for announcements, communications with the students, questions and answersfrom the contents of the videos and additional problem solving if there was extra time left.The lab portion included hands-on activities similar to the face-to-face labs. The Electrical andComputer Engineering Department purchased M2K modules and loaned them to studentsthrough the CSU Chico library. A more detailed set of videos were posted on how to use theM2K modules for powering the circuit, providing input signals, and measuring output signals.The labs were also explained in the live sessions if needed.Students’ reflection on this mode of instructionThe students liked the fact that they could watch the videos again and have the opportunity toslow down the speed of
, it becomes veryindispensable to befit an advanced and diverse range of hands-on lab experiments and teaching materials into curriculums thatmeet the needs of the cyber security industry. While the cyber security spending has past 96.3 billion dollars by the beginning of 2019 (according to the internationalresearch and advisory firm, GartnerInc. estimation) and cybercrimes increased to affect various parties (government, or-ganizations, individuals, etc.), more and more students are to seek cyber security degrees or certificates. Therefore, in thecyber security teaching, the curriculum should satisfy necessary advanced skills that align with highly-demanded certificationexams, e.g., Certified Information Systems Security Professional
Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”IntroductionIn order to evaluate our educational program, we have a Dean’s Student Council made up ofundergraduate and graduate students from all three of our program’s disciplines (computerscience, information science, and information technology) and an advisory council made up ofindustrial leaders from technology oriented companies from across our local region. When askedhow they would improve their education, the members of the Student Council consistentlymentioned that they would like to see more demonstrations and have more hands-on labs wherethey could explore the various theoretical topics discussed in class. The
emphasizes that it is “responding to the critical challenge impactingAmerica’s technical labor pool and the number of students without hands-on science,technology, engineering, and math (STEM) skills used in our manufacturing, industrial, andtechnical business areas.” These skills are promoted through the design and creation ofcompetitive robots. It also encourages competitive sportsmanship and creativity among teams of Page 14.424.4students. 3The tournament rules and procedures document defines the rules and procedures for a safe, fairand efficient
topics leads to good job prospects and careers; moreover, science shows us that a greater diversityof perspectives in engineering teams leads to better results [6]; it is thus both a moral and practical imperativeto find ways to achieve greater diversity within engineering and technology fields.This paper describes experiences developing a new course at UMass Amherst, called Queer Lights, that aimsto share the excitement and potential of electronics and computing with students who might not otherwiseexperience these topics by pursuing an engineering major. The course has the following description: “QueerLights will cast light on lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, and asexual (LGBTQA) topics while the studentsin the class literally cast light
, higher achievement of learning outcomes, and a morehighly satisfied instructional team. Future work includes the analysis of learning outcomes onexam 4, and the development of new modules to more clearly address concepts that weredifficult for students.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by th National Science Foundation under GrantNumber DUE1525775. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.ReferencesFelder, R. M., D. R. Woods, J. E. Stice and A. Rugarcia (2000). "The future of engineeringeducation II. Teaching methods that work." Chemical Engineering Education 34(1): 26-39
systems androbotics are taught in separate courses, which may result in students not being able to appreciatethe interrelationship that exits between these areas. In this paper a strategy is detailed wherein theauthors have used a “hands-on” approach, using robots as a tool for communicating key conceptsin control systems. The use of robots as a tool also enables students to “discover” the relationshipbetween the two areas.IntroductionThis paper deals with pedagogical problems that were encountered in teaching automation,robotics, and controls systems to engineering technology and manufacturing engineeringstudents at Texas State University-San Marcos. Controls theory as presented in classical bookssuch as those by Kuo1 and Ogata2 has the
laboratory exercises,since the bulk of entering engineering students lack laboratory experiences. Consequently, many Page 7.1194.1educators are stressing the need for hands-on teaching of fundamentals3-9. Over the past ten Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationyears, the Mechanical Engineering Department of the University of Wyoming (UW) has usedalumni recommendations10, Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) 2000criteria11, as well as UW’s Engineering Task Force on Undergraduate
also includedclass participation and class presentations. The course was well received by the majority ofstudents and there was gratitude expressed from the students for the opportunity to work withstudents from other disciplines. Projects from the class spawned a product (already in use byCalTrans), multiple Master’s projects, multiple senior projects, and a new collaboration betweenelectrical engineering, materials science, biomedical department and a group on campus doingprinted circuits in the Graphic Communication department. The course not only gave thestudents an opportunity to explore how to work with interdisciplinary teams but also a view intoother specialties that they might need to seek out to complete projects in the
capitalinvestment in these facilities and they are generally situated in well-developed urban areas.Unfortunately, it is in the historically disadvantaged rural areas where there is the greatestdirect need for the students to be exposed to this technology.This paper will describe the authors work in implementing video conferencing using standardlow bandwidth analogue telephone (POTS) lines to bring the advanced technology that isavailable in the University of Cape Town’s Department of Mechanical Engineering into theclassroom in a way that fosters a feeling of hands on experience of the equipment being usedby the students.2. Effective Use Of Distance Learning For Technology Education in a Rural EnvironmentIn South Africa, students in rural areas have little
construct a test wetlands area to clean up runoff from cattle, dairy and swine farms to treat creek water Impact: Improved water quality. New techniques for mitigating agricultural runoff. Facts: Begun fall 1998, Disciplines: CE, EE, IDE, Chemistry, Biology13. Project Title: Discovering Engineering Careers Partner: Purdue Office of the Dean of Engineering and local K-12 schools Tasks: Develop portable, hands-on demonstrations of engineering principles and practice that will spark interest in engineering careers among elementary, middle, and high school students Impact: Helping youths make decisions about high school course selection, attending college and career choices. Increased awareness of engineering and interest in
lesson. Thequiz provides instructors information about student understanding. The quiz also offers students anaide for material retention.Module construction is very important to pedagogical effectiveness. For example, modules Page 6.704.2 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationdeveloped for topics in a basic physics class consisted of definition, example, review questions,and quiz9. Students received feedback automatically on their quiz performance. The quiz resultswere also sent to the
technological gap, the University of Southern Maine has developed a CubeSatdesign competition targeting grade 6-8 and 9-12 students to engage participants in collaborativeSTEM learning. In this program, teams of 1-15 students from school districts across Mainecreate a unique science or technology demonstration mission and use the engineering designprocess to design and build a CubeSat meeting the mission requirements under cost, performanceand time constraints. Teams are judged on their mission success and ability to communicateresults to a broad audience. Teams are provided learning workshops in the design process,computer-aided design, computer programming and fundamental science during the competition.Methodologies, outcomes and assessment tools are
concept is good, however, implementing the industrialcapstone project effectively within 16 weeks is always a challenge to all the parties involved.Studies showed that students with internship and co-op experiences would further develop theirinterpersonal and communication skills than those without the experience [14,15,16].Moreover, industry expects recent graduates with the capability of proposing innovative, quick,sustainable, and cost-effectively solutions. Universities must offer the experiential learning toallow their students to achieve advanced engineering knowledge and hands-on practicalexperience. We need to understand the motivation and the perception of capstone projectbenefits for the industry sponsors [9]. Benefits may include but
the next generation of AI-skilled students. Byexposing youth to different STEM topics with a support system such as the curriculum andsummer program described here, they are more likely to feel positive self-efficacy. Additionally,this hands-on approach can motivate teenagers to pursue AI and science fields and increase theirinterest in STEM-related topics. This can lead to greater self-efficacy for AI and STEM andimproved participation of individuals from traditionally underrepresented groups STEM degreesand careers. AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.2147625. References[1] D. Long and B
aflair for the entrepreneurial might be: “I’m an engineer trained in the art and science of thedesign process, willing to explore new projects and gather more experiences, I’ll take on thenew project, learn what needs to be known to accomplish the job at hand, speak with experts Page 6.1038.11or consultants, read the state-of-the-art literature and “get the job done, professionally andethically”; presenting viable solutions that are well grounded in engineering art and science. “Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Expsoition Copyright 2001, American Society of
Engineering Educationhad shortcomings in the knowledge of prerequisite topics that prevented them from following andunderstanding the materials being covered in courses. This required that the instructor review theprerequisite topics before starting to lecture on new topics in the course. Therefore, the instructorcould not introduce all the course topics that were covered in the past, but only focus on the mostimportant topics in the course. For example, when the conduction was being covered in the heattransfer course, some students could not solve a simple second order ordinary differential equationsuch as 𝑑𝑑 2 𝑇𝑇⁄𝑑𝑑𝑥𝑥 2 = 𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐, even though a course covering differential equation is a prerequisite. Table 2
the first of five experiments was toassess how witnessing subtle gender bias events influences explicit stereotype activation amongpeople who recognize the events as gender stereotyping as well as those who do not. We utilizedvideo materials that were developed and tested in our previous NSF research that show a groupof four engineering students, 2 women and 2 men, working together on an engineering designtask. There are two versions of the video: one in which the students engaged in subtle genderbias (bias version), and one in which the students engaged in neutral interactions (controlversion). Over 400 participants were recruited from a large midwestern research university fromcomputer science and engineering majors in which 30% or fewer
mainly involvebook reports and synopses of science articles and television shows. Table 2 shows thatwe rank these very low, and we have serious doubts as to their usefulness. We have tried Page 8.1224.17making an assigned report based on “The Physics of Materials” booklet published by the Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationNational Academy of Sciences22 which had some benefit to students in our opinion.However, similar to the seminar component of the course, we are currently wrestling withhow to allow student
, there is a concomitant needfor changes in design and manufacturing pedagogy. It is important for engineering education to have the multi-and cross-disciplinary approaches expected of practicing engineers. Design education needs a perspective ofproduction-related topics while manufacturing education needs an emphasis on manufacturing response todesign changes. The Design & Manufacturing course introduced at R.P.I. in Spring 1995 combined elements of bothdesign and manufacturing education in a new way. This upper-class Mechanical Engineering course gives avertical exposure to elements of the design-to-production process. It gives the opportunity to combine and applymaterial from engineering science courses to working a unified set of
knowledge of a given concept. The authorsidentified a core, required, sophomore-level engineering science course to incorporate theworksheets because the foundational skills covered in this course apply to many of the follow-oncourses in the curriculum. The worksheets are intended as supplemental assessment for thestudent and are not intended to be scored for a grade.Worksheet PlatformWhen designing these tutorials, the first decision was to determine the platform on which toimplement the worksheets. A variety of platforms were researched, but it was quickly decidedthat the Maple program would be the most appropriate option. While there may be otherapplicable programs such as Maple T.A., Maple provided the best fit for the tutorials and
. Page 24.1058.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 RoboSim for Integrated Computing and STEM EducationAbstractThis paper describes the design, implementation, and application of RoboSim, a robotvirtual environment, for integrated computing and STEM education in K-12 schools.Robots are being increasingly used in schools for hands-on project-based learning andmotivating students to pursue careers in Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (STEM). However high costs and hardware issues are often prohibitive forusing robotics as often as desired in mathematics and science classroom teaching. Due tothe tight schedule for teaching math and science subjects, hardware mishap and failure,such as
Harding University, a MS in mathematics and PhD in biomedical mathematics from Florida State University. His current interests include 3D-printing, active learning, and infusing more physical activity into mathematics courses. Recent grant positions include principal investigator on the NSF-funded grant ”EAGER: MAKER: Engaging Math Students with 3D-Printing for STEM Success and co-PI on the NSF-funded grant ”Collaborative Research: Improving Representational Competence by Engaging with Physical Modeling in Foundational STEM Courses”. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Feel the force! An inquiry-based approach to teaching free-body diagrams for rigid
given many workshops and pres-entations. Her research in this area has been funded by the NSF, DOE, Sloan Foundation, EiF, and the NCIIA. She is an associate editor of the Journal of Engineering Education.Larry Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry J. Shuman is Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh and Professor of Industrial Engineering. His areas of interest are improving the engineering education and the study of ethical behavior of engineers. As Associate Dean, he has introduced a many curricula innovations. He has been principle or co-principle investigator on over 20 sponsored projects funded by the NSF, HHS and DoT, the RW Johnson Foundation
Session 1520 Using Mobile Robots to Explore Intelligent Behaviors: The Obstacle Course Challenge Michael D. Ward, Michael V. Doran, W. Eugene Simmons University of South Alabama School of Computer and Information Sciences Mobile, Alabama 36688Abstract: A recently concluded NSF-ILI grant provided equipment to create hands-on laboratoriesfor CIS students. The goal of this laboratory environment was to provide a setting to reinforcecourse concepts. One of the target courses was the Artificial
teach- ing, Bassam built the Engineering Program at Chandler/Gilbert Community College where he still resides. He developed courses, articulated with surrounding universities, led committees, met with industry lead- ers, organized events, attended conferences, and applied for grants to enhance the program for students. More specifically, his career includes service as PI or Co-PI on seven National Science Foundation funded grants. In addition, he has been a lecturer at Arizona State University for 12 years. All of the effort and collaboration has amounted to a well-established Chandler/Gilbert Engineering Program—the largest in Maricopa district. Recognitions and awards include Motorola Educator of the Year Award
. He worked for TRW in Redondo Beach, CA for 11 years, primarily on signal processing projects. He is a member of IEEE, ASEE, ACM, AAAS, ASES and SHOT. Page 15.198.1Linda Shepherd, California Polytechnic State University Linda Shepherd is Professor of Political Science and Public Policy at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, California, where she has also served as founding director of the Master of Public Policy program, founder of the Institute for Policy Research, and past Chair of the Department of© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Political Science. She specializes in teaching
of critical thinking and self-assured behavior puts the students involved in the EVP leaps and bounds ahead of their peerswhen entering the job market.ConclusionThe EVP projects provide a change in the traditional course structure from lecture, wordproblems, and exams while offering a great opportunity for inquiry and discovery. The inclusionof hands-on research projects in the freshman level has created interest, enthusiasm, and self-motivation for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) students. While theresearch projects require more time than traditional lecture course, the students walk away with agreater understanding of the material and a real-world experience of their chosen field of study.The on campus engineering
first is Discovering Design3 . The book is a compilation of papers by various authorsincluding professors of design, design history, philosophy and political science. Eachauthor touches on the essence of design in a unique and meaningful way. Topics ofdiscussion by these authors are rich and full of texture. Contributing authors and topicsinclude: § Victor Margolin The concepts of “product milieu” and “product web” and human interactions with them Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Page 7.540.10 Conference & Exposition
engineering at universities in Turkey, Australia, France, Switzerland, Greece, Belgium and Finland. He holds the holder of MESc, ME and PhD degrees, all in electrical engineering. His research interests have been focused on electrical machines and drives, and include modelling Page 14.98.1 and simulation of electrical machines using numerical methods and the application of mathematical techniques to design optimisation of electromagnetic devices. He is particularly interested in the design and development of novel electromechanical energy conversion devices, which integrate emerging active materials