describe the course’s desired student learningoutcomes which were developed based upon needs identified in the preparation of studentsentering the senior design experience. For previous ECE students their first exposure to manydesign concepts and tools was during their senior year course. Building key design skills andconceptual understanding via exposure to multiple small, open-ended projects that increase incomplexity through the semester during their junior spring semester will enable students to entertheir capstone course the following year in a higher state of readiness. The course providesexposure to multiple design processes prevalent in academe and industry and encouragesstudents to internalize the key steps common to nearly all
. Further a thorough analysis ofthe stakeholders involved will be presented, outlining the obstacles and advantages that mayallow MOOCs or deny them from altering current educational models.Index Terms – MOOC, Online Courses, Education, Disruptive Innovation, Academic, STEM.I. IntroductionThe online world shifted between 2002 and 2008 from Web 1.0 to 2.0, moving from closed-content distribution for consumption to open-source collaboration; this has allowed for users’own educational creations through production of ideas.1 Through this growing increase ofeducational information via the internet, the emergence of Massive Open Online Courses(MOOC) is continuing to grow. These educational materials span from Pre-K through postdoctoral courses. As
learners andinstructors) is a key factor which defines the success of online education3.But unfortunately, engineering courses such as that are in need of laboratories, team works,construction site visits, field personnel’s technical presentations cannot be offered through onlinemedium. The physical interactions that are needed in the laboratories and construction sitescannot be offered by the online courses. Such collaborations of educational institutions withindustry and Government are necessary for Civil Engineering program’s success. UndergraduateEngineering students love to have hands-on experience for the most of the courses in theirCourse curriculum. The instructors who teach courses that are complemented by laboratoriesreceive high grade
B. Ritter, Ph.D., FAIMBE, Stevens Institute of Technology Dr. Ritter received his BChE degree from the City College of New York, and his MS and PhD degrees in ChE from the University of Rochester. Before returning for his PhD degree he had over 10 years of indus- trial experience in the aerospace industry for the US Navy and United Aircraft in solid rocket propellant development and as a development engineer for the Mixing Equipment Company and the DuPont Co. His first academic appointment was at Stevens Institute of Technology in the department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering where he did research on solar energy storage and conversion and optimal control of chemical processes. He taught courses in
success models in engineering, global engineering education, teamwork and team effectiveness, and production systems control and optimization. He worked as a production control engineer in Taiwan, and has taught laboratory classes in manufacturing engineering and freshmen engi- neering in the U.S. He earned his Bachelor and Master degrees in Industrial Engineering from National Tsing Hua University (Taiwan) and Purdue University (U.S.A). His ultimate career goal is to help cul- tivate world-class engineering graduates that can compete globally, as well as collaborate with the best engineers across different cultures.Xingyu Chen, Purdue University
Regional Campus. Wade has has been teaching for the Utah State college of Engineering for over 8 years. He holds duel B.S degrees in Industrial Technology Educa- tion and Civil Engineering from Utah State University, as well as an M.S. and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from Utah State University. His research interests include metacognitive processes and strategies involved in engineering design using Solid Modeling, learning style impacts upon hybrid synchronous broadcast engineering education, and team teaching in broadcast environments. Page 22.87.1 c American Society for Engineering
Lockheed Martin, IBM, and Ericsson. In 1997 she became a faculty member at NC State University and became the Director of Women in Engineering and K-12 Outreach. She has taught classes at the university from the freshman level to the graduate level, and outside the university from the kindergarten level to the high school level. Dr. Bottomley has authored or co-authored 37 technical papers, including papers in such diverse jour- nals as the IEEE Industry Applications Magazine and the Hungarian Journal of Telecommunications. She received the President’s Award for Excellence in Mathematics, Science, and Engineering Mentoring program award in 1999 and individual award in 2007. She was recognized by the IEEE with an EAB
. Page 22.223.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUM: INTEGRATION OF ARCHITECTURE AND ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING Ahmed Cherif Megri Associate Professor, amegri@uwyo.edu University of Wyoming Civil and Architectural Engineering Department Laramie, WY, USAAbstract:Architectural engineers apply engineering principles to the construction and design of buildings.They often collaborate with architects, who focus on function layout or aesthetics of buildingprojects. Architectural Engineering often encompasses
first tested with a rising sophomore student of engineering. The student hadtaken first year courses in mathematics and physics. In addition, the student had taken a surveycourse of exemplary works of structural engineering, but had not yet taken any other engineeringcourses on, for example, statics or mechanics. This project sought to explore how a modelbuilding project could augment or perhaps even supplant traditional approaches to teachingintroductory engineering topics.This project was formed as a collaboration between industry (a structural engineering firm) andacademia (a college’s civil engineering department). The student spent the first half of theproject at the engineering firm under the guidance of a practicing engineer and the
sustainability. Hence this requires an approach to education that is learner-centered, participative, experiential, case/problem-focused, and team-based. As long asthese criteria are met, the goal of this program to educate professionals with the capacityto transform theory into practice in collaborative and empowering ways can be achieved.This modular structure produces a flexible curriculum design where adding or dropping a Page 15.404.5particular course can be done at any time in response to the changing needs in the 4marketplace. Also, the list of application courses can be constantly modified based on theneed of
Distinguished Teaching Professor at The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Mechanical Engineering. Dr. Wood’s current research interests focus on product design, development, and evolution. The current and near-future objective of this research is to develop design strategies, representations, and languages that will result in more comprehensive design tools, innovative manufacturing techniques, and design teaching aids at the college, pre-college, and industrial levels.Michael Maixner, United States Air Force Academy Page 15.445.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Effects of
15.337.3disciplines, (b) the manager will be an effective agent in human relations, (c) the manager willhave coursework in her background that includes an appropriate mix of mathematics, science,Page 15.337.4Page 15.337.5A specialization block extends the student’s knowledge in a career-oriented direction and at anadvanced level of undergraduate study. An AES student selects her specialization based onstudent interest, career opportunity, and strengths in collaborating units on campus. Supply-chainmanagement and telecommunications are the two existing specializations.The supply chain management program is currently selected by approximately 95% of AESstudents and constitutes 27 semester hours of work. Courses are taken in our Management andSupply Chain
ElementaryEducation, is also the Director of Women in Engineering and The Engineering Place at NC StateUniversity. She has been working in the field of engineering education for over 20 years. She isdedicated to conveying the joint messages that engineering is a set of fields that can use all typesof minds and every person needs to be literate in engineering and technology. She is an ASEEFellow.2) Elizabeth Parry is an expert in engineering education, especially elementary, havingtransitioned from an industry job at IBM over 20 years ago. She is a partner for the Engineeringis Elementary Curriculum from the Museum of Science, Boston. She is well known for coachingschools as they transform themselves to engineering magnets or as they use engineering as
of shea nuts.Allan Feldman, University of South Florida Allan Feldman is a professor of science education at the University of South Florida. For the past 20 years his research has focused on science teacher learning and action research. His current research focuses the ways in which people learn to engage in science and engineering practices in apprenticeship situations. He has been PI and co-PI of NSF projects, many of which have been in collaboration with colleagues in the sciences and engineering. These include environmental studies of acid mine drainage, arsenic in the environment, algal biofuels, and water and wastewater treatment. He is currently working with an interdisciplinary team of engineers
science/technology and society3.The STSE educational approach may include the following features4: ≠ An understanding of the environmental threats, including those of a global nature, to our quality of life ≠ The economic and industrial aspects of technology ≠ An understanding of the fallible nature of science ≠ Discussion of personal opinion and values, as well as democratic action ≠ The multi-cultural dimension of scienceThe progression of an STSE “unit” typically follows a series of steps, as proposed byDerek Hodson5, one of Canada’s preeminent science education researchers. The first stepis represented by gaining an appreciation of the social impact of scientific andtechnological change. The second step involves students making
foresaw. The same design is used forradically different purposes by different users. In fact, some designers intentionally allow theuser to participate in the creative process by producing products that are extensible, adaptable, Page 10.392.3and customizable. Such designs treat the user not as consumer, but as collaborator. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationDeconstructing engineering design breaks down false perceptions of universality. Assuming thattechnology is universal and generic blinds
the 3 unit STSrequirement (science and technology track) for non-technical students majoring inCHASS (B.A., B.S.), Education (Business and Marketing), Technology Education,Management (Accounting, Economics), and Architecture, (Art and Design, GraphicDesign, and Industrial Design). These student groups were our target audience. To recruit these students, we first sent invitations and flyers to undergraduateadvisors in the corresponding colleges, with the hope that word of mouth would provide aflow of enrolled students. No responses were received. We then placed the followingadvertisement in the local student newspaper, and were rewarded with interest fromseveral students, who formed our fall 2004 student class of three
engineering may be in biology. What is Life? explains how many different organisms and processes work, and much of that can be used in engineering to build better and more efficient products.” Robert, 2004 “I will be on the verge of the new technology and the collaboration of engineering with biology. Engineering is taking on a biological shape (ex. Computers made from living molecules).” John, 2002 Page 10.784.5 “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education
optimize a knowledge management with information technologies is acontinuous effort. As a greater number of people adopt it, they will look for moreopportunities to share and collaborate in other ways. Page 9.836.1 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright2004, American Society for Engineering EducationTypical enterprise applications, including ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning), CRM(Customer Relationship Management), SCM (Supply Chain Management), and ERM(Employee Relationship Management), require various types of integration of businessprocess
engineering students.Implications for Educational Research – re PBLThis research is in response to the call from authors, such as Rich, et. al. (2000), who statethat the ability to foster collaborative learning is still a “great frontier” in on-line learning.And as Moursund (2003) states, “Although computers have been used in education for morethan 50 years, we are just barely getting started in the changes Information Technology willbring to education.” Thus, today’s campuses are still increasing their use of technology intheir teaching environments (Keown, 1999; McLester, 2001). And the consensus thus far isthat computer assisted learning can be used in combination with the traditional classroomexperience (Merino and Abel 2002, Pitman, Gosper and
immediately available for assessment or monitoring bythe instructor.Course DesignStudents work in collaborative groups to solve one problem for each problem domain in threeweeks. There are three problems per domain, meaning that different groups will be workingon different problems and comparing and contrasting their findings during each 3-weekperiod. Each group will solve a total of five problems in one semester. Page 10.74.6 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationIn addition to the scaffolds, each UUNES
Outcomes: Students should be able to 1. describe the various branches of engineering (civil, computer, electrical, industrial, mechanical, and chemical engineering); 2. apply engineering problem solving techniques; and be introduced to some computer applications used in engineering; 3. understand how to work efficiently as part of a team; 4. demonstrate an understanding of the "Design Process"; 5. enhance written and oral communication skills 6. know engineering ethics.3. Online Development Software – BlackboardThe Blackboard system provides an easy-to-learn online site for communicating with studentsvia email, discussion boards, and announcements as shown in Figure1. Blackboard is a webbased educational software platform
. Experiential media is a non-trivial problem and can only be realizedthrough formalized efforts of interdisciplinary teams that have access to the appropriateresearch infrastructure and long-term support. Formalized graduate concentrations withinexisting degrees allow students to combine solid training in their chosen disciplineoffered through their home department with hybrid engineering-arts-sciences trainingoffered through AME. Students are already enrolled in concentrations and our research inexperiential media is advancing rapidly and achieving wide recognition.. Studentsgraduating from our program will have varied employment opportunities ranging fromthe media, computer and entertainment industries, to biodesign, education and security.Our
, the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health (SPH), the Johns HopkinsApplied Physics Laboratory (APL), and the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Indian Head Division(IH). The final project for this successful collaboration requires that student teams define thetechnology and its applications, review applicable literature, analyze the strength of theprovisional patent application (with the assistance of students from the Intellectual Propertycourse), identify technology and market gaps, gauge the interest of potential customers andlicensees, define a business model, project the potential returns to licensees, evaluate spin-offpossibilities, value the technology from the perspective of its owner(s), and describe next steps.They hold extensive
to develop an awarenessof communication patterns within the design education community, describe the current state ofdesign education, and identify areas of improvement in design education.*The words “citation” and “reference” are used interchangeably throughout the document.Introduction:Engineering design education is vital to the successful instruction of future engineers. It hasrecently become apparent that graduates are deficient in vital areas of design, thus affecting theengineering industry as a whole. At the Center for Engineering Learning and Teaching (CELT)we know that research exists that could be of value to educators. We have envisioned aworkshop that would bring educators and researchers together where educators’ questions
© 2002, American Society for Engineering Education Session 1526Rowan University is pioneering a progressive Engineering program that uses innovative methodsof teaching and learning to prepare students better for a rapidly changing and highly competitivemarketplace, as recommended by ASEE [2]. Key features of the program include: (1)multidisciplinary education through collaborative laboratory and course work; (2) teamwork asthe necessary framework for solving complex problems; (3) incorporation of state-of-the-arttechnologies throughout the curricula; and (4) creation of continuous opportunities for technicalcommunication [3]. The Rowan program emphasizes
raisinginterest in designing and building robots and learning science and technology subjects.AcknowledgementsTCFFHRC sponsors include Motorola SPS, Watts Industries, the National CollegiateInventors and Innovators Alliance, and Charles L. Wilson III. The authors thank JakeMendelssohn, contest coordinator, and Eyal Hershko, robotics teacher, for their manycontributions.References[1] Pack, D.; Mankowski, A.M.; and Freeman, G. J. 1998. A Fire-Fighting Robot and its Impact on Educational Outcomes. In Proceedings of the 1998 ASEE Annual Conference, CD. Washington, D. C.: American Society for Engineering Education.[2] Avanzato, R. 1998. Collaborative Mobile Robot Design in an Introductory Programming Course for Engineers. In Proceedings of the 1998
understandby creating a platform on which students can experiment with the various facts anddesign new systems which may otherwise require a large and an expensive setup oflaboratory equipment and at the same time making the theoretical courses moreinteresting to learn. Moreover, we are simultaneously attempting to develop tools thatresearchers can use to readily simulate complicated systems which may otherwise requirehours of work.IntroductionThe photonics industry is growing at a very high rate in response to an increase in themarket demand for new photonics equipment like fiber optic communications systems,optical scanners, displays and laser printers leading to a demand for skilled workers withhands-on experience and the ability to design and
of faculty, students,alumni, and industrial representatives, both in the United States and in Sweden. Theyserve as the program outcomes of MIT's two aerospace education programs accredited byABET under its new evaluation criteria and policies. 1 The more detailed list of outcomes,called the CDIO Syllabus, is available at the CDIO Web-site.2 Here, the 16 programoutcomes are outlined in two additional levels of detail. Page 7.1267.1 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education Table 1. Program Outcomes
-course assessment results Collaboration with Business and Future Plans Early in the development of the course, a faculty member from CU’s Leeds College of Business developed a guest lecture series focusing on entrepreneurship aspects of product development. Topics included characteristics of entrepreneurs, converting ideas into opportunities, sources of funding for innovation, etc. The lectures were timely and informative, and the material is considered to be essential to a successful invention and innovation course. However, because the course is already team-taught by both authors, students found the addition of a third instructor to be confusing. In subsequent course offerings