Session 3220 Production of Digital Internet Video Material for Streaming Applications Z. Chambers, M. B. Taylor, J. Iannelli and A. J. Baker University of Tennessee Knoxville, TN 37996-2030AbstractThe rapid growth of Internet-based teaching curricula has prompted a new direction for distanceeducation - the streaming of live video lectures to remote student sites for on-demand education.This live material is exceptional while the post-processed static files are better than nearly allcurrently produced streaming video formats. The
will allow the faculty and instructors to control and evaluatetheir own teaching techniques and improve the system of education.The mission of the complete e-assessment system is not only to serve as a presentationtool of the CS and CpE educational programs, but also to be generally viewed as abenchmark by other institutions and programs.5. References1. Official ABET Website: http://www.abet.org2. Criteria 2000 Evaluator Training: http://www.abet.org/AnnualMeeting/Laptop%20Presentations/Session%207/Jacobson- Town%20Meeting.pdf3. List with ABET Criteria: http://www.abet.org/criteria.html4. Accreditation in US Engineering Education: http://www.studyoverseas.com/engineering/articles/enngacc.htm5. Computing Sciences
student engagement in the course materials combined with a competency-based learning approach, affects student motivation to attemptFirst Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference August 6 - 8, 2017, Daytona Beach, FL W1A-1 Session W1A assignments demonstrating aptitude towards course II. Teaming objectives, in comparison to earlier approaches
faculty wereassigned as mentors to student teams. An additional 35% of respondents indicated that whilefaculty were not formally assigned to advise teams, students were provided opportunities andeven encouraged to contact other faculty members to provide discipline-specific mentorship.Table 2.2. Identifying the number of faculty or external members involved in the project Number of faculty or external 1 2 3 4 5+ other members involved Number of faculty members involved 49% 23% 10% 4% 8% 6% Number of external members 12% 8% 4% 10% 35% 31%Technical Advisors & Industrial InvolvementTechnical advisors, be they
and Make members Analyze solutions Decisions ●Seek feedback from Create a preliminary stakeholders business model ●Define parameters and Assess policy and constraints regulatory issues Evaluate1, 3, 5 Perform technical Ideate Generate Ideas ●Brainstorm range of ideas design with team members and
assessing individual student outcomes by improving team dynamics, includingindividual assignments, and incorporating creative brainstorming sessions. Over several years, aframework for assessing ABET Student Outcomes in civil engineering competition-basedcapstone projects. The research questions this study sought to answer were: 1. How can faculty members design competition-based projects to help students achieve individual ABET Student Outcomes? 2. How can faculty members assess and document individual contributions through ABET Student Outcomes?MethodologyThe United States Military Academy has been competing in Steel Bridge and Concrete Canoe forover 25 years. Initially the teams would complete the project during a single
Session 2470 Learning from our Minority Engineering Students: Improving Retention Maria A. Reyes, Mary R. Anderson-Rowland, Mary Ann McCartney Arizona State UniversityAbstractSince the summer of 1996, the Minority Engineering Program (MEP) at Arizona State University(ASU) has directed an MEP Summer Bridge Program for students entering the College ofEngineering and Applied Sciences (CEAS) in the fall semester. Participating students competein teams for scholarships as they learn how to cope with the difficult introduction to engineeringcourse. A requirement for the scholarship is attendance in the fall Academic
Session 3249 Women in Engineering Technology: Where are they? Timothy Brower, Harriet Cornachione Oregon Institute of TechnologyAbstractDespite substantial increases in the number of women entering law, medicine, and business ³fields previously dominated by men, there is still a scarcity of women in the field of engineering.Women continue to lag behind men in their enrollment into engineering programs and,consequently, in their completion of engineering degrees. At Oregon Institute of Technology(Oregon Tech) the disparity is especially acute in the engineering
Session 2544 Alliance by Design: International Student Design Teams Richard Devon, Wayne Hager, Dhushy Sathianathan The Pennsylvania State University Dominique Saintive, Michel Nowé, Jacques Lesenne The Université d'Artois at BethuneAbstractA French and an American University collaborated in the Fall of 1997 to run a design projectusing teams of French and American Students. The project was carried out using many differentforms of information technology, including A-V conferencing. The students in the winning teamwere given the airfare to visit
of this work is on students’ experiences, the course is described in sufficient detail forpossible adoption. Based on the course learning outcomes, a set of general topics, shown in Table1, are developed. Chapter references in Table 1 refer to the textbook [1]. The course lectures andregular labs are scheduled twice a week. All of the graduate courses in the engineering departmentare scheduled starting at 4:00 PM and later to allow the engineers from industry to attend classes.The VR lecture only sessions are scheduled for 1.5 hours on Tuesdays. On Thursdays, half-an-hour lectures on lab topics are presented and discussed and then two-hour (or longer) labs areconducted. The instructor implemented the inverted classroom method where students
Concepts that includes ChE faculty directing projects lasting more than a week. Additional common engineering courses include 3 credit Engineering Computing and 9 credits on Writing/Communication. (49) - Rowan University has no course specific for ChE. A series of two multidisciplinary, project-based general engineering courses are required with a ChE project that lasts over 1 week. The projects serve as a framework for teaching a core set of engineering skills. Class size is about 160 with about 80 each section. Freshman Engineering Clinic includes technical communication formats; analytical tools; computer-based tools and an introduction to design; engineering ethics; teamwork. Freshman Engineering
Teaching16:00 – 17:00 Marquis Foundation Room Executive Committee Meeting16:00 – 17:00 Tour of Acopian Engineering Center16:00 – 17:00 Tour of Skillman Library18:00 – 20:00 Faculty Dining Room Dinner & Keynote SpeakerSaturday, April 17 - Hugel Science Center (HSC)07:30 – 08:30 HSC Lobby Breakfast08:30 – 09:00 HSC 103 Welcome/Opening remarksSaturday, April 17 - Acopian Engineering Center (AEC)07:30 – 14:00 AEC 308 Registration09:15 – 10:30 AEC 306, 315, 327 Technical Session 1A, 1B, 1C10:30 – 10:45 Break10:45 – 12:00 AEC 306, 315, 327 Technical Session 2A, 2B, 2C12:00 – 12:30 AEC 325 ASEE Section Business Meetings12:00 – 12:30
. Full program descriptions, desiredoutcomes, and past assessment results are included as case studies.IntroductionProblem OverviewUnless the U.S. can attract more students to science, engineering, and technical fields, there willbe a shortage of qualified workers for our increasingly technology-oriented society. Womenmake up 46 % of the available workforce, but only 9 % of engineers are women.1,2 Additionally,the next generation of scientists and engineers will have to be innovative to quickly adapt toemerging technologies. Participation in the development of innovative technologies requiresdiverse perspectives.3 With the continued success of recruitment and retention programs offeredat the Rochester Institute of Technology and universities
Session 1526 Developing and Implementing Hands-on Laboratory Exercises and Design Projects for First Year Engineering Students Richard J. Freuler, Audeen W. Fentiman, John T. Demel, Robert J. Gustafson, John A. Merrill The Ohio State UniversityAbstractDuring the past ten years, The Ohio State University’s College of Engineering has moved from aseries of separate freshman courses for engineering orientation, engineering graphics, andengineering problem solving with computer programming to a dual offering of course sequencesin the Introduction to
were specified as: Upon successful completion of the course, the student will have: 1. Gained factual knowledge (terminology, classifications, methods, trends) of electrical and computer systems. 2. Learned fundamental principles, generalizations, or theories related to circuits and computer systems and developed an ability to apply those principles to the design and analysis of practical circuits as demonstrated in laboratory experiments and student design projects. 3. Developed specific skills and competencies related to the use of software tools and lab instruments to design, simulate, build, test and document embedded systems using the Arduino platform. 4
Session 3648 A Capstone Experience: Putting Students to the Task Dr. W. Larry Williamson, Mr. Randy Winzer Pittsburg State University Pittsburg, KansasAbstractPittsburg State University has been teaching a “Capstone” class involving all seniors majoring inMechanical and Manufacturing Engineering Technology since being accredited by TAC/ABET.(Technology Accreditation Commission of the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology, Inc.) The class is a culmination of the knowledge the
;Thermodynamics II - (Prof. Mass); Methods of Product Development (KLA) A; MaterialsScience II; a Global/Culture Awareness or Language General Studies Elective; the first semesterof the multinational design team project; and in some cases a technical elective course typicallytaught by resident director from the Purdue faculty. Students from Karlsruhe and Shanghai JiaoTong have somewhat more flexibility and take junior level classes at Purdue.Multinational Design Team Project: One of the most important and compelling aspects of theGEARE model is the opportunity to participate in a two-semester design team project, workingface-to-face on a team with two Purdue students and two Karlsruhe or Shanghai students. In theKarlsruhe model, the first term of this
Engineering EducationIntroductionWomen and men face different challenges when they enter engineering school. In general, mostmen are more likely to succeed in engineering due to many factors. First, the traditionalstereotype that men are good at math and science, while women are perceived to have lessability.1 To help women succeed, researchers have suggested that students work in teams, receiveencouragement, and learn via various instructional methods.1,2 Because men are expected toexcel in math and science prior to college, this expectation follows them into the universitywhere they have more confidence that engineering is the right career choice for them thanwomen. 3 Women have a tendency to doubt their abilities and frequently question their
Engineering Cloning Bioterrorism Biosensing Gene Therapy Biophotonics Bioremediation Page 7.705.3 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2002, American Society for Engineering EducationObjectives The biochemical engineering course has three main purposes for the students who enroll: (1) provide an avenue to expand the breadth of technical knowledge and apply concepts learned in the chemical engineering curriculum to biochemical areas, (2) allow
sample application written using SimPlus.The Class Diagram in Figure 1 is a UML class hierarchy diagram illustrating the overall systemarchitecture. As shown in the figure, the kernel of SimPlus incorporates four major components:a Simulation Entity handler, an Event handler, Random Number Generation (RNG), and aStatistic Collection handler.The Event handling subsystem takes care of event scheduling, event processing, and event-listmanagement. The simulation objects are inherited from Entity and ServerEntity, and can beaggregated by EntityQueue. There are two types of Random Number Generation: Local RNG andNet RNG. The Local RNG uses a pseudorandom number generator based on the MersenneTwister, whereas the Net RNG fetches the needed random
to today’s basic undergraduate civilengineering programs, the outcomes prescribe significantly more technical and professionalpractice content. The 21st Century civil engineer must demonstrate:1. an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering. (ABET a) Commentary: A technical core of knowledge and breadth of coverage in mathematics, science and civil engineering topics is stressed in this outcome. Underlying the professional role of the civil engineer as the master integrator and technical leader are most of the following: mathematics through differential equations, probability and statistics, calculus-based physics, biology, chemistry, ecology
was that the analytical vehicle Page 14.164.2dynamics theory would be covered by the author (instructor), U-Haul Technical Center2would suggest and support suitable ‘real life’ projects and students will work on theseprojects using MSC software suite (specifically, ADAMS View, ADAMS Car, ADAMSChassis etc). MSC University program3 supported this idea and provided ASU, anacademic network license for 150 seats at a much discounted price as grant. Thisacademic license allowed students to work on the class projects and homework problemsusing MSC-ADAMS. MSC University program manager also provided the instructorMSC-ADAMS study material that is used by
. Topics include; team development, idea generation, concept selection, conflict resolution, projectplanning techniques, task assignment and delivery, project record keeping, all illustrated with “real world”examples. Student involvement in the lectures is encouraged through the use of “I-Clickers”.At the beginning of the term students are assigned to 5-person design teams. All studio work is conducted asmembers of these teams. Lecture topics provide the background and required to deal with the designcomponents in the studio sections2,3. Student projects are not technically complex, but they do utilize thedesign tools discussed in the lectures and they do require student to move from concept, through fabricationto demonstration.System
groups, and summarizing theresults in a short memo. At the end of the course a physical experimental apparatus wasassembled that resembled the student’s design. Students assisted in conducting a crash test andrecorded acceleration data and high speed video which they used to analyze the results todetermine the effectiveness of their own bumper design. Also students prepared a poster for aposter session on the last day of class where they compared their results with all of the otherteams and were asked to explain the properties of a good bumper. Assessment of the projectincluded surveys that asked the Dynamics students to compare the amount of time they spentoutside of class for the course and the effectiveness of the project in helping them to
Session Number 2470 Summer Engineering Bridge Program at the University of Maryland Eastern Shore: Objectives and Enrichment Activities Abhijit Nagchaudhuri, Gurbax Singh University of Maryland Eastern Shore Princess Anne, MD 21853AbstractThe National Aeronautical and Space Administration (NASA) supported summerengineering "Bridge" program is designed for students who have applied and have beenaccepted to join the University of Maryland Eastern Shore (UMES) as freshman in thefall semester. Furthermore, it is directed primarily towards students who have expressedan interest in
the outstationsites.The following lessons were learned from using this system which apply to all our distancelearning activities: 1. Physical distance among classrooms has no bearing on the dynamics of classroom or learning. There are advantages of classrooms being near each other. However, quality of sound is very important when all members of the class can hear anyone for greater interaction among students and the instructor to reduce the impact of physical distance. 2. Voice contact is comparatively more important than the small faces appearing on visual images on the screen. 3. More preparation required for the classes. The relevant material for the class session must be in the hands of the students at the beginning
college Page 5.121.1planned to major in engineering and only 1 percent planned to enter technical fields (comparedto 11.8 and 5.4 percent of men, respectively) (National research Council, 1994). Some writershave begun to argue that science today is so antagonistic to women that it must be radicallychanged before women can comfortably participate in it [3].Most studies suggest that environmental and social influences are responsible for thisunderrepresentation of women. Environmental factors including masculinity and femininity,education, self-efficacy, female role models, and perceptions of engineering are considered to bethe major factors.A two
curriculumrepresenting a discipline‟s activities. Activities and projects of introductory computing curriculum designedto attract students generally focus on the dramatic outcomes of tasks whose programming challenges arefrequently more clerical than analytical. Consider the voluminous specification required to generate thedetailed choreography of a robotic dance (without regards for physics). While the graphical outcomes ofthese projects are impressive, and the specification of these moves may provide may provide useful practiceof coding skills, we have concern that the technical tasks have little similarity with analytically intenseacademic coursework typical of computer science and other STEM disciplines. We have encounteredstudents who enjoy analytical work
with how the problem was framed [1], [31], [32] in the design brief from instructors.For Team 1, their design brief introduced them to the broad problem of pollutants in bodies of water,with no suggested solutions. Students therefore begin their design process at the stage of conceptualdesign, where they need to explore and generate different design alternatives as potential solutions [33].In contrast for Team 2, their design brief outlined a chemical plant as the key solution direction andprovided a patent and technical details on what such a plant might contain. In this way, students on Team2 started in preliminary or detailed design [34] where a concept was already selected but many of itscomponents, interactions and functions still needed
. Page 15.721.2These four activities, which were described and justified in a previous paper in the proceedingsof the 2009 ASEE National conference1, have already impacted several hundred students and theimpact is measurable. The following sections briefly described the four specific activities andthe preliminary results obtained as well as the necessary adjustments that are currently takingplace.Activity 1: Enhanced Student ServicesActivity 1 identified a strong need for student support services in the primary mathematicsgateway course for STEM majors: Calculus I. The project implemented a system of studentassistants and a series of mentoring sessions to better guide students to success in Calculus Iclasses. From the initiation of the project