Foundation in the Division of Undergraduate Education, and was on the faculty in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and Segal Design Institute at Northwestern University. Dr. McKenna received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Drexel University and Ph.D. from the University of California at Berkeley.Rocio C. Chavela Guerra, American Society for Engineering Education Rocio Chavela is Director of Education and Career Development at the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). She holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University, a B.S. and a M.S. in Chemical Engineering from Universidad de las Americas, Puebla in Mexico. Rocio’s current efforts focus on engineering faculty
Paper ID #37237An Evaluation of an Implementation of High School GirlsSummer Outreach Camp Converted to an Online Format(Evaluation)Carol Geary Carol Geary is a doctoral candidate in the Engineering Education program at Virginia Tech. While at Virginia Tech Carol has directed peer mentoring programs and high school STEM outreach camps. Her research interests include co-curricular support, student success, and persistence. Carol received her B.S. in Aerospace engineering from Virginia Tech.Tawni Paradise (Graduate Student)Hannah GlissonKim Lester (Director Pre-college Programs) © American
Paper ID #14806ASEE Safe Zone Workshops and Virtual Community of Practice to PromoteLGBTQ Equality in EngineeringDr. Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University Dr. Stephanie Farrell is Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University (USA) and was 2014-15 Fulbright Scholar in Engineering Education at Dublin Institute of Technology (Ireland). She obtained her PhD in Chemical Engineering from New Jersey Institute of Technology in 1996. Prior to joining the fac- ulty at Rowan in 1998, she was an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering and Adjunct Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Louisiana Tech University until 1998
Paper ID #40695Organizational Transformation for Graduate Education: IntentionallyEngaging Graduate Students as Partners in Equity WorkMs. Julia Machele Brisbane, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Julia Brisbane is a Ph.D. student in the Engineering Education Department at Virginia Tech. She received her M.S. in Biomedical Engineering from the Virginia Tech-Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences Engineering and her B.S. in Bioengineering from Clemson University. Her research interests lie in undergraduate research experiences in engineering, racial health disparities, and
Paper ID #37261Working Full Time and Earning an Engineering Degree:Wellbeing in a Co-Op-Based Engineering ProgramCatherine Mcgough Spence (Assistant Professor)Luke John NybergJustine Chasmar (Assistant Professor and Quantitative Reasoning CenterDirector)Jodi NelsonMarissa Tsugawa Marissa Tsugawa is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University. Their research interest is in neurodivergence and how it manifests in engineering education. Past work includes exploring motivation and identity of engineering graduate students, women of color's experiences on engineering teams, and
Paper ID #9141Multiple starting lines: Pre-college characteristics of community college andfour-year institution engineering studentsDr. David B Knight, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education David Knight is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education and affiliate faculty with the Higher Education Program at Virginia Tech. His research focuses on student learning outcomes in undergraduate engineering, interdisciplinary teaching and learning, organizational change in colleges and universities, and international issues in higher education.Ms. Inger M Bergom, University of Michigan Inger
Paper ID #42668An Exploratory Study on Upper-Level Computing Students’ Use of LargeLanguage Models as Tools in a Semester-Long ProjectBen Arie Tanay, Purdue Engineering Education Ben Tanay is an engineering education PhD student at Purdue University. He acquired his BS in computer engineering from the University of Pittsburgh in 2022.Lexy Chiwete Arinze, Purdue University, West Lafayette Lexy Arinze is a graduate student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University, where he is pursuing his Ph.D. degree. Lexy is passionate about impacting others using his Engineering knowledge, mentoring, and helping
‘globalization’ of engineering education through the sharing of in-class assignments, problems and solutions, and projects between Kettering University and its newly formed European University partners. • Continuous exchange of ideas: The relationships built during the conference have enabled the continuous exchange of students’ innovative projects and ideas between Kettering University and other Universities around the world. They have also allowed Kettering University to directly present such ideas to businesses. • New opportunities to collaborate with businesses: o Kettering University is currently in the preliminary development stages on two major collaboration endeavors aimed at the global connectivity and
2006-2371: SUPPORTING K-12 TEACHER PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENTTHROUGH THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR ENGINEERING ANDTECHNOLOGY EDUCATIONKurt Becker, Utah State University Kurt H. Becker, Ph.D is Interim Department Head in the Department of Engineering and Technology Education, College of Engineering at Utah State University. Areas of research include adult learning cognition, engineering education professional development and technical training. He is the co-project director for the NSF funded "National Center for Engineering and Technology Education" and the PI for the NSF funded "Communities of Effective Practice: A Professional STEM Development Model for Teachers of American Indian Students". He also
Model in ConstructionEngineering and Management”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,Jan/Feb 2003, Vol. 129, No. 1 p65-69.NSF Representative, “Curricular developments in the analytical sciences”, NSFworkshop 1996 and 1997.Sabatini, David A., “Teaching and research synergism: the undergraduate researchexperience”, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, July1997 v123 n3 p98(5).Stier, K.W., “Intergrating into Undergraduate Coursework to Provide ProfessionalExperiences”, Journal of Construction Education 1:18-28.BiographyBrown, H.J.Dr. Heather J. Brown is an Assistant Professor in the Department of EngineeringTechnology and Industrial Studies at Middle Tennessee State University (Murfreesboro,TN). Her
Negotiating Comfort in Difference: Making the Case for Interdisciplinary Collaboration April A. Kedrowicz University of Utah/College of EngineeringAbstractThe face of engineering education is changing. Engineering students’ education not onlyemphasizes technical skills learned through math, science, and computer technology, but inmany cases, also has a leadership focus, manifested through an emphasis on oral communication,writing, teamwork, and ethics. In response to the growing demand for engineers to occupypositions of leadership in organizations upon graduation, engineering educators have had torethink the approach taken to
lessons learned through its emergence as apowerful cross-discipline learning mechanism. An assessment of the course describes iteffectiveness at building the collaborative and interdisciplinary skills needed for students to playleadership roles in the future of sustainable construction. Page 8.229.1 “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”IntroductionA rapid shift is currently taking place in the design and construction of the built environment.Increasingly, importance is placed on the design and
AC 2009-410: SYSTEMS AND GLOBAL ENGINEERING: RESULTS OF A PILOTSTUDY FOR HIGH-SCHOOL STUDENTS AND TEACHERSMercedes McKay, Stevens Institute of TechnologyDebra Brockway, Stevens Institute of TechnologyBeth McGrath, Stevens Institute of TechnologyHenry Harms, Stevens Insititue of TechnologyEirik Hole, Stevens Institute of TechnologyDavid Janosz, NJTEA Page 14.1116.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Systems and Global Engineering: Results of a Pilot Study for High School Students and TeachersAbstractThis three-year project is designed to engage high school classes in New Jersey and elsewhere ina geographically-distributed systems
. Her re- search interests include interdisciplinary collaborations, ways of thinking, online/blended learning, and pedagogy of technology integration.Dr. Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University Dr. Adam Carberry is an associate professor at Arizona State University in the Fulton Schools of Engi- neering Polytechnic School. He earned a B.S. in Materials Science Engineering from Alfred University, and received his M.S. and Ph.D., both from Tufts University, in Chemistry and Engineering Education respectively. His research investigates the development of new classroom innovations, assessment tech- niques, and identifying new ways to empirically understand how engineering students and educators learn. Prior to
competitive, at the cutting edge of technology,bringing to market products desired by customers, of excellent quality, and at competitive prices,is absolutely essential. It is also a time when, more than ever, “no man is an island”; whentimely collaboration with others across the room, or across an ocean is essential for rapid product Page 9.745.1 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineeringdevelopment, good quality, and producing at a competitive price. To be able to perform
presently inhibiting extensive collaboration between theGLC and engineering education at Ohio University are described as well as opportunities for marginallyimproving collaboration despite these challenges.I. IntroductionA university-wide committee of faculty and administrators designed Ohio University’s Global LearningCommunity in 1996-97. It began operating as an experimental program in fall 1998 and was officiallyinaugurated as a formal university certificate-granting program on November 23, 1999.1The GLC’s raison d’être is to provide opportunities to internationalise curricula across campus. It of-fers a thirty-credit, two-year undergraduate residential certificate.2 Admission is competitive and opento all majors; and the certificate is
, Page 9.621.2 and logistic collaboration among program partners.3c; and Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ÆÉ 2004, American Society for Engineering Education• Create an online environment that facilitates collection of data and research collaboration among FEST participants.3a,4,5Development of online and/or blended online versions of the FEST core coursesWeb based technologies are being used to help manage the project comprised of distantpartners with disparate environments, including application of a learning managementsystem to act as: 1) a content management system and 2) a course development systemfor inter-institutional faculty who
progress in addressing thesechallenges and reported its work in a previous workshop session. Building on its findings andgathering input from a broader cross section of attendees, this session produced the followingrecommendations: • Relevant organizations (ECEDHA, IEEE/PES, etc.) should be working to create a single collaborative voice to advocate for power and energy engineering education and research. Building awareness, advertising available programs and highlighting industry opportunities would be possible elements of such a collaborative. Web-based resources would be extremely useful in this regard. • Ways to strengthen/retain engineering talent in this area should include: (1) providing a biennial
allinvolved. Industry can benefit by gaining access to university facilities and its human resources,and by receiving the services and products that faculty and staff generate. In turn, jointcollaboration can provide the College with additional revenue and access to industrial equipmentand setups not available on campus. Successful ventures also help overcome the complaintsabout engineering education: lack of hands-on experience, not enough teamwork, and textbookproblems rather than real-world applications. Students’ involvement in such collaborative effortscan boost their self-confidence and help in improving their communication skills. Jointundertakings could provide professional development to faculty members as well, by exposingthem to practical
at Purdue University. Her research interests include vocational choice in engineering, human-artifact interaction, and engineering and public policy.Ms. Brook Sattler, University of Washington Brook Sattler is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering at the University of Washington. Her dissertation focuses on mechanisms for supporting engineering student development, specifically self-authorship. Page 25.621.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Exploring the Reasons for Collaboration and Cooperation among Graduate Student
Exchange (CLOE)CLOE2 is a collaborative project of fifteen Ontario universities to create an innovativeinfrastructure for joint development of multimedia-rich learning resources, coordinated by, andlocated at, the University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. Each participating institution will Page 9.1428.3 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationdevelop multimedia learning resources, will contribute them to the co-operative exchange andwill use resources developed by the other institutions in return
AC 2011-766: TRAINING CIVIL ENGINEERS TO COMMUNICATE EF-FECTIVELYMaria Dawn Blevins, University of Utah Department of Communication PhD Student CLEAR Consultant for University of Utah School of Engi- neering Page 22.1539.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Training Civil Engineers to Communicate Effectively in the Public Participation Processintroduction Civil engineers are responsible for designing many of the public works projectssponsored by local, state, and federal agencies. They make sure all technical requirementsof the project are
commitment to civic responsibility, participation in volunteer or community service, and multicultural awareness. • Increased student understanding of and commitment to leadership. • Increased student understanding of emotional intelligence factors, such as knowing and managing one’s emotions, motivating oneself, recognizing emotions in others, and handling relationships. • Increased sense of satisfaction by faculty in educating students. Page 9.1319.3 • Increased collaboration between academic and student affairs. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual
. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationSome time is included for instruction on pedagogy and IT, though most of the time is dedicatedto collaborative work within project teams and to each teacher participant developing anInstructional Framework (IF). As described in the LRC, teachers implement their IFs in theirclassrooms over the next year.Teachers who implement their IFs are allowed to return for the next summer session, which isalso for three weeks on campus and within the structure of two graduate courses. Collaborativeteams continue their work with further instruction as needed. Teacher participants
developmentworkshop. These will provide possible implications for improving teaching and learningeffectiveness of engineering education in Taiwan. Page 9.699.1Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education Secondly, five successful attributes of the workshop were found: 1. Administrativesupport by Ministry of Education reinforced faculty rewards and incentives; 2. Disciplinaryrelated teammates are arranged to encourage collaborative learning during group interactions;3. Involvement of multi-disciplinary team facilitators from both
, she is involved in the following projects: National Science Foundation project: Midwest Coalition for Comprehensive Design Education, Society of Manufacturing Engineers Education Foundation Project: Product Lifecycle Management Curriculum Modules and Workforce Innovation in Regional Economic Development (WIRED) Opportunity Fund for North Central Indiana: Development of Integrated Digital Manufacturing Curriculum. She is a student member of the American Society of Engineering Education, Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME), Society of Woman Engineers (SWE), and Woman in Technology (WIT). She published two chapters in two textbooks, two journal articles and presented 23
. Soysal, “Collaborative Engineering Education at Frostburg State University,” Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Zone I Conference, United States Military Academy, West Point, New York2. FSU Engineering Programs Home Page, http://www.frostburg.edu/dept/engn/engrmain.htmOguz A. Soysal received the B.Sc., M.Sc., and Ph.D. degrees from Istanbul Technical University, Turkey.In 1983 he joined ABB-ESAS Power Transformer Company (Istanbul, Turkey) as an R&D engineer. From1986 to 1993 he worked for Black-Sea Technical University, Turkey, as Assistant and Associate Professor.In 1987 he visited The Ohio State University (OSU) as a Post Doctoral Scholar, and in 1991-1992 he spenta sabbatical leave at the
Page 8.947.1 consistent with a quality approach, such as that expected by the AUQA 4 and the IEAust 3.Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education The first stage of this process is an engagement with stakeholders that is providing a more detailed view of the capabilities appropriate for each program.• Year themes are proposed as a way of focussing our attention on the changing needs of students at each year of our programs. The four themes are: o Connection to their own purpose in first year, to studying at university and to the profession o Fundamental principles (founded on practice) in second year
implementationof these ventures to advance engineering education are featured and further explored through theschema. This approach is expected to be of value to new and experienced faculty and administrativepersonnel interested in developing the communication skills and collaborations critically importantfor forming effective, equitable team-based funding structures.IntroductionThe identification of funding opportunities and associated proposal development activities areinterconnected items, but the process of writing for grant and proposal opportunities is notnecessarily linear. In actuality, the process is often highly iterative, moving in different directionsby way of the communication and interpretation of those working in the team to develop
interests are in electric rocket propulsion. He has also spent over twenty five years in course, curriculum, and laboratory development. Page 12.1280.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Site Analysis and Environmental RestorationAbstractTuskegee University (TU), in collaboration with University of Cincinnati (UC), has beenengaged in the development of a two course sequence to educate students inenvironmental restoration/waste management (ER/WM). The course sequence is:1) Introduction to Radiological Engineering and Waste Management and 2) Site Analysisand Environmental Restoration.The content of