assist them with completing problems.Several factors affect student perceptions of availability:• Subject expertise • Hiring tutors has a price tag. It is not always possible to hire students to be able to support attendees in every subject. • The more subjects each tutor is responsible for, the less likely they are to be able to effectively support students in that area. • Tutoring services without connections to academic units or expertise in tutor training may hire tutors based on performance in core classes, not necessarily their ability to teach problem solving skills.• Engagement • High traffic (before an assignment is due or before an exam) can make it difficult
to the group and present their findings. Thisprocess requires that all group members develop effective communication skills. At thecompletion of the teaching session, each student is evaluated by the others in the group, whichcan result in the identification of strengths and weaknesses. The instructor is available to providerecommendations on better communication practices. This peer-oriented review and evaluationprocess can result in improved communication skills.Criterion 3(h) focuses on a student’s ability to recognize the need for and to engage in life-longlearning. This ABET criterion is highly linked to the second major motivating factor whichresulted in the change in the course pedagogy. After the authors of this paper reflected on
engineering education with a focus on emerging technology systems in thecontext of applications and societal impact. We do this through a program of faculty-mentoredmultidisciplinary research, professional development, and exposure to real-world issues thatreflect the impact of nanotechnology on society, the business community, human health, and theenvironment. This approach also supports self-efficacy, multidisciplinary team-building,understanding the broader impacts of technology, and building the skills necessary for researchand lifelong learning.Overall, the key goals are:1. To provide an exciting and productive research experience for each fellow.2. To create a small cohort of students, who share common goals, that supports the developmentof
experience requiring additional effort to remediate. Teaming graduate andundergraduate students leverages the technical knowledge of the graduate student whilemaximizing the value of the enthusiasm of the undergraduate student.In order for a university housed service center (i.e., one that provides a fee-based suite ofservices to the community) to be effective while engaging undergraduate and graduate students,a core set of technical professionals have to be in place to offset the additional effort expendedon student learning without negatively impacting project performance.The Community of Glendale, Kentucky. Glendale is a small unincorporated communityapproximately 10 miles south of Elizabethtown, Kentucky, with approximately 75
has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for introductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conduct- ing research on a large scale NSF faculty development project. His team is studying how workshops on strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect faculty be- liefs, classroom practice, and development of disciplinary communities of practice and associated student achievement. He was a coauthor for the best paper award in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2013 and this year has received the Michael Ashby Outstanding Materials Educator Award from the
theparticipants, both students and instructors, engage in classroom activities to sustain meaningfullearning as the outcome of the instructional process. Proceedings of the 2008 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 2In this context, the mediating role of technology-driven tools on the structure of the instructionalprocess generates both contradictions and synergies6 . Instructors tend to resist using onlineinstructional tools mainly because they seem very impersonal. Instructors also feel they losecontrol over the instructional process when using these tools. The personal contact with studentsin face-to
led by real-world engineers. Given that women aremore likely than men to leave engineering due to a lack of engagement, this study also attemptsto make the field more inclusive by showcasing diverse perspectives and experiences.Throughthese videos, students virtually visit construction sites and later test soils collected from the sites.An assessment plan will be implemented to measure the impact on engagement and students’ability to apply their understanding in near and far transfer.IntroductionEngineering courses typically focus on covering content while omitting the stories andmeta-narratives that bring meaning and coherence to a subject. Such an approach not only missesan opportunity to generate the student engagement needed for deep
GraduatesAbstractStudent engagement in Experiential Learning Activities (ELA) is typically correlated withimproved post-graduation outcomes. Our School categorizes ELA into four areas: global (e.g.,studying abroad), industrial (e.g., internships, co-ops), undergraduate research, and teamprojects. This study aimed to evaluate ELA participation and investigate the impact on post-graduation outcomes such as full-time employment and graduate school admissions.Additionally, a statistical analysis was conducted to assess the correlation between ELAparticipation and starting salary in industry placements. Our results show starting salariesincreased with the number of ELA (i.e., students completing two or more ELA have highersalaries than those completing a single ELA
; Page 12.158.3For this assignment the students write one or two pages about the impact of their project onsociety.Other CPRs: Additional CPRs done are: resume construction, memo writing, writing anexecutive summary, and how to do power point presentation.CPR Provides DataThis project was started with the pragmatic emphasis to address EC3(g) (ABET EngineeringCriterion 3-g): “ability to communicate effectively.” Each CPR assignment requires students tocomplete three calibration essays. Each student is assigned a score based on their performance onthese calibration essays. This score is reported as the Reviewer Competency Index – RCI. The“RCI” (Reviewer Competency Index) indicates how well the student “trained” during thecalibration. RCI scores
projects:Based on faculty feedback, it was determined that female students would benefit from enhancedinteraction with the local community. This community engagement is expected to foster socialawareness and meaningful practical experience. Additionally, the faculty recommended theinvolvement of female leaders in the community in these service projects would greatly impact femaleretention.Case Study ApproachThe vision of Georgia Southern University’s service learning initative is to create an environment thatwould foster diversity, and groups of students with advanced academic knowledge and meaningfulpractical experience, who are also generously committed to improving their local communities. Based onthe feedback gained during the investigative period
design processbegins with understanding the needs of the stakeholders and involves them throughout the designprocess. It is iterative and advocates the use of prototypes and empirical evaluation to makedesign decisions. It also includes attention to the delivery, service, and maintenance aspects ofthe project. [17]The overall philosophy of EPICS is guided by the core values that balance student learning andpreparation for life after graduation with community partnerships and impact. EPICS isacademically a design course that is done within the context of community engagement whichoffers rich opportunities for authentic design projects and opportunities for broad learning andimpact on people, communities, and the environment. A model that
comprised of over 92,000 residents with aschool-age population of 18,000 students, in building STEM capacity through transformativechange. As a community engagement, empowerment, and self-efficacy strategy, STEM-UpTMintends to indirectly impact a long-term return on investment on traditional academicperformance measures. Such a large-scale undertaking is a unique approach to STEM educationawareness. To accomplish this undertaking, STEM-UpTM seeks to drives transformative changeby leveraging the existing cultural richness of the community toward STEM.In its design, STEM-UpTM relies on the parents and teachers as STEM Ambassadors, who areinformed with the tools and resources to change the apprehensions and negativities associatedwith math and science
instructionalstrategies have on students self reported engagement and motivation.References1. Shell, D., et al., The Impact of Computer Supported Collaborative Learing Communities on High School Students‘ Knowledge Building, Strategic Learing, and Perceptions of the Classroom, Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 33, no. 3, 2005, pp. 327-349.2. Husman, J., W.P. Derryberry, H.M. Crowson, & R. Lomax, Instrumentality, task value, and intrinsic motivation: Making sense of their independent interdependence, Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol 29, 2004, pp. 63-76.3. Heywood, J., “Philosophy and Engineering Education: A Review of Certain Developments in the Field,” Frontiers in Education Conference, Oct. 20084
teaching assistants and another two students were interviewed. The survey andinterviews were designed to document (a) the impact the course had on students’ confidence in their owntechnical, communication, and other soft skills that the industry requires and (b) to learn what studentsexperienced when they were challenged to work with peers from other engineering disciplines to design 5and develop a product. The survey included several open-ended questions that, along with the interviews,allow us to add to this paper the students’ course experience as described in their own voices. The demographics of students in this course are shown in
. Several different approaches to K-12 engineeringoutreach have been employed to get students interested in the field of engineering, anticipatingthat this interest may impact later career choices. Some such outreach programs focus oneducating K-12 teachers about engineering so they may pass the knowledge on to their students,while others focus on university engineering faculty directly interacting with the students whomthey hope to affect. When institutions of higher education devise K-12 outreach programs, theinstitution itself must consider many factors; time commitment required of developers, fundsavailable, effectiveness of the program, and program sustainability are those that receive the mostattention. The outreach model we have developed
support their students for future success byincluding communication skills learning objectives in all years of undergraduate coursework.This paper discusses a writing assignment used in 2020 and 2021 in an upper-level StructuralEngineering class at Case Western Reserve University. The assignment follows a lesson plandeveloped by RePicture and the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC).The assignment was designed to help students in several ways, including: • Practice writing skills • Engage with technical concepts and relate what they are learning to actual projects • Better understand the breadth of their engineering career options • Create online material that they can include on their resumeThe structural engineering
and other viewers on YouTube. Two weeks of a 16-weekcomputer networking course were allocated to work on this video project. Students in theintervention group received instruction on critical viewing of videos as well as guidance ontechniques related to making and editing videos for communication with a broad audience.Control group students only received instruction on critical viewing of videos. This design wasused to determine the impact of assigning the video term-paper on student media literacy.Requirements of the video project included: • Create an original video essay that informs the viewing audience about a particular topic related to digital computer networks and/or the Internet. • Length of video is between 2 - 4 minutes
PhD granting institutions. To improve our training program and start layingthe groundwork for sustainability, we will create a new course that takes the best of our Tech 494course on lesson planning and curriculum development and combines it with research and timemanagement skills training, awareness of STEM research opportunities and careers, and aservice learning component to engage other CSULA undergraduate and graduate students notfunded through the IMPACT LA program. We will continue to work with Great Minds in STEMto look for ways to outreach to the community. Lastly, we will continually improve ourassessment metrics based on program feedback. For example, to get a better understanding ofhow we are changing the perceptions of Hispanic
engineering in industry,government or academia. This is achieved by creating a student-centered, supportive, encouraging, andintellectually stimulating environment that allows talented students to explore challenging new areas,connects them with mentors, refines their communication skills, engages them in a community serviceactivity and increases their confidence levels [2,3]. Students work in small teams on a research projectunder the mentorship of a faculty member, and often, a graduate student and industry mentor. In addition,students participate in a number of professional development activities, including touring industry facilities,attending seminars, participating in an outreach activity to K-12 students [3], meeting with automotive andenergy
communication skills can result from experiences that requiresstudents to communicate with other students. Additionally, MacGuire and Halpin5 note that, inreference to the work of Tinto6, “once at the university, the quality of the individual’sinteractions with others has a strong impact on persistence (p. 6)”. Related to the types ofactivities the authors included in their proposals, “vicarious experiences”, such as shadowing andobserving, and “verbal persuasion”, such as the encouragement of faculty and other adults, havebeen shown to serve as significant contributors in the enhancement of self-efficacy7.All three proposals included a high GPA in order to stay in the program (3.0 or higher). In theinitial proposal submitted by engineering in 2009
. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Infusing Your Course with Social and Environmental Justice and Ethics DiscussionsAbstract: As educators, it is our responsibility to not only teach our students but to guide themtowards becoming responsible, empathetic, and ethical members of society. Engineering educationmust encompass an understanding of social and environmental justice and ethics, as the actions ofthese professionals have significant impacts on the health and welfare of the environment andsociety. This paper discusses how to infuse a class with social justice, environmental justice andethics discussions, the importance of awareness, how to prepare students for uncomfortableconversations and how
. During breaks and onweekends, the group engaged deeply with the community – befriending locals, practicingSpanish, tasting local cuisine, and even taking surfing lessons and fishing trips. Simultaneously,students experienced first-hand many of the challenges the community faces on a regular basis –water shortages, power outages, poor trash disposal, and broken wastewater systems, thus givinga more holistic view of the purpose and impacts of their work. One student, who participated inboth the design challenge and the study abroad component, commented on how the designchallenge compelled her to be “deeply invested in the area [she] was working in” and the studyabroad experience was “a journey coming full circle” and “an absolutely amazing and eye
the necessary guidance, both of which have increased student retention during criticalattrition period of transition from first-year to sophomore. Engaging students in hands-on designactivities and in undergraduate research early on in their degree attainment has proven to beeffective in sustaining their interest in the field. In an NSF study conducted at an HBCU inSTEM fields, students ranked undergraduate research/internships as having the largest impact onprofessional preparedness for a STEM career and/or graduate studies [4,16]. The authors alsoinvited seniors into classes and graduate engineers using technology to serve as mentors for first-year students to ensure their smooth transition into the campus life, to inspire and motivate
engineering communities as any groups that student engage induring their undergraduate career, whether formal or informal. Though students define thesegroups, during our analysis we are particularly interested in those engineering communities thatare communities of practice (e.g., they have mutual engagement, shared repertoire, and jointenterprise [6]). Engineering communities are important for engineering identity development(e.g., [7], [8], [9]). Therefore, we are examining how different student pathways may impactcommunity development in engineering students.To begin to understand the impact of community on engineering identity, we used an instrumentdeveloped by Jones, Paretti, Hein and Knott [10] to understand students’ major choice, careerchoice
stakeholders, but do not discuss stakeholders. perspectives. how they will communicate with *Students discuss how they will these parties. communicate with these parties. Comments ABET Skill 3h. Understanding of the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and cultural/societal contexts Students consider the project’s impact on global, economic, environmental, and cultural/societal contexts. Struggling Developing Mastering0 1 2 3
active promotionof STEEM careers appear to have increased the girls’ engagement in STEEM, and possibly tohave reinforced the idea that they might pursue STEEM careers, while the introduction ofEntrepreneurship is helping Girls’ Interest in STEEM. During the teacher interviews, 11 out ofthe 13 (85%), stated explicitly that entrepreneurship was having a positive impact on thestudents. From the teachers’ perspectives, all students appeared interested in entrepreneurship.They also stated that; “the girls who participated in this study were clear that they connect withSTEEM and see career opportunities in STEM through the inclusion of entrepreneurship.”Similar efforts at the college level has proven to be of strong interest to minority students such
course.Special attention is paid to identify a theme and related open-ended problem that is timely andrelevant to the region’s communities. The proposed course theme for the WVU case study andthe corresponding problem are transportation-centered and involve the Impacts of Connectedand Autonomous Vehicles. The four student domains include two engineering-centered ones,namely Technology and Infrastructure and Transportation Impacts, one economics-centereddomain, namely Policy and Economics, and one strategic communication-centered one, PublicPerception and Outreach. Figure 1. Illustration of the Holistic Engineering Project Course (HEPC) StructureThe goal is that the four domains complement each other. Below is a description of the
technical experiences can be in a research group,the benefits of which are that students develop domain expertise, gain an understanding andappreciation of the research process and its practice, and acquire team, communication, problem-solving, and higher-level thinking skills. Students with this experience are better prepared toaddress the remainder of their undergraduate curriculum successfully, as well as being equippedto attend graduate school. This paper describes a model developed to engage students inundergraduate research and to deliver the benefits and responsibilities of a small research lab totheir hands. This model, based on the affinity group model, formalizes functional tasks withinthe lab as well as serving as a foundation for
their education to date, askill it is hoped will remain with them throughout their lives.One class delved into an economic evaluation of recycling. The area surrounding the Universityhas no recycling. Although the community is attempting to initiate that service on a limitedbasis, no broad recycling exists. The project was kicked-off with an in-class discussion. Thestudents, who had spent five weeks in class learning to think of engineering issues in terms ofeconomic analysis, were able to list many facets of recycling the economic viability of which arekey factors in the success of a complete program. The students selected key elements in anyrecycling program and researched the economic implications. These topics included pick-up,sorting
]. Whilst this may not seem particularly high, the driving factor behind the developmentof the Changing Futures Project was the fact that for those students who do drop out ofuniversity, the impact on their lives and futures can be significant. 2. Background2.1 Retention & SuccessThe question of ‘what works?’ forms the basis of much discussion within the UK HigherEducation Sector where literature on ‘retention and success’ gives an insight into the somewhatdebated social, educational and economic factors underpinning student attrition [11,12,13,14]. Themost frequently expressed explanations as to why students fail to complete their degree reflectthe complexity of the issues and vary in nature from a lack of ‘engagement with studies’ throughto