both the actions taken by the students to engage in researchactivities and the actions of the faculty to engage with the students, we found that the membersof Team Y used four kinds of power, shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: A strict inclusion domain analysis of the power yielded by the members of Team YWe defined these four kinds of power as follows. Knowledge refers to the power that comes fromthe generation of new ideas or the use of other's knowledge or ideas (e.g. faculty memberssuggesting the use of a particular method to the undergraduate researchers based on theirknowledge of and prior use of the method). Resources are tangible sources of power (e.g.introducing the students to a researcher they know who could be interviewed for their
, Purdue University at West Lafayette Robin S. Adams is a Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University, USA. She holds a PhD in Education, an MS in Materials Science and Engineering, and a BS in Mechanical En- gineering. Her research is in three interconnecting areas: cross-disciplinary thinking, acting, and being; design cognition and learning; and translating educational research to practice. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Situative Understanding of the NGSS Science and Engineering Practices (Fundamental)Introduction The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) for pre-college science education callsfor 3
Group’s ’Tutorials in Introductory Physics’ system and ’Physics by Inquiry’ curriculum in comparison to labatorials as well as observed their ongoing physics laboratory reform.Dr. Mandana Sobhanzadeh, Mount Royal University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Comparison of Labatorials and Traditional Physics Labs Franco La Braca1, Calvin S. Kalman1 , Mandana Sobhanzadeh21 Department of Physics, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec H4B 1R6, Canada Phone-1-514-848-2424x32842 Department of General Education, Mount Royal University, Calgary, Alberta T3E 6K6, Canadaintroduction The physics lab has long been a distinctive part
separately, and yet the responses showed similarthemes across their different levels and types of experiences as women in CE (undergraduatestudents, alumni working in CE field, faculty members in a CE program with experience in thefield).Sense of belongingDuring the initial stages of the group sessions, participants described their personal definitions ofa sense of belonging. Their examples and points raised were categorized utilizing the NVivosoftware Ⓡ in order to generate a word cloud, shown in Figure 1.Figure 1. Word cloud to conceptualize sense of belonging according to study participants (NVivo Ⓡ).According to participant responses, the sense of belonging is fueled by positive feelings of self
have been developed in computing education to measure and assess self-efficacy [9, 10, 11]. Recently, Steinhorst et al. proposed a more generalized instrument for assessingself-efficacy that is paradigms and language agnostic [12]. Multiple studies have investigated therole of self-efficacy in the context of introductory programming courses [13, 14, 15, 16]. Whilethere have been a number of studies, it should be noted that the landscape of CS1 has been evolv-ing with growing enrollments and a wide variety of programming languages used in the courses.Also, more students can now take CS0/1 in high school compared to some time back [17]. Thus,studying the effect of motivational constructs may differ based on students’ past experiences
[7]. Even ally programs, such as Green Zonetraining, have the potential to perpetuate harmful stereotypes about student veterans [8].Evidence suggests that student veterans experience negative consequences from stereotypesabout their experiences, strengths and weaknesses, and capability of succeeding in highereducation [9-10].Common MythsThere are eleven common myths or stereotypes undermining public and civilian perceptions ofveterans [11]. The survey employed for this current study included all eleven items except for thequestion about generational bias, captured in item (4) below. (1) Veterans suffer disproportionately from PTSD. (2) Due to combat induced PTS, veterans are a liability and can break at any moment. (3) Veterans get
Learning Styles,” in 2003 Annual Conference Proceedings, Nashville, Tennessee, Jun. 2003, p. 8.31.1-8.31.17. doi: 10.18260/1-2--12424.[22] A. P. Zimmerman, R. G. Johnson, T. S. Hoover, J. W. Hilton, P. H. Heinemann, and D. R. Buckmaster, Comparison of Personality Types and Learning Styles of Engineering Students, Agricultural Systems Management Students and Faculty in an Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, Trans. ASABE, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 311–317, 2006, doi: 10.13031/2013.20213.[23] A. Turner, “Generation Z: Technology and Social Interest,” J. Individ. Psychol., vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 103–113, 2015, doi: 10.1353/jip.2015.0021.[24] K. A. J. Mohr, “Understanding Generation Z Students to Promote
accomplished over a four-week period of one laboratory session per week, 2.8 hours persession, and three lectures sessions per week, 0.8 hours per session. An outline of the projecttasks is presented by week.Project Tasks • Understand the operating principles of ADS-B In and Out, and the technical standards of ADS-B Out. (Week 1 Lecture, one 0.8-hour session) • Understand the framework of designated ADS-B receiver, data flow and the function of each component. (Week 1 Lecture, one 0.8-hour session) • Check for understanding using a short quiz on architecture and data flow. Discuss applications of ADS-B in industry (Week 1 Lecture, one 0.8-hour session) • Verify that all students have completed the previous labs in the
science andtechnology innovation in Chinese universities, obtain the necessary conditionalvariables and allocation factors, and provide policy Suggestions for thedevelopment of higher education and scientific research in China in the new erathrough empirical research. Therefore, the research question of this paper is: (1)what are the comprehensive factors that affect the performance of scientific andtechnological innovation in universities? ( 2 ) From the perspective of policyformulation, how should universities improve the performance of scientific andtechnological innovation?Firstly, on the basis of literature research, condition variables are listed asreferences. Secondly, resource dependence theory is used to establish a model, anddescriptive
transitioning from a typicallecture-based approach to an experiential learning approach while describing associated benefitsrelated to engineering and technology student leadership outcomes.IntroductionIt is increasingly apparent that today’s engineering challenges require a higher order of thinking.The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) states that engineeringprograms must demonstrate that their baccalaureate students attain certain outcomes forgraduation. A set of 11 student outcomes1 are described in General Criterion 3 that can bedivided into two primary categories: five “hard” technical skills and a second set of six“professional” or “soft” skills2 as indicated in Table 1 below.Table 1 - ABET General Criterion 3. Student
determined in [15], [16] and are presented below: • Perception of STEM fields, like engineering, as too difficult. • Considerable time commitment outside of the classroom, approximately double the time outside of class required for majors like communications, marketing, and criminal justice. • Higher dropout rate for engineering students than for most majors. • Lack of preparedness for the level of rigor involved in engineering programs. • Student interests do not match college engineering degree programs.Many of these factors can be addressed in the K-12 education system or from higher educationinstitutions in a pre-college setting. In general, the literature presents two types of outreachactivities: (1) student-oriented
decade. Typically, survey-type courses covering a wide variety ofinfrastructure topics allow enduring themes to guide specific content. In the case of oneinfrastructure engineering course, the enduring themes have been energy, water, andtransportation. For many students, water’s basic properties are well-understood; directobservation and physical interaction with water concepts like pressure and flow rate result in aninnate understanding upon which deeper knowledge can be built. Conversely, the properties ofenergy, especially electric power, tend to pose special challenges. Although students’ lives areinextricably dependent upon electricity, daily experiences generally do not provide for direct,physical, or visual observation of the fundamental
. 1 0These states are orthonormal. The same thing would happen with the horizontal or verticalpolarization states H H V V 1 and H V V H 0 .The general quantum state of a spin ½ particle (or photon) is a linear superposition such as a b a 1 b 0 where a and b are complex amplitudes that obey the Born12 rule, a b a*a b*b 1 . They are a superposition of states – something with no classical analog. 2 2An N-qubit register is N of these 2-state systems. A 3-qubit register has 23 basis states. For an N-qubit register with 2 N basis states a quantum operator (quantum logic gate) is represented by a2 N 2 N unitary matrix.For a 2-state system that corresponds to 2N basis states; we
proposition might be for thesocial enterprise they are ideating as part of their project.A list of all topics covered in the course is provided in Table 1 below, categorized according tothe three overarching course topics of WPs, social entrepreneurship, and S/CC. Regarding theS/CC topics, students receive a general introduction to the topics of sustainability and climatechange, and then throughout the semester, learn about additional, different S/CC-focusedproblems. In addition to learning about each problem, emphasis is placed on how each problemcan be addressed through three different paths: through policy changes, through individualchanges, and through social entrepreneurship. Examples of businesses and social enterprisesaddressing each problem
dynamicvehicle evaluations, technical presentations, and deliverables are calculated and the winners forthe year announced.In order to execute a competition of this magnitude, sponsors provide both in-kind donations(e.g. engineering software applications, hardware, dedicated training sessions) and supplementalmonetary donations. In return, sponsors receive opportunities to interface with the studentparticipants and an increased visibility within the EcoCAR program. EcoCAR highlights sponsorcontributions to external audiences via social media, blog posts, interviews, and other marketingmediums. Additionally, EcoCAR provides sponsors with roughly 1000 students and futureengineers to beta-test their cutting edge technology.B. COVID-19 Impacts on the EcoCAR
isrelated to attitudes [1]. However, attitude studies are rather general and do not emphasize therelevance of students’ careers. In studies with pre-university students, the results show that thereis a significant difference by gender between the perceptions of the relevance of sciences, infavor of the male student, and that this difference increases with age [2].Porche, Grossman, Noonan and Wong [3] analyzed factors that influence young females topursue a STEM career. Among their results, science and math self-efficacy were factors toconsider. Eccles, Wigfiedl, Harold and Blumenfeld [4] analyzed the age and gender differencesthat elementary students have in self-efficacy.The attitude that students have of themselves on science and mathematics is
and technological development, and general education knowledge, ascaptured by the college students’ experience questionnaire [1]. We postulate that students’investment in the quality of effort in their academic task, utilization of resources in theenvironment, motivation to learn, college environment policy in terms of scholarships that areprovided, and parents’ educational background are all significant predictors of progress studentsmake in terms of their overall desired progress they make in college.MethodResearch questionThe research questions that guided this research are as follows:RQ 1: What factors have a significant relationship with high-achieving engineering students'progress toward desired educational outcomes?RQ 2: What factors
. Allcomponents are controlled and monitored through an online interface that interacts with a localhost Raspberry Pi computer. Figure 1: A 3D render of the remote wet labNetwork ArchitectureUltimately, the intent of the project is to build a reproducible infrastructure of network hardware,interface code, and laboratory equipment to provide the next generation of students meaningfulaccess to laboratory experiences. A fully online interface to view, study, and interact withgeneral laboratory equipment is a lofty goal but one that can be achieved at relatively simplelevels nonetheless. To make the design most accessible, hardware components must beinexpensive and common, computer or peripheral needs must not be prohibitive, and
have attended projectmeetings and contributed to the project are acknowledged gratefully. Project leaders and thestudents also appreciate the funding support from the Maryland Space Grant Consortium(MDSGC) and the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA).References[1]. A.Nagchaudhuri, T.W. Ford, and C. Hartman, "Overview of Remote Sensing Efforts at University of Maryland Eastern Shore." Proceedings of the ASME 2019 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 9: 15th IEEE/ASME International Conference on Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications. Anaheim, USA. August 18–21, 2019. V009T12A027. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2019-98457
systemwas worthwhile.The general process for asynchronous multimedia feedback is shown in Figure 1. Studentssubmit their assignments in a traditional manner using a course management system, in this case,Blackboard. The instructor then grades the assignment, capturing in real time their computerscreen and audio commentary. This is accomplished using one of many readily availablesoftware packages, including but not limited to Camtasia Studio, Microsoft Expression, Jing, orSnagit. As the program is executing or the code is being reviewed, annotations are made on thescreen in real time using a tool such as Epic pen, which allows annotations to be made on top of Figure 1: Asynchronous Multimedia Feedback flow.any desktop. These
National Academy ofEngineering entitled “Workshop on Pathways for Engineering Talent.” This workshop wasorganized by the NAE’s Committee on Understanding the Engineering-Education WorkforceContinuum. Attendees included members of the NAE, engineering educators, industryrepresentatives, and public policy fellows. The goal of this workshop was to investigate thecareer paths of four-year engineering graduates and to delve into factors affecting the persistenceof engineering graduates in engineering and other technical fields. Presenters includedeconomists, sociologists, engineering recruiters, university and professional career counselors,and educational researchers. Information from this workshop, including that obtained frombreakout session
may not have a lot of discretionary time to devoteto formal out-of-school STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) programs,which foster the subsequent pursuit of STEM careers.1 Moreover, working youth may not haveextra disposable income to devote to many STEM activities such as attendance at sciencemuseums or the purchase of STEM magazines and materials, which also foster the pursuit ofSTEM careers.2, 3 High school students’ workplaces may thus be promising sites for fosteringequitable STEM learning because they are sites inhabited by many youth who do not have thesame access to formal STEM learning opportunities as youth from more affluent families.The purpose of this study was to identify the types of engineering-related
proper etiquette,as well as general types of questions they could pose to learn more about the leadership style ofeach speaker. Immediately after that preparation, a “practice” guest speaker comes to the class;usually the instructor. The preparation of the students to ask good questions is significantlyenhanced by asking one student to introduce a speaker for the session. This gives each studentthe valuable experience of talking to the speaker before the seminar.The willingness of the speakers to educate the next generation of leaders is the single mostimportant element of the class. Nearly to a person, the speakers need to believe in the importanceof leadership development – not only for their organization, but for society. A good speaker
, in the Graduation outcome section, “DNG”refers to “Did Not Graduate”, and “G” represents “Graduated”. (a) Classification with All Predictors (b) Classification without Gender or Race Predictors Figure 1: Classification ResultsThe results were generated using different classifier selections for different neural networktraining and testing. Figure 1a shows the results of the network that uses all the classifiersavailable in Table 1. Figure 1b shows the results with the removal of the gender and ethnicityclassifiers. This provides a more general prediction without taking into account somedemographic data. We noticed that there were no major differences in the results obtained foreach combination.It is
rendered animations on the same website as theCurriculum for public access. Figure 1 and Figure 2 shows several such developed pest models.Figures 3 shows the Ecoregions of Texas generated by TPWD which is the basis for oursearchable module. Figure 4 shows our Ecoregion module with an example of correspondingplants/pests found in said ecoregion. Figure 5 shows Info Panels accessible to the students forreview and study that also include links to USDA Fact Sheets and Identification Guides fordownloading. (a) Asian Citrus Psyllid eggs: Original1 (left) and Animated (right) (b) Adult Asian Citrus Psyllid: Original2 (left) and Animated (right) (c) Red Ring Disease: Original3 (left) and Animated (right)Figure 1: Glimpse of
include gender in engineering education research, interdisciplinarity, peer review, engineers’ epistemologies, and global engineering education. Page 26.626.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Engineering Faculty Members’ Discussing the Role of University Policy in Addressing UnderrepresentationIntroductionDespite over thirty years of research and outreach to recruit and retain female engineeringstudents, women remain significantly underrepresented in engineering.1 While a large amount ofliterature has been generated on gender inequalities in faculty careers, no
look different. In the week following the first exam, students were asked to begindeveloping a concept map for Convection Heat Transfer. In the week preceding the secondexam, which focused primarily on Convection Heat Transfer, another instructor-created conceptmap was shared with the class. Student-created concept maps were collected at the end of thecourse, but they were not graded. Note that a concept map was not developed for Radiation HeatTransfer as the course schedule permitted only a brief (approximately two weeks) introduction tothe topic. An instructor-generated concept map is presented in Figure 1.The study was repeated during the Spring 2023 offering of the same course by the instructorwhen eighteen students were enrolled
insights. This preliminary analysis serves as a foundation for deeper investigationsinto spatial skills within the MET program. While the data shows promising trends, furtherexamination and collaboration are essential to unlock the full potential of spatial skills assessmentand its impact on education and interdisciplinary cooperation.REFERENCESDuffy, G., Power, J., Sorby, S., Bowe, B. (2018). Differentiating between Spatial Ability as aSpecific Rather than General Factor of Intelligence in Performance on Simple, Non-routineProblems in Mathematics. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 82(1), 43-46.http://edgj.org/index.php/EDGJ/article/view/682Lubinski, D. (2010). Spatial ability and STEM: A sleeping giant for talent identification anddevelopment
; exposing policy students to contemporary technologicalissues and the importance of understanding technology in the policy creation process; andpromoting and increasing future involvement of the students, generally, and engineering andscience students, particularly, in the policy making process.IntroductionThe present wisdom holds that as technology becomes increasingly important in society, there isa simultaneously increasing need for a well-trained workforce comprising leaders and decisionmakers who understand technical issues and problems associated with our economic, social andenvironmental well-being, including those related to clean water, environmental sustainability,information security, energy production, nonproliferation, food security
insufficient attention to the latter and lackof related competencies in entry-level engineers [4], [5].University students who major in construction engineering typically manage construction sitesafter graduation. There is a growing recognition that higher education institutions must placegreater emphasis on developing generic skills among students [7]. These generic soft skillsinclude the ability to work effectively in a team, communicate clearly, engage inmultidisciplinary teamwork, collaboratively build knowledge, and solve complex problems [7].The study indicated that there are two perspectives among students regarding engineers' ability tomove from technical to managerial positions [4]. Some students believe that engineers can makethe transition