles using actual x-ray equipment is unrealisticdue to high equipment costs, limited availability of such devices, and, most of all, safetyconcerns. Computer simulators can substitute for hands-on learning but are notnecessarily as effective, especially for kinesthetic learners, and typically limit the amountof collaborative work possible. The objective of this work is to teach principles of x-rayimaging using a creative, safe and inexpensive alternative to “real” hands-on-learning.Visible light is used in specially designed exercises to teach the principles of attenuation,magnification, penumbra, and detector resolution. An exercise to
leveraging AI to tackle simple and longstanding problems in engineering education. With over a decade of industry experience as a Technology Strategist and Technical Lead, he has established himself as a forward-thinking innovator in AI and EdTech. His expertise spans Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA), Machine Learning (ML), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and Prompt Engineering Techniques (PETs) with Large Language Models (LLMs). Taiwo is known for his ability to collaborate effectively within and across organizations to meet project goals and drive transformative results. He excels in leading technical teams, offering strategic IT consultations, and implementing solutions that enhance productivity.Dr. Sarah Jane Bork
Boeing-University Relations - A Review and Prospects for the Future John H. McMasters, Narayanan Komerath The Boeing Company / Georgia Institute of TechnologyAbstractThe Boeing Company has been noteworthy within the aerospace industry for its ambitiousuniversity relations program originally conceived in the early 1990s. This program has aimed atnot only creating strong company relations with universities important to its business interests,but also to lead broader industry efforts to enhance engineering and related technical andbusiness education programs across the nation. This paper reviews the development of theBoeing program, discusses important lessons learned from the overall effort, and
AC 2010-1313: COMPUTER SIMULATION FOR MANUFACTURINGPARTNERSHIPSPaul Nutter, Ohio Northern University Paul Nutter, CMfgE, CQE, CQA, is an Associate Professor in the Department of Technological Studies at Ohio Northern University. He has been teaching manufacturing technology since 2000, and has 26 years experience in manufacturing and industrial engineering, primarily with Rockwell Automotive. Paul is active in the Society of Manufacturing Engineers as faculty advisor for SME Student Chapter S186, is currently chair of the SME Automated manufacturing and Assembly Community, and has served as chair on the 2007 and 2008 SME Simulation Technical Group, on the 2006 SME Member Council, and
2006-1888: A DESIGN-FOR-MANUFACTURABILITY WORKBOOKAlvin Post, Arizona State University Alvin Post, Ph.D., P.E., received a doctorate in mechanical engineering from the University of Hawaii. He has extensive industrial experience as a machine design engineer.Thuria Narayan, Arizona State University Thuria Narayan received a Bachelors degree in Mechatronics engineering from Bharathiar University, Tamilnadu, India in 2004 and is currently pursuing a masters degree in the Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering Department at Arizona State University. Her areas of interest are design and automation
Systems 4 Arizona State University East 5 / Western Carolina University 6 / Morgan State University 7 California Polytechnic State University 8 / Rochester Institute of Technology 9 New Jersey Institute of Technology 10 / Purdue University 11 University of South Carolina 12 AbstractThis is the fourth of four papers prepared for a special panel session of the National Collaborative TaskForce on Engineering Graduate Education Reform focusing on new educational approaches and processesthat better meet the development needs of the U.S. engineering workforce in industry to enhance globalcompetitiveness. Further graduate development of the U.S
, shopping, farming, sewing,professional industries, and family activities [5]-[15]. These informal experiences have beenidentified as critical predictors of children’s developing math skills and knowledge. Forexample, Benigno [16] observed the natural mathematical practices of four-year-old AfricanAmerican children and their families, finding evidence of counting, geometric thinking,spatial reasoning, and discussions of difference and similarity. This growing recognition ofthe interplay between formal and informal mathematics learning underscores the importanceof leveraging everyday mathematical experiences to inform and enhance classroominstruction.In engineering education, much like mathematics, the integration of contextualized problemsinto the
engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts 5. an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives 6. an ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions 7. an ability to acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate learning strategies.The term “complex” appears in both the department mission statement as well as in the firststudent outcome. For the purpose of this paper, the ABET [3] definition of
include a written and oral presentation as a case study.5. ConclusionsThe National Collaborative is creating and implementing a new model for professional graduateengineering education that enables continued growth of graduate engineers in industry andgovernment service throughout their entire professional careers ─ from entry-level through thehighest levels of professional engineering leadership for innovation and creative practice. Themodel is patterned after actual engineering development programs and experience in aerospaceand other industrial practice. Consequently, the centerpiece of the model is the technologydevelopment project. Here we have discussed in general terms the way in which technologydevelopment projects form a key component of
carefullyevaluated by faculty members at work in actual academic environments. The authors hope toconduct a significant portion of the curriculum model evaluation and validation in industrialengineering departments within the structure of the SUCCEED NSF Engineering EducationCoalition. Working within the SUCCEED Coalition has provided opportunities to developexcellent collaborative relationships among industrial engineering colleagues in some of thenation's best industrial engineering departments, which by good fortune are in the contiguousstates of Virginia, North and South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida. SUCCEED engineeringschools represent a remarkable slice of our country's engineering student population.Engineering enrollments in SUCCEED universities
energy frontier through unique projects. The mission ofI-SWEEEP is to create a collaborative yet competitive environment in which students canpresent their innovative ideas/projects to solve today’s challenges in energy, engineering, andenvironment, which will ensure a sustainable world for tomorrow. All the judges for the projectevaluations are selected from academia and industrial professionals. The judging process gives agood opportunity to engineering professionals and academicians to review and evaluate whatprospective engineers have developed for a sustainable future. The I-SWEEEP promotesengineering inventions and energy efficiency/management discoveries, which nurture eco-friendly technology concepts in K-12 STEM education.1
Paper ID #45350A Portable Educational Model for an Energy Management System of DukeEnergyDr. Tarek Kandil, Western Carolina University Tarek Kandil has been an assistant professor at Western Carolina University since August 2022. He got his B.Sc. and M.Sc. degrees from Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt, in 1993 and 1999, respectively, and his Ph.D. from the University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, in 2004. He has over 19 years of experience teaching at the undergraduate and postgraduate levels, as well as ongoing research and collaboration in the fields of renewable energy; AI and machine learning applications; energy