. Dr. Assanah’s research focuses on the synthesis of hydrogels to mimic the mechanical behavior of the brain matter and investigate the cellular response to injury. My past research focused on biomaterials and tissue engineering with a particular emphasis in bone tissue regeneration. This involved combining hydrogel-based cell therapy and acoustic radiation forces via Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound (LIPUS), for healing large scale bone defects. Previous research also involved hydro- gels as three-dimensional cultures to study the effects of mechanical forces on axons for repairing spinal cord injury.Kristina Wagstrom Dr. Kristina Wagstrom is the Northeast Utilities Assistant Professor for Environmental Engineering
is currently launching CU Teach Engineering, a unique initiative to produce secondary science and math teachers through a new design-based engineering degree, with the ultimate goal of broadening participation among those who choose to come to engineering college.Beth A Myers, University of Colorado Boulder Beth A. Myers is the engineering assessment specialist for the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program at the University of Colorado Boulder. She holds a BA in biochemistry, ME in engineering management and is currently a PhD candidate studying engineering education at the College of Engineering and Ap- plied Science. She has worked for the University of Colorado in various capacities for 16 years, including
addition to the basic criteria for ABET accreditation. The latter isalso true of Engineering Physics programs, but these are not included here since the “Physics”designation is often significant; i.e., it represents a real program emphasis in the discipline ofphysics. The Engineering, General Engineering, Engineering Science and Engineering Sciencesprograms are hereinafter collectively referred to as “general Engineering” programs, while thelowercase use of “engineering” will refer to any or all types of engineering programs.We can hypothesize that general Engineering programs exist primarily for one of two reasons.First, when an institution begins its initial program in engineering, the program may be small andmore general than it is specialized
Session 1843 Humanitarian Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines: An Example of Multidisciplinary Engineering Joan Gosink, Juan Lucena, Barbara Moskal Colorado School of Mines Golden, Colorado 80401Introduction:With the support of a grant from the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, we aredeveloping a new program in Humanitarian Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines(CSM). The goal of this project is the nurturing of a new cadre of engineers, sensitive tosocial contexts, committed and qualified to serve humanity by contributing to the
as Hurricane Katrina’s effect on natural gas prices in 2005 and 2006. For utilities,using energy efficiency instead of traditional energy supply means energy needs can be met bymaking small, incremental investments in energy efficiency rather than large, risky investmentsin energy supply. Current pending carbon legislation would further increase the need for non-emitting energy resources that would be increasingly expensive for utilities to own and operate.Meeting state and national energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions goals will alsobecome increasingly important (Sandy Glatt, 2009).Studying the feasibility of adopting renewable energy sources in manufacturing systems alongwith case studies on recent technology developments in
Science. She spearheaded design and launch of the Engineering GoldShirt Program to provide a unique access pathway to engineering for high potential, next tier students not admitted through the standard admissions process; early findings revealed significant challenges in calculus readiness. Sullivan was conferred as an ASEE Fellow in 2011 and was awarded NAE’s 2008 Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education.Tanya D Ennis, University of Colorado, BoulderBeth A Myers, University of Colorado Boulder Beth A. Myers is the engineering assessment specialist for the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program at the University of Colorado Boulder. She holds a BA in biochemistry, ME in engineering management
key features of the course that serve to furthermotivate students to learn programming are then discussed in a later section. The articleconcludes with assessment of the course that has come from the experience of teaching it for thelast four semesters.Course Description The course as it is presently conceived has been taught every semester since Spring 2002.The focus of the semester-long course is now a group-based structural design competition.Groups of one to three students compete against one another to produce the most “profitable”truss-style balsa wood bridge. The bridge benefit is determined using an “S” shaped function ofbridge strength (Figure 1). Bridge costs are calculated by summing a fixed cost, a material costfor the wood
Paper ID #41539Neurodivergent and Neurotypical Students in a First-Year Engineering DesignCourse: Identity, Self-Efficacy, and ExperiencesDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and the Director for the Integrated Design Engineering (IDE) program. The IDE program houses both an undergraduate IDE degree accredited under the ABET EAC General criteria and a new PhD degree in Engineering Education. Dr. Bielefeldt conducts research on engineering ethics
through taking technical electives.The Engineering Technology department at Western Washington University has a history ingraduating students who specialize in CAD/CAM from its Industrial Technology (IT) program.The majority of these students find employment regionally in small and medium sizedcompanies that specialize in product design and the fabrication of molds and tooling. There is anaerospace influence driven by companies that are part of the Boeing Company supply chain.Even with the economic downturn employment opportunities though not as abundant as beforeare available for graduates.In spite of the viability of this program, state and university directives have necessitated movestowards accreditation of programs to ensure that graduates
compete in an increasingly globalized world, questions still remainabout how to best meet this need. The specific goals of the project implemented in this paperwere to teach students about cultural awareness and to give them experience working andcommunicating with a team of international collaborators. Techniques to achieve similar goalsthat have been explored by other educators include foreign language instruction9, study abroadprograms10,11, international team projects12,13, and broader degree and certificate programs with aglobal focus14,15.Several barriers exist that hinder the implementation of the above techniques. One such barrier isthe large number of technical courses required by most modern engineering curricula. The sheernumber of
pleased with the improved gender ratio,especially for the first session.In 2006, the program also provided a record number of students (31) with MartellScholarships, totaling $8,400. Updating Table 2, the Martell scholarship fund has nowhelped over 150 students, with a total of almost $43,000.In regards to the upcoming 2007 sessions, with the applications we have already receivedat the time of the writing of this paper, we anticipate that the numbers will be very similarto those of 2006. We welcome the challenge!From IEP to Notre DameA good number of IEP participants apply to Notre Dame, and many of them end upattending school here, though not all in Engineering. We keep track of those students, andtry to assess IEP’s impact on their academic
, concept generation, and commercialization. Dr. Reuther received her BS in Biomedical Engineering from The College of New Jersey and her Ph.D. in Bioengineering, specializing in Orthopaedic Biomechanics, from the University of Pennsylvania.Mr. Michael John Cennamo, Columbia University Michael Cennamo is a Senior Educational Technologist at Columbia’s Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL). He is also an instructor and doctoral student at Teachers College, Columbia. Michael is currently designing both online and blended learning environments for Columbia faculty; his interest and passion lie in helping teachers to effectively use technology in their classrooms, both large and small. Michael lives in NYC.Ms. Tiffany
pursuing initial accreditation for a new program underABET EC 2000 criteria.I. Program Origin The engineering manpower needs of Kentucky had largely been provided for many yearsby the University of Kentucky College of Engineering (Lexington). As the state’s land-grantinstitution, it produced its first engineering graduates in the 1880’s. The University of Louisvilleestablished its engineering school in 1924, and became part of the state university system in 1970.These two schools offered the only accredited engineering programs in Kentucky in the early1990’s. Both of these institutions are over 200 miles east of the heavily industrialized JacksonPurchase region of Western Kentucky. Many of the industrial plant managers in this area
institutionalpractice and policy will be discussed.IntroductionCommunity colleges hold the potential for diversifying the pathway into STEM because theyserve a large proportion of the academically talented, low-income, first-generation, and raciallyminoritized students traditionally underrepresented in STEM fields [2;13]. However, low-incomestudents are less likely to enter STEM programs in community colleges or to transfer to STEMfields than higher-income students [15]. A frustratingly large fraction of community collegestudents who complete STEM courses leave college without any postsecondary credential [2]and Black, Latinx, and Native American students are underrepresented in all transfer-levelSTEM courses in community colleges [2]. Moreover, students who
LIAT College Access andSuccess model (L-CAS), integrates elements from Lent’s Social Cognitive Career Theory andTinto’s Departure model in a framework provided by a structured scholarship program designedto mitigate the economic hardship of students while also providing a multistage intervention planto improve their success metrics. In this paper, we revisit the theoretical foundations of the L-CAS model and the academic setting where it was implemented to look at the data acquiredthroughout its application during three years on a pilot group of 92 students. We assess themodel effectiveness for springing LIATS into actions leading to their success while reflecting onthe results obtained so far. We also discuss opportunities for improvements
rapidly toadapt their curriculum to better match the needs of our information-based economy. Anew program in Computer Engineering Technology (CpET) was recently approved atIUPUI to be offered by the Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringTechnology (ECET). In the design of this new program, we studied and assessed variousvendor-sponsored certification programs and professional registration examinations. Inthis study, we identified skill-sets necessary for several generally recognized job roles incomputer networking, programming and telecommunications. We further classified andextracted exam questions into sets of high-level principles and analytical concepts basedon these different job roles. In this paper, course objectives developed
involves designing and assessing interventions for extra- and co-curricular activities for students throughout the educational ecosystem. He is also a member of the ASEE CDEI Spotlight Team. Dennis holds a B.S. in mechanical engineering from The University of Alabama and a M.S. in mechanical engineering from the University of Florida.Jabari Wilson, University of FloridaDr. Karen Theodora HicklinDr. Jeremy A. Magruder Waisome, University of Florida Dr. Jeremy A. Magruder Waisome is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department at the University of Florida (UF). Her research focuses on self-efficacy and critical mentoring. She is pas- sionate about broadening participation in engineering, leveraging
doctoral student in Biomechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Davis graduated from Rose- Hulman Institute of Technology with a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering. His discipline-specific research focuses on computational design methods. His engineering education-based research focuses on methods for increasing participation in engineering and the assessment of instructional approaches.Spencer DavenportKaitlynn Conway © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work In Progress: Initiating a graduate teaching fellow program to support transfer students into engineering and computingIntroductionThe Student Pathways in
: knowledge-centeredness, communitycenteredness, learner-centeredness, and assessment-centeredness. The G-RATE provides ateaching profile across these categories, as well as a chronological profile of teachinginteractions. Given the huge amounts of classroom data captured over large spans of time, the processof effectively representing the depth and breadth of classroom activities becomes messy. Howcan data be represented in a detailed, meaningful manner that can inform educators’ teachingpractices? Using data collected among 7 instructors in a first-year engineering course at a largeMidwestern university, the authors present an overview of data collection techniques used toinform faculty about their pedagogical instruction. Implications for
this work without significantsupport in the form of a TA or other departmental resources.)For large courses with 100+ students which are typical of large state universities, an instructormust lean on a team of TAs for course administration. To have a successful BYOP experienceTAs must be effectively trained in managing scope and the willingness to escalate to theinstructor if they are unsure of how to proceed. Graduate student TAs, which may not be typicalof a first programming course, would be especially helpful in this context. Their practicalexperience and programming knowledge can be useful in the overall defining of the project,scoping, as well as progress assessment process.In a departmental context, training a team of students to become
retained betterinto the following year. In consequence, peer marking is to be retained as a standardcomponent in ELECTENG 101 and is now becoming a standard feature of other first-yearengineering courses at the University of Auckland.Bibliography1. Godfrey, E., Archer, R., Denny, P., Hyland, M., Smaill, C., & Stol, K. (2009). Innovation and Integration in an In-house First-Year Engineering Program: A fast track to Enculturation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Austin, TX.2. Smaill, C. (2005). The implementation and evaluation of OASIS: a Web-based learning and assessment tool for large classes. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(4), 658-663.3. Smaill, C., Godfrey, E., & Rowe, G. (2008
and move through spaceswithout being perceived as a threat. My class has afforded me access to social capital and high-quality formal education, and the privilege of never fearing that I'd lack any of the essentials I needto survive. My upbringing in a "liberal" family within a politically and culturally conservativeregion of the country motivated my commitment to social justice but exposed me to a very narrowview of what social justice entails. My knowledge about systems of oppression and understandingof critical theoretical frameworks for interpreting our social world have expanded throughengagement with activism and learning about oppression and social inequality within the contextof academia, at both a small women's college and a large
Paper ID #22994Capability Analysis of Internet of Things (IoT) Devices in Botnets and Impli-cations for Cyber Security Risk Assessment ProcessesProf. Andrew R. Schmitt, Metropolitan State University Andrew Schmitt is an information security professional with a passion for networking. Starting his ca- reer in application and end-user support, his passion for network and security technologies was quickly realized. Currently, Schmitt is a cybersecurity professional with a focus on network security and net- work threat prevention. Additionally, he is a community faculty member at Metropolitan State University where he
in the design of this program, resulting in the development of a novel and flexiblecurriculum addressing the needs of engineering graduates in the modern, global workplace. Onekey feature of this program is a PBL(problem-based learning) pedagogicalemphasis. Each semester for four years,the engineering students enroll in a three-credit project course in which engineeringprinciples are learned by doing a project.The facilities have been designed tosupport this emphasis. All engineeringproject courses are taught in a studiosetting with space for teamwork andprototype fabrication including small shoptools, raw materials and labinstrumentation.The program received an unexpectedopportunity in the summer of 2005 whenthe department was contacted by
fieldsampling techniques and interpret the collected data for a graded laboratory assessment. Giventhe large administrative burden on the instructor, the disproportionately large time requirements,and the intricate balance between devoting class time to introduce the required skills andbackground knowledge versus covering material for other assessed learning objectives begs thequestion “Is the service learning/community outreach project worth the bang for the buck?” The purpose of this research study was to: 1) empirically validate the addition of the service learning/community outreach project to the course design; and 2) leverage the service learning/community outreach event to maximize increases in student
process. At our institution, and perhaps in general, there is an anecdotal hypothesisthat the mathematical skills, or more generally, the academic strengths of first-year engineeringstudents have been significantly declining in the last two decades. To address this hypothesis, alongitudinal study of pre-engineering indicators for first year engineering students in a Canadianuniversity transfer program was initiated almost a decade ago through the use of two assessmentexams and by collection and consolidation of high school achievement data. It is not unusual touse these academic indicators as a measure of skill level. To this end, two assessment tools(Math Advisory and Engineering Assessment) were used to generate data with which to test
Management, Lighting, Sustainable Buildings, Electrical Services Engineering and Organisational Change. He has pre- sented peer reviewed papers at ASEE annual conferences in Hawaii and Austin, SEFI and SEFI/IGIP conferences in Norway, Finland, Hungary, Turkey, Slovakia and Ireland in the last four years.Brian Bowe, Dublin Institute of Technology Page 22.1207.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Qualitative Research in Engineering EducationIntroductionEngineering education programs provide students with the knowledge, understanding,skills and competences required to
terms of engineering content.Dr. Megan O’DonnellWendy M. Barnard, Arizona State UniversityDr. Alison Cook-Davis, Arizona State University Dr. Alison Cook-Davis is Assistant Director for Program Evaluation at the Arizona State University’s Office of Evaluation and Educational Effectiveness (UOEEE). She has a BA in Psychology, MS in So- cial Psychology, MLS Legal Studies, and a Ph.D. in Experimental Social Psychology. Prior to joining UOEEE, she supported the research and program evaluation efforts of Maricopa County Adult Proba- tion Department, coordinated and executed the research and program evaluation for a large Department of Justice Second Chance Act grant. These efforts included monitoring, assessing, and
thesehighly valuable skills. In the following sections, we will describe the IREECE program focusingon student activities, recruitment efforts, and assessment results. Following these sections, wewill focus on lessons learned and provide advice for faculty who may wish to start an REUprogram at their institution.Recruitment and application process:The recruitment efforts typically started late December to early January and concluded in mid-March. While successful in the past, competition for an undergraduate’s time during the summerseems to be increasing. Thus, it is suggested that recruitment efforts begin earlier (see lessonslearned section for more details). The primary avenues for recruitment were through pastprogram alumni, emails to school and
Paper ID #18125Incorporation of Ethics and Societal Impact Issues into First-Year Engineer-ing Course:: Results of a National SurveyDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She has served as the ABET assessment coordinator for her department since 2008. Professor Bielefeldt is the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice