Session 3513 Student Portfolios — Assessing Criteria 2000 Carolyne E. García, Edgar C. Clausen University of ArkansasAbstractABET’s Criteria 2000 identifies 11 desired outcomes for engineering education. Engineeringprograms will be evaluated according to their success in producing students with the ability to:1) apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering; 2) design and conductexperiments and interpret data; 3) design a system, component, or process; 4) function on multi-disciplinary teams; 5) identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems; 6) understand
Session 2557 Balanced Scorecard for Education Assessment Teri Reed Rhoads, Justin R. Chimka, and Melisa Moore The University of Oklahoma School of Industrial EngineeringAbstractIn choosing a method to evaluate an academic unit, there are multiple choices to consider. Thispaper begins with a discussion of the decision process that one college of engineering took alongthe path of deciding how to assess their newly formed strategic initiative. The four sets ofperformance measures that compose Kaplan and Norton's Balanced Scorecard
Session Number 2557 Modeling for Educational Enhancement and Assessment* Mary Besterfield-Sacre1, Larry Shuman1, Harvey Wolfe1, Alejandro Scalise 2, Siripen Larpkiattaworn 1, Obinna S Muogboh1, Dan Budny 1, Ronald Miller3 and Barbara Olds3 1 University of Pittsburgh/ 2TransSolutions/3Colorado School of MinesAbstractIndustrial engineering programs have typically adopted the new ABET accreditation criteria withmore enthusiasm than other engineering programs, in part since the principles of continuousimprovement and statistical measurement are commonly
Session 1307 Assessment of an Innovative Masters Program Niaz Latif, Michael Dyrenfurth School of Technology, Purdue UniversityContextPurdue University houses one of the nation’s largest Schools of Technology. Over 5000 studentsare served by more than 180 full time faculty organized into eight separate departments deployedover one home site (West Lafayette) and eleven statewide locations. Notably, and rather thanhaving individual departments each mount their own graduate program; to insure critical mass,consistency and quality; Purdue’s School of Technology opted for a
Session 1566 Industry Visits as an Assessment Tool Cici Mattiuzzi and Frederick H. Reardon California State University, SacramentoAbstractUnder the new ABET criteria for judging the effectiveness of engineering and technologyprograms, the success of program graduates serves as an additional and necessary measure ofprogram quality. This paper describes a structured, industry site visit program employed by eachof the departments of the College of Engineering and Computer Science at California StateUniversity, Sacramento. The visits typically consist of plant tours and
AC 2011-118: OUTCOME ASSESSMENT OF LIBERAL EDUCATION SKILLSTom A. Eppes, University of Hartford Tom A. Eppes is Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Hart- ford. He earned a Ph.D from the University of Michigan and an M.S. degree from Texas A&M University. His research interests are fiber optic communications, photonics, laser manufacturing processes, multi- physics modeling, and remote laboratories.Ivana Milanovic, University of Hartford Ivana Milanovic is Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Hartford. She earned a Ph.D. from Polytechnic Unviersity, New York, and an M.S. degree from the University of Bel- grade. Her research interests
AC 2011-2215: PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF UNDERGRADUATEVIBRATIONS COURSEAnca L. Sala, Baker College Anca L. Sala, Associate Professor, is Chair of the Engineering Department at Baker College. Dr. Sala coordinates several engineering and technology programs, teaches and develops engineering curriculum, and leads the ABET accreditation activities in the department. She is an active member of ASEE, ASME, and OSA.Raghu Echempati, Kettering University Raghu Echempati is a professor of Mechanical Engineering with over 25 years of teaching, research and consulting experiences in Design and Simulation of Sheet Metal Forming Processes. He has published several educational and research papers at ASEE, ASME and other
paper will describe the student-company internshipmatches that were created. To encourage companies to participate, $2000 was made availablefrom the NSF grant to support each student’s internshipTo evaluate the effectiveness of the internships in achieving project objectives, each studentcompleted a survey at the end of his/her internship to assess the impact of the experience.Company representatives also completed a survey, with the goal of collecting information toimprove future internship experiences. The paper will summarize survey results.IntroductionSustainability has been identified as one of the global grand challenges of the 21st century. Inorder for future generations to enjoy a satisfactory quality of life, the current generation
Session 2520 Student Assessment of Web-Assisted Instruction Robert LeMaster, Ed Wheeler Department of Engineering College of Engineering and Natural Science University of Tennessee at MartinIntroductionThere is much interest in the use of Internet based technologies to deliver or to enhance thedelivery of engineering course material. Papers describing the use of various web-basedtechnologies in engineering and technology courses are reported in previous ASEE Conferenceproceedings1,2. The use of the Internet
Session 2251 Innovative Outcome Portfolios for ABET Assessment Susan M. Morgan, W. Bradford Cross, Mark P. Rossow Southern Illinois University EdwardsvilleAbstractThe EC 2000 criteria require the assessment of program outcomes. While some engineeringdepartments are using student portfolios for this assessment, the faculty charged with developingthe undergraduate assessment plan in the Department of Civil Engineering at Southern IllinoisUniversity Edwardsville decided that student portfolios would be cumbersome to manage. Inorder to assess the outcomes directly, the faculty developed a new type of
Session 2261 Reflection as an Assessment Measure Barbara M. Olds Colorado School of Mines Golden, CO 80401I. IntroductionAs I teach and advise engineering students, I am constantly amazed at their motivation, theircapacity for hard work, their intelligence. But I am also often amazed at their lack of self-awareness, at their “can’t see the forest for the trees” approach to getting through each hour, eachday, each semester, a college education. They refer, often jokingly, to “getting out,” instead ofgraduating, and they
Session 2793 Assessing and Refining EC 2000 Neelam Soundarajan Computer & Information Science Dept. Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 e-mail: neelam@cis.ohio-state.eduAbstractThe goal of this paper is to consider the impact on engineering programs of various aspectsof EC 2000 such as the focus on well-specified processes for defining and evaluating programobjectives, or the requirement of well-defined assessment and feedback mechanisms; andpossible ways to refine and further improve EC 2000, in particular
Session 3530 Assessing Readiness for Lifelong Learning Thomas Litzinger, John Wise, Sangha Lee, Timothy Simpson, Sanjay Joshi Penn State UniversityAbstractIn general, lifelong learning can occur in two modes: formal and informal. Formal (or directed)modes include university courses or corporate training, whereas the informal modes, whichoccur naturally as part of learning to accomplish work tasks, are “self-directed.” The workpresented in this paper focuses on assessment related to students’ ability to engage in self-directed learning and some early attempts at course enhancement
Session 1421 Assessment of ASCE/AISC Student Projects Enno “Ed” Koehn Lamar UniversityAbstractThe Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) has adopted a revised set ofcriteria for accrediting engineering programs. Nevertheless, as in the past, civil (construction)engineering departments will be required to demonstrate proficiency in specific subject areaswhich are included in the ABET program criteria.This paper investigates, according to civil engineering and construction related students, the levelat which the understanding of
Session 1437 THE ASSESSMENT OF PROPOSED TECHNOLOGIES Tim Healy, Neil Quinn Santa Clara UniversityAbstractAs new technologies are introduced at an increasingly rapid rate, it becomes vital thatsociety develop strategies that assess the impact of such technologies on our lives. Toaddress this challenge the Graduate School of Engineering at Santa Clara University hasintroduced a new course requirement for all engineers. This paper describes the need,and the approach that Santa Clara has taken.It has long been understood that new technologies often have a life of their own, leadingto
Session 2313 A Portfolio-Based Assessment Program Barbara M. Olds and Michael J. Pavelich Colorado School of Mines Introduction In this paper we describe the process, successes, and pitfalls of the decade-old portfolioassessment program at the Colorado School of Mines (CSM). We will also discuss how we anticipatebuilding a new version of the assessment program into our current campus-wide curriculum reformefforts. CSM has agreed on its overall educational goals and has articulated them in a Profile of theCSM
Session 3530 Productive, Quick, and Enjoyable Assessment Sudhir Mehta North Dakota State University ABSTRACT The primary purpose of classroom assessment is to determine how well students arelearning on a continuous basis and to take necessary corrective measures as soon as possible toimprove their learning. This paper describes an assessment technique which has been tested overthe last three years in different courses. The technique involves asking a few multiple choicequestions at the end of a class period. The
Session 3431 DEVELOPING YOUR OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT PROCESS Charles F. Yokomoto, Russell K. Dean Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis/West Virginia UniversityAbstractIn this paper, we describe several issues related to the development of an outcomes assessmentprocess, a key element in an organization’s assessment plan. We will present a comparison ofseveral examples of high-profile outcomes assessment processes, explain why an organizationshould develop its own assessment process instead of adopting one written by anotherorganization, and highlight the difficulties caused by the lack of standard terminology
Session 3557 MSQA ON-LINE: AN INITIAL ASSESSMENT Lori S. Cook, Lawrence S. Aft Southern Polytechnic State University Department of Industrial Engineering Technology Marietta, GA 30060 ABSTRACTSouthern Polytechnic State University’s (SPSU) mission includes providing educationalexperiences to all of the citizens of Georgia. The Internet provides a mechanism for providingthese educational experiences to all qualified students regardless of geographic location andability to be in a
Session 2630 Structural Assessment to Support Engineering Education Jennifer Turns, Alex Kirlik Georgia Institute of TechnologyAbstract: The ABET 2000 changes in accreditation standards of engineering programs will soonmake it necessary for engineering programs to demonstrate that their students have theknowledge and abilities necessary for performing professional engineering activities. StructuralAssessment, a method for assessing students knowledge of the relationships among concepts,methodologies, and problems in a domain, may represent a valuable assessment
Session 2432 STUDENT ASSESSMENT WITH INTERNETQUIZ Raymond G. Crepeau, M.B.A. Department of Computer Technology Purdue School of Engineering and Technology Indiana University Purdue University IndianapolisThe curriculum of the Computer Technology Department of the Purdue School of Engineeringand Technology at Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) is undergoing amajor reengineering effort to keep pace with the dynamic changes in technology. Thisreengineering effort features faculty collaboration in five sub-disciplines
Jack Wilson is a Ph.D. student in the Edward P. Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering at NC State, focusing on Advanced Manufacturing and Systems Analytics and Optimization. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Challenges in Automated CAD Modeling AssessmentAbstract Automating the assessment of CAD models has been the focus of significant research efforts.One focus of this has been in its application to grading in support of training of engineeringstudents in 3D parametric modeling skills and practices. However, there continue to besignificant challenges in producing broadly acceptable tools of practice due to the complexitiesinvolved in creating a CAD model
AC 2011-1015: SIMPLIFYING ASSESSMENT USING DIRECT MEASURESRonald W. Welch, University of Texas, Tyler Ron Welch is Professor and Head, Department of Civil Engineering at The University of Texas at Tyler. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Virginia. Until 2 Jan 2007, Ron was an Academy Professor at the United States Military Academy (USMA). Ron received a BS degree in Engineering Mechanics from the USMA in 1982 and MS and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1990 and 1999, respectively. Ronald Welch@uttyler.edu. Page 22.1294.1
AC 2011-27: CHALLENGES IN ASSESSING INTERDISCIPLINARY EN-GINEERING PROGRAMSMeg Krudysz, City College of New YorkDr. Ann Wittig, City College of the City University of New York Page 22.318.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011Challenges in Assessing Multidisciplinary Programs between Engineering and Non-Engineering SchoolsAbstractProgram accreditation by ABET requires that faculty assess and evaluate student performance todemonstrate that a program achieves its outcomes. For a conventional single-disciplinaryprogram, these assessments are challenging to conduct because they require a substantial
Session 2793 Assessment of First Professional Degree Criteria By Enno “Ed” Koehn Lamar UniversityAbstractRecently, the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) approved the concept of the Master’sdegree as the First Professional Degree for the practice of engineering. The American Societyfor Engineering Education (ASEE) and the National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE)are also discussing this idea.The present investigation suggests that undergraduate and graduate students approve thisconcept. In fact, undergraduates during a six-month period have sharply
Session 2647 Using Portfolios to Assess Student Writing Barbara M. Olds Colorado School of MinesIntroductionPortfolios as a qualitative assessment tool are nothing new—art, architecture, and writingstudents, for example, have long used portfolios to showcase and evaluate their work. However,portfolios have become increasingly popular over the past few years; they are now used to assesseverything from student outcomes to faculty accomplishments. In this paper I focus on the use ofportfolios for feedback to individual students in writing or writing-intensive
Session 2513 Assessment For Improvement In The Classroom Barry McNeill, Lynn Bellamy Arizona State UniversityIntroductionMasaaki Imai, in his book Kaizen1, pointed out that unless a company continually strives toimprove the quality of their products, the products’ quality will decline over time, even if theproducts start out as first in class. The same is true for educational courses; unless wecontinually work at improving the quality of a course, the course’s quality (effectiveness) willdecline over time. The Second Law of
2513 Assessment Process at a Large Institution P. David Fisher Michigan State UniversityAbstract - This presentation focuses on the challenges encountered at a large, diversifiedinstitution as it organized itself, developed strategies, and implemented plans for continuousimprovement through outcomes assessment of its undergraduate engineering programs. Severalquestions are addressed, including the following. What have been the respective roles of thefaculty and administration? What has been Michigan State University's critical path intransforming itself to
AC 2010-225: ASSESSING CURRICULUM IMPROVEMENT THROUGH SENIORPROJECTSJianbiao Pan, California Polytechnic State University Dr. Jianbiao (John) Pan is an associate professor in the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA. After completing a PhD at Lehigh University in Industrial Engineering in 2000, he joined the optoelectronics center at Lucent Technologies/Agere Systems as a member of technical staff. He received a M.E degree in Manufacturing Engineering from Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, and a B.E. degree in Mechatronics from Xidian University, Xian, China. Dr. Pan's research interest lies in environmentally benign
AC 2010-372: ROBOTICS ENGINEERING: ASSESSING ANINTERDISCIPLINARY PROGRAMMichael Gennert, Worcester Polytechnic InstituteFred Looft, Worcester Polytechnic InstituteGretar Tryggvason, Worcester Polytechnic InstituteTaskin Padir, Worcester Polytechnic InstituteLance Schacterle, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Page 15.1046.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Robotics Engineering: Assessing an Interdisciplinary ProgramAbstractIn the spring of 2007, Worcester Polytechnic Institute introduced a BS degree program inRobotics Engineering. The degree program is a collaborative effort, involving faculty from thedepartments of computer science, electrical and computer