Paper ID #37061The Ties that Bind: Library E-Resources and FacultyResearchChristie A Wiley Chris Wiley is an Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Data Services Librarian with Grainger Engineering Library © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comAbstractIncreasingly, academic libraries are becoming more interested in visualizing collection usagestatistics to demonstrate return-on-investment analyses. Data visualization provides a detailedview that connects subscription resources provided by the library to researchers
University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (UTRGV). His research interests include Tribology, Lubrication, Biomaterials, Additive Manufacturing, and Engineering Education. Dr. Ortega has been involved in different research projects, including tribological and corrosion studies of surface-engineered biomaterials intended for hip joint replacements and developing vegetable-oil-based lubricants modified with nanoparticles as lubricant additives.Dr. Arturo A. Fuentes, The University of Texas, Rio Grande Valley Dr. Fuentes is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley where he has worked since 2001. He obtained his MS and Ph.D. degrees from the Rice University in 1997 and 1999
-time and discrete-time systems, analog or digital filter design, and hybrid power system design. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Project-Based Learning on Diverse Concepts in a Power Electronic LaboratoryAbstractThis paper presents a project-based learning approach to teach the fundamental aspects of a DCmotor, half-wave, and full-wave rectifier circuits in a laboratory. The lab's objectives include: 1. Learn about the essential components of a DC motor by constructing a low-cost DC motor kit. 2. Explore practical methods to enhance the design and performance of the DC motor. 3. Explore and build half-wave and full-wave rectifier circuits to
AC 2011-802: GRADE 3-8 TEACHERS’ INITIAL IDEAS ABOUT 21STCENTURY SKILLS IN THE CONTEXT OF A SCIENCE AND ENGINEER-ING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMAugusto Z. Macalalag Jr., Stevens Institute of Technology Augusto Z. Macalalag Jr. is an Assistant Director of STEM Education Research at Stevens Institute of Technology’s Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education. He is responsible for conducting teacher workshops, program development, research, and publications as part of the National Science Foundation’s Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program. His research interests include improving K-12 science and engineering education through teacher preservice and inservice programs.Chris Jurado, Stevens
. Page 6.251.5“Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering Education” Figure 3. The ABE peer mentor coordinated an information meeting with past ABE interns and co-op students in the Maple Hall lounge area.Faculty-Student DinnersFaculty-Student dinners are an important feature of our LLC. Coordinated once each semester,the faculty-student dinners are held in Maple Hall. The events begin at 5:15 p.m. with pre-dinnerappetizers (catered by the ISU Department of Residence) in the Friant House lounge. During thisinformal time, faculty and students are able to engage in conversation in a relaxed
., Dromgold-Sermen, M. S., Potter, H., Sathy, V., & Panter, A. T. (2020). “Looking at myself in the future”: How mentoring shapes scientific identity for STEM students from underrepresented groups. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00242-3[12] Domingo, M. R., Sharp, S., Freeman, A., Freeman, T., Harmon, K., Wiggs, M., Sathy, V., Panter, A. T., Oseguera, L., Sun, S., Williams, M. E., Templeton, J., Folt, C. L., Barron, E. J., Hrabowski, F. A., Maton, K. I., Crimmins, M., Fisher, C. R., & Summers, M. F. (2019). Replicating Meyerhoff for inclusive excellence in STEM. Science, 364(6438), 335–337. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar5540[13] Tsui, L. (2007
skill to the engineering students,” University of Arkansas-Fort Smith/University of Missouri-Rolla, 2007.[16] P. L. Hirsch et al., “Engineering design and communication: The case for interdisciplinary collaboration,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 17, no. 4/5, pp. 343–348, 2001.[17] “Mega 2560 The Most Complete Starter Kit,” ELEGOO Official. [Online]. Available: https://www.elegoo.com/products/elegoo-mega-2560-the-most-complete-starter-kit
. Paul, R. Khan, A. Tursunbayeva, N. Perez, and S. Bhaduri, “What we do not know: Gpt use in business and management,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.05273, 2025.[17] R. Khan, S. Bhaduri, T. Mackenzie, A. Paul, S. KJ, and I. Sen, “Path to personalization: A systematic review of genai in engineering education,” in KDD AI4Edu Workshop, 2024.[18] H. Landemore, “Inclusive constitution making and religious rights: Lessons from the icelandic experiment,” The Journal of Politics, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 762–779, 2017.[19] S. Mueller, M. Gerber, and H.-P. Schaub, “Democracy beyond secrecy: assessing the promises and pitfalls of collective voting,” Swiss Political Science Review, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 61–83, 2021
under shear loading. She is currently an Associate Professor in the Mechanical Engineering department at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology where her research interests include novel manufacturing and characterization techniques of polymer and composite structures and the incorporation of multifunctionality by inducing desired responses to mechanical loading.Stuart D. Kellogg (Professor & Chair)Deborah Jean Mitchell (Artist in Residence )Matthew Whitehead © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Investigating the Impact of Arts on Student Learning by Introducing Glass Science in the
styles. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2005. 21(1): p. 103-12.7. Rosati, P.A. The learning preferences of engineering students from two perspectives. in ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education. 1998. Tempe, Arizona.8. Litzinger, T.A., et al., A psychometric study of the index of learning styles. Journal of Engineering Education, 2007. 96(4): p. 309-319.9. Zualkernan, I.A., J. Allert, and G.Z. Qadah, Learning styles of computer programming students: a middle eastern and American comparison. IEEE Transactions on Education, 2006. 49(4): p. 443-50.10. Felder, R.M., Learning and teaching styles in foreign and second language education. Foreign Language Annals, 1995. 28(1): p. 21-31.11. Bonar
responsive learning environments. Her recent publications appear in the Handbook on the Cultural Foundations of Learning, the Studies in Engineering Education journal, the International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, and the Anthropology and Education Quarterly.Dr. Tahira Reid, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Tahira Reid Smith (publishes under ”Reid”) is a Professor at Pennsylvania State University in Me- chanical Engineering and Engineering Design, the Arthur L. Glenn Professor of Engineering Education, and the Associate Department Head for Inclusive Research and Education in Mechanical Engineering. She is also a co-founder of Black in Engineering. Her research involves the quantification and integra
). Many community colleges across the U.S. offer engineering courses whichtransfer to a four-year university, and 42.7% of engineering students are enrolled at a communitycollege at some point in their education (NSF, 2019). However, year-over-year retention ofstudents in community colleges is low – freshman-to-sophomore rates of retention hover around55% on average (Monaghan and Sommers, 2022). One reason for low retention is thatcommunity college students tend to have more commitments outside of school than theircounterparts at four-year universities. Many colleges offer programs intended to increaseretention and engagement among these students (such as research, scholarships, and formalmentorship). In this review, I sought to answer the
design, development, and facilitation, and offers future recommendations forimprovements.IntroductionEngineering educators often combine emerging new technologies with creative teaching andlearning strategies [1]-[3]. To usher the planet into the next century, the National Academy ofEngineering (NAE) identified fourteen grand challenges that must be tackled to ensure thecontinuation of life by making our world more sustainable, secure, healthy and joyful (Table I).The Grand Challenges Scholars Program (GCSP) was established and endorsed in 2008 by theNAE. Table I The NAE’s Twenty-First Century Grand Challenges for Engineering Make Solar Energy Economical Prevent Nuclear
] when they used case-based teaching compared to the lecture only format.It may also be an approach to address Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET)accreditation Criterion 3 (Student Outcomes) argue Sankar and colleagues [7]. These include aspectssuch as “an ability to apply knowledge …, to design solutions…., [and] to function effectively as amember of a technical team” (ABET.org https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-technology-programs-2024-2025/).The barrier to implementing this approach to teaching may be high if time resources are not expendedto create something. I would like to introduce science and engineering educators to a wonderfulresource for doing case
Paper ID #37282Assessing Various Pedagogical Features of Remote Versus In-PersonIterations of a First-Year Engineering, Makerspace CourseDr. Brian Scott Robinson, University of Louisville Brian Robinson is an Associate Professor with the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the Uni- versity of Louisville. His primary research focus is in Engineering Education, with highest interest in first-year (and beyond) engineering retention & the effects of value-expectancy theory on student persis- tence.Dr. Thomas Tretter, University of Louisville Thomas Tretter is professor of science education and director of the Gheens
, D., and Schwoerer, C. (1994). Developing effective work teams: Guidelines for fostering work team efficacy. Organization Development Journal, 12(3), 29-39.40. Adams, S., and Gul, O. (2003). A comprehensive model for product development team formation and performance. 12th International Conference for the International Association of management of Technology Proceedings. Nancy, France.41. Swanson, R., and Holton, E. (2001). Foundations of Human Resource Development. San Francisco, CA: Berret-Koehler Publishers, Inc.42. Molano, C. (2002). Development of a protocol to measure team behavior in engineering education. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. University of Nebraska. Lincoln.43. Campbell, J.P. (1990). Training design for the
was a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Southern University-Armstrong Campus, Savannah GA. He received his Ph.D. and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology and his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering (Cum Laude) from Louisiana State University. He has published 16 papers in peer-reviewed journals, 28 papers in peer-reviewed conference proceedings, and given 12 technical presentations on various topics including: additive manufacturing, mechatronics, biomechan- ics, and engineering education. He currently teaches the Engineered Systems In Society, Mechanical Engineering Professional Practice, and Capstone Design I and II courses.Dr. Dominik May, University of Georgia Dr. May
Paper ID #18319Enhancing visualization of magnetic fields in Electromagnetic Fields CourseDr. Carl Iolani Pettiford, Liberty University Dr. Carl Pettiford is the Chair of the Engineering Department at Liberty University. He received his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Hawaii, M.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Dayton, and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Northeastern University. Dr. Pettiford is a senior member of IEEE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017Enhancing Visualization of Magnetic Fields in Electromagnetic Fields CourseThis
implementation. Bibliography1. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.2. Bell, P., & Davis, E. A. (2000). Designing Mildred: Scaffolding Students’ Reflection and Arguemntation Using a Cognitive Software Guide. In B. Fishman & O’Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 142-149). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.3. Linn, M. C. (1995). Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The scaffolded knowledge integration framework. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(2), 103-126.4. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility
Akershus University College. Dr Komulainen has research interests in engineering education research, process simulators and chemical process modeling.Dr. Christine Lindstrøm, Oslo and Akershus University College Christine Lindstrøm works as an Associate Professor of Science in the Faculty of Teacher Education at Oslo and Akershus University College in Oslo, Norway, where she teaches physics and science education to pre-service science teachers. She undertook her tertiary studies at the University of Sydney, Australia, from which she has a Bachelor of Science (Honours), Master of Education and PhD in Physics. Christine’s PhD project was in Physics Education Research, where she focused on improving the first year physics
, Rudnitsky AN (2003) “Getting the ‘big picture’ in engineering: using narratives and conceptual maps”. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Nashville, TN, June 22-25. 7. Technically Speaking: why all Americans need to know more about technology, Committee on Technology Literacy; National Academy of Engineering; National Research Council. Greg Pearson and A. Thomas Young, Editors. National Academies Press. 2002. 8. Ibid, p17. 9. Ibid, p25. 10. Rose LC, Gallup AM, Dugger WE Jr., Starkweather KN. “The Second Installment of the STEA/Gallup Poll and What it Reveals as to How Americans Think About Technology.” International Technology
Paper ID #46143Using Photovoice to Assess Technology Student Perceptions of Virtual RealityInside and Outside the ClassroomDr. Lisa Bosman, Purdue University Dr. Bosman holds a PhD in Industrial Engineering. Her engineering education research interests include entrepreneurially minded learning, energy education, interdisciplinary education, and faculty professional development.Rhea Dutta Rhea is a sophomore studying Industrial Engineering at the Purdue University College of Engineering and the John Martison Honors College. She is originally from Princeton, New Jersey, and will graduate in May 2026
,” 2021.[3] S. Haag, N. F. Hubele, A. M. García, and K. McBeath, “Engineering undergraduate attrition and contributing factors,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 929–940, 2007.[4] R. Stevens, K. O’Connor, L. Garrison, A. Jocuns, and D. M. Amos, “Becoming an Engineer: Toward a Three Dimensional View of Engineering Learning,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 355–368, 2008, doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2008.tb00984.x.[5] E. Crede and M. Borrego, “The Effect of International Diversity on Graduate Engineering Education: A Literature Review,” 2010. doi: 10.18260/1-2–15975.[6] M. C. Paretti and L. D. McNair, “Analyzing the intersections of institutional and discourse identities in
students agreed in class that theypreferred the three-attempt testing to the paper-based one-attempt testing for this course, whichparalleled and supported the excerpt survey in the Appendix from Nader & DeMara [8]. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 2024 ASEE Southeast Section ConferenceAppendix A [8] Statement Strongly Agreed Agreed Helped me take the test with less stress, knowing I have other chances. 85% 13% Allowed me to go back to learn the material better before my next 82% 15% attempt
- 9830.2010.tb01056.x[2] C. Hodges, S. Moore, B. Lockee, T. Trust, and A. Bond, “The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning,” Educause review, vol. 27, pp. 1-12, 2020.[3] J. J. Park, M. Park, K. Jackson, and G. Vanhoy, “Remote Engineering Education under COVID-19 Pandemic Environment,” International Journal of Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Higher Education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp 160-166, 2020.[4] S. Asgari, J. Trajkovic, M. Rahmani, W. Zhang, R.C. Lo, and A. Sciortino, “An observational study of engineering online education during the covid-19 pandemic,” EdArXiv, 2020, doi: 10.35542/osf.io/ursmb.[5] L. A. Gelles, S.M. Lord, G.D. Hoople, D.A. Chen, and J.A. Mejia, “Compassionate
. Bon, “The impact peer mentoring can have on freshman students”, Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. 1,6, Oct. 2006.3. F. Tobajas, V. De Armas and A. Morales, "Effectiveness of a peer mentoring program in engineering education”, Education Engineering (EDUCON), 2010 IEEE, pp. 14-16. Apr. 2010.4. E. Hansen, E. Stein and V. May, “Work in progress-building community among first year engineering students”, Frontiers in Education Conference, Oct. 2008.5. F. Leung, E. Ko and T. Chow, “Helping first-year engineering students in transition: Promoting transformative learning in student and faculty development”, Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE), IEEE International Conference, Aug. 20126. M. Marszalek, A. Snauffer, S
.LaVant, B. D., Anderson, J. L., & Tiggs, J. W. (1997). Retaining African American men through mentoring initiatives. New Directions for Student Services, 1997(80), 43-53.Lee, W. Y. (1999). Striving toward effective retention: The effect of race on mentoring African American students. Peabody Journal of Education, 74(2), 27-43.Maton, K. I., Hrabowski, F. A., & Schmitt, C. L. (2000). African American college students excelling in the sciences: College and postcollege outcomes in the Meyerhoff Scholars Program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 629-654.Maton, K. I., & Hrabowski III, F. A. (2004). Increasing the number of African American PhDs in the sciences and engineering: A strengths
teacher is his alma mater and a Ph.D. student in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University working on graduate student and international graduate student motivation.Dr. Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University Dr. Bodnar is an Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game-based learning in undergraduate classes as well as innovation and entrepreneurship.Dr. Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University Kaitlin Mallouk is an Associate Professor of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Prior to beginning that role, she spent five years an Instructor in
development of engineering students.Finally, the colonial structures in HE educational programs themselves are also beingre-examined for oppression or unequal cultures, policies, and norms. For example, common HEteachings that students can address the engineering disparities for others are being criticized forreinforcing colonial narratives such as “white saviorism” in student value systems [20], [21],[22]. Other scholars have argued that HE spaces may be relying on the false deficit narrative, anarrative that attributes the disparities faced by communities to internal or presumed deficienciesof their families and cultures, to give their field value and purpose to “fill” those educational andcultural deficits [18], [23], [24]. Further researchers
Paper ID #36991Assessing Impact of the Leadership Development Programduring the COVID-19 PandemicBruce DeRuntz (Director of Leadership Development) (Southern IllinoisUniversity Carbondale) Bruce DeRuntz, is a Professor in the College of Engineering and Director of SIUC’s Engineering Leadership Development Program. He brings 10 years of industrial and 20 years of teaching experience to his classes on project management and leadership in the CoE, and advanced leadership in the MBA program. He consults with universities and companies on their organizational and leadership development. He hold a PhD in Workforce Education and