.Software Development Laboratory (SDL) is a three-quarter course sequence in the junior andsenior years, designed to provide the students a “real world” experience in an academic setting.This arrangement provides students an opportunity to work in teams on ongoing large-scaleprojects [3]. This setting also provides an opportunity to students to apply the quality assurancetechniques that they have learnt in various courses to a project at different phases of a project lifecycle. In addition to development responsibilities, students work on various “staff teams” such asthe Software Engineering Process Group (SEPG), the Software Configuration Managementgroup (SCM), the Software Quality Assurance team (SQA), the Planning and Tracking group
retiring from NASA, the Head of the Aerospace Engineering Department at Texas A&M University asked him to come to A&M and teach a Senior Capstone Design course focused on Spacecraft Design. He began his second year of teaching at Texas A&M in August 2012.Dr. Kristi J Shryock, Texas A&M University Dr. Kristi J. Shryock is the assistant department head for Undergraduate Programs and Outreach in the Department of Aerospace Engineering at Texas A&M University. She is also a senior lecturer in the De- partment. She received her Ph.D. in interdisciplinary engineering with a research focus on engineering education. She works to improve the undergraduate engineering experience through evaluating prepara
information, determining an appropriate source and applying the information.”Engineering programs can still employ their previous instruments used for the assessment andevaluation of SOs (A-k) or modify them to assess and evaluate the student outcomes in the newgeneral criteria. Most programs have been using the results of student performance on specificproblems, laboratory experiments, design projects, or other types of reports as primary directmeasurement for assessing student outcomes. Other instruments such as results of thefundamentals of engineering (FE) exam and student surveys are used as secondary instrumentsfor the assessment of student outcomes. Most programs have been using the same instrumentsfor the assessment of both student outcomes
Session 2559K-12 Programs Plug into Technology with Project Lead The Way Curriculum Gerard N. Foster Purdue University, School of Technology, Kokomo, Indiana Abstract Project Lead The Way (PLTW) is a national program that offers a pre-engineering curriculum for high schools and middle schools. The high school curriculum consists of five courses covering solid modeling with a CAD package, digital electronics, principles of engineering, computer integrated manufacturing, and implementation of a design project. Teachers learn the technical, project-based course material in an intensive, two- week
creativity, experience and knowledge to solve problems to help people. Engineers design electric cars, mobile phones, bridges and processes to clean environment and mass transportation systems to move people and goods. Engineers can choose different types of jobs such as design, manufacturing, research, testing or sales etc. A student interested in discovering new knowledge can consider a career in research. If you are imaginative and creative, design engineering may interest you. If you like computers, you can be a CAD engineer. If you like laboratory and experiments, you may choose development engineering. Engineering is also organized in traditional fields such a mechanical, electrical, civil, chemical, biomedical or computer
. Though not visible in Figure 2, all require laboratory experiences in these areas. Page 25.1384.4 Figure 2. Percent Requiring Math and Basic Science Courses100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Figure 3. Percent Requiring Engineering Topics100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Page 25.1384.5All accredited engineering management programs are also required to provide one and one-halfyears of engineering topics, consisting of engineering sciences and engineering designappropriate to engineering management. Figures 3 and 4 3,4,5,6,7,8,9 display the percent ofaccredited engineering management
experience1In civil engineering, experiential learning is typically delivered through multiple projects thatform the culminating experience for completion of a course or degree. These projects mayinclude term projects for individual courses, senior design projects, theses, or independentstudies. Many undergraduate design courses are often accompanied with term projects. Forexample, a course in design of steel structures may require a culminating design project.. Thepurpose of such projects is to enable students to apply engineering knowledge and skills to solverelevant engineering problems. In this regard, students are expected to follow specific standardsand procedures. This expectation shifts to another level of achievement in a senior design
, Antoine Technical Consulting LLC, where she she continues to offer process design, scale-up and water management solutions to manufacturers principally in the chemical process industries. Keisha is the holder of two patents and is a registered professional engineer in the state of Texas.Dr. Kazeem B Olanrewaju, Prairie View A&M University Kazeem B. Olanrewaju is an assistant professor in the department of chemical engineering at Prairie View A & M University. His more than 10 years of experience in the chemical engineering profession both in the public and private sectors includes positions as Chemical/Cement Laboratory Engineer at State Highway Administration, Maryland Department of Transport., Associate
; and better student experience,covering mental healthiness, a design for all learners, etc.The world needs empathetic engineers, technology stewards [11], people who are aware of thechallenges the world faces, the multitude of voices needed to tackle the challenges in the worldtoday. There are several studies showing growing challenges for graduates entering theworkforce (e.g. [14],[15], and with regards to practical and communications-related skills insoftware engineering, [19],[20]), and with the global recession from COVID-19 [16], studentsneed to come to the job market with a more well-rounded engineering education. In curricula, wehave often sidelined the graduate attributes related to the so-called “soft” skills ofcommunication
Congress, Salonika, Greece, pp 201-209.18. Ring, B. P., Lemley, E. C. (2014). “Design and implementation of a low cost particle image velocimetry system for undergraduate research and education.” American Society for Engineering Education.19. Brower, T. I. (2011). “Going with the flow in a service learning project.” AC 2011-751, American Society for Engineering Education.20. Goharzadeh, A., et al. (2006). “A proposed particle image velocimetry (PIV) system for instructional purposes in a modern mechanical engineering undergraduate laboratory program.” 2006-1293, American Society for Engineering Education.21. Goharzadeh, A., et al. (2007). “Innovative fluid mechanics experiments for modern mechanical engineering program.” AC 2007-987
Education FrameworkDuring the summer of 2003 the Project Catalyst team utilized this framework as the basisfor delivering two one-week workshops for faculty from across the country. From a poolof over 400 applicants we selected 48 faculty participants. Because the faculty teamworkaspect is such a valuable part of the Catalyst experience, in as many cases as we could,we invited multiple participants from an institution with the hopes that they would betterbe able to support each other when they returned to their institution.This workshop was designed to introduce participants to principles of instructional designwith a special emphasis on hands-on, practical development of instructional materials thatcan be used in the classroom. Participants took
elements for a real-time DSP learning environment. Two other types of elements are typically needed: Means of generating known, controlled signals to be applied to the DSP system as input, and means of monitoring and characterizing the output signals produced by the DSP hardware system. Although the necessary instruments for signal generation and monitoring are available in instructional laboratories at universities, or in some design departments in industry, they may not be available to many interested practicing engineers, or may represent a strong investment for small colleges that would like to implement real-time DSP courses
price (~$70 per copy), this fall, must meet the instrumentation requirements ofmost academic laboratories [www.natinst.com].Properly sensed and conditioned signals determine the quality of display, analysis, and control ofdata from real time systems. Study of a lathe instrumentation system, whose discussion is thesubject of this paper, provides students with hands-on experience and an environment to comparedata from laboratory experiments. Here the NI Labview instrumentation and analysis softwarealong with its DAQ board, has been utilized to interface signals from an actual lathe system setup to a PC. Required initial preparation and the details of NIDAQ and Labview in an electric dcM-G set implementation are discussed in a previous paper. The
twodifferent contexts, typically in two different disciplines. It should be noted, though, that aparticular module is likely only to introduce students to a small slice of the engineeringdiscipline – the focus is on design.The learning outcomes for the course as a whole are as follows: Upon completion of this course, students will: • recognize that engineering at Lafayette College and beyond is innovative and exciting • understand the engineering design process In support of the outcomes listed above, students will: • have had an introductory design experience • have had experiences using engineering equipment, tools, software, and hardware appropriate to the topic of the course • have a working
the field of engineering is the so called“Y2M” day, or simply, Yes to Mathematics. This program was ultimately intended to bringabout further awareness of environmental and civil engineering as a career for young women byemphasizing mathematics fundamentals.5A further approach to outreach programs for high school students is to enable these students toselect a particular engineering experience based on their own interests. The Milwaukee School ofEngineering is a prime example of an institution developing such activities6. The “Focus on thePossibilities” program, undertaken by the aforementioned institution, afforded talented highschool students the opportunity to design, build, or test a scale-model race car. This was achievedby the students
are allowed a budget of $20 per team for completing their designs. Results of exitsurveys done at the end of the semester clearly show that a majority of students benefited fromtheir experiences with SEDP and appreciated the relevance of sustainability as part of their earlydesign experiences. At the workshop in Mysore, the entire process of implementing the SEDPwas demonstrated to all participants. In addition, they were shown examples of design sketches,team logs, peer evaluations, design project reports, and final designs. A paper [6] based on SEDPwork won the best paper award at 2007 Annual conference of the ASEE. Further details onSEDP implementation including assessment data are given in [7].LabVIEW Modules: LabVIEW (Laboratory Virtual
technology fields, and a preference for learning from hands-onactivities, students are beginning their university studies with little to no practical experience indesign or manufacturing processes. Much of the technical experience they do have is fromcompleting virtual labs and other computer-based instruction in high school which does notalways translate into useful abilities in a university laboratory environment with physicalequipment. These virtual activities do not provide realistic practical experience and they do littleto improve spatial skills. Students beginning their engineering and technology studies with poorspatial skills have lower levels of academic success at university. The use of haptic activities hasbeen shown as a necessary
) It should include a substantial amount of project work. For best results, students should be engaged in projects at all stages of their educational experience. (2) While engaged in team projects students should maintain a rigorous set of classroom-based courses. (3) Project activity should be conducted at a centralized location, as opposed to dispersing it among a variety of shops and laboratories. A centralized facility engenders a sense of community among participants and is also helpful in making the projects grow into startup companies. (4) The students need to be taught not only how to create their devices, but also how to make them a
Visualization and Animation TechniquesIII. Laboratory-based Computational Physics CourseThe formal prerequisites for this course have been college level physics and calculuslevel courses, but I have often been willing to waive some of the prerequisites if a studenthas had solid programming experience. Student taking the course are expected to have atleast some minimal knowledge, although the programming is not a formal prerequisite.Over the years, there have been a significant number of students who have taken thecourse without prior programming knowledge. Finally, they developed goodprogramming skills along the way, even though this lack entailed a somewhat steeplearning curve at the beginning of the course. An immediate question that I faced when
variouspolymers. Some of the salient features of individual modules are as follows: • It combines modeling and simulation with experimental data obtained by hands-on laboratory activity or by available data library of experiments. • It introduces usage of Matlab tools (GUI, state space modeling, symbolic toolbox, numerical solvers) in the field of material modeling and characterization, while emphasizing the application area of Biomaterials. • It facilitates the assimilation of proposed learning tools in a wide range of courses, and project-based learning experiences for undergraduate and graduate students.Description of learning studios and an individual module The first learning modules have been developed
, Oxford University Press (2001).31. Lienhard, J.H, Inventing Modern: Growing up with X-Rays, Skyscrapers, and Tailfins, Oxford University Press. (2003).32. Mahajan, A. and D.McDonald, “Engineering and Technology Experience for Liberal Arts Students at Lake Superior State University,” Proceedings of the1996 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (1996) American Society for Engineering Education. .33. Mikic, Borjana and Susan Voss, “Engineering For Everyone: Charging Students With The Task Of Designing Creative Solutions To The Problem Of Technology Literacy,” Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (2006). American Society for Engineering Education. 34. Neeley
with global education to complement their technical education. TheUniversity of Michigan’s Engineering Global Leadership Honors Program shows the value ofinter-disciplinary team projects. Observations from the exploratory study of these existingmodels proved to be an invaluable resource for designing the Michigan Global Concentration.3. Michigan Model for Global Engineering EducationBased on the benchmarking and experience with the Engineering Global Leadership Program Page 6.36.3we established a set of design paradigms for the program.Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &
education1. This paper reports on work that was undertaken torespond to this need through the development of the Manufacturing Integrated LearningLaboratory (MILL) concept. The MILL concept is predicated on the use of integrated projectsspanning multiple courses to give students relevant and realistic hands‐on experiences. It entailscoordination of the hands-on activities in the multiple targeted courses around the unifyingtheme of designing and making a functional product2,3. This was collaborative work betweenfour institutions namely: Wayne State University, Prairie View A&M University, New MexicoState University, and Macomb College. Four knowledge areas were identified for study namely:(1) drafting/design, (2) manufacturing processes, (3
’ perceived value of course content. She has five years of industry experience working as an Electrical Design Engineer. She holds a master’s degree in electrical engineering and has an active professional engineering license in the state of Louisiana.Dr. Mary E Caldorera-Moore, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Mary Caldorera-Moore is an assistant professor of Biomedical Engineering and Nanosystems Engineering, director of Women Influencing Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (WiSTEM) outreach organization, and the co-organizer of the New Frontiers in ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Building Community and Increasing Confidence Among First- Year Female
a decision on what to assess (e.g., ability to apply theories to case study problems) and how to assess (e.g., short answer questions), the tasks of designing the instrument, collecting the responses from the students, keeping track of the information, determining what to count as correct, and correcting the responses can take a lot of time.• Creatively Balancing Instruction and Assessment Time. Time spent performing assessment, particularly collecting assessment information from students, is often seen as antithetical to more learning oriented activities such as lecture and project work. Assessment can be part of a good learning experience, but such benefits do not come without effort. Having students answer large
Mechanics from Virginia Tech and hisPh.D. in Bioengineering at the University of Utah. He has four years of experience with the AirForce Research Laboratory and is in his fifth year of teaching in the Department of EngineeringMechanics at the US Air Force Academy. Areas of research include impact injury mechanisms,sports biomechanics, and aerospace physiology.Dr. John J. Wood is currently an Assistant Professor of Engineering Mechanics at the UnitedStates Air Force Academy. Dr. Wood completed his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering atColorado State University in the design and empirical analysis of compliant systems. He Page 9.1203.5received his M.S. in
Corporation researching the use of flow control in aggressive engine inlet ducts. After graduation, Dr. Vaccaro held a lead engineering position with General Electric Aviation in Lynn, Massachusetts. There, he designed the fan and compressor sections of aircraft engines. He frequently returns to General Electric Aviation as a consultant. Currently, he is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Hofstra University in Hempstead, New York where he teaches Fluid Mechanics, Com- pressible Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer, Heat Transfer Laboratory, Aerodynamics, Measurements and Instrumentation Laboratory, and Senior Design in addition to conducting experimental aerodynamics un- dergraduate research projects.Dr
meticulous planning and collaboration, we endeavored to infuse each engineeringcourse with practical laboratory components, bridging theoretical knowledge with hands-onapplication. This approach not only enriched the learning experiences of students but alsounderscored the interdisciplinary nature of engineering within a liberal arts context.Central to our developmental trajectory was the deliberate structuring of course sequencesand content, informed by a synthesis of industry trends, pedagogical best practices, andinstitutional imperatives. As we navigated through the iterative process of curriculumdesign, project-based learning emerged as a cornerstone, fostering creativity, problem-solving, and collaborative skills among students. Real-world
. Class and field activities are hands-on, inquiry-basedactivities, utilizing whole group discussions, cooperative learning groups, and someindividual projects. Laboratory experiences are designed to emphasize the scienceprocess skills. The remaining 25% of class time is devoted to lecture, discussion, anddemonstration. During the laboratory engineering concepts were discussed anddemonstrated.This paper will focus on the effectiveness of instruction by a chemical engineeringfaculty member as evaluated by in-course assessment tools. Was there any perceivedbenefit of having an Engineer involved with a course designed for education majors?Were the students more aware of the engineering field and of engineering concepts due tothis involvement? Were
, structures and systems. All three programs providerelevant applied experience within the academic environment through laboratory and classroomprojects and experimentation. The programs also provide elective relevant industrial experiencevia cooperative education. The mission of the programs differ within the specialization by focuson thermodynamics, design and development, or CNC programming, production planning andquality control, or structures, project management and supervision.The Technology Accreditation Commission of the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (TAC of ABET) TC2K criteria calls for a continuous quality improvement plan. Inresponse the faculty and Industrial Advisory Board (IAB) for the engineering technologyprograms