: the campus-wide summer bridge training andtraining specific to the Engineering GoldShirt Summer Bridge Program; moreover, they servedas resident advisors (RA’s) and teaching assistants (TA’s) for the summer bridge classes.The pre and post assessments and survey results of this summer bridge program are analyzed andoutlined in this paper. Survey results from peer mentors are also provided. Sharing this summerbridge model will hopefully encourage other universities to take up diversifying summer bridgeprograms and increasing engineering expertise for incoming scholars.Theoretical FrameworkThe design of the Engineering GoldShirt Summer Bridge Program could be described using theconcept of conjecture mapping used in the design based research
Laboratory at MIT. She received her Ph.D. in Sociology from Boston University. Her research interests include the assessment of innovations in pedagogy and the use of educational technology.Rafael Bras, Massachusetts Institute of Technology RAFAEL L. BRAS is Edward Abdun Nur Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering and of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences at MIT. Dr.Bras' undergraduate and graduate degrees are from MIT, where he joined the Faculty in 1976. He is a former Department Head and Chair of the Faculty. His research interests are in hydrology. His educational interests revolve around Terrascope, the program described in this paper.Kip Hodges, Massachusetts Institute of
Paper ID #10119Integration of a First-Year Learning Community with a Vertically-IntegratedDesign ProgramDr. William C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette William (Bill) Oakes is the Director of the EPICS Program and Professor at Purdue University. He is one of the founding faculty members in the School of Engineering Education with courtesy appointments in Mechanical, Environmental and Ecological Engineering as well as Curriculum and Instruction in the College of Education. He has received numerous awards for his efforts at Purdue including being elected as a fellow of the Teaching Academy and listed in the Book of
. Gupta’s current research projects focus on sensor systems and engineering design education. Dr. Gupta likes to tinker with new technology and work on small hobby projects in her basement lab. Her other hobbies include reading, classical dancing, and traveling.Greg A Dunko Dunko Greg is the Senior Vice President of the Product and Program Management Office (PMO), where he leads strategic product planning and program business operations. Prior to joining NantHealth, he served as Global Head of Product Development at BlackBerry, leading all mobile phone hardware development. Prior to this, Greg led the Electrical and Computer Engineering senior design program at North Carolina State University – creating a new full
measurement of variations in size between objects of the same type in a large stack of images. Although labor intensive, this project should be reasonable for a novice student to complete during a semester. I would provide weekly training for students to introduce them to computational techniques and image analysis, while you provided students with guidance on the research project within your discipline. The goal for these manual projects would be to help students gain research skills while also helping you work on a small research problem/project of interest to you. As students gain skills, they may work with you to extend the projects to further automate and accelerate your research.”All of the
means and how best to deliver the appropriatelessons to students, is the overarching goal of a set of work suggested in the introduction. Thework is to fully explore what soft skills are most important and are perceived as lacking and thenidentify techniques by which these skills may be successfully enhanced in students. This firstwork helped gather some insight into faculty perceptions of skills lacking and now can lead to anext research question. Considering this multistep approach , a possible next step to continue thiswork would be validation of any weakness among the students. In other words, how do theyview themselves? Do they think they can juggle small and large assignments from multiplecourses well and get work done efficiently? Do
) Engineering at San Jose State University (SJSU). He is currently the chair of SJSU Senate Student Success Committee. Farshid completed his Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interests center on First-Year Engineering student success and engineering design. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Developing a Program to Assist in Qualitative Data Analysis: How Engineering Students’ Discuss Model TypesAbstractThis Research paper discusses the opportunities that utilizing a computer program can present inanalyzing large amounts of qualitative data collected through a survey tool
ChoiceAbstract:This complete evidence-based practice paper explores the longitudinal impact of a first-yearengineering course designed to help students discern their future engineering major. The purposeof this study was to assess an engineering educational program’s effectiveness in helping studentsto make an informed selection of an engineering major. Effectiveness is relative and based onmeasures of student persistence and major changes after five semesters. The institution studied isa medium-sized Midwestern, urban public institution in which four cohort years were tracked.Two cohorts (2012 and 2013) took a one-credit hour large lecture (200+ students) course to learnabout the engineering majors offered and is contrasted with two cohorts (2014 and 2015
concern is that of the interface between a computer and acommunication network, such as an ISDN or LAN based system.1 0.0 Computers—small, medium and large Page 3.87.10 10Today there is a vast spectrum of microcomputers, minicomputers, and large centralizedcomputers. This module will discuss some of the underlying architectural and performancedifferences of small, m6dium, and large computing complexes.The evolution of computer applications and functionality in a world with powerful chips will betraced and projected.11.0 Operating Systems We assume
Science and Information Technologies, and Applied Sciences. Inthis contribution, we report an overview of student satisfaction toward achieving the course'sspecific objectives, the students' perception of the importance of each avenue, and theirperceptions of difficulty and time demands. We surveyed 1,499 students enrolled in programs inall four avenues of the School of Engineering and Sciences after completing the introductorycourse. The overall results of the survey showed a high level of student satisfaction. The studentsperceived that the course effectively conveyed the avenue contents and how the educationalmodel works to develop and assess competencies. They valued having explored the differentavenues of the school. The results also
for Undergraduate Studies in the Bagley College of Engi- neering at Mississippi State University. His background is in biomedical engineering and he has been a big proponent of self-directed learning and active learning in his classes and was the first person to intro- duce problem-based learning in the department of agricultural and biological engineering at MSU. James is also the Adjunct Director for training and instruction in the professional services department at ABET. In this role, Warnock oversees the development, planning, production and implementation of the ABET Program Assessment Workshops, IDEAL and the assessment webinar series. He also directs activities related to the workshop facilitator training
currently holds the title of Senior Lecturer and focuses on designing the curriculum and teaching in the freshman engineering program. She is also involved in the NAE Grand Challenge Scholars Program, the ASU ProMod project, the Engineering Projects in Community Service program, the Engineering Futures program, and the Global Freshman Academy. Dr. Zhu also designs and teaches courses in mechanical engineering at ASU, including Mechanics of Materials, Mechanical Design, Mechanism Analysis and Design, Finite Element Analysis, etc. She was part of a team that designed a largely team and activ- ity based online Introduction to Engineering course, as well as a team that developed a unique MOOC introduction to engineering
can be difficult to internalizeand discuss in an open forum, the course builds towards these topics, starting out withrelatively easier topics (e.g. Mindset and Bloom’s Taxonomy) and moving towards issues ofbelonging and identity by the end of the 15-week semester.An important aspect of the course is that it is incorporated into the students’ general educationrequirements and is not an extra burden of credits taken in addition to required program andgeneral education coursework. RIT requires students to take a course that addressesidentification of ethical questions, and the Metacognition course addresses the outcomes andhas assessments that examine students’ ability to identify and address ethical scientificquestions through case study
Paper ID #32931Longitudinal Effects of Team-Based Training on Students’ Peer RatingQualityMr. Siqing Wei, Purdue University at West Lafayette Siqing Wei received BSEE and MSEE from Purdue University. He is currently pursuing a Ph.D. degree in Engineering Education program at Purdue University. After years of experience of serving the peer teacher and a graduate teaching assistant in first-year-engineering courses, he is now a research assistant at CATME research group studying how cultural diversity impacts teamwork and how to help students improve intercultural competency and teamwork competency by interventions
Paper ID #29646Asking Questions about Data: First-year Engineering Students’Introduction to Data AnalyticsMr. Ruben D. Lopez-Parra P.E., Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Ruben D. Lopez-Parra is a graduate research assistant at Purdue University pursuing a Ph.D. in Engi- neering Education. Previously, he worked as a Natural Science teacher in High School where he, as a scholarly teacher, constantly assessed his performance to design better learning environments that pro- mote students’ conceptual understanding. In 2015, Ruben earned the M.S in Chemical Engineering at Universidad de
beenintroduced to them in classroom presentations early in the semester and again the week beforethis first meeting.On the day of the meeting, all available Connector Faculty volunteers (28 out of 34) gathered inthe large EGR 100 classroom and were introduced to the entire student group. After briefintroductions, each faculty member met with his or her student group. Since the classroom is ina residence hall (the future site of our residential program), a cafeteria and coffee shop werereadily available for informal first meetings. Each faculty member was provided with speciallydesigned T-shirts in the school colors and emblazoned with the title “I’m Connected!” Thesewere distributed to the students as a small token to mark the occasion (and to advertise
basic concepts in management, business, publicpolicy, and leadership.”This paper describes a course entitled “CEE Professional Practice” that can serve as a model forother universities striving to meet and exceed the requirements of the new program criteria. Thecourse focuses on 11 areas of professional practice such as how management and leadershipdiffer, management of self and others, and how organizational structure can influence success.These areas are interrelated through a semester-long keystone project. The project selected forthis course must meet certain criteria; the project must be current, large in scope, andcontroversial with unknown solutions.At the conclusion of this course, students have had the opportunity to lead, manage
being used toteach first-year engineering students are programs throughout the country, highlighting therationale for each. Next, a summary of the previous first-semester programs at Valparaiso willbe presented, along with a discussion of the revision process that took place over a period ofmany months. Finally, we will describe the resulting course, which was taught for the first timein the fall semester of 2005, including an assessment of its effectiveness and lessons learned forfuture improvement of the course.2. Philosophies in First-Year Engineering EducationSeveral very different approaches to teaching first-year students have emerged over the pastseveral decades. Each of them has merit, and each has arisen as a result of real needs of
-Dux is a Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in Food Science from Cornell University and her Ph.D. in Food Process En- gineering from the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering at Purdue University. She is a member of Purdue’s Teaching Academy. Since 1999, she has been a faculty member within the First- Year Engineering Program, teaching and guiding the design of one of the required first-year engineering courses that engages students in open-ended problem solving and design. Her research focuses on the development, implementation, and assessment of modeling and design activities with authentic engineer- ing contexts. She is currently
engineering education strategies as well as the technologies to support the 21st century classroom (online and face to face). He also has assisted both the campus as well as the local community in developing technology programs that highlight student skills development in ways that engage and attract individuals towards STEAM and STEM fields by showcasing how those skills impact the current project in real-world ways that people can understand and be involved in. As part of a university that is focused on supporting the 21st century student demographic he continues to innovate and research on how we can design new methods of learning to educate both our students and communities on how STEM and STEAM make up a large part of
common courses; (2) classroomlearning communities where a cohort of students enrolled in a large lecture are broken intosmaller cohorts for cooperative learning and group process learning opportunities (3) residentialliving and learning communities where students with a common major live in the same area of aresidential hall increasing the opportunity for out-of-class learning experiences; (4) student typelearning communities which enroll a targeted group, for example academically at risk students,honors students or minorities in engineering. While living and learning residential hall programsare fairly common in engineering programs across the country, curricular learning communitiesare rare in the engineering curriculum [2]. In fall 2007, the
graduatestudents teaching in the undergraduate program. Also, the class size for lecture and laboratorysections are intentionally kept small, even during the first-year, in order to be consistent with themission of the School. Laboratory sections are geared to be between ten and fifteen students.Lifelong learning in the curriculum. A rubric was developed to assess students on thedemonstration of knowledge and awareness of lifelong learning, of application of skillsconsistent with, and of behavior associated with someone who is a lifelong learner. Performanceindicators constituting evidence that lifelong learning is occurring included: ● recognition of the need for further education and self-improvement; ● recognition of the necessity of continuing
typicalintegrated “trio.” All three programs have recently undergone an institutional assessment of programeffectiveness—the Instruction Matters: Purdue Academic Course Transformation (IMPACT)initiative (informed by Deci & Ryan14), and have accordingly redesigned their curricula to bemore student-centered. We expect that these adjustments in curricula and objectives will alsoaffect how well each section’s instructors are able to create synergy between the sections theyare teaching, Furthermore, the programmatic structures of the three courses may also challengeinstructors’ efforts to integrate content and teaching. The relatively set, centralized syllabus forCommunication and Technology courses allowed for pre-planned integration at the level
how to manipulate large datasets through flexiblecoding languages [2], [3]. Thus, there is currently dissonance between curriculum norms associated withcoding and the future needs that have been identified in the civil engineering industry at large.Literature also suggests that it is becoming increasingly critical to teach students how to understandalgorithmic syntax, that is the structure of code and the process of data analysis, rather than simply how togenerate a “correct” result from a single function [4]. Programming has been shown to help student findalgorithmic solutions to problems when implemented correctly and Python provides a unique, general-purpose coding language with a small core of intuitive commands that allow even novice
, compile data and perform analyses related to the value of agiven technology-based business opportunity as specified by their project sponsor. In additionthey write four formal assessments of current vs. best practice with recommendations, prepareand discuss a mid-term interim findings report, and at end of term deliver a comprehensive reportalong with an extensive presentation with Q&A. The writing professor on our team will consultwith these students as they work on their written reports.Conclusions and ContributionsIt is important for engineers to be able to practice in a global environment. More and moreengineers are going to be involved with companies in other countries. ABET recognizes this isimportant. One of its mandated program
summarized findings from the projectimplementation, laboratory assessment, and instrument development perspectives:educational tools must be carefully designed and tested in order to be effectively used bystudents; frequent access to tools is needed before noticeable changes can be observed;and laboratory work has the most impact on a student’s ability to conduct experiments, ontheir opinions/understanding of engineering, and on their attitude toward work.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science FoundationCourse, Curriculum, & Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Program (now theTransforming Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)Program) under Type I grant DUE–0942680. Opinions
course concepts due tolack of understanding of domain vocabulary. One strategy for addressing this problem is tomake design of vocabulary part of overall course design. This requires explicitly identifying thevocabulary that students need to learn in the course of their studies. Proper specification ofvocabulary is likely to be particularly important in introductory courses that form the foundationof engineering disciplines.Identifying discipline-specific words helps instructors establish clear expectations of requiredvocabulary knowledge, while building robust technical communication skills. If students have aclear understanding of required vocabulary, then instructors will be able to develop higherquality teaching and assessment material. As a
Engineering, CIP Code 14010100 7. While this pool islarge, only a small subset of the total may be interested in an online program after completing thefirst two years at community college. Although it is not a requirement most, but not all, of ouronline 2+2 students are Texas residents. The quality of community college transfer students isreasonably good with only a slight drop off in academic performance when the students transferto a 4 year engineering program8. The program has also attracted students who left engineering for non-academic reasonsincluding family responsibilities, employment and starting businesses. The pool of these studentsis small, but the department has historically had success with this student population. About halfof
students.Engineering students usually study the syntax and semantics of low-level programminglanguages (PL) such as C or assembly in one or two semesters. They have fewer opportunities toapply the learnt programming skills compared with computer science or software engineeringstudents. It is common for engineering students to forget the syntax of C language. When a classproject involves software programming, students often spent a large amount of time indebugging syntax and semantics errors, with little time left for algorithm development andverification. Some engineering students consider writing a small program with 300 to 500 linesof code as a painful experience. And a large percentage of the junior or senior design projectsthat could not be accomplished
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Depart- ment at ASU. His interests include student pathways and motivations into engineering and developing lab-based curriculum. Recently, he has developed an interest in non-traditional modes of content delivery including online classes and flipped classrooms.Dr. Haolin Zhu, Arizona State University Haolin Zhu is a faculty lecturer in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State Univer- sity. She received her Ph.D. in Solid Mechanics from Cornell University. Currently she focuses on the freshmen engineering program, as well as designing and teaching mechanical engineering courses.Dr. Chao Wang, Arizona State University Chao Wang received her Ph.D. in Electrical