learning to make it ‘real’ and case studies tomake that reality sufficiently broad”—should we be concerned that our approaches are notconverging to this ideal solution? Furthermore, should those of us using one of the approachesHaws criticizes fear that we are not being effective?We believe the answer to both questions is “not necessarily.” As developers, instructors, andassessors of a one- to two-credit reading and discussion course at the University of Wisconsin-Madison entitled “Social and Ethical Impacts of Technology,” we were initially a bit discouragedas we began to compile and report our findings from two semesters’ experience with a coursethat Haws probably would criticize. Indeed, when the preliminary abstract for this paperreceived its
engineer. Mostwomen do not learn the skills or the vocabulary associated with tinkering even though they arepreparing for a career that is strongly identified with tinkerers. However, for most women theiracademic success will offset any insecure feelings about technical ability 26.A contextual curriculum is a common theme for making the science and engineering classroommore inclusive. This allows students the opportunity to connect what they are learning in the Page 13.1289.4classroom to events outside the classroom. Learning is enhanced if students understand therelationship between abstract ideas and real-world applications. This can be achieved
increased”(Frechtling, 2010, p. 32). However, it is recognized that these are often impossible toundertake in real-world settings because they are resource intensive, and unfeasiblegiven challenges associated with identifying equivalent treatment and comparisongroups (Mertens & Wilson, 2018; The W.K. Kellogg Foundation, 2017). Even studiesthat meet lesser standards, including interventions with control and comparison groups,such as quasi-experimental designs with group equivalence can be difficult to undertakein certain settings (What Works Clearinghouse, 2020). Some scholars have evencritiqued experimental designs as reductionist, due to the assumption of linear causalrelationships between program elements and outcomes (Frye & Hemmer, 2012
andextending their knowledge of more fundamental concepts they had learned previously.Furthermore, several mentioned enjoying the authentic, “real-world” feel of the tasks with whichthey were presented.IntroductionThe inclusion of extra credit (EC) in a course has been used in an effort to address a variety ofpedagogical goals, including to improve student learning [2, 3], reduce procrastination [4],promote additional work [5], and increase attendance [6]. However, the presence of extra credit incourses has long been a subject of debate, typically advocated by students excited by theopportunity to earn extra points but treated with skepticism by instructors [7] who question theirpedagogical utility. Norcross et al. [8] surveyed students and faculty in
. These projects are groupprojects that are a nearly complete design of an engineered system such as the foundations for alarge, big box store, using the actual site information for a real-world project, the actualstructural loads from the actual building, and the constraints of the site known at the time ofdesign.Table 1. Structure of junior level geotechnical courses Course Structure Modules 1 and 2 Mid-Term Modules 3 and 4 Final Week / Topic 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Quiz Due 1 2 3 4
revisited study [9]). Other reasonsincluded external pressures, a chilly climate for underrepresented students, and changinginterests. As it pertains to attrition of women in chemical engineering specifically, one study findsno gendered patterns in attrition ([5]), while another found that, at institutions which were moresuccessful in retaining women, providing real world experiences, the impression that faculty careabout them, and forming connections with female peers were all factors that contributed tostudent persistence [6].The issue of representation in STEM is usually conceptualized as a “leaky pipeline,” where welose students at certain critical junctures in their careers. This metaphor has fallen out of favorrecently because it fails to
outlined related to cognitive development includethat culture is significant in learning, and that individuals learn and develop within their role in acommunity [3]. As educators, we facilitate learning by guiding exchanges and create engagingcommunities for cognitive development. The active learning activities incorporated in theclassroom are socially oriented and this group work provides social connection. Vygotskyrecognized that social settings and learning were closely entwined. Students gain knowledgewhen they collaborate with their peers or mentors on activities that involve problem-solvingskills and real-life tasks. The community activities in the examined courseware are project-basedlearning focused on systems approaches to sustainability
design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 5th edition. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.[33] C. Robson (2002). Real World Research (second edition). Oxford: Blackwell.[34] R. Thornberg (2012). “Ground theory.” In J. Arthur, M. Waring, R. Coe and L. V. Edges (eds). Research Methods and Methodologies in Education. London: Sage, pp. 85-93.[35] J. C. Greene, V. J. Caracelli & W. F. Graham (1989). “Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs.” Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 11(3), 255- 274.[36] J. Saldaña (2014). “Coding and analysis strategies.” In The Oxford handbook of qualitative research
, Physical is actual objects in the real world you representation of an mathematical, can see, such as scale models or prototypes. idea or object that can computational, Mathematical models are used to show theories. help an observer graphical, financial Computational models are usually created in a understand a concept or CAD software. Graphical displays information information better. in a format that is easier to understand. Financial shows different ways money and resources can be manipulated.Out of all 1,829 Students’ Survey
learned in their lectures. As muchas possible, “real-world” applications are used so that students get a sense that what they are learning isimportant and relevant.Financial need: BFCIT is a Minority Serving Institution (MSI) and has the lowest tuition of any privateinstitution in Massachusetts with tuition and fees for the EE program set at $17,600 in years 1-2 and$18,800 in years 3-4. With Federal Pell Grants, state MassGrants, the remaining tuition is about $10,000.Forming an engineering identity: The BFCIT EE program promotes forming an engineering identitythrough STEM mentoring activities; networking, educational, and internship professional opportunities;and with role models. STEM Mentoring Opportunities: BFCIT EE students have the
Perspective,” Educ. Stud. Math., vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 131–147, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1007/s10649-006-9026-4.[4] I. M. Gómez-Chacón, “Affective influences in the knowledge of mathematics,” Educ. Stud. Math., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 149–168, 2000.[5] J. Swenson, E. Treadway, K. Beranger, and A. Johnson, “‘Let Me See What I Could Do’: Students’ Epistemic Affect When Solving Open-ended, Real-world Problems,” in Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Lincoln: IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–8.[6] E. Treadway, J. E. S. Swenson, and M. Caserto, “Development of a Survey Instrument for Measuring Affective Pathways,” in American Society for Engineering Education, Minneapolis: ASEE, 2022.[7] A. Johnson and J. Swenson, “Open-Ended Modeling Problems in a Sophomore
performance and scores when visual cuing was incorporated [1] [2], [3],[4], [5]. Marquez and Garcia reported that the physical understanding of fundamental concepts inEngineering Mechanics were strengthened by the integration of visual tools during lecturesessions, and aided their understanding of real-world applications [17].With the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the routinized and normalization of the educationalprocess was thrown into a tailspin that forced both educators and students to adapt to a profoundlydifferent learning environment. This new, complex environment presented educators bothchallenges and opportunities to reimagine, reassess, and reorganize course structure, contentdelivery, and assessments in a complete virtual setting
research about the use of hybrid learning, Raes et al. [9] suggest cautiousoptimism about its continued use given the pedagogical and technological challenges that itposes. Hybrid learning offers flexibility in constructing learning spaces but also requires carefuldesign to facilitate student learning outcomes.Experiential LearningExperiential learning theory provides an integrative perspective of learning as a process that isgrounded in experience [10]. As such, students’ learning and development benefit from highlycontextualized, hands-on, real-world learning experiences, such as those found through out-of-class student involvement [11]. As theorized by experiential learning theory, students developknowledge through collaborative and reflective
critical engineeringpractices (such as problem scoping) that can be difficult to support in more constrainededucational settings that lack a personal or social context. In these ways, our work supports theconclusion that empathic approaches to engineering education can welcome girls’ perspectivesand encourage all learners to cultivate the skills and habits of mind that are necessary for solvingcomplex real-world problems.References[1] Engineering Accreditation Commission. Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Baltimore, MD, USA: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), 2017. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for- accrediting-engineering-programs-2018
newapproaches to managing academic and social challenges. Some of the more productive teachingand learning tactics related to effectively introducing diverse perspectives are using interactiveteaching techniques, such as small group discussions, role-playing, and debates [31]. Habituscomprises socially ingrained habits, skills, and dispositions. It is the way that individualsperceive the social world around them and react to it. These dispositions are usually shared bypeople with similar backgrounds and are acquired through imitation. It is the reality in whichindividuals are socialized, which includes their individual experiences and opportunities [32, 33].Developing new ways of responding can be triggered in different ways, such as encounters withnew
articles sourced from ASEEconference proceedings, and the remaining two papers sourced from other databases. Here, wesummarize (see Table 2) the studies based on the intervention participant population, researchsetting (with Hispanic-Serving Institution [HSI] status specified), specific engineering disciplinefor intervention (if applicable), and whether the intervention was applied at a course or programlevel. All studies were conducted in the United States, and most were set at a four-yearinstitution. One study included students at a community college and at a nearby four-yearinstitution. One article described an intervention with faculty, while the other six focused oninterventions with students. The majority of the studies (5 of 6) described an
way intoaccreditation boards’ criteria. For example, the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) adopted its EC2000 criteria in the late 1990’s emphasizing the importanceof the role of CI when accrediting a program [4]. Within academia, computing programsembraced the CI trend given the rapid advances in the field. For that matter, faculty and studentscreated many software applications to help in their own department’s or program’sadministrative and CI tasks [5], [6]. When faced with declining enrollment [7], CI is even moreimportant for higher education in general and computing programs in particular.Academic computing programs are also required to obtain local, regional, national, orinternational accreditation as either a
foundations are also typically includedtowards the end of the course. The prerequisite material for geotechnical courses mainlyincludes mechanics of solids, fluid mechanics, and civil engineering materials. Foundation Engineering is a senior-level elective course at both RHIT and SLU. TheRHIT course takes place in the fall quarter and includes roughly 15 students each year. Thecourse meets 4 times per week over the course of ten weeks for 50 minutes each time. Thecourse is taught in a classroom equipped with flattop tables and is arranged in a traditionallecture format: chalkboards at the front and side of the room and tables in rows. Case studiesand real-world example problems are used extensively along with a variety of active
Capstone experience is“to integrate the engineering and management disciplines into a single comprehensiveeducational experience”2 ,“to provide a bridge for the students to cross between the academicworld on one side and the technical professional world on the other”3 , to “provide an extensiveplatform to practice engineering design and to facilitate the integration of what students havelearned throughout their curriculum”4 ,“to better prepare graduates for engineering practice”5,and “to demonstrate their abilities to potential employers.”6 All of these statements are valid.Using the measured outcomes of a Capstone course to assess how well students are prepared forengineering practice makes up an important and growing task for engineering and
what BME is, BME undergraduates at a large R1research institution often defined BME as a combination or application of sciences, engineering,medicine, and math [5]. These findings set a precedence for studying how BME students andprofessionals understand and interpret the field of BME as science, engineering, or acombination of both. Several different theories and conceptual frameworks have been used to analyze identitywithin STEM. Multiple identity theory asserts that individuals can be described by a variety ofidentities, some of which are formed by the individual and others which are imposed upon them[8]. An important tenant of this theory is that individuals inhabit and perform different identitiesin different contexts [9], with
-disciplinaryintervention with practitioners outside traditional engineering fields. For example, whenengineering students brainstorm with preservice teachers and elementary students, they are likelyto hear approaches that differ considerably from what they or their fellow engineers mightimagine. This idea diversity may enhance their creativity and lead them to develop moreinnovative solutions that appeal to a broader audience. The ability to empathize, compromise,and communicate effectively within professionally and demographically diverse groups preparesengineering students to address real-world problems that have greater societal impact, in additionto engaging in engineering problems of technical nature. The engineering students need tounderstand that their
generally [20]. Students gain and apply technical as well as professional skills while designing a solutionto a real-world problem. This one-semester course consists of three components, some of whichoccur concurrently. In the first component, students develop technical skills (e.g., 3D printing)that are applicable to many of the design projects. In the second component, students learn aboutthe various stages of the engineering design process. In the third component, students apply theengineering design process to solve a problem presented by a client. In the early portion of the semester, students complete two projects selected from areassuch as computer-aided design and 3D printing, circuits and microcontrollers, woodworking
mental health problems and their application in clinical practice. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work in progress: Measuring stigma of mental health conditions and its impact in help-seeking attitudes among engineering students.AbstractIn this work in progress we explore the relationship between stigma of mental health conditions(MHC) and help-seeking attitudes among engineering students. The prevalence of mental healthconditions among college students has been increasing during the last few decades, and it willonly be compounded by the challenges currently faced in our society. Nevertheless, it has beendocumented that college students have
educational settings,the use of strategic doing in such environments is growing. Some recent examples includedeployment at individual universities seeking to reform their curriculum, as a technique forstudents to better organize teams in classes like capstone design, the transformation of academicdepartments, and the formation of cross-disciplinary research teams to address “grandchallenges.”This paper describes the process and its application to engineering education, specifically in aneffort to increase the range and quality of innovation and entrepreneurship offerings forundergraduate engineering students.Program descriptionThe Pathways to Innovation (Pathways) program is an initiative of the National Center forEngineering Pathways to Innovation
MATLAB software to model and analyzesimple systems. All sections were coordinated and involved instruction in a computer classroomwith emphasis on hands-on exercises. Another of the desired changes to the course was toincorporate laboratory experiments that could be performed by the students to further increasetheir interest in engineering and to generate real-world data sets for processing, analysis andreporting. It was decided that the computer-based data acquisition system be controlled usingLabVIEW software in order to provide the students with a foundation for higher-level classeswhere MATLAB and LabVIEW are used. During Spring 2005 and Spring 2006, considerableeffort was expended on the design of suitable hands-on PowerPoint lectures for
traditional instructional methods will be implemented next year as studentcomments indicated they felt they did not feel they gained the CAD skills we hoped they would.The field trips to a complex automated recycling facility, a wind power industry (housed in agreen designed and engineered building) and a water treatment and supply facility provided awelcome break from the regular academic schedule and gave students an opportunity to see somereal world applications of engineering that required technical skills, design abilities, and had verypositive societal benefits. An added benefit was an opportunity to spend time with theirinstructors in a casual environment (including a stop at the Ben & Jerry’s factory!). Studentcomments on the field trips
Enables for Women in Engineering. The Bridge 30 (2000) 6. National Academies Press, 2006. Rising Above the Gathering Storm. 7. U.S. Department of Labor. February 22, 2008 . 8. Rice, J., T. M. Bayles, G. Russ, and J. Ross, “Preparing Freshmen for Future Energy Issues”, Paper AC 2007-1748 published in the Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Presented in the Hands-on & Real world Studies Session in The Freshman Programs Division Session #2253 at the ASEE Annual Conference, Honolulu, HI, June 26, 2007. 9. Bayles, T.M., T. Foster, D. Sheridan and C. Parker, “Let it Roll
step 1 of the IDEO design process – Understand the Problem. Please document your classroom discussion and complete any part of the discussion that was cut short due to lack of time. You should address the client, market, technology and constraints. 2. Complete step 2 of the IDEO design process – Observe People in Real Life Situations. You should discuss why the “bug” you chose bugged you, your experience with other people experiencing the problem, and how the people you observed coped or fixed the bug. 3. Step 3 of the IDEO process was to visualize new-to-the-world solutions. a. Include a cell phone picture (or other electronic illustration) of the
throughdecision support systems (i.e., to become “power users” not programmers). Emphasis is placedon the analysis of data in order to make more efficient and effective decisions. The coursesemploy a series of “in-class labs”, integrating the traditional lab and lecture sessions into one,and all in-class activities are done on student-owned laptops [1, 2]. The labs are crafted tocapture the student’s attention the entire time owing to the large distraction of having acomputer. Many of the homework assignments and case studies come from industrial sponsoreddata and represent real world situations. Course content as well as teaching methodologiesemployed and developed have been described in earlier research [1, 2]. Even though this courseis offered in two
. • Work as an effective contributor in a team environment. • Prepare written documentation and make oral presentations that effectively explain project progress or results. • Present hand-written technical information in a clear and orderly manner. • Manage time and commitments with minimal supervision. • Design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze and interpret data.For completeness, the seven outcomes not listed as being directly reinforced by the coursefollow: • Pass the Fundamentals of Engineering Exam • Prepare and Interpret schematics and engineering drawings • Perform basic engineering economic assessments • Possess real-world experience obtained through internships and co-op programs