Industrial Engineering, and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering with emphasis in Operations Research from the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign.Mr. Andr´es Esteban Acero, Universidad de los Andes Andr´es Acero is a PhD Candidate of Engineering at Universidad de los Andes, Colombia. He holds a bachelor’s and master’s degree on Industrial Engineering from the same academic institution. His re- search interest lie in the area of applications of social justice, engineering education and systems science, ranging from theory to modelling to implementation. In recent years, he has focused on natural resources management, active learning and waste management on emergent economies. Andr´es is an active mem- ber of
variable. So far it has worked just fine. I always forget to add the null character until I look at your code.”Having students participate in these conversations provides one more way to get students toengage in the code and topics of the course. It seems no matter how often we cover a topic, somestudents don’t hear or it just doesn’t make sense to them. Hearing the topics discussed by newvoices and seeing code that has a different style, approaches a solution in a different way, or isorganized differently broadens the student’s exposure to the topics of the course and to code andproblem solving more generally. V. Related WorksResearch suggests that the benefits of working together on code include increased success ratesin introductory
Chapter , “Writing Winning Proposals,” pp. – andChapter , “Long Reports,” pp. – .12 General Information Concerning Patents, p. 12.13 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Technology Programs, www. abet. Org, 9/13/99. pp. 5–6.14 Criteria, p. 4.15 For example, Proposed Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Technology Programs, July 25, 1999Natalie D. SegalPrior to her appointment as a full-time teacher of technical communications at S. I. Ward College ofTechnology at the University of Hartford, Assistant Professor Natalie Segal taught the subject part-time atWard College for eight years and worked for more than 20 years as a technical writer. She holds herBachelor's Degree in English Education from the University of Connecticut and her
andcompression, and then advance to analysis and design topics as they are more empiricallypresented in the relevant building codes. The importance of hands-on active learning has longbeen an integral part of education theory. Educational Psychologist Jean Piaget states thatoptimal learning occurs through “active methods” which “require every new truth to berediscovered or at least reconstructed” by the student1. The National Science Foundation2 arguedin 1993 that “Engineering curriculum reform is necessary to meet the objectives of enhancing theacceptability of US industrial products in the international market” and that hands-onexperiences should be an integral part of that reform3. Having students design, fabricate and testreinforced concrete beams
partners. The team approach to internship development has served to enhance students’technical as well as human relations skills. Workshops designed to enhance studentdevelopment and marketability include topics such as resume writing, communicationskills and team dynamics. The partnership between the College of Engineering and theCareer and Development Center is a significant factor in the success of the RowanPrograms. The success of the program is evident by the student and industrialparticipants program evaluations. To date, 71% of the Rowan Engineering Students haveparticipated in the internship program. The student participation increased with the levelof study. Of the junior class, 94% of students participated in the internship
inInterdisciplinary Studies and the topic has taken a front-line position in science and engineeringresearch in the US with the introduction of the Science and Technology Centers (STC) andEngineering Research Centers (ERC) by the National Science Foundation (NSF) in 1980’s. Thepreponderance of such centers in research education is clearly articulated by Schuler, who statesthat at some schools “interdisciplinary programs and centers… have become as numerous as thetraditional academic departments 2.” Finally, in 1998 ABET introduced its Engineering Criteria2000, which mandates that “Engineering programs will demonstrate that their graduates canfunction on interdisciplinary teams.” It turns out that interdisciplinary studies in engineeringeducation is rather
2006-2369: USE OF RUBRICS FOR ASSESSMENT OF A SENIOR PROJECTDESIGN COURSEAhmed Khan, DeVry University-Addison Ahmed S. Khan, Ph.D. is a senior Professor in the EET dept. at DeVry University, Addison, Illinois. He received his M.Sc (applied physics) from University of Karachi, an MSEE from Michigan Technological University, and an MBA from Keller Graduate School of Management. He received his Ph.D. from Colorado State University. His research interests are in the areas of Fiber Optics Communications, faculty development, and outcomes assessment, and, Internet and distance education. He is author of “The Telecommunications Fact Book” and co-author of “Technology and Society: Crossroads to the 21st
Paper ID #33192Comparing Student Outcomes From Four Iterations of an EngineeringLearning CommunityMiriam Howland Cummings, University of Colorado Denver Miriam Howland Cummings is a PhD candidate in the Education Research Methods program at the Uni- versity of Colorado Denver. Her work focuses on applying a wide variety of quantitative and qualitative research methods to education contexts, including both K-12 education and higher education.Dr. Maryam Darbeheshti, University of Colorado Denver Dr. Maryam Darbeheshti is Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Colorado, Denver. She is the PI of a
important are appropriate considerations for data that is sensitive in nature.This includes protected human information under FERPA (Family Educational Rights andPrivacy Act), HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act), and data that ispersonally identifiable, proprietary, classified, or locally sensitive.As storage formats evolve, concerns about the feasibility, validity, and awareness of archiveddata becomes critical. Decisions may have to be made around using software emulation orsimulation techniques to either replicate (emulation) or mimic (simulation) older data formatswhen storing or presenting data in current computing environments. .ARCHIVINGThe longevity and storage requirements for archived data are an active topic of
be trained appropriately with the requisite nuclear knowledge andskills at the university level to meet future workforce demands (Baradaran et. al., 2024).While formal education at UNSW provides foundational knowledge, ANSTO is whereindispensable practical experience is gained. The workplace plays a fundamental role inproviding experience for engineering graduates (Baradaran et. al, 2024). Therefore, there is aneed to understand what learning takes place in the workplace and the specific tasks andactivities that nuclear engineers undertake within their roles at ANSTO, to uncover the corecompetencies and create educational programs that align with workforce needs.Competency, in terms of Knowledge, Skill and Ability refers to the integrated
employing. This approach to curriculum bridges the gapthat exists between the classroom practices and industrial practices. This unifiedapproach would deliver students with career-bound knowledge essential for the industry.I. IntroductionIn the Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology (ECET) department of PurdueUniversity Calumet (PUC), the faculty by choice have taken upon themselves to makethe changes, the essence of which is reflected in this paper. After a lot of deliberation thecurriculum committee agreed to make the changes to the curriculum that essentially,prepares the student to function in the market place as the System Designer. It wasrealized that the ECET curriculum should impart to the graduating student enoughexposure to pursue
Lin is a doctoral student in the Technology, Learning and Leadership PhD program at the University of Maryland’s College of Education. He got his undergraduate degree from the University of Georgia, double majoring in Mathematics and Mathematics Education. He also has a master’s from University of Pennsylvania Graduate School of Education in Learning Science and Technology. As a lifelong programmer, he holds a firm belief in the importance of computer programming education. His recent work involves creating a taxonomy for block-based programming environments. His research focuses on exploring ways to bridge the gap between block-based and text-based programming and using physical computing as a means to support
10.1189.1solution ownership takes hold and becomes part of the student’s desires. Proceedings of the 2005American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationStudents are then required to explain their analysis thought process during a general classdiscussion. Ultimately, comprehension of the underlying concepts of the rules, equations,procedures, and methods give students more confidence in and a better retention of the newmaterial. These in turn serve as an excellent foundation for additional learning on the subject.IntroductionMany faculty lament the high school educational experience of their students. They cite witheach other concerns
the Electrical and Computer Engineering De- partment at Valparaiso University since August of 2001. He teaches courses in senior design, computer architecture, digital signal processing, freshman topics, and circuits laboratories and is heavily involved in working with students in undergraduate research. Will is also a 2013 recipient of the Illinois-Indiana ASEE Section Outstanding Teacher Award and the 2014 ASEE National Outstanding Teaching Award. Upon coming to Valparaiso University, Will established the Scientific Visualization Laboratory (SVL), a facility dedicated to the use of Virtual Reality (VR) for undergraduate education. Working exclusively with undergraduate students, Will developed VR hardware and
onstationary mounts, i.e., the motor is suspended4.In order to produce the required characterization plots, the following measurements are made byvarying the loading on the generator from no-load up to 115% rated load. j ‚ Motor Input Complex Apparent Power, Sin ‚ Motor Power Out, Pout1 ‚ Motor Torque, Tm ‚ Motor Speed, ym Page 12.921.3 Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ø 2007, American Society for Engineering EducationLoad adjustment is
mechanical objects in engineering education instruction), and how engineering students’ personality traits influence ethical decision making process in engineering design.Dr. Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Monica F. Cox is an associate professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and is the inaugural director of the Engineering Leadership Minor. She obtained a B.S. in Mathematics from Spelman College, a M.S. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Alabama, and a Ph.D. in Leadership and Policy Studies from Peabody College of Vanderbilt University. Teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy
assessment is based on thecommonly used course topics and based on identifying the common course learning objectives(CLOs). CLOs are then mapped with ABET’s program outcomes (POs). Assessment tools suchas class work, home work, quizzes, tests, as well as the final exam and/or final project work withpresentations are used to assess the performance of the students. The rationale for writing thispaper is to understand the variation if any in students’ understanding of the material on theiroverall performance in the class. Variation is to be expected since the student population isdifferent (full time versus part time, graduate versus undergraduate) and the course is taught bydifferent instructors. However, usage of common CLOs, course topics, and
Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationBecause much of the evidence of student satisfaction with the outcomes of the capstoneproject is anecdotal, an outcomes survey of both students and industry will b implementedover the course of the next three years. The survey will involve four major themes including,“how well was the capstone project taught”, “what skills did the students gain which helpedthem in industry”, “what improvements could be implemented in the management of theproject”, and lastly, “how could industry involvement affect the outcomes of the capstoneproject”. These questions can only be asked after the student has graduated and beeninvolved with
include neuralengineering among their track options, but a search through the Whitaker FoundationBiomedical Engineering Curriculum Database [2]– a repository for course and curricularinformation in bioengineering– returns 187 courses having “neural” in the title. (Accordingto the web site, the database includes information for “more than 100 academic institutions” Page 11.77.2[2].) In our own BioEngineering Department at UIC, neural engineering is one of severaltracks in which undergraduates may focus their studies. Over the past three yearsapproximately 40% of graduating seniors selected neural engineering for their track.Students concentrating in
deliver a new generation of graduates, whose knowledge of controlsystems would never be questioned by potential employers.Hence, the following reasons speak for the need of a simple way to deliver the basics ofcontrol systems theory and applications for first-year engineering technology students. • The need for further integration of controls in engineering technology curriculum • The universal applicability of control systems theory towards real-life problems • The growing demands of I4.0 revolutionBelow is the description of the student guide for the design and analysis of a basic controlsystem using the example of a semi-autonomous trailer.Description of the Student Guide 1
Paper ID #47175A Follow-up Study of a Redesigned Cybersecurity Lab CourseDr. Peng Li, East Carolina University Peng Li received a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from University of Connecticut. Dr. Li is currently an Associate Professor at East Carolina University. He teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in programming, computer networks, information security, web services and virtualization technologies. His research interests include virtualization, cloud computing, cyber security and integration of information technology in education.Dr. Sohan Gyawali, East Carolina University Dr. Sohan Gyawali is currently an
En- gineering and STEM Education at the University of Texas at Austin. Dr. Borrego is Senior Associaate Editor for Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. She previously served as Deputy Editor for Journal of Engineering Education, a Program Director at the National Science Foundation, on the board of the American Society for Engineering Education, and as an associate dean and director of in- terdisciplinary graduate programs. Her research awards include U.S. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE), a National Science Foundation CAREER award, and two outstand- ing publication awards from the American Educational Research Association for her journal articles. All
exclusively useinternet for learning. However a traditional lecture based class coupled with internet resourcesyields the favorable results.IntroductionThe goal of this research is to explore the best classroom learning approach for engineeringstudents. The idea of deductive vs. inductive techniques has been explored extensively in liberalarts. In recent studies, it has been shown that students learn better when they are given the task ofstudent centered active learning in a classroom [1, 2]. The inductive techniques of learning havebeen successfully implemented. In the traditional deductive methodology, the instructor teachesstudents a certain concept and then gives a test, whereas; the inductive approach is studentcentered and interactive. A topic
in 1985 and Ph.D. in 1989, both from Purdue University. He teaches mechanical engineering design and geometry modeling for design. Dr. Crawford’s research interests span topics in computer- aided mechanical design and design theory and methodology. Dr. Crawford is co-founder of the DTEACh program, a ”Design Technology” program for K-12, and is active on the faculty of the UTeachEngineering program that seeks to educate teachers of high school engineering. Page 26.584.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Effects of a Structured Prototyping Strategy on Capstone
Carolina University. Page 14.281.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Bioprocess Engineering Curriculum Development and AssessmentAbstractEast Carolina University’s new general engineering program is built around the goal ofexcellence in undergraduate education. The faculty of the program are encouraged to pursuenovel approaches to engineering education in order to achieve this goal. The newly createdconcentration in bioprocess engineering provides an excellent opportunity to develop andimplement a novel curriculum based upon proven pedagogical approaches designed to engagethe students and improve their mastery of
Paper ID #19588First-Year Engineering Student Perspectives Of Google Docs For Online Col-laborationMs. Natasha Perova-Mello, Oregon State University Natasha Perova-Mello is currently a Postdoctoral researcher at Oregon State University in the School of Civil and Construction engineering. She recieved Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. She previously worked at the Harvard Graduate School of Education as a Research Assistant focusing on students’ learning algebra and also taught an introductory physics course at Suffolk University, Boston, Mass. Before that, she worked as a Graduate Research Assistant at
. 27BA0 The role of prior STEM experiences K-12 STEM education still played a role with our students, but was mentioned by fewer students. BA1 "The most influential factor leading me to pursue engineering is my high school STEM program. I had great experiences and opportunities to learn. I wanted to continue on the same path after graduation." 2852% of our participants reported that STEM experiences in K-12 influenced theirdecision to become an engineer, whereas the remaining 48% found it moderatelyimportant to not important at all. We also saw this in our open-ended questionresponses
to encourage and supportundergraduate students to pass the FE Exam before graduating. The new programming will beembedded in all four years of undergraduate study. Programming includes external speakers,alumni feedback, and course-related discussions that highlight the potential benefits of passingthe FE Exam as a student and pursuing a PE License after graduating. New strategies to increasemotivation will be incorporated at the School, Program, and student organization levels.Additionally, new study tools and exam preparation materials will be developed and provided tostudents for self-guided review. Future work will include data collection and assessment todetermine levels of student participation in and effectiveness of the multi-year
student projects, equipment challenges, and the paperconcludes with ideas for future course improvements and/or adaptation to other formats ordisciplines.IntroductionA primary goal of a technical two-year college degree is to provide the graduate with the skillsthey need, so that they will be successful upon entering the workplace and, at the same time,collaterally provide the local workplace with the workforce that it needs. That workforce hastraditionally been made up of jobs in the manufacturing sector and the subsequent required fieldservicing of the same products once deployed (i.e. field service sector). Desired studentoutcomes and the closely associated technical program’s educational objectives are typicallybased on both general and
visiting appointment with the Department of Computing Science, University of Alberta,Edmonton, Alberta. Dr. Ramakrishnan’s research interests include distributed computing, performance evaluation, Page 3.483.9parallel simulation, and fault-tolerant systems.MOHAMMAD B. DADFAR is an Associate Professor in the Computer Science Department at Bowling Green StateUniversity. His research interests include Computer Extension and Analysis of Perturbation Series, SchedulingAlgorithms, and Computers in Education. He currently teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in datacommunications, operating systems, and computer algorithms. He is a