is a Professor of Mechanical Engieering at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. He has obtained a teaching award from the College of Engineering and was selected as professor of the semester four times by the local chapter of Pi-Tau-Sigma. Page 11.588.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Enhancing student understanding of mechanics using simulation softwareAbstractThe wide availability of commercial codes, such as MAPLE®, has made it possible tosignificantly enhance the teaching of undergraduate courses in mechanics. New problems,usually non-linear, can be
shown in Figure 2, where the high percentageof single-pane glass indicates the high solar cooling load from the summer time and the highconduction heat loss in the winter time. The utility bills over the past few years have beengrowing, and the director of Historic New Harmony approached the Engineering Department Page 15.993.8about doing a feasibility study for the installation of a geothermal heat pump. Coming out of thisdiscussion, it was decided to use the building to perform an energy analysis of the entire building 7with the F/TD class and evaluate the economic possibility of a geothermal
textbooks limits them to relativelysimple problems that fail to show students the larger picture when it comes to economic analysis.The use of personal finances similar to those identified by Martinazzi and Lavelle3 has beenfound to increase interest in a subject that many students find dry and confusing. By usingpractical common sense problems, faculty is able to impress the applicability of engineeringeconomy on the individual student.Bibliography1. Hartman, J.C., “Engineering Economy: Suggestions to Update a Stagnant Course Curriculum,” American Societyfor Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, 1998.2. Wells, W.E., “Economics for Engineers: An Integrated Approach,” American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference
quality of undergraduate engineering students.Dennis Coon, University of Wyoming Dennis N. Coon received a BS in Ceramic Engineering from the New York State College of Ceramics at Alfred University in 1979, an MS in Ceramic Science from the Pensylvannia State University in 1984, and a Ph.D. in Ceramic Science from the Pennsylvannia State University in 1986. He was employed at the Idaho National Environmental and Engineering Laboratory from 1985 through 1988 where his primary interest was in the devlopment of advanced materials for high temperature engines. He was a member of the development team that was awarded a R&D 100 award by Research and Development Magazine for development of
transform all aspects of teachingand learning within this context is being sought from the audience. More specifically, thefollowing questions are posed: • Curriculum Content – What types of K-12 curricula will be developed or already exist that could be part of the WATERS Network? • Pedagogy – What K-12 pedagogical approaches will be used, enhanced or transformed in the WATERS Network? • Education and Research Inform Each Other –In what ways can K-12 educators and students work with researchers to develop new knowledge and to disseminate that knowledge? • Vertical Collaboration Among Researchers, Educators, and Learners – How can the WATERS Network increase collaboration between researchers and K-12
Paper ID #30850Grading by Competency and Specifications: Giving better feedback andsaving timeDr. Jennifer Pascal, University of Connecticut Jennifer Pascal is an Assistant Professor in Residence at the University of Connecticut. She earned her PhD from Tennessee Technological University in 2011 and was then an NIH Academic Science Education and Research Training (ASERT) Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of New Mexico. Her research interests include the integration of fine arts and engineering, retention of women in engineering, and developing effective methods to teach transport phenomena.Dr. Troy J. Vogel, University
and engineering with established scientists and engineers; and the new Faculty for the Future initiative11; • books such as the comprehensive discussion of Ph.D. study by Lazarus, Ritter, and Ambrose12; • programs supported by industry, including the AT&T Fellows Program13. All of these programs provide important support and information in various ways and many provide mentors to help overcome many of the obstacles listed above. But none of these programs specifically addresses the student’s relationship with her research advisor. The Mentor Training Workshops we describe here are specifically designed to strengthen the mentoring aspect of this important relationship.3. Concerns Which May Be Addressed
the following: • Hands-on learning--Make K-12 science curriculum less theory-based and more context-based (hands-on), emphasizing the social good of engineering and demonstrating how it is relevant to the real world. • Interdisciplinary approach--Add a technological component to all subjects and lessons, and implement writing guidelines in math and science courses. • Standards--Involve engineering in K-12 lessons that map to state standards for math and science. • Use/Improve K-12 Teachers--Engage more K-12 teachers in outreach efforts and curriculum writing, and increase teacher salaries to attract the best technological
Paper ID #8714A Successful Partnership between Industry and Academia: Curriculum Im-provement, Research, and Outreach through Collaboration with IndustryDr. Ivan Lopez Hurtado, Northern New Mexico College IVAN LOPEZ HURTADO received his B.S. degree in Industrial Physics Engineering from Tec de Mon- terrey, Monterrey, Mexico, 1995. M.S. degree in Automation from Tec de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico, 1998 and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA in 2008. He is currently the Department of Engineering, Chair at Northern New Mexico College.Dr. Jorge Crichigno, Northern New Mexico
someconfusion for the students.In order to help the students further explore these new concepts and ideas and overcome some ofthe issues related to this departure in material, several MATLAB and LabVIEW graphical userinterfaces (GUIs) have been developed. GUIs related to response of first and second ordersystems due to a variety of different input conditions have been developed. The GUIs presentdata in a form so that students can immediately see the effects of changing system parameters asthey relate to pole locations in the s-plane, time response and settling time, and complexfrequency response characteristics. The GUIs are presented along with student surveyassessment on the usefulness of the new software tools.I. IntroductionMechanical Engineering
freshman engineering courses in theGeneral Engineering program at Virginia Tech are being transformed to follow a similar 1-lecture, 1-workshop per week format. The team-based approach helped to successfullyimplement the new delivery format of the course. Lo and Lohani shared responsibilities fordeveloping lecture and workshop material as well as managing personnel including graduate andundergraduate teaching assistants and graders. In spring 2005, there were 4 graduate studentswho taught the workshop sections. In fall 2005 and 2006 semesters, the authors managed 14graduate students who were involved in teaching the workshops. The new format has been byand large a successful experience. Some other advantages are noted below.Multiple faculty could
: Experience With Objectory’s Use Case Approach". 8th Conference on Software Engineering Education (CSEE'95), New Orleans, LO, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Linda Ibraham (Ed), Springer Verlag. April 1995[12] Huang, W., "Anatomy and Physiology Series Introduction to Human Physiology Rapid Learning Center", Rapid Learning Inc. http://www.RapidLearningCenter.com[13] Esselink, B. "A Practical Guide to Localization." John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam/Philadelphia. ANSI Z3948-1984 pp. 1-24, 2000[14] Kresten, G. E., Kresten, A. A., and Rakowski, W. M., "Proceeding of the Journal of Global Information Management", Idea Group Publishing, pp.86-101, 2002[15] Luong, T.V., Lok, J.S., Taylor, D.J. and Driscoll, K
extended toacademics as well.While other approaches to curriculum development often mimic what has already been done orput into practice earlier, a quality based approach significantly improves the employability ofstudents. It imparts a set of marketable skills that. In order to accomplish this objective, theaforementioned approach places heavy emphasis on ‘how-to’ approach of problem solvingpertaining to safety engineering in this particular situation.The concept of safety management is more or less universal in nature. The kinds of accidents anemployee in any kind of workplace situation could be exposed to have been extensively studiedover the years. The only obstacle to implementation could result if an entirely new kind of causefor accidents
2006-830: EMBEDDED COMPUTER SYSTEMS & PHOTONICS: APROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSE FOR MIDDLE AND HIGH SCHOOLTEACHERSMichael Pelletier, Northern Essex Community CollegeWayne Kibbe, Northern Essex Community CollegePaul Chanley, Northern Essex Community College Page 11.529.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Embedded Computer Systems & Photonics: A Professional Development Course for Middle and High School TeachersAbstractThe STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) Fellows Program wasa new initiative of the Northeast Network STEM Pipeline Project in 2004-2005, to focusattention on STEM education in middle schools and high schools
much published on the concept that students possess different types ofpreferred learning styles. Likewise, there are many effective educational philosophies whichclaim to provide the best model for instructor / student interactions.Among the primary goals for post-secondary educational institutions are to prepare its graduatesfor employment and to enable them to serve as useful contributors to the community. Thedevelopment of engineering technology curriculum is often based on industry needs, and a morepragmatic approach to instruction and areas of focus are sought. This is often modeled throughthe practice of establishing an industrial advisory board whose goal is to provide insight intocurrent and future needs in the industry, with the
institution’s responsibility centered management approach) is tied to retention. New facultycan identify this as a long-term strategy (once tenured) to limit teaching load.Reflecting on these initial thoughts it becomes clear that the main barriers to change relate to ourtraditional academic reward system. Over recent decades, engineering faculty have beenpromoted and tenured predominantly based on their accomplishments in research as return-on-investment becomes a key factor. Adding to this is that an economic-centered approach toeducation identifies that a non-tenure track/adjunct faculty member is much more cost-effectivethan a typical tenure-track faculty member. The former can often be paid less, will not take upmuch/if any research lab space and
. Before describing some specifics of our project, it is useful to reflect on past approaches to teaching core knowledge in the engineering curriculum. Literature suggests that it typically follows one of three models: 1) traditional; 2) integrated; 3) in-between [9,15,20,33]. In the traditional approach, core subjects are taught by faculty in their respective disciplines with little regard for the ultimate application. This approach, as cited earlier, is one of the reasons for low retention rates [6,15,17,19,31]. An integrated core approach is one where students learn multiple
learning and application of programming concepts. Based on the well-acknowledged ef-fectiveness of the writing across the curriculum (WAC) and Writing-to-Learn (WTL) move-ments, this paper employs the intermingling of writing activities with coding, which has the po-tential to dramatically impact the programming learning process. We term this approach Writing-to-Learn-to-Program (WTLTP). Following our discussion of the WTLTP genre, we presenttechnologies that support the genre and discuss our future efforts to investigate the effectivenessof WTLTP in the classroom environment. This paper contributes both to WTL literature by in-corporating WTL principles into a new domain and to computer science education literature byproposing a new approach to
strategic plan with the College’s 52-member board of directors, and supported the College in reducing their budget by 6% across all functional areas. In addition to these experiences, Gwen has conducted over 130 grant-funded education and research-based evaluations, collectively throughout the United States. Gwen received her bachelor’s degree from Southeastern Louisiana University in 1984, a master’s degree in Curriculum and Instruction in 1996, and a PhD in Education Administration in 1999, both from Indiana State University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Beyond Scholarships: A Comparative Analysis of Institutional Approaches to Students Retention and Academic
an initial investigation of the impact the ConnectedLearning and Integrated Course Knowledge (CLICK) approach has had on students’ motivation,engineering identity, and learning outcomes. CLICK is an approach that leverages VirtualReality (VR) technology to provide an integrative learning experience in the IndustrialEngineering (IE) curriculum. To achieve this integration, the approach aims to leverage VRlearning modules to simulate a variety of systems. The VR learning modules offer an immersiveexperience and provide the context for real-life applications. The virtual simulated systemrepresents a theme to transfer the system concepts and knowledge across multiple IE courses aswell as connect the experience with real-world applications. The
activities todevelop his expertise and teaching skills, provide service to industry, and promote theuniversity. The paper will provide guidelines and advice for new faculty on the best practicesfor using consulting activities for faculty development. The paper will focus on the benefitsfaculty can derive from industry consulting and offer ideas on how they can utilize this facultydevelopment technique.IntroductionFaculty development is a major concern for faculty, academic administrators and students1.Consulting activities offer faculty the opportunity to engage in faculty development byallowing them to develop their expertise and enhance their teaching skills. Also, consultinginitiatives can provide faculty, including engineering and technology
could impact all the students the educator teaches, undergrads and grad students, research labs and traditional classrooms. One educator decided to attend a teaching-related workshop in order to learn new teaching strategies he could incorporate into his teaching repertoire. 5. All the students in my department. This code captured decision points that could possibly impact all students within the educator’s department. For example, one department chair decided to assist in designing, implementing and modeling mentoring relationships with undergraduates, graduates and junior faculty members. Such an approach would eventually affect all the students in the department. 6. All students in the college. This
LAU’s strategic plan and launching new programs such as Engineering PreMed and Chemical Engineering. A Professor of Mechanical Engineering, he has led ABET accreditation renewals, curriculum modernization, and major lab expansions. His research focuses on turbulence modeling and CFD for wind energy. He holds degrees from METU and Lehigh University and serves as an ABET evaluator representing ASME.Dr. Pierre Rahme, Lebanese American University Dr. Pierre Rahme is an associate professor of Mechanical Engineering and the director of the VIP Program at the Lebanese American University (LAU). He holds a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Toulouse. He is a member of the American Society of Mechanical
Ausgabe von „Visible Learning“besorgt von Wolfgang Beywl und Klaus Zierer. Schneider Verlag Hohengehren, Baltmannsweiler.Deslauriers, L. & Schelew, E. & Wiemann, C. (2011): Improved Learning in a Large-Enrollment Physics Class.Science, 332, 13 May, p.862-864.Graaff, E. de & Kolmos A. (2007): Management of Change. Implementation of Problem-Based and Project-Based Learning in Engineering. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam/Taipei.Heywood, J. (2005): Engineering Education. Research and Development in Curriculum and Instruction. JohnWiley & Sons, Hoboken/New Jersey.Hake, R.R. (1998): Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-students survey ofmechanics test data for introductory physics courses. Am. J. Phys. 66 (1
thenuclear engineering program, and a strong mandate from institutional leadership, establishing aviable combating WMD program turned out to be a difficult challenge. Several issuescontributed greatly to the difficulties. Foremost was the difficulty in defining and refining theconcept of combating WMD as it applied to the program. Ask five people to define it and youwill get five answers. Indeed, entire articles have been written on it. 6 How AFIT approached itis discussed later. Another challenge to establishing the program was the attitude of many faculty membersagainst an interdisciplinary approach. At AFIT, there is still a lot of entrenched bias againstgranting a degree in an interdisciplinary area, with a new degree name, as opposed to
engineering course for the first time and to provide new ideas for those who are alreadycourse coordinators.Background information for the three coursesENGE 1024: All engineering freshmen at Virginia Tech are required to take the 2-credit“Engineering Exploration” during their first semester. In fact, this is the only common Page 25.135.2engineering course for undergraduates in the College of Engineering and typically enrollsapproximately 1,300 students in fall and 180 students in spring semesters. Two authors (Lo andLohani) have served as the co-coordinators of this course since spring 2005 and haveimplemented a number of activities into ENGE1024 to
organization before the semesterbegins. This requires a well-organized schedule and insight to the material rather than buildingthe course as one teaches it during the semester.Bibliography[1] S. M. Reynolds and R. N. Tackie, "A Novel Approach to Skeleton-Note Instruction in Large Engineering Courses: Unified and Concise Handouts that are Fun and Colorful," in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[2] S. T. Peverly, J. K. Garner and P. C. Vekaria, "Both handwriting speed and selective attention are important to lecture note-taking," Reading and Writing, vol. 27, pp. 1-30, 2014.[3] S. L. Robinson, H. E. Sterling, C. H. Skinner and D. H. Robinson, "Effects of Lecture Rate on Students' Comprehension and
study reinforced the importance of collaborative learning outside-the-classroom through virtual interactive environments. This active learning environment was able toimprove the flipped classroom model and added to it a new learning dimension. The hybridapproach also helped cater to all the students’ learning styles including the visual and verballearners. However, one of the main challenges in implementing this approach is the students’resistance to change especially if this change is time demanding for the students’ outside-the-classroom.Bibliography[1] National Academy of Engineers (2005), “Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century”, National Academic of Engineering: Washington, D.C.[2] Prince
Paper ID #32794Low-Barrier Strategies to Increase Student-Centered LearningMiss Nicole Erin Friend, University of Michigan Nicole Friend is currently a PhD student in the Biomedical Engineering program at the University of Michigan. She received her B.S in Bioengineering: Biosystems from the University of California, San Diego in 2017. Nicole’s research interests are centered around regenerating vasculature in ischemic envi- ronments. Nicole is also interested in more broadly defining the field of tissue engineering and regenera- tive medicine to inform curriculum design and student career trajectories.Cassandra Sue Ellen
approach.4 This curriculum is the context for observing evidence ofdevelopmentally-appropriate engineering practices in Kindergarten students. In addition to thefive lessons shown in Table 1, there is an introductory lesson where engineering, the engineeringdesign process, and the overarching engineering challenge is introduced.Table 1. PictureSTEM Designing Paper Baskets curriculum Lesson 1 Lesson 2 Lesson 3 Lesson 4 Lesson 5 L Book: Book: Book: Book: Book: i If you Find a I Get Wet (part I Get Wet (part Pattern Fish Rocks, Jeans t Rock 1) 2) and Busy e