(EOP) has designed a framework of student outcomes (Framework)intended to be a tool for transforming engineering education to one that enables engineers toprovide engineering “solutions while minimizing potential negative environmentalconsequences.” The Framework outlines nine outcome categories, including systems thinking,environmental literacy, social responsibility, responsible business and economy, environmentalimpact measurement, materials choice, design, critical thinking, and communication andteamwork. This Framework also includes learning outcomes that enable assessment of students'ability to design and formulate solutions while minimizing negative environmental and socialconsequences. Aspects of this broad Framework can be applied
impact inseveral ways. First, it emphasizes the importance of a safety culture. It is also effective method for engagingthe students early in the class, and helping students transition to the class environment. More importantly, itshows that we value safety as a topic, that we value the safety of our students and community. Anotherobservation was that student feedback has been very positive. We frequently receive positive open-endedcomments in our student ratings of teaching effectiveness (SRTEs). Here, students’ comments includestatements that they enjoy the safety moments and find them engaging and valuable. Even when safetymoments were not directly related to class, student interest / engagement was approximately the same. We feel
, prototyping, and iterative design, is crucial for fostering creativityand innovation. Encourage students to engage in hands-on projects that address real-worldproblems, facilitating a deeper understanding of the complexities involved in trustworthy AIdevelopment.Facilitate Real-World Exposure: Incorporating field trips and guest lectures from industryexperts provides students with invaluable insights into the application of AI technologies invarious sectors. This exposure is essential for broadening students' perspectives and enhancingtheir ability to identify and tackle relevant challenges within their research.Prioritize Community Building: The development of a supportive and inclusive community iskey to the success of interdisciplinary programs
of STEM Engagement, I lead the Rice Excellence in Secondary Science Teaching (RESST) biology program. In this capacity, she guides Houston area high school Life Science teachers in weekly meetings on Rice’s campus to explore both biology concepts and the ways in which they can be taught using inquiry methods. I also works with the NEWT Center and leads their Nanotechnology Environmental Engineering for Teachers (NEET) and NEWT Research Experience for Teachers (RET) programs.Jorge Loyo-Rosales, Rice UniversityAlice Chow Alice Chow is an Associate Director for Research and Grants for the Rice University Office of STEM Engagement. She conducts research in K-12 STEM education on topics such as impact of teacher profes
scientist and evaluator. She leads the Applied Research, Evaluation, and Engagement area of Duke University’s Social Science Research Institute. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Work-In-Progress: Engineering Self-Efficacy in First-Year DesignAbstract This work-in-progress paper describes the implementation and results of surveys tounderstand the impact of a first-year engineering design course on students. During theEngineering Design and Communication (EGR 101) course, students work in teams to learn andapply the engineering design process to a client-based problem drawn from a community partner.The learning outcomes are to 1) apply the
electrical and systems. He has conducted several projects to reduce carbon dioxide and other building emission impacts by evaluating and improving the energy practices through the integration of sustainable systems with existing systems. His current research focuses on engaging and educating students in sustainable and green buildings’ design and energy conservation. He is currently investigating various ways to reduce energy consumption in office buildings. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Project Based Guided Learning for Machine Elements Design CourseAbstractProject based learning (PBL) technique was adopted in Machine Elements Design course tomotivate students enrolled in
Students are noticeably engaged through note-taking, 4.7 3 questioning, and responding. Students use or demonstrate reading skills by following 4.5 3.1 written instructions or project directions, reviewing print and digital resources, and asking questions about what they have read. Students rely on writing skills to organize lab reports, 4.4 2.7 posters, and presentation materials. Students interpret the verbal and nonverbal communication 4.33 3.1 efforts of others and follow and take directions from teachers or peers. Average Value
meet desired needs d. an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams e. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility g. an ability to communicate effectively h. the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context i. a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning j. a knowledge of contemporary issues k. an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practiceWith only minor modifications to the lab courses, we were able to address Outcomes a, b
should incorporate elements of critical consciousness and social responsibility in their teaching. This allows students to question and critique systemic inequality and its impact on various communities. When students are able to interrogate accepted knowledge in their field of study and evaluate the biases inherent in its formation, validation, and dissemination, they are able to navigate these biases and make socially responsible decisions. In this way, faculty prepare students to be responsible, productive citizens.This definition of CRP and implementation guidelines are being communicated through keychannels within the university such as the faculty senate, deans, department chairs, and
selected as partners for enhancing the broader impacts of the project.Both CCC and NJAAS are located within 30 minutes of the Rowan University campus and boththese locations are within the two New Jersey Federal Empowerment Zones (EZ). The EZprograms are designed to empower people and communities across the United States by inspiringcommunities to work together to develop a strategic plan designed to create jobs andopportunities in the nation's most impoverished urban and rural areas.The CCC partnership allows us to prepare the community college students for the Rowanengineering program by having direct input on their freshman Introduction to Engineeringcourse. CCC is a comprehensive community college that is accessible, learning-centered
selected as partners for enhancing the broader impacts of the project.Both CCC and NJAAS are located within 30 minutes of the Rowan University campus and boththese locations are within the two New Jersey Federal Empowerment Zones (EZ). The EZprograms are designed to empower people and communities across the United States by inspiringcommunities to work together to develop a strategic plan designed to create jobs andopportunities in the nation's most impoverished urban and rural areas.The CCC partnership allows us to prepare the community college students for the Rowanengineering program by having direct input on their freshman Introduction to Engineeringcourse. CCC is a comprehensive community college that is accessible, learning-centered
[8], [9], i.e. collection, analysis and interpretation of data. Thelearning should be collaborative [8], [9], while Blumenfeld, Kempler and Krajcik [8] considertechnology as an element of a cognitively engaging environment since it can be effectively usedas a hook to engage students. The positive impact of technology on engagement has beenreported in several studies [12] – [14].The primary advantage of an authentic learning environment is that it promotes engagement withthe content to be learned. The result is increased self-efficacy, motivation and persistence.Improved academic performance is a result of this interaction between engagement, self-efficacyand motivation. This connection between engagement, self-efficacy, and motivation is
, the curriculum, college research, engineeringcareer fairs, engineering student organizations, college faculty and staff. Peer leaders in thisprogram do not serve in any disciplinary role for the residential participants so the relationshipsthat they establish are mutual.Peer leaders also work to create an environment in the residence hall that is designed to engageliving and learning participants in their academic and social environment. According to Tinto,an expert on student success and the impact of learning communities on student growth andattainment, effective retention is highly contingent upon inclusiveness.6 Peer leaders work toinclude students in the development of all aspects of the living and learning environment.During each
-curricular programs and campus engagement positively relates to belongingness [18].Through workshops and other activities, students are validated, and overcome fear and lack ofconfidence to experience themselves as legitimate members of the community [19], [20]. Theyare able to safely share personal passions and ideas and more comfortably navigate academicspaces [19]. Through a strong sense of belonging, students see themselves as resources, helpingothers, and making an impact on the community [19]. The well-being of the community takesprecedence over individual goals, which reduces isolation and alienation and gives UREPstudents a greater awareness of purpose and sense of belonging in STEM [15]. Without a strong STEM identity and community
primary research question: “Did the classroom interventionsimpact students’ feelings about their major?” We mentioned the research question was answered mostly because not all the participantsmentioned the impact of the course on their feelings about the major directly in their responses.The students primarily focused on their experiences in the course in the qualitative responses.During the next iteration of the course, we would be interested in finding the impact of the courseon students’ belonging in classroom and the correlation between belonging in classroom andbelonging in major through quantitative analysis.BackgroundTheoretical frameworks Our interventions for creating a supportive classroom were inspired by three theoreticalframeworks
included basic topics in land development suchas comprehensive plans, zoning ordinances, base mapping techniques, conceptual design,sustainable development, parcel layout, utilities, topography, grading, hydrology basics, anderosion and sediment control. The course included several guest lectures from LDDI’spractitioner volunteers. The course is a prerequisite for Land Development Design.2. Land Development Design (CEE 4274): This original LDDI course has been substantiallymodified to further engage industry professionals with students. The senior-level LandDevelopment Design course has long been one of the department’s “design courses”, one ofwhich must be taken by each student as a requirement for attainment of a Bachelor of Sciencedegree in CEE
University Partnerships andInnovation – Learning fromthe New York City Example April 17, 2012 Lance R. Collins Dean of EngineeringGROWING APPLIED SCIENCES A Game Changer for NYC February 9, 2011The 2008 recession prompted NYC to redouble effortsto find economic ‘Game Changers’Game ChangersExercise Format: – a series of round-tables, workshops, and panels in 2009-2010. Participants: – 325+ CEOs of large, medium and small companies. – 25+ community groups representing a broad spectrum of views. – 12+ University Deans/Presidents of NYC universities. Inputs: – Sector analyses of our leading industries and growth sectors. – Benchmarks with global
programs [17] are excluding Latinx students and impinging onstudent success.The Anti-deficit LensThe Anti-deficit Lens is a framework that focuses on removing the stigma and accountabilityfrom underserved communities and placing the onus on the larger culture [19]. Mejia et al,defines the asset-based approach in engineering to be one that acknowledges the embodiedknowledge of students of color [20]. This study uses the critical lens to understand theintegration of reflection and praxis to help students grow in the ownership of their learning andbe liberated from the constraints of the university barriers to achievement [20].CURRENT STUDYThe current study examined the impact of different teaching strategies in Statics, morespecifically, the impact
circuit setup in ADS (b) Smith Chart that results from for lumped element impedance matching the simulation shown in (a) Figure 13: Transmission-line What-if impedance matching gameApplication of Impedance Matching using MomentumGupta15 has argued that the one of the major impacts of CAD in education is in making realisticdesign examples and case studies available to students. In this class, 3D planar electromagneticsimulator Agilent's Momentum is introduced to simulate a square-patch antenna. Proceedings of the 2013 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Conference Copyright © 2013, American Society for Engineering Education
capable of predictive analytics willhave the broad impact of informing the STEM community of best practices for timelyinterventions and improving retention and graduation rates. The Navigate platform is used for predictive analytics and to track and document ECS Scholarprogress toward achieving benchmark goals in the areas of retention, graduation rates,internships, undergraduate research experiences, and job placement. The use of predictiveanalytics has significant potential for helping students arrive at successful outcomes. However, itis an assumption of this project that the successful use of predictive analytics should take intoconsideration not simply the accuracy in identifying students who are struggling but in the socialattributions of
-wide Introduction toEngineering course to replace the first-year introductory engineering courses offered byindividual departments. Introduction to Engineering is an innovative course designed toreinforce the retention efforts of the COE by addressing several issues that hamper studentsuccess. Introduction to Engineering adopts a holistic approach to keep students interested and excitedabout engineering. All engineering freshmen are exposed to different engineering disciplinesthrough a combination of engaging and informative lectures, projects and seminars. The hands-on projects increase students’ self confidence and teach them skills that a traditional classroomsetting cannot offer. The course also aims to dispel the fear of mathematics, the
. · Guest lectures from the UMASS community: We used five guest lectures to supplement the professor’s lectures on the topic of multimedia systems. The lectures provided differing viewpoints, presentation styles and expertise. Fred Zinn, a staff member from the UMASS Office of Information Technologies, presented an engaging talk on Graphic Design for the Web. Mike Chan, an ECE senior and TA in the course, presented a lecture on HTML, Flash and various Web technologies. Graduate Students doing research in Multimedia System implementation 1 gave the next three lectures. Jeongseon Euh presented a talk on 3D Graphics and its latest implementations in gaming products like the Playstation2 and the
American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Cultivating Geospatial Engineers in a Population Underrepresented in STEM IndustriesIntroductionThe field of geospatial technology has exponentially grown and significantly impacted multipleaspects of our global society, especially the engineering industry. Geospatial technology is anumbrella term for Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Global Positioning Systems (GPS),and Remote Sensing. This paper discusses one model for reaching students throughout the stateof Hawaii to prepare them for a future in geospatial technology and engineering careers.The model was developed and implemented by the Women in Technology Project (WIT) whichis funded in part by the U.S
. The modulefollows an entrepreneurship approach, modeled after the successful Engineering Projects inCommunity Service (EPICS) engineering design process, where students research an issue intheir own community and design a program to help people solve it [6]. Through these activities,students learn many valuable lessons including the role of community service in society, thesignificant impact that their engineering skills can have on their community, and that assistingothers leads to their own substantial growth. The module teaches design, planning, codeversioning, collaboration, and aspects of human-computer interaction (HCI) and usability. Thefinal product serves as a capstone project for the course. Industry volunteers and local
interested in? What's important to you? And really learning that.” - Matt Wolfer ● “I felt confident and supported to try new things, and really push myself and learn something, and I don’t feel like that in other classes.” - Colette Donovan ● “...you have to go to school, through high school. You’re forced to, [but] for me it is so I can have an impact on my community and have a positive influence on my life and the people around me, and owning that, and know that what I’m doing in my classes is important and that I need to get the most benefit out of them. I to want use that information in projects and in real life, and not just sleep through lectures but be engaged and be a fully
curriculum at the University of Hartford aims to engage students ininterdisciplinary design and real-world projects in each of their four years. As enteringfreshman, all engineering students are required to take a course in which they work with robotson various small projects. The sophomore course, described in this paper, is entitled Engineeringby Design and it is the next course in the sequence. Its purpose is to involve students in a projectthat is more comprehensive and realistic than their freshman experience. The junior level coursestudies the engineering process from conceptual design to manufacturing. Finally, as seniors, thestudents take their capstone design course in which groups work on a single significantengineering problem that may be
industry related topics such that academic development isstrengthen and post-graduation career venues are explored and advocated.V. CONCLUSIONA strong STEM workforce is contingent on developing policies, programs, and initiatives thatwork to provide equitable access and opportunities for all students, especially those fromunderrepresented and underserved communities. This commitment to diversifying the STEMworkforce will require deep commitment at all levels. Regardless of policy or reform efforts todrive significant change in the STEM fields, faculty members have a tremendous influence inshaping the engineering landscape. As such, the active recruitment and mentoring by facultyadvisors is critical in engaging underrepresented students in research
chatbotdevelopment assignments: overall difficulty, engagement, career relevance, and the time spentcompleting the assignment. On a scale of 1 (very difficult) to 5 (very easy), both undergraduateand graduate students rated the difficulty of the assignment between 3 and 4, indicating that thetask was generally perceived as leaning towards easy rather than difficult, with undergraduatestudents finding it slightly easier compared to graduates. When asked about the engagement levelof the chatbot development process, undergraduate students rated it at 3.4 (moderately to veryengaging), while graduate students rated it slightly higher at 3.8, suggesting that both groupsfound the assignment engaging, with graduate students showing a stronger perception of
fully understandthe challenges faculty face when implementing any of the strategies in their courses. To thisend, as the next steps, we hope to identify a few faculty implementing one or more of thelisted strategies in their classrooms and measure the impact from both the faculty and studentperspectives. We also want to invite people to share their experiences implementing thestrategies - what worked well and what did not. Eventually, we would like to see the livingdocument develop into a community bulletin board where faculty can view the checklist andunderstand how to operationalize the strategies in their classrooms.Another limitation of this study, which might be beyond the scope of the paper, is the lack ofstrategies for student
years. He has 7 US patents, of which 3 have been commercialized by the university. This research work is a collaboration with the Children’s Services Council of Broward county in FL.Dr. Diana Mitsova, Florida Atlantic University Diana Mitsova has a background in research design, statistical and spatial analysis, as well as environ- mental planning and modeling using geographic information systems, and interactive computer simula- tion. Her primary area of research involves the impact of urban development on ecosystems and other environmentally sensitive areas.Her recent publications focus on the impact of climate-related stressors on coastal communities and the implementation of planning approaches related to