their designs. Qualitative analysis of student evaluationsand project reports revealed that the approach effectively reinforced theoretical concepts,fostered critical thinking, and promoted self-directed learning. Challenges identified includedtime management and balancing project demands with new material. Recommendations forimprovement include earlier project introduction and structured lab-based assignments. Thefindings highlight the potential of project-based learning and technology integration to enhanceinterdisciplinary learning and prepare engineering students to address complex societalchallenges.IntroductionEngineering is becoming increasingly interdisciplinary, requiring engineers to demonstrateknowledge and experience in multiple
Introduction to Computer Engineering II. CprE 182X wasdesigned with special emphasis on the supporting laboratory experiments and interactive activities.The instructional approach focused on introducing cooperative learning strategies and teamingconcepts in the context of hands-on laboratory experiments. Students designed, implemented andtested computer based projects in an interactive, team oriented approach.CprE 182X met once a week for 2 hours and we spent most of the time working with the robotsand providing support for the other courses the students were taking. Most of the sessionsrevolved around building and programming the robots, however every class started with anopening go round and ended with a closing go round. The two go rounds allowed
particular community college. The transfer students can also takeclasses on a full- or part-time basis. Since the majority of courses in the AET program are fullyintegrated with training and laboratory experience, the transfer students participate in hands-onlaboratory activities using Drexel’s state-of-the-art laboratories. These laboratories also utilizedduring the nine-credit, three-term Senior Design Project sequence.IntroductionThere are more than 1,500 higher education institutions in the United States that offerengineering programs.1, 2 The demand for engineers and engineering technologists continues togrow while the percentage of U.S. undergraduates studying the profession is remaining low.3, 4, 5In 2000, American higher education
sidewalk improvements, vending and Café Q food service improvements, building security, and promotion of design team membership. 4TOM C. ROBERTS, P.E., FASEE, FNSPEAssistant Dean, Recruitment and Leadership Development, College of Engineering, Kansas State UniversityTom has more than 30 years experience in planning, organizational development, and leadership training programs.He worked for Black & Veatch for 16 years, formed Upward Consulting in 1989 and has served as a learning organ-ization and process improvement consultant for a number of manufacturing and service companies, and
Paper ID #11361Developing Global Engineering Competency Through Participation in ”En-gineers Without Borders”Dr. Stephanie Marie Kusano, Virginia Tech Stephanie Kusano is a postdoctoral research fellow from George Mason University Department of Ap- plied Information Technology. She received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education in 2014, B.S. in Me- chanical Engineering in 2010 and her M.S. in Biomedical Engineering in 2012, all from Virginia Tech. Her research interests include non-curricular learning, informal learning, design education, and students’ professional development. Her teaching experience has primarily been with
reasoning in the form of comments. We have utilizedthese experiments as such, but the negative aspect of these experiments’ code is they have notutilized standard C, and furthermore they were not designed using Structured ProgramingMethodology. In this class we utilized the skill set of the prerequisite class, where students learnand mastered C++ code design, strictly following Structured Programing Methodology. Thus ourstudents have designed the code using standard C and following the principles of StructuredPrograming Methodology. All the inter-functional data communication is carried throughutilizing Pointers.IV. Architectural details of ATmega328 microcontrollerA specific objective of this course was to study the architectural details of
society’s needs; technologies are the result of engineered designs created tosolve societal needs and wants4 These common threads can be strengthened when educationalsolutions and opportunities for engagement are consistently, creatively, and thoughtfully applied.In8, the Engineering Projects in Community Service (EPICS) Program at Purdue University wascreated to provide undergraduates with a real design experience within a service-learningcontext. EPICS teams perform their designs within four main areas of focus: 1.) Education andOutreach, 2.) Access and Abilities, 3.) Human Services, and 4.) Environment. Included withinthe realm of Education and Outreach is a concerted effort to focus on the integration ofengineering within the P/K-12 community
think. “We haven’t much money so we must use our brains.”Lord Rutherjord, Cavendish Laboratory With greater reliance on automation in the research process, it is all too easy for researchersto take machine-derived results at face value. However, all researchers have no doubtexperienced the garbage-in, garbage-out phenomenon at one time or another. In detectingpotentially faulty results, experienced engineering researchers often rely on their intuition andtechnical judgement. Consequently, it is important to instill in students a respect for theimportance of this engineering judgement and to help them to develop their own intuition. Whiledeveloping this type of intuition typically requires years of experience, there are some
Session: 2526 Matlab numerical method application in student research Roman Stemprok and Preeti Nagarajan University of North TexasAbstractMatrices Laboratory is a versatile package that performs a multitude of mathematical calculationsinvolving signal-processing systems and control systems, and it has toolboxes for imageprocessing, neural networks and communication applications. This “hands-on” student researchintroduces a method of capturing the luminance of roadway scenes using a charge-coupled device(CCD) camera, and later, analyzing these images to calculate the spatial
, present andreceive feedback on their ideas, conduct experiments, build hands-on models, and createinstructional materials to explain nanotechnology and related science concepts. Duringprofessional development, interns learn about creating classroom activities, techniques forpresenting to non-technical audiences, and strategies for assessing their materials; and work ontheir skills in teamwork, project design, leadership, and science communication. In addition tovisiting middle-school classrooms, interns participate in on- and off-campus informal scienceeducation events where they present to wider audiences ranging from science teachers, tomembers of the adult lay public, to groups of middle-school-age children. In this paper, wediscuss the
: Page 9.109.4 o Integration of a fuel cell onto a Chrysler Global Electric Motorcar (GEM) Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright @ 2004, American Society for Engineering Education o Integration of a fuel cell onto a John Deere Electric Utility Vehicle o Conceptual design of the military transport o Drivetrain design The projects that involve integration of the fuel cell into the electric vehicles are a key milestone in the development of the hybrid military ground transport. This is because most AFE students (and the faculty advisor) do not have much experience with hybrid vehicles. Rather
possessed two key elements: connect students with access to professional engineersand provide hands-on laboratory experiences. This close working relationship between studentsand engineering students provided students with a more accurate image of engineers as creativeand logical professionals.Providing the SpaceThe CPCC engineering program decided to transform its own student engineering space from atraditional classroom lab to something more novel and up to date. Most of the old lab equipmentwas from the early 1980s and was irrelevant to today‟s engineering education. This gave faculty Page 22.1201.4an opportunity to revise the space. Designers
/ http://www.windowscentral.com/features/reports/ntfs/ http://www.windowscentral.com/features/reports/fat32/ What are the minimal hardware requirements for Windows 95? Windows NT Workstation 4.0? What is the primary disadvantage of Windows NT 4.0 Workstation as compared to Windows 95? What platforms does Windows NT 4.0 Workstation run on? What is the design philosophy of Windows NT? What does NTFS stand for and what is it? Name at least three differences between Windows 95 and Windows NT.This assignment was given as a structured, two-hour laboratory. To have told students to justsearch for this material might have led to confusion and endless searching through portals anddead-links
, the Associate Head for Undergraduate Programs, and the Director of Undergraduate Laboratories of the Mechanical Engineering Department at the Pennsylvania State University. She develops new engineering laboratory curriculum to empower students’ cognition skills and equipped them to solve real-world challenges. Her past engineering education experience includes undergraduate curriculum management, student advising, and monitoring department-level ABET assessment. Her current research interest focus on creating new learning tools to enhance student engagement.Dr. Stephanie Cutler, Penn State University Dr. Stephanie Cutler has degrees in Mechanical Engineering, Industrial and Systems Engineering, and a PhD in
. Seniorfaculty that have demonstrated proficiency in these areas, or those that continue to providestudent-valued courses could develop best practice documentation, or provide video recordingsof effective classroom activities.Best practice documentation in areas of teaching that could benefit new instructors includeeffective syllabus development, textbook selection/review, methods of information delivery (ie.lecture-only, blackboard/whiteboard notes, Powerpoint presentations, etc.), systems forproviding consistent content from course offering to course offering, and effective assessmentstrategies.Laboratory best practices could include activity design, timing considerations, equipmentutilization methods, as well as general laboratory facilities
Engineering at Technology. It is an opportunity for students and families to learnmore about different engineering programs. The event includes laboratory tours, as well asmeetings with current students, faculty, and the Office of Admissions. Faculty from variousdepartments open their labs and showcase their research. Other events are focused on hosting aspecific group of students, such as the Girl Scouts or the Verizon STEM Academy. Additionally,other groups are hosted specifically for laboratory tours, such as various high and middle schoolsfrom the area. The college also hosts an Open House, Scholar Day, Discover Engineers Week,Admitted Students Day, and Engineering Student Senior Design Expo. The open house is anevent in which teachers
being replaced by extensivetheoretical design and simulation followed by automatically manufacturing a few test boards.Many systems formerly designed by EETs are now being implemented directly in silicon assingle VLSI chips or closely coupled chip-sets. The development of electronic circuits is thusbecoming more and more the development of VLSI circuits, a largely software and simulationoriented exercise. All these factors tend to draw students away from experimenting withelectronic hardware. Software, on the other hand, can still be developed by individualexperimenters and there are many real and apocryphal stories of successful computerentrepreneurs. Children and young adults play computer games and use the Internet constantly.Several of them
to design and conduct experiments to analyze and interpret experimental dataC-2 to use modern engineering tools, software, and laboratory instrumentationC-3 to communicate effectively through written, oral, and graphical presentationsStudent Outcomes for Objective D: Students will be introduced to the following issues throughtheir undergraduate education in this department and will gain:D-1 an ability to work in teams to solve multi-faceted problemsD-2 an ability to understand and contribute to the challenges of a rapidly changing societyD-3 an understanding of ethical and societal responsibilities of professional engineersD-4 an understanding of the need for lifelong learning and continuing professional educationThe department
design firm in industry while providing a class experience that combines field construction with an engineering design project to benefit people of the developing world.University of Pittsburgh, PA. Mascaro Offers undergraduate research and courses in sustainabilitySustainability Initiative; Department of and development. The Green Construction and Sustain-Civil and Environmental Engineering. able Development Program offers a grassroots approach towww.engr.pitt.edu/msi/ project planning and design; political economy of development; and skills in development.Purdue University
specific lesson objectives that ultimately getdirectly tested on an exam, problem set, laboratory experiment, or design problem. Meyer et.al.(2005) illustrates an initial attempt at using embedded indicators for outcome assessment. Thereare many more opportunities to apply the same approach to other situations.IX. ConclusionsThe full implementation of ASCE Policy 465 that makes the masters degree the first degree ofcivil engineering is a monumental effort that will take two decades to implement. The process iswell underway as an initial body of knowledge necessary for professional licensure has beendefined in the form of 15 outcomes. The level of competency in these outcomes that is to beattained through undergraduate education, masters level
spaces andbringing project-based learning pedagogies and hands-on laboratory experiences to theirundergraduate engineering programs. There is a tension rooted in ABET accreditation standards(current and proposed) for what is expected to be taught in computing and engineeringundergraduate programs, how to assess and what values about our enterprise of engineeringeducation.Under thematic analysis this study used ABET criteria as a framework for coding artifactelicitation interviews used to collect the stories of Young and Adult Makers about the skills theyused to create artifacts displayed at Maker Faires. A total of 36 self-identified Young Makers,age 12-17, and 40 Adult Makers, age 18-60+, were sampled purposefully and stratified byexperience
so that the bulk of their work is to implement the control systemand, therefore, learn the actual course content for the lab session.This paper introduces an innovative, low-cost robotics testbench (RTB) and Raspberry Pi-basedrobot controller (PRC) designed for teaching Python, focusing on robotics in mechatronicseducation. The design of the RTB and PRC are described in detail to provide an accessible pathwayfor learners and educators. The RTB, PRC, and the accompanying experiments allow students tograsp the fundamentals of Python while interacting with various actuators and sensors.The RTB and PRC were developed to support the laboratory of a new course, MXET 250 (RoboticSystems Design) for the Multidisciplinary Engineering Technology (MXET
Real Time Communication Systems With PCsAbstractCommunication system classes have been traditionally taught with a lecture-only format.However, the proliferation of new concepts and algorithms in communication systems makes itincreasingly hard for students to master them only through mathematical derivations.Furthermore, without a hands-on demonstration of how the algorithm is used in real-lifeapplications, students without strong mathematical skills can become frustrated and generate aretention problem in EET/CET/EE programs. To overcome this problem, the theory taught inlecture has been complemented with laboratory experiments and class projects. However, manytraditional communication systems’ laboratory experiments are related to various
. A. and S. M. Lord, "Design of an Undergraduate Atomic Force Microscopy Laboratory for aMaterials Science Lecture Course," Proceedings of the 1999 ASEE Annual Conference, Session 3264, Charlotte,North Carolina, June 1999.7. From p. E-15 of 1999 NETI materials. Adapted from Brown, R. W., “Autorating: Getting individual marks fromteam marks and enhancing teamwork,” Proceedings of the 1995 Frontiers in Education Conference, Paper 3C24,Atlanta, Georgia, November 1995.8. Demetry, C. and J. E. Groccia, “A Comparative Assessment of Students’ Experiences in Two InstructionalFormats of an Introductory Materials Science Course,” Journal of Engineering Education, 86 (3), 203-210, 1997.SUSAN M. LORDSusan M. Lord received a B. S. in Electrical
-on experiences in engineering classes:the need, the implementation, and the results,” World Transactions on Engineering andTechnology Education, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 12-18, 2017.20. T. Jaworski, A. Borgaonkar, and J. Sodhi, “Work in Progress: Hands-On Engineering DesignActivity for First Year Engineering Students Using Lego Pieces,” proceedings of the 2018 FYEEConference, paper 24446, Glassboro, NJ, July 2018.21. R.J. Freuler, A.W. Fentiman, J.T. Demel, R.J. Gustafson, and J.A. Merrill, “Developing andImplementing Hands-on Laboratory Exercises and Design Projects for First Year EngineeringStudents,” 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.22. S. Cui, Y. Wang, Y. Yang, F.M. Nave, and K.T. Harris, “Connecting Incoming
thefundamental principles of electrical engineering such as quantities and their units, providingexposure to electronics and the laboratory environment. Modules cover various aspects ofelectrical engineering in both analog and digital domains such as basic circuits with applications,including historical context, measurement units, and laboratory techniques. The courseincorporates project-based learning with basic component-level design, simulation, and circuit-level practices.Course 2: Electrical Engineering Clinic I: This course focuses on developing a comprehensiveunderstanding of the laboratory environment, covering topics such as laboratory safety protocols,basic equipment operation, requirements interpretation, and test plan creation and
laboratory equipment can result inshortened completion time and save financial resources required to create technologicalinnovations. However, the success of a university mission depends largely upon its facultyreward system. The multi-faceted duties of faculty need to be prioritized and rewarded accordingto contributions to the goals of the institution in this global environment for years to come.ENGINEERING SOCIETIES/INSTITUTES Engineering societies/institutes commonly promulgate standards and codes for generalpractice. These are important in design, construction, and manufacturing with regard to savingmaterial resources, improving quality control, achieving cost-effectiveness and providing safetyfor the users. They also sponsor regional
signal processing and its applications to sophomores and juniorssince seniors are already required to take a course in DSP.Acknowledgments This work was made possible by a grant form the National Science FoundationNSF-ILI Grant DUE-9750697 and the Engineering Application Center at the College ofEngineering, University of HartfordBibliography[1] “Digital Signal Processing Laboratory Experiments Using C and the TMS320C31 DSK”, Rulph Chassaing, Wiley Interscience, 1998.[2] “Digital Signal Processing with C and the TMS320C30”, Rulph Chassaing, Wiley Interscience, 1992.[3] “Low-Cost Personal DSP Training Station based on the TI C3x DSK” A. Barreto & C. Aguilar, DSPS Fest 97, Texas Instruments Inc. 1997.[4] “TMS320C3x Users
APSTO N E PRO JECT S GRADUATE PROGRAM S Figure 1. iP3 Program StructurePre College OutreachThe Career Awareness Program (CAP) at Lehigh University involves the Colleges ofEngineering and Applied Science, Business and Economics, and Arts and Sciences. Withfinancial and personnel assistance from companies such as Ernst & Young and Alcoa, CAPsupports the achievement of greater diversity by attracting, engaging, and mentoring the brightestpre-college students of color. This recruitment/leadership development initiative introduces theparticipants to the e-team project experience in accounting (ACAP), industrial design (IDCAP
) laboratory." International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education 53.4 (2016): 331-340. 4. Guo, Liping, and R. Pecen. "Design projects in a programmable logic controller (PLC) course in electrical engineering technology." The technology interface journal 10.1 (2009). 5. Saygin, C., Kahraman, F. “A Web-based programmable logic controller laboratory for manufacturing engineering education.” AMT 24, 590–598 (2004). 6. Lindsay, Euan and Liu, Dikai and Murray, Steve and Lowe, David. “Remote Laboratories in Engineering Education: Trends in Students' Perceptions,” 18th Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Dec 2007. 7. C. A. Chung, "A cost-effective approach